Pandemic Messaging: Congressional Communication and the Mechanisms of Polarizing Rhetoric

References

• Allcott, Hunt, Levi Boxell, Jacob Conway, Matthew Gentzkow, Michael Thaler, and David Y. Yang. 2020. Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing During the Coronavirus Pandemic (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3574415). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3574415
   Google Scholar
• Allcott, Hunt, Levi Boxell, Jacob Conway, Matthew Gentzkow, Michael Thaler, and David Y. Yang. 2020. “Polarization and Public Health: Partisan Differences in Social Distancing during the Coronavirus Pandemic.” Journal of Public Economics 191: 104254. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. Lance, and Alexandra Segerberg. 2013. The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bove, Vincenzo, and Riccardo Di Leo. 2020. “COVID-19, Security Threats and Public Opinions.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 26 (3): 20200033. doi: 10.1515/peps-2020-0033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobba, Giuliano, and Nicolas Hubé. 2021. “Between Mitigation and Dramatization: The Effect of the COVID-19 Crisis on Populists’ Discourses and Strategies.” In Populism and the Politicization of the COVID-19 Crisis in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, Johan, Huina Mao, and Alberto Pepe. 2011. “Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena.” In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Vol. 5. No. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Laura Moses. 2021. “Meaningful Messaging: Sentiment in Elite Social Media Communication with the Public on the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Science Advances 7 (29): eabg2898. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg2898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, David W., Hahrie Han, and Jeremy C. Pope. 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 79–105. doi: 10.3162/036298007X201994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Dennis J. Farlie. 1983. Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Capano, Giliberto, Michael Howlett, Darryl S. L. Jarvis, M. Ramesh, and Nihit Goyal. 2020. “Mobilizing Policy (in)Capacity to Fight COVID-19: Understanding Variations in State Responses.” Policy & Society 39 (3):285–308. doi: 10.1080/14494035.2020.1787628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, Feng, and Nathan Yang. 2010. “Twitter in Congress: Outreach vs. Transparency.” SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1630943.
   Google Scholar
• Cormack, Lindsey, and Kirsten Meidlinger. 2021. “Congressional Communication in a Pandemic: “Follow the Leader” Politics and Responsive Representation.” Congress & the Presidency 1–26. doi: 10.1080/07343469.2021.1955037.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, Volden, and Alan. E. Wiseman. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Nicholas T., and Johanna L. Dunaway. 2016. “Party Polarization, Media Choice, and Mass Partisan-Ideological Sorting.” Public Opinion Quarterly 80 (S1): 272–97. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfw002.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, Larry. 2020. “America’s COVID-19 Disaster Is a Setback for Democracy.” The Atlantic, April 16. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/04/americas-Covid-19-disaster-setback-democracy/610102/
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Samara Klar, Yanna Krupnikov, Matthew Levendusky, and John B. Ryan. 2021. “How Affective Polarization Shapes Americans’ Political Beliefs: A Study of Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 8 (3): 223–34. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2020.28.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, George C. 1989. At the Margins: Presidential Leadership of Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, Patrick J. 2013. Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Endres, Kyle, Costas Panagopoulos, and Donald P. Green. 2021. “Elite Messaging and Partisan Consumerism: An Evaluation of President Trump’s Tweets and Polarization of Corporate Brand Images.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (4): 834–51. doi: 10.1177/1065912920939188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Heather K., and Jennifer H. Clark. 2016. “You Tweet like a Girl!”: How Female Candidates Campaign on Twitter.” American Politics Research 44 (2): 326–52. doi: 10.1177/1532673X15597747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, Heather K., Sean Smith, Alexis Gonzales, and Kayla Strouse. 2017. “Mudslinging on Twitter during the 2014 Election.” Social Media + Society 3 (2): 205630511770440. doi: 10.1177/2056305117704408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, E. J. 2021. “Issue Ownership and the Priorities of Party Elites in the United States, 2004–2016.” Party Politics 27(1): 149–60. doi: 10.1177/1354068819839212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feezell, Jessica F. 2018. “Agenda Setting through Social Media: The Importance of Incidental News Exposure and Social Filtering in the Digital Era.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (2): 482–94. doi: 10.1177/1065912917744895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein, Yuval. 2020. “Applying Sociological Theories of Emotions to the Study of Mass Politics: The Rally-Round-the-Flag Phenomenon in the United States as a Test Case.” The Sociological Quarterly 61 (3): 422–47. doi: 10.1080/00380253.2019.1711255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, Richard, and Rasmus K. Nielsen. 2019. “Generalised Scepticism: How People Navigate News on Social Media.” Information Communication & Society 22 (12): 1751–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadarian, Shana. K., Sara W. Goodman, and Thomas B. Pepinsky. 2020. “Partisanship, Health Behavior, and Policy Attitudes in the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemicno.” PLoS One 16 (4): e0249596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainous, Jason, and Kevin M. Wagner. 2014. Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, Jeremy. 2019. “In Pursuit of Power: Competition for Majority Status and Senate Partisanship.” Party Politics 25 (6): 782–93. doi: 10.1177/1354068817749779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, Jeremy. 2021. “Partisan Intensity in Congress: Evidence from Brett Kavanaugh’s Supreme Court Nomination.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (2): 450–63. doi: 10.1177/1065912920911464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, Jeremy, and Steven Lloyd Wilson. 2022. “Measuring Congressional Partisanship and Its Consequences.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 47(1): 225–56. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, Bryan T., Heather K. Evans, and Annelise Russell. 2020. “Tweeting for Hearts and Minds? Measuring Candidates’ Use of Anxiety in Tweets during the 2018 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 53 (4): 652–6. doi: 10.1017/S1049096520000852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, Bryan T., and Irwin L. Morris. 2018. Reactionary Republicanism: How the Tea Party in the House Paved the Way for Trump’s Victory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gostin, Lawrence O., and James G. Hodge. Jr. 2020. “US Emergency Legal Responses to Novel Coronavirus: Balancing Public Health and Civil Liberties.” Journal of the American Medical Association 323(12): 1131–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, Jeffrey, and Elisa Shearer. 2019. News use Across Social Media Platforms 2016 (United States of America) [Report]. Pew Research Center. https://apo.org.au/node/64483
   Google Scholar
• Green, Jon, Jared Edgerton, Daniel Naftel, Kelsey Shoub, and Skyler J. Cranmer. 2020. “Elusive Consensus: Polarization in Elite Communication on the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Science Advances 6 (28): eabc2717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groeling, Tim J. 2010. When Politicians Attack: Party Cohesion in the Media. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Groenendyk, Eric. 2011. “Current Emotion Research in Political Science: How Emotions Help Democracy Overcome Its Collective Action Problem.” Emotion Review 3 (4): 455–63. doi: 10.1177/1754073911410746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, Guy, Soojong Kim, Jonah Rexer, and Harsha Thirumurthy. 2020. “Political Partisanship Influences Behavioral Responses to Governors’ Recommendations for COVID-19 Prevention in the United States (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3578695).” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 117 (39): 24144–53. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007835117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, Jacob S, and Paul Pierson. 2005. Off Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, Feng, and Wanyun Shao. 2021. “Understanding the Effects of Individual and State-Level Factors on American Public Response to COVID-19.” American Journal of Health Promotion 35 (8): 1078–83. doi: 10.1177/08901171211017286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, Jessica M., Sarina Rhinehart, and Michael. H. Crespin. 2019. “Jumping on the Trump Train or Ditching the Donald: Campaign Rhetoric and the 2016 Congressional Election.” Journal of Political Marketing 18 (1-2): 4–30. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2018.1478650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemphill, Libby, Annelise Russell, and Angela. M. Schopke-Gonzalez. 2021. “What Drives US Congressional Members’ Policy Attention on Twitter?” Policy & Internet 13(2): 233–56. doi: 10.1002/poi3.245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, Whitney, and Annelise Russell. 2020. “Tweeting Red: Assymetric Emotional Appeals in Congress.” In The American Political Science Association Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, Andreas, and Pascal Jürgens. 2013. “Forecasting the Pulse: How Deviations from Regular Patterns in Online Data Can Identify Offline Phenomena.” Internet Research 23 (5): 589–607. doi: 10.1108/IntR-06-2012-0115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, Matthew M., and Renu Singh. 2020. “Democracy, Capacity, and Coercion in Pandemic Response—COVID 19 in Comparative Political Perspective.” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 45 (6):997–1012. 8641530. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8641530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernell, Samuel, and Laurie L. Rice. 2011. “Cable and the Partisan Polarization of the President’s Audience: Kernell and Rice/Cable and the Partisan Polarization.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 41 (4): 693–711. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03910.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, John, Costas Panagopoulos, and Sander van der Linden. 2021. “Political Polarization on COVID-19 Pandemic Response in the United States.” Personality and Individual Differences 179: 110892. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, Donald F. 2020. “States Divided: The Implications of American Federalism for COVID-19.” Public Administration Review 80 (4):595–602. doi: 10.1111/puar.13243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krogstad, Jens M. 2015. ““Social Media Preferences Vary by Race and Ethnicity.” Pew Research Center, February 3. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/02/03/social-media-preferences-vary-by-race-and-ethnicity/
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, Jonathan M, and Gabriel S. Lenz. 2011. “Does Anxiety Improve Voters’ Decision Making?: Does Anxiety Improve Voters’ Decision Making?” Political Psychology 32 (2):347–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00805.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, David S., and Adam R. Brown. 2011. “Twitter: The Electoral Connection?” Social Science Computer Review 29 (4): 419–36. doi: 10.1177/0894439310382749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jayeon, and Weiai Xu. 2017. “The More Attacks, the More Retweets: Trump’s and Clinton’s Agenda Setting on Twitter.” Public Relations Review. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipinski, Daniel, and Gregory Neddenriep. 2004. “Using “New” Media to Get “Old” Media Coverage: How Members of Congress Utilize Their Web Sites to Court Journalists.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9 (1): 7–21. doi: 10.1177/1081180X03259819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsitz, Keena. 2018. “Playing with Emotions: The Effect of Moral Appeals in Elite Rhetoric.” Political Behavior 40 (1):57–78. doi: 10.1007/s11109-017-9394-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Xue., Mei He, and Zhonggen Yu. 2022. “An Ideological Analysis of the Former President Donald Trump’s Tweets during COVID-19.” Corpus Pragmatics: International Journal of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 6 (1): 23–38. doi: 10.1007/s41701-021-00113-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macdonald, Maggie, and Whitney Hua. 2020. “Mind the Gap? Negative Tweets & Partisanship in the House of Representatives.” APSA Preprints. doi: 10.33774/apsa-2020-qj6hx.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, Thomas E., and Norman J. Ornstein. 2012. It’s Even Worse than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the New Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, Nolan M., Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mellon, Jonathan, and Christopher Prosser. 2017. “Twitter and Facebook Are Not Representative of the General Population: Political Attitudes and Demographics of British Social Media Users.” Research & Politics 4 (3): 205316801772000. doi: 10.1177/2053168017720008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkley, Eric, Aengus Bridgman, Peter J. Loewen, Taylor Owen, Derek Ruths, and Oleg Zhilin. 2020. “A Rare Moment of Cross-Partisan Consensus: Elite and Public Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 53 (2):311–8. doi: 10.1017/S0008423920000311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, Jonathan S. 2001. “Reexamining the Politics of Talk: Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1): 101. doi: 10.2307/440405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, Sheila. T., Lauren B. Frank, Joyee S. Chatterjee, and Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati. 2013. “Narrative versus Nonnarrative: The Role of Identification, Transportation, and Emotion in Reducing Health Disparities.” Journal of Communication 63 (1): 116–37. doi: 10.1111/jcom.12007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleszek, Walter. J. 2007. Congress and the iInternet: Highlights. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi, and Maria de Fatima Oliveira. 2012. “Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt.” Journal of Communication 62 (2): 266–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, Newly, and Mingxiao Sui. 2022. “I Can Feel What You Feel: Emotion Exchanges in Twitter Conversations between Candidates and the Public.” Journal of Political Marketing 21(2): 175–95. doi: 10.1080/15377857.2019.1684419.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Rolfe D. 2012. “To Tweet or Not to Tweet: Exploring the Determinants of Early Adoption of Twitter by House Members in the 111th Congress.” The Social Science Journal 49 (4): 430–8. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2012.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825. doi: 10.2307/2111797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2020. “Republicans, Democrats Move Even Further Apart in Coronavirus Concerns.” Pew Research Center—U.S. Politics & Policy, June 25. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/06/25/republicans-democrats-move-even-further-apart-in-coronavirus-concerns/
   Google Scholar
• Poell, Thomas, and Erik Borra. 2012. “Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as Platforms of Alternative Journalism: The Social Media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 Protests.” Journalism 13 (6): 695–713. doi: 10.1177/1464884911431533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozell, Mark J. 2000. “Helping Women Run and Win: Feminist Groups, Candidate Recruitment and Training.” Women & Politics 21 (3): 101–16. doi: 10.1300/J014v21n03_05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Annelisa. 2018a. “U.S. Senators on Twitter: Asymmetric Party Rhetoric in 140 Characters.” American Politics Research 46 (4):695–723. doi: 10.1177/1532673X17715619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, Annelisa. 2018b. “The Politics of Prioritization: Senators’ Attention in 140 Characters.” The Forum 16 (2): 331–56. doi: 10.1515/for-2018-0020.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Annelisa. 2021. “Minority Opposition and Asymmetric Parties? Senators’ Partisan Rhetoric on Twitter.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (3):615–27. doi: 10.1177/1065912920921239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scacco, Joshua M., and Kevin Coe. 2021. The Ubiquitous Presidency: Presidential Communication and Digital Democracy in Tumultuous Times. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scanlan, Quinn. 2020. “Partisanship in a Pandemic: Democrats More Concerned about Virus than Republicans, But Increasing Concern for All: Polls [News Website].” ABC News, March 26. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/partisanship-pandemic-polling-shows-democrats-coronavirus-republicans-parties/story?id=69781489
   Google Scholar
• Scheller, Simon. 2019. “The Strategic Use of Fear Appeals in Political Communication.” Political Communication 36 (4): 586–608. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2019.1631918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, Dietram A, and David Tewksbury. 2007. “Framing, Agenda Setting, and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models: Models of Media Effects.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shear, Michael D., and Maggie Haberman. 2020. “Pence will Control All Coronavirus Messaging from Health Officials.” The New York Times, February 27. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/27/us/politics/us-coronavirus-pence.html
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, Theda, and Vanessa Williamson. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, Deborah A., Jennifer S. Lerner, and Baruch Fischhoff. 2006. “Emotion Priming and Attributions for Terrorism: Americans’ Reactions in a National Field Experiment.” Political Psychology 27 (2): 289–98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00007.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, Stefan, and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2012. “Political Communication and Influence Through Microblogging—An Empirical Analysis of Sentiment in Twitter Messages and Retweet Behavior.” In 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Stieglitz, Stefan, and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2013. “Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior.” Journal of Management Information Systems 29 (4): 217–48. doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, Jacob R., Matthew E. Glassman, Colleen J. Shogan, and Susan N. Smelcer. 2013. “Communicating in 140 Characters or Less: Congressional Adoption of Twitter in the 111th Congress.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (1):60–6. doi: 10.1017/S1049096512001242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straus, Jacob R., Raymond T. Williams, Colleen J. Shogan, and Matthew E. Glassman. 2016. “Congressional Social Media Communications: Evaluating Senate Twitter Usage.” Online Information Review 40 (5): 643–59. doi: 10.1108/OIR-10-2015-0334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tausczik, Yla R., and James W. Pennebaker. 2010. “The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29 (1): 24–54. doi: 10.1177/0261927X09351676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Theriault, Sean M. 2013. The Gingrich Senators. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Titiunik, Rocio. 2016. “Drawing Your Senator from a Jar: Term Length and Legislative Behavior.” Political Science Research and Methods 4 (2): 293–316. doi: 10.1017/psrm.2015.20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, Ella. 2020. “A Timeline of Cuomo’s and Trump’s Responses to Coronavirus Outbreak [News Website].” ABC News, April 3. https://abcnews.go.com/US/timeline-cuomos-trumps-responses-coronavirus-outbreak/story?id=69914641
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Zeynep, and Christopher Wilson. 2012. “Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations from Tahrir Square.” Journal of Communication 62 (2): 363–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Ted Brader, Eric W. Groenendyk, Krysha Gregorowicz, and Vincent L. Hutchings. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 156–70. doi: 10.1017/S0022381610000939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Vincent L. Hutchings, Antoine J. Banks, and Anne K. Davis. 2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29 (2): 247–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Green, Ted, and Alec Tyson. 2020. “5 Facts about Partisan Reactions to COVID-19 in the U.S.” Pew Research Center. April 2. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/04/02/5-facts-about-partisan-reactions-to-Covid-19-in-the-u-s/
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R Kent 1986. “The Politics of Blame Avoidance.” Journal of Public Policy 6 (4): 371–98. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00004219.
   Google Scholar