Representation and Legislative Roles in Congress: Evidence from the 1950s

References

• Ardoin, Philip J., and James C. Garand. 2003. “Measuring Constituency Ideology in U.S. House Districts: A Top-Down Simulation Approach.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1165–89. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, Scott, and Ethan Bueno de Mesquita. 2006. “Delivering the Goods: Legislative Particularism in Different Electoral and Institutional Settings.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 168–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00378.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, Michael, and David W. Brady. 1998. “Heterogeneity and Representation: The Senate and Free Trade.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 524–44. doi: 10.2307/2991769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, David C., and Christopher Jan Carman. 2012. Representing Red and Blue: How the Culture Wars Change the Way Citizens Speak and Politicians Listen. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barron-Lopez, Laura. 2017. March 23, “It’s Not Just Conservatives Upset About Trumpcare. Another GOP Faction Is Too.” The Huffington Post. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/moderate-republicans-trumpcare_us_58d2bf1de4b0f838c62eca79 on 12/27/17.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, David A., Ira Katznelson, and John Lapinski. 2015. “Southern Politics Revisited: On V.O. Key’s "the South in the House.” Studies in American Political Development 29 (2): 154–84. doi: 10.1017/S0898588X1500005X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, Anthony M., and Jamie L. Carson. 2011. “Small Changes, Big Results: Legislative Voting Behavior in the Presence of New Voters.” Electoral Studies 30 (1): 201–9. doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2011.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco, William T. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishin, Benjamin. 2000. “Constituency Influence in Congress: Does Subconstituency Matter.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (3): 389. doi: 10.2307/440413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishin, Benjamin. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishin, Benjamin, Jay K. Dow, and James Adams. 2006. “Does Democracy Suffer from Diversity? Issue Representation and Diversity in Senate Elections.” Public Choice 129 (1-2): 201–15. doi: 10.1007/s11127-006-9024-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Michael C. Herron, and Kenneth W. Shotts. 2001. “Leadership and Pandering: A Theory of Executive Policymaking.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (3): 532–50. doi: 10.2307/2669237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, Joshua D. 2006. “Representation in Congress: Constituents and Roll Calls in the 106th House.” Journal of Politics 68 (2): 397–409. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00415.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, Joshua D., Anthony Bertelli, Christian R. Grose, David E. Lewis, and David C. Nixon. 2012. “Separated Powers in the United States: The Ideology of Agencies, Presidents, and Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (2): 341–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00559.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Jeffrey E., and Brandon Rottinghaus. 2018. “Constituent Approval, Electoral Marginality, and Congressional Support for the President.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 48 (2): 202–24. doi: 10.1111/psq.12435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, Philip E., and Roy Pierce. 1986. Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
   Google Scholar
• Deckard, Barbara Sinclair. 1976. “Electoral Marginality and Party Loyalty in House Roll Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 20 (3): 469–81. doi: 10.2307/2110683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron, Bradley, and Robert Tibshirani. 1986. “Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy.” Statistical Science 1 (1): 54–75. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177013815.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert. 1978. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Data.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 511–35. doi: 10.2307/2110459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, Robert S., Norman Luttbeg, and W. Holloway. 1975. “Knowing One’s District: How Legislators Predict Referendum Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 19 (2): 231–46. doi: 10.2307/2110434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulau, Heinz, and Paul D. Karps. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 2 (3): 233–54. doi: 10.2307/439340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eulau, Heinz. 1987. “The Congruence Model Revisited.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 171–214.
   Google Scholar
• Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1977. “U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12 (2): 171–214. doi: 10.2307/439918.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P. 1973. “Electoral Margins, Constituency Influence, and Policy Moderation: A Critical Assessment.” American Politics Quarterly 479–498.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Justin, and Kenneth W. Shotts. 2009. “Delegates or Trustees? A Theory of Political Account Ability.” Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1225–37. doi: 10.1017/S0022381609990260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, John D. 2006. “Electoral Competition and Democratic Responsiveness: A Defense of the Marginality Hypothesis.” Journal of Politics 68 (4): 911–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00479.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, John D., and Patrick Flavin. 2011. “How Citizens and Their Legislators Prioritize Spheres of Representation.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (3): 520–33. doi: 10.1177/1065912910373552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, Justin. 2013. “Appropriators Not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (3): 624–42. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose, Christian R., and Antoine Yoshinaka. 2011. “Ideological Hedging in Uncertain Times: Inconsistent Legislative Representation and Voter Enfranchisement.” British Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 765–94. 794. doi: 10.1017/S000712341100010X.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, Girish J. 2004. “Revisiting the Link between Electoral Competition and Policy Extremism in the U.S. Congress.” American Politics Research 32 (5): 495–520. 520. doi: 10.1177/1532673X04263820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, Jeffrey J. 2013. “Multidimensional Responsiveness: The Determinants of Legislators’ Representational Priorities.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (2): 155–84. doi: 10.1111/lsq.12009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden, Jeffrey J. 2016. Multidimensional Democracy: A Supply and Demand Theory of Representation in American Legislatures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harden, Jeffrey J., and Thomas M. Carsey. 2012. “Balancing Constituency Representation and Party Responsiveness in the US Senate: The Conditioning Effect of State Ideological Heterogeneity.” Public Choice 150 July: (1-2): 137–54. doi: 10.1007/s11127-010-9693-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, John, and John Brooks. 2016. “Mediating the Electoral Connection: The Information Effects of Voter Signals on Legislative Behavior.” Journal of Politics 78 (3): 653–69. doi: 10.1086/685380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, Patrick. 2019. “Electoral Vulnerability and Presidential Support in the House of Representatives.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 75–96. doi: 10.1111/psq.12481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley, Patricia A., and Kim Quaile Hill. 2003. “Beyond the Demand-Input Model: A Theory of Representational Linkages.” Journal of Politics 65 (2): 304–26. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-2-00002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, Malcolm. 1970. Attitudinal Determinants of Legislative Behavior: The Utility of Role Analysis. In Legislatures in Developmental Perspective, eds. Allan Kronberg and Lloyd D. Musol. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Bryan D. 1973. “Competitiveness, Role Orientations, and Legislative Responsiveness.” Journal of Politics 35 (4): 924–947. doi: 10.2307/2129214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Bryan D. 2001. Politics and the Architecture of Choice: Bounded Rationality and Governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, Kwanghee, Jaehoon Lee, Vibhuti Gupta, and Gyeongcheol Cho. 2019. “Comparison of Bootstrap Confidence Interval Methods for GSCA Using a Monte Carlo Simulation.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. 3rd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolpien, Tim. 2009, August 18. “Reed Stunned by Massa Video.” http://www.tomreedforcongress.com/press-releases/2009-08-18/reed-stunned-massa-videoon 2/28/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, James H. 1977. “District Competitiveness and Legislative Roll Call Behavior: A Reassessment of the Marginality Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (3): 627–38. doi: 10.2307/2110584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuklinski, James, and Richard Elling. 1977. “Representational Role, Constituency Opinion, and Legislative Roll-Call Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (1): 135–47. doi: 10.2307/2110452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, Matthew S., and Jeremy C. Pope. 2010. “Measuring Aggregate-Level Ideological Heterogeneity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 35 (2): 259–82. doi: 10.3162/036298010791170196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipinski, Daniel. 2003. “Rhetoric on Representation: Which Members of Congress Portray Themselves as Delegates?” Working Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, Savannah, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsusaka, John G. 2017. “When Do Legislators Follow Constituent Opinion? Evidence from Matched Roll Call and Referendum Votes.” Working Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCrone, Donald, and James Kuklinski. 1979. “The Delegate Theory of Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (2): 278–300. doi: 10.2307/2111003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrone, Donald, and Walter Stone. 1986. “The Structure of Constituency Representation: On Theory and Method.” Journal of Politics 48 (4): 956–75. doi: 10.2307/2131007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGrath, Robert J., and James A. Rydberg. 2016. “The Marginality Hypothesis and Supreme Court Confirmation Votes in the Senate.” Congress & the Presidency 43 (3): 324–51. doi: 10.1080/07343469.2016.1196267.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Warren, and Donald Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56. doi: 10.2307/1952717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picket, Kerry. 2009. August 16, “Rep. Massa: I will vote against the interests of my district.” The Washington Times Retrieved from http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2009/aug/16/video-rep-massa-i-willvote-against-interests-my-d/on 2/28/2011.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214–30. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409090261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, John, and Eric Uslaner. 1978. “Congressional Behavior and Electoral Marginality.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 536–53. doi: 10.2307/2110460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlke, John. 1971. “Policy Demands and System Support: The Role of the Represented.” British Journal of Political Science 1 (3): 271–90. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400009121.
   Google Scholar
• Woon, Jonathan. 2012. “Democratic Accountability and Retrospective Voting: A Laboratory Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (4): 913–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00594.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Gerald C., and Brian F. Schaffner. 2002. “The Influence of Party: Evidence from the State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 96 (02): 367–79. 379. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000229.
   Google Scholar
• Zahari, Siti Meriam, Norazan Mohamed Ramli, and Balkiah Mokhtar. 2014. “Bootstrapped Parameter Estimation in Ridge Regression with Multicollinearity and Multiple Outliers.” Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences 4:150–6.
   Google Scholar