88
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Who Gets Blamed When Congress and the President Collide?

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Byers, Jason S., Jamie L. Carson, and Ryan D. Williamson. 2020. “Policymaking by the Executive: Examining the Fate of Presidential Agenda Items.” Congress & the Presidency 47 (1): 1–31. doi:10.1080/07343469.2019.1631905.
  • Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cameron, Charles, and Nolan McCarty. 2004. “Models of Vetoes and Veto Bargaining.” Annual Review of Political Science 7 (1): 409–35. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104810.
  • Carson, Jamie L., Joel Sievert, and Ryan D. Williamson. 2020. “Nationalization and the Incumbency Advantage.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (1): 156–68. doi:10.1177/1065912919883696.
  • Carson, Jamie L., Joel Sievert, and Ryan D. Williamson. 2024. Nationalized Politics: Evaluating Electoral Politics across Time. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Christenson, Dino, and Douglas Kriner. 2020. “Beyond the Base: Presidents, Partisan Approval, and the Political Economy of Unilateral Action.” Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy 1 (1): 79–103. doi:10.1561/112.00000005.
  • Christenson, Dino, and Douglas L. Kriner. 2017a. “Constitutional Qualms or Politics as Usual?: the Factors Shaping Public Support for Unilateral Action.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (2): 335–49. doi:10.1111/ajps.12262.
  • Christenson, Dino, and Douglas L. Kriner. 2017b. “Mobilizing the Public against the President: Congress and the Political Costs of Unilateral Action.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (4): 769–85. doi:10.1111/ajps.12298.
  • Conley, Richard S., and Amie Kreppel. 2001. “Toward a New Typology of Vetoes and Overrides.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (4): 831–52. doi:10.1177/106591290105400408.
  • Delli, Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Gilmour, John B. 1995. Strategic Disagreement: Stalemate in American Politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Gilmour, John B. 2002. “Institutional and Individual Influences on the President’s Veto.” Journal of Politics 64 (1): 198–218. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00124.
  • Gilmour, John B. 2011. “Political Theater or Bargaining Failure: Why Presidents Veto.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 471–87. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2011.03882.x.
  • Groseclose, Tim, and Nolan McCarty. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 100–19. doi:10.2307/2669362.
  • Guenther, Scott M., and Samuel Kernell. 2021. “Veto Threat Bargaining with a Bicameral Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 74 (3): 628–44. doi:10.1177/1065912920925917.
  • Hassell, Hans J. G., and Samuel Kernell. 2016. “Veto Rhetoric and Legislative Riders.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (4): 845–59. doi:10.1111/ajps.12217.
  • Hibbing, John R., and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jacobson, Gary C. 2012. “The President’s Effect on Partisan Attitudes.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 42 (4): 683–718. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2012.04013.x.
  • Jacobson, Gary C. 2015. “How Presidents Shape Their Party’s Reputation and Prospects: New Evidence.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 45 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1111/psq.12168.
  • Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago, IL: Univeristy of Chicago Press.
  • Kriner, Douglas, and Liam Schwartz. 2009. “Partisan Dynamics and the Volatility of Presidential Approval.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 609–31. doi:10.1017/S0007123409000647.
  • Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lewis, David E., and James Michael Strine. 1996. “What Time is It? The Use of Power in Four Different Types of Presidential Time.” Journal of Politics 58 (3): 682–706. doi:10.2307/2960438.
  • Matthews, Stephen A. 1989. “Veto Threats: Rhetoric in a Bargaining Game.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (2): 347. doi:10.2307/2937851.
  • Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • McCarty, Nolan M. 2009. “Presidential Vetoes in the Early Republic: Changing Constitutional Norms or Electoral Reform?” Journal of Politics 71 (2): 369–84. doi:10.1017/S0022381609090331.
  • Nicholson, Stephen P. 2012. “Polarizing Cues.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (1): 52–66. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00541.x.
  • Reeves, Andrew, and Jon C. Rogowski. 2015. “Public Opinion toward Presidential Power.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 45 (4): 742–59. doi:10.1111/psq.12227.
  • Reeves, Andrew, and Jon C. Rogowski. 2016. “Unilateral Powers, Public Opinion, and the Presidency.” Journal of Politics 78 (1): 137–51. doi:10.1086/683433.
  • Reeves, Andrew, and Jon C. Rogowski. 2022. No Blank Check: The Origins and Consequences of Public Antipathy towards Presidential Power. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reeves, Andrew, Jon C. Rogowski, Min Hee Seo, and Andrew R. Stone. 2017. “The Contextual Determinants of Support for Unilateral Action.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 47 (3): 448–70. doi:10.1111/psq.12391.
  • Rice, Laurie L., and Samuel Kernell. 2019. “Presidents’ Vetoes and Audience Costs.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 49 (1): 130–52. doi:10.1111/psq.12485.
  • Rohde, David W., and Dennis M. Simon. 1985. “Presidential Vetoes and Congressional Response: A Study of Institutional Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (3): 397–427. doi:10.2307/2111137.
  • Sievert, Joel, and Ryan D. Williamson. 2018. “Public Attitudes toward Presidential Veto Powers.” Research & Politics 5 (1): 205316801775387. doi:10.1177/2053168017753873.
  • Sievert, Joel, and Victor Hinojosa. 2022. “Whose Party is It? Lame Ducks, Presidential Candidates, and Evaluations of the Party.” American Politics Research 50 (4): 539–44. doi:10.1177/1532673X221076435.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.