The Potential of Participatory Social Economics: A Framework and Feminist Perspective

References

• Ajaps, S., & Mbah, M. F. (2022). Deconstructing community-based research for sustainable development: The role of indigenous knowledge holders. In M. F. Mbah, W. Leal Filho, & S. Ajaps (Eds.), Indigenous methodologies, research and practices for sustainable development (pp. 65–76). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Albert, A., Balázs, B., Butkevičienė, E., Mayer, K., Perelló, J., et al. (2021). Chapter 7 citizen social science: New and established approaches to participation in social research. In K. Vohland (Eds.), The science of citizen science (pp. 119–138). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, N. (2020). Black women in the united states and unpaid collective work: Theorizing the community as a site of production. The Review of Black Political Economy, 47(4), 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034644620962811
   Google Scholar
• Banks, S., Herrington, T., & Carter, K. (2017). Pathways to co-impact: Action research and community organising. Educational Action Research, 25(4), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1331859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D. K., & Kuiper, E. (2003). Toward a feminist philosophy of economics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beetham, G., & Demetriades, J. (2007). Feminist research methodologies and development: Overview and practical application. Gender & Development, 15(2), 199–216. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20461201 https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070701391086
   Google Scholar
• Bergeron, S. (2023). Feminist economics. In I. Yi (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the social and solidarity economy (pp. 37–43). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boni, A., & Walker, M. (2020). Potential of participatory action research processes to overcome epistemic injustice in non-ideal university settings. In M. Walker & A. Boni (Eds.), Participatory research, capabilities and epistemic justice (pp. 243–259). Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56197-0_10
   Google Scholar
• Bonney, R. (1996). Citizen science: A lab tradition. Living Bird, 15(4), 7–15. Retrieved from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/280462
   Google Scholar
• Booth, S., Pollard, C. M., & Pulker, C. E. (2022). Citizen-driven food system approaches in cities. In C. M. Galanakis (Ed.), Environment and climate-smart food production (pp. 349–381). Springer International Publishing and Imprint: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury, H., & Reason, P. (2003). Action research: An opportunity for revitalizing research purpose and practices. Qualitative Social Work, 2(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325003002002003
   Google Scholar
• Butkevičienė, E., Skarlatidou, A., Balázs, B., Duží, B., Massetti, L., Ioannis, T., Loreta, T., et al. (2021). Citizen science case studies and their impacts on social innovation. In K. Vohland (Eds.), The science of citizen science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, C. (2007). Participatory data analysis: Based on work with the fed up honeys. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory action research approaches and methods (pp. 181–187). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, C., Quijada Cerecer, D. A., & Bradley, M. (2010). “dreaming of …” : Reflections on participatory action research as a feminist praxis of critical hope. Affilia, 25(4), 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109910384576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J., & Gibson, K. (2020). Action research for diverse economies: Chapter 56. In J. K. Gibson-Graham & K. Dombroski (Eds.), The handbook of diverse economies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Cancian, F. M. (1993). Conflicts between activist research and academic success: Participatory research and alternative strategies. The American Sociologist, 24(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02691947
   Google Scholar
• Chiaravalloti, R. M., Skarlatidou, A., Hoyte, S., Badia, M. M., Haklay, M., & Lewis, J. (2022). Extreme citizen science: Lessons learned from initiatives around the globe. Conservation Science and Practice, 4(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.577
   Google Scholar
• Ciampa, F., & Bosone, M. (2022). Towards eco-social transition: Community regeneration indicators respond to the polycrisis. TECHNE – Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 23, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-12140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Community Economies Institute (2023a). Ce research network (cern). https://www.communityeconomies.org/about/ce-research-network-cern
   Google Scholar
• Community Economies Institute (2023b). Community economies research and practice. https://www.communityeconomies.org/about/community-economies-research-and-practice
   Google Scholar
• Community Economies Institute (2023c). Publications. https://www.communityeconomies.org/publications
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation, the new tyranny? Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. B., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2016). Two meanings of citizen science. In D. Cavalier & E. Kennedy (Eds.), The rightful place of science: Citizen science (pp. 51–62). Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Cordeiro, L., Soares, C. B., & Rittenmeyer, L. (2017). Unscrambling method and methodology in action research traditions: Theoretical conceptualization of praxis and emancipation. Qualitative Research, 17(4), 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794116674771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. W. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/3007
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B., & Dolfsma, W. (2008). Social economics: An introduction and a view of the field. In J. B. Davis & W. Dolfsma (Eds.), The elgar companion to social economics (pp. 1–7). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2007). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects (4th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Open University Press. Retrieved 2022-04-04, from https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=582a0dbf217e20276533f5a5&assetKey=AS:428404664213506@1479151039119
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 41(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diskin, J. (2013). How subjectivity brings us through class to the community economy. Rethinking Marxism, 25(4), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2013.842694
   Google Scholar
• Dollar street: Photos as data to kill country stereotypes (2024). https://www.gapminder.org/dollar-street
   Google Scholar
• Dugger, W. M. (1977). Social economics: One perspective. Review of Social Economy, 35(3), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346767700000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECSA. (2015). Ten principles of citizen science. London: European Citizen Science Association. Last modified May 10, 2021. https://ecsa.citizen-science.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/ecsa_ten_principles_of_citizen_science.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eitzel, M. V., Cappadonna, J. L., Santos-Lang, C., Duerr, R. E., Virapongse, A., West, S. E., Kyba, C. C. M., Bowser, A., Cooper, C. B., Sforzi, A., Metcalfe, A. N., Harris, E. S., Thiel, M., Haklay, M., Ponciano, L., Roche, J., Ceccaroni, L., Shilling, F. M., Dörler, D., … Jiang, Q. (2017). Citizen science terminology matters: Exploring key terms. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 2(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.96
   Google Scholar
• Eleta, I., Galdon Clavell, G., Righi, V., & Balestrini, M. (2019). The promise of participation and decision-making power in citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epstein Jayaratne, T., & Stewart, A. J. (1995). Quantitative and qualitative methods in the social sciences: Feminist issues and practical strategies. In J. Holland, M. Blair, & S. Sheldon (Eds.), Debates and issues in feminist research and pedagogy (pp. 217–234). Multilingual Matters in association with the Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Estensoro, M. (2015). How can social innovation be facilitated? experiences from an action research process in a local network. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 28(6), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9347-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020a). Enabling citizens to act on climate change, for sustainable development and environmental protection through education, citizen science, observation initiatives, and civic engagement. https://www.msp-platform.eu/fundings/enabling-citizens-act-climate-change-sustainable-development-and-environmental
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2020b). Responsible research & innovation: Horizon 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018). Citizen science for environmental policy: Development of an eu wide inventory and analysis of selected practices. Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• Fals-Borda, O. (1987). The application of participatory action-research in latin america. International Sociology, 2(4), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/026858098700200401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fals-Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (Eds.). (1991). Action and knowledge: Breaking the monopoly with participatory action research. Apex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferber, M. A., & Nelson, J. A. (Eds.). (1993). Beyond economic man: Feminist theory and economics. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., & Barreras, R. (2001). To be of use. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 1(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1530-2415.00012
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M., Torre, M. E., Boudin, K., Bowen, I., Clark, J., & Hylton, D. (2003). Participatory action research: From within and beyond prison bars. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design (pp. 173–198). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, A., Dinnie, E., Ellis, R., Eastwood, A., Carter, A., & Welsh, G. (2021). Exploring the potential of citizen social science for environmental and sustainability research: Experiences of and with community-based researchers. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.389
   Google Scholar
• Fraisl, D., Campbell, J., See, L., Wehn, U., Wardlaw, J., Gold, M., Moorthy, I., Arias, R., Piera, J., Oliver, J. L., Masó, J., Penker, M., & Fritz, S. (2020). Mapping citizen science contributions to the un sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 15(6), 1735–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire, P. ([1970] 2005). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th Anniversary ed.). The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Frisby, W., Maguire, P., & Reid, C. (2009). The ‘f’ word has everything to do with it: How feminist theories inform action research. Action Research, 7(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750308099595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The end of capitalism (as we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy (First University of Minnesota Press edition, 2006). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2002). Beyond global vs. local: Economic politics outside the binary frame. In A. Herod & M. W. Wright (Eds.), Geographies of power (pp. 25–60). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006). A postcapitalist politics. Minneapolis and London. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2020). Reading for economic difference. In J. K. Gibson-Graham & K. Dombroski (Eds.), The handbook of diverse economies (pp. 476–485). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take back the economy: An ethical guide to transforming our communities. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R. (2018). Food sovereignty and community economies: Researching a spanish case study. In L. Shevellar & P. Westoby (Eds.), The routledge handbook of community development research (pp. 210–222) Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon-Nembhard, J. (2023). Black political economy, solidarity economics, and liberation: Toward an economy of caring and abundance. Review of Radical Political Economics, 55(4), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/04866134231163216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Nembhard, J., & Nzinga Ifateyo, A. (2023). African american solidarity economics and distributive justice. In I. Yi (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the social and solidarity economy (p. 105). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information: Overview and typology of participation. In D. Z. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. F. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge (pp. 105–122). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2021). Chapter 1 geographic citizen science: An overview. In A. Skarlatidou & M. Haklay (Eds.), Geographic citizen science design (pp. 15–37). UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., Dörler, D., Heigl, F., Manzoni, M., Hecker, S., & Vohland, K. (2021). What is citizen science? the challenges of definition. In K. Vohland. (Eds.), The science of citizen science. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M., Motion, A., Balázs, B., Kieslinger, B., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Nold, C., … Wehn, U. (2020). Ecsa’s characteristics of citizen science. Zenodo.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1995). Can feminist thought make economics more objective? Feminist Economics, 1(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/714042212
   Google Scholar
• Hayward, C., Simpson, L., & Wood, L. (2004). Still left out in the cold: Problematising participatory research and development. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00264.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2015). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Hill Collins, P. (1999). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, b. (1984] 2015). ([Feminist theory: From margin to center (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hossein, C. S. (2019). A black epistemology for the social and solidarity economy: The black social economy. The Review of Black Political Economy, 46(3), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034644619865266
   Google Scholar
• Hossein, C. S., & Pearson, M. (2023). Black feminists in the third sector: Here is why we choose to use the term solidarity economy. The Review of Black Political Economy, 50(2), 222–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/00346446221132319
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J. (2019). New pathways to social change – creating impact through social innovation research. Teval Journal for Research and Technology Policy Evaluation, 48, 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Howaldt, J., Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation. Dortmund. https://www.sfs.tu-dortmund.de/cms/en/social_innovation/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Hoyer, D., Bennett, J. S., Reddish, J., Holder, S., Howard, R., Benam, M., … Turchin, P. (2023). Navigating polycrisis: Long-run socio-cultural factors shape response to changing climate. Philoshophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 378(1889), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, C., Burton, M., & Siddiquee, A. (2017). Action research. In C. Willig & W. Stainton Rogers (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 55–73). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, C. (2001). On the grounds of globalization: A topography for feminist political engagement. Signs, 26(4), 1213–1234. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3175362 https://doi.org/10.1086/495653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, R., Fleming, A., Pecl, G. T., Richter, A., & Bonn, A. (2019). Social license through citizen science: A tool for marine conservation. Ecology and Society, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10704-240116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., MacTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2013). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, S. A., & Kral, M. J. (2005). Practicing participatory action research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klocker, N. (2012). Doing participatory action research and doing a phd: Words of encouragement for prospective students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36(1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2011.589828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvangraven, I. H., & Kesar, S. (2023). Standing in the way of rigor? economics’ meeting with the decolonization agenda. Review of International Political Economy, 30(5), 1723–1748. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2131597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebenberg, L., //Ao, /., Lombard, M., Shermer, M., Xhukwe, /., Biesele, M., //xao, D., Carruthers, P., Kxao, ≠., Hansson, S. O., Langwane, H. (., Elbroch, L. M., /Ui, N., Keeping, D., Humphrey, G., Newman, G., G/aq’o, /., Steventon, J., Kashe, N., … Voysey, M. (2021). Tracking science: An alternative for those excluded by citizen science. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.284
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lock, A., & Strong, T. (2012). Social constructionism: Sources and stirrings in theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=313328
   Google Scholar
• Loewenson, R., Laurell, A. C., Hogstedt, C., D’Ambruoso, L., Shroff, Z. (2014). Participatory action research in health systems: A methods reader. http://equinetafrica.org/sites/default/files/uploads/documents/PAR_Methods_Reader2014_for_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, M. (1990a). Emphasizing the social: Social economics and socio-economics. Review of Social Economy, 48(3), 303–320. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29769512 https://doi.org/10.1080/00346769000000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, M. (1990b). Social economics: Retrospect and prospect (Vol. 22). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod, M. A., & Emejulu, A. (2014). Neoliberalism with a community face? a critical analysis of asset-based community development in scotland. Journal of Community Practice, 22(4), 430–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2014.959147
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, P. (1987). Doing participatory research: A feminist approach. Center for International Education, School of Education, University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R. (1991). Principles for participatory action research. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001848191041003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTaggart, R. (1997). Guiding principles for participatory action research. In R. McTaggart (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 25–43). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, J. (2008). To be or not to be? the ontic and the ontological in economic inquiry. In J. T. Harvey & R. F. Garnett (Eds.), Future directions for heterodox economics (pp. 73–95). University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moralli, M., & Allegrini, G. (2021). Crises redefined: Towards new spaces for social innovation in inner areas? European Societies, 23(sup1), S831–S843. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2020.1841263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social economy, third sector and solidarity relations: A conceptual synthesis from history to present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037–2053. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., & Hillier, J. (2013). Social innovation: Intuition, precept, concept. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation (pp. 13–24). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). General introduction: The return of social innovation as a scientific concept and a social practice. In F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, & A. Hamdouch (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation (pp. 1–6). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Moustard, F., Sheppard, A., Moreu, M., Hoyte, S., Laws, M. (2020). Extreme citizen science: Analysis and visualisation (ecsanvis) project. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/geography/ECSAnVis/en/#
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (1993). Gender and economic ideologies. Review of Social Economy, 51(3), 287–301. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29769681 https://doi.org/10.1080/758537259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (1995). Feminism and economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.2.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (2016). Ethics and climate change policy. In E. Searing & D. Searing (Eds.), Practicing professional ethics in economics and public policy (pp. 171–193). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (2018). Economics for humans (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M., Erel, U., Kaptani, E., & Reynolds, T. (2019). Borders, risk and belonging: Challenges for arts-based research in understanding the lives of women asylum seekers and migrants ‘at the borders of humanity’. Crossings: Journal of Migration & Culture, 10(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1386/cjmc.10.1.129_1
   Google Scholar
• Pain, R., Askins, K. B., Banks, S., Cook, T., Crawford, G. C., Crookes, L., Darby, S., Heslop, J., Holden, A. C., Houston, M., Jeffes, J., Lambert, Z., McGlen, L., McGlynnn, C., Ozga, J. P., Raynor, R., Robinson, Y. K., Shaw, S., Stewart, C. S. Vanderhoven, D. (2015). Mapping alternative impact: Alternative approaches to impact from co-produced research. Durham, UK. https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/beacon/MappingAlternativeImpactFinalReport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Palka, J. (2024). Participatory and Place-Based Socioeconomic Knowledge Generation: An Experience in Community-Based Research Pedagogy. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal 12. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.8
   Google Scholar
• Peake, L. (2016). On feminism and feminist allies in knowledge production in urban geography. Urban Geography, 37(6), 830–838. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecl, G. T., Stuart-Smith, J., Walsh, P., Bray, D. J., Kusetic, M., Burgess, M., Frusher, S. D., Gledhill, D. C., George, O., Jackson, G., Keane, J., Martin, V. Y., Nursey-Bray, M., Pender, A., Robinson, L. M., Rowling, K., Sheaves, M., & Moltschaniwskyj, N. (2019). Redmap australia: Challenges and successes with a large-scale citizen science-based approach to ecological monitoring and community engagement on climate change. Frontiers in Marine Science, 6, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrykowski, B. (2015). Participatory economic research: Benefits and challenges of incorporating participatory research into social economics. Review of Social Economy, 73(3), 242–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2015.1044841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (2011). The economy as instituted process. In M. S. Granovetter (Ed.), The sociology of economic life (pp. 3–21). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, K. (Ed.). ([1944] 2001). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time (2nd Beacon Paperback ed.). Beacon Press. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/hm031/00064156.html
   Google Scholar
• Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). Social provisioning as a starting point for feminist economics. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570042000267608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. N. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, L. M., & Cooper, C. (2019). Citizen science ethics. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.235
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Read, J. (2011). The production of subjectivity: From transindividuality to the commons. New Formations, 70(70), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.3898/NEWF.70.07.2010
   Google Scholar
• Riva, R., Aldovini, G., & Dal Santo, R. (2022). Managing the eco-social transition: Communities in action to build possible futures. TECHNE - Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment, 23, 62–68. https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-12152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romaioli, D., & McNamee, S. (2021). (mis)constructing social construction: Answering the critiques. Theory & Psychology, 31(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320967757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowell, L. L., Bruce, C. D., Shosh, J. M., & Riel, M. (2017). The palgrave international handbook of action research. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, S., & Edwards, M. (2019). Citizen science during the flint, michigan federal water emergency: Ethical dilemmas and lessons learned. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Senabre Hidalgo, E., Perelló, J., Becker, F., Bonhoure, I., Martine, L., & Cigarini, A. (2021). Participation and co-creation in citizen science. In K. Vohland. (Eds.), The science of citizen science (pp. 199–218). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B. V., Krasny, M. E., & Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 1–20. http://www.jstor.org/stable/26269051 https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarlatidou, A., Fraisl, D., Wu, Y., See, L., & Haklay, M. (2022). Extreme citizen science contributions to the sustainable development goals: Challenges and opportunities for a human-centred design approach. In C. Ardito. (Eds.), Sense, feel, design (Vol. 13198, pp. 20–35). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Skarlatidou, A., & Haklay, M. (2021). Geographic citizen science design: No one left behind. In A. Skarlatidou & M. Haklay (Eds.), Geographic citizen science design (pp. 3–12). UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. E. (1997). Deepening participatory action research. In S. E. Smith, D. G. Willms, & N. A. Johnson (Eds.), Nurtured by knowledge (pp. 173–264). The Apex Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., Bratini, L., Chambers, D.-A., Jensen, R. V., & Romero, L. (2010). Between idealism and reality: Meeting the challenges of participatory action research. Action Research, 8(4), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310366043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassmann, D. (1997). Editorial: Expanding the methodological boundaries of economics. Feminist Economics, 3(2), vii–viii. https://doi.org/10.1080/135457097338771a
   Google Scholar
• Stringer, E. T. (2007). Action research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thambinathan, V., & Kinsella, E. A. (2021). Decolonizing methodologies in qualitative research: Creating spaces for transformative praxis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110147. 160940692110147. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211014766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Association for Social Economics (2021). About the ase: The association for social economics. https://socialeconomics.org/about/
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, E. J., Ettinger, A. K., Burgess, H. K., DeBey, L. B., Schmidt, N. R., Froehlich, H. E., Wagner, C., HilleRisLambers, J., Tewksbury, J., Harsch, M. A., & Parrish, J. K. (2015). Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181, 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuhiwai Smith, L. (2022). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (3rd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, A., Heigl, F., & Bonn, A. (2018). The threefold potential of environmental citizen science: Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biological Conservation, 225, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Noordwijk, T., Bishop, I., Staunton-Lamb, S., Oldfield, A., Loiselle, S., Geoghegen, H., & Ceccaroni, L. (2021). Creating positive environmental impact through citizen science. In K. Vohland. (Eds.), The science of citizen science (pp. 373–395). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452961000157564
   Google Scholar
• Wright Austin, S. D. (2023). The black social economy. In I. Yi (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the social and solidarity economy (pp. 92–96). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zill, M. (2022). Confessions of an ‘academic tourist’: Reflections on accessibility, trust, and research ethics in the grandhotel cosmopolis. In C. Button & G. Taylor Aiken (Eds.), Over rearched places (pp. 133–148). Routledge.
   Google Scholar