Toward Mainstreaming of Feminist (Counter)Publics? The Networked Structure of Feminist Activism on Twitter

References

• Ackland, R., & O’Neil, M. (2011). Online collective identity: The case of the environmental movement. Social Networks, 33(3), 177–190. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: Divided they blog. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Link Discovery, 36–43. doi:10.1145/1134271.1134277
   Google Scholar
• Asen, R. (2000). Seeking the “counter” in counterpublics. Communication Theory, 10(4), 424–446. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausserhofer, J., & Maireder, A. (2013). National politics on Twitter: Structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Information, Communication, and Society, 16(3), 291–314. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banet-Weiser, S. (2018). Empowered: Popular feminism and popular misogyny. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509–512. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proceedings of the Third International ICWSM Conference, 361–362. doi:10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., Roberts, H., Faris, R., Solow-Niederman, A., & Etling, B. (2015). Social mobilization and the networked public sphere: Mapping the SOPA-PIPA debate. Political Communication, 32(4), 594–624. doi:10.1080/10584609.2014.986349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Yang, Y. (2018). The strength of peripheral networks: Negotiating attention and meaning in complex media ecologies. Journal of Communication, 68(4), 659–684. doi:10.1093/joc/jqy032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berns, N. (2004). Framing the victim: Domestic violence media and social problems. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, D., & Moody-Ramirez, M. (2020). Black Twitter representations of #Kavanaugh hearings. Journal of Research on Women and Gender, 10(1), 43–70.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 10(P1000), 1–12. doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, K., & Rathnayake, C. (2020). #HimToo and the networking of misogyny in the age of #MeToo. Feminist Media Studies, 20(8), 1259–1277. doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1661868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breese, E. B. (2011). Mapping the variety of public spheres. Communication Theory, 26(21), 130–149. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01379.x
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2012). How long is a Tweet? Mapping dynamic conversation networks on Twitter using Gawk and Gephi. Information, Communication, and Society, 15(9), 1323–1351. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.635214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., & Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2016). Mapping sociocultural controversies across digital media platforms: One week of #gamergate on Twitter, YouTube, and Tumblr. Communication Research and Practice, 2(1), 79–96. doi:10.1080/22041451.2016.1155338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power, and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1, 238–266.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover, M. D., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2012). Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Science, 1(1–19), 17. doi:10.1140/epjds6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162. doi:10.1080/10584600590933160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejmanee, T., Zaher, Z., Rouech, S., & Papa, M. J. (2020). #MeToo; #HimToo: Popular feminism and hashtag activism in the Kavanaugh hearings. International Journal of Communication, 14, 3946–3963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, J., & Fenton, N. (2003). New media, counter publicity and the public sphere. New Media and Society, 5(2), 185–202. doi:10.1177/1461444803005002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drüeke, R., & Zobl, E. (2016). Online feminist protest against sexism: The German-language hashtag #aufschrei. Feminist Media Studies, 16(1), 35–54. doi:10.1080/14680777.2015.1093071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgesem, D., Steskal, L., & Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Structure and content of the discourse on climate change in the blogosphere: The big picture. Environmental Communication, 9(2), 169–188. doi:10.1080/17524032.2014.983536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felski, R. (1989). Beyond feminist aesthetics: Feminist literature and social change. Hutchinson Radius.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 1990(25–26), 56–80. doi:10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1996). Öffentlichkeit neu denken: Ein Beitrag zur Kritik real existierender Demokratie. In E. Scheich (Ed.), Vermittelte Weiblichkeit (pp. 151–182). Hamburger Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (2009). Feminism, capitalism, and the cunning of history. New Left Review, 56, 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, R. J., Stowell, E., Parker, A. G., & Foucault Welles, B. (2019). Reclaiming stigmatized narratives: The networked disclosure landscape of #MeToo. Proceedings of the ACM on Human–Computer Interaction, 3(96), 1–30. doi:10.1145/3359198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & E. Lawrence, Trans.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. A. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 154–174. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horeck, T. (2014). #AskThicke: “Blurred Lines,” Rape culture, and the feminist hashtag takeover. Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1105–1107. doi:10.1080/14680777.2014.975450
   Google Scholar
• Hosterman, A. R., Johnson, N. R., Stouffer, R., & Herring, S. (2018). Twitter, social support messages, and the #MeToo movement. Journal of Social Media in Society, 7(2), 69–91.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). Hijacking #myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 932–952. doi:10.1111/jcom.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Foucault Welles, B. (2016). #Ferguson is everywhere: Initiators in emerging counterpublic networks. Information, Communication, and Society, 19(3), 397–418. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1106571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., Bailey, M., & Foucault Welles, B. (2020). #HashtagActivism: Networks of race and gender justice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J. (2017). Public spheres of skepticism: Climate skeptics’ online comments in the German networked public sphere. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1661–1682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, J., & Puschmann, C. (2017). Alliance of antagonism: Counterpublics and polarization in online climate change communication. Communication and the Public, 2(4), 1–17. doi:10.1177/2057047317732350
   Google Scholar
• Kavada, A., & Poell, T. (2020). From counterpublics to contentious publicness: Tracing the temporal, spatial, and material articulations of popular protest through social media. Communication Theory, 31(2), 190–208. doi:10.1093/ct/qtaa025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kearney, M. W. (2018). rtweet: Collecting Twitter data: R package (Version 0.6.7). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=rtweet
   Google Scholar
• Klaus, E., & Drüeke, R. (2017). Internetöffentlichkeiten und Gender studies: Von den Rändern in das Zentrum? In E. Klaus & R. Drüeke (Eds.), Öffentlichkeiten und gesellschaftliche Aushandlungsprozesse (pp. 101–126). Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Knüpfer, C., Hoffmann, M., & Voskresenskii, V. (2020). Hijacking MeToo: Transnational dynamics and networked frame contestation on the far right in the case of the “120 Decibels” campaign. Information, Communication, and Society, 25(7), 1010–1028. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2020.1822904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2004). Strategic political communication: Mobilizing public opinion in “audience democracies.” In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing political communication (pp. 184–212). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maireder, A., & Ausserhofer, J. (2014). Political discourses on Twitter: Networking topics, objects, and people. In K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt, & C. Puschmann (Eds.), Twitter and society (pp. 305–318). Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Maireder, A., & Schlögl, S. (2014). 24 hours of an #outcry: The networked publics of a socio-political debate. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 687–702. doi:10.1177/0267323114545710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, F. (2020). Wer ist #MeToo? Eine netzwerkanalytische Untersuchung (anti-) feministischen protests auf Twitter. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 68(3), 255–272. doi:10.5771/1615-634X-2020-3-255
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/ANNUREV.SOC.27.1.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Megarry, J. (2018). Under the watchful eyes of men: Theorising the implications of male surveillance practices for feminist activism on social media. Feminist Media Studies, 18(6), 1070–1085. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1387584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2018). #MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism: European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(2), 236–246. doi:10.1177/1350506818765318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138–166. doi:10.1177/1940161212474472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2000). Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism. Institut für Höhere Studien, Abt. Politikwissenschaft. Retrieved from https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/24654
   Google Scholar
• Nuernbergk, C. (2013). Anschlusskommunikation in der Netzwerköffentlichkeit: Ein inhalts- und netzwerkanalytischer Vergleich der Kommunikation im “Social Web” zum G8-Gipfel von Heiligendamm (1st Ed.). Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266–282. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perc, M. (2014). The Matthew effect in empirical data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11(98), 20140378. doi:10.1098/rsif.2014.0378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B. (2018). Dissonant and disconnected public spheres as challenge for political communication research. Javnost—The Public, 25(1–2), 59–65. doi:10.1080/13183222.2018.1423942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfetsch, B., Adam, S., & Bennett, W. L. (2013). The critical linkage between online and offline media. Javnost—The Public, 20(3), 9–22. doi:10.1080/13183222.2013.11009118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauchfleisch, A. (2017). The public sphere as an essentially contested concept: A co-citation analysis of the last 20 years of public sphere research. Communication and the Public, 2(1), 3–18. doi:10.1177/2057047317691054
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.r-project.org/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Squires, C. R. (2002). Rethinking the Black public sphere: An alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory, 12(4), 446–468. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00278.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoltenberg, D., Maier, D., & Waldherr, A. (2019). Community detection in civil society online networks: Theoretical guide and empirical assessment. Social Networks, 59, 120–133. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2019.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töpfl, F., & Piwoni, E. (2017). Targeting dominant publics: How counterpublic commenters align their efforts with mainstream news. New Media and Society, 20(5), 2011–2027. doi:10.1177/1461444817712085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, V. (2018). Connected feminists: Foregrounding the interpersonal in connective action. Australian Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 116–129. doi:10.1080/10361146.2017.1416583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trott, V. (2020). Networked feminism: Counterpublics and the intersectional issues of #MeToo. Feminist Media Studies, 21(7), 1125–1142. doi:10.1080/14680777.2020.1718176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, J. (2018). The reconstruction of public space in democracy. In J. van Dijk & K. L. Hacker (Eds.), Internet and democracy in the network society (pp. 83–107). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2009). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Repr. with corrections, 18. print.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhouse-Watson, D. (2012). Framing the victim. Australian Feminist Studies, 27(71), 55–70. doi:10.1080/08164649.2012.648260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J. (1999). Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. doi:10.1038/30918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar