Reactions to experts in deliberative democracy: the 2016–2018 Irish Citizens’ Assembly

References

• Aitken, M., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Pagliari, C. (2016). Moving from trust to trustworthiness: Experiences of public engagement in the Scottish health informatics programme. Science and Public Policy, 43(5), 713–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexiadou, D., & Gunaydin, H. (2019). Commitment or expertise? Technocratic appointments as political responses to economic crises. European Journal of Political Research, 58(3), 845–865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedock, C. (2017). Reforming Europe: Institutional engineering in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., Watanabe, K., Wang, H., Nulty, P., Obeng, A., Müller, S., & Matsuo, A. (2018). Quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(30), 774.
   Google Scholar
• Bertsou, E., & Caramani, D. (2022). People haven’t had enough of experts: Technocratic attitudes among citizens in nine European democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 66(1), 5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boussalis, C., Coan, T. G., Holman, M. R., & Müller, S. (2021). Gender, candidate emotional expression, and voter reactions during televised debates. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1242–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. (2014). Expertise and deliberative democracy. In S. Elstub, & P. McLaverty (Eds.), Deliberative democracy: Issues and cases (pp. 50–68). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. H., Chan, G. C., Leeper, T. J., & Becker, J. (2021). Rio: A Swiss-army knife for data file I/O. R package version 0.5.29.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. P., & Greene, D. (2020). Talk is not cheap: Policy agendas, information processing, and the unusually proportional nature of European Central Bank communications policy responses. Governance, 33(2), 425–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curato, N., Farrell, D. M., Geissel, B., Grönlund, K., Mockler, P., Pilet, J.-B., … Suiter, J. (2021). Deliberative mini-publics: Core design features. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, D. B., Scott, D., Roosen, C., Magnusson, A., & Swinton, J. (2019). xtable: Export Tables to LaTeX or HTML. R package version 1.8-4.
   Google Scholar
• Devaney, L., Brereton, P., Torney, D., Coleman, M., Boussalis, C., & Coan, T. G. (2020). Environmental literacy and deliberative democracy: A content analysis of written submissions to the Irish Citizens’ Assembly on climate change. Climatic Change, 162(4), 1965–1984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., Bächtinger, A., Chambers, S., Cohen, J., Druckman, J. N., Felicetti, A., … Warren, M. E. (2019). The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation. Science, 363(6432), 1144–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkink, J. A., Farrell, D. M., Marien, S., Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2020). The death of conservative Ireland? The 2018 abortion referendum. Electoral Studies, 65, 102142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkink, J. A., Farrell, D. M., Reidy, T., & Suiter, J. (2017). Understanding the 2015 marriage referendum in Ireland: Context, campaign, and conservative Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 32(3), 361–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstub, S. (2018). Deliberative and participatory democracy. In A. Bächtinger, J. S. Dryzek, J. Mansbridge, & M. E. Warren (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy (pp. 187–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, O., & Elstub, S. (2017). Forms of mini-publics. New Democracy. URL: https://www.newdemocracy.com.au/2017/05/08/forms-of-mini-publics/.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., & Field, L. (2022). The growing prominence of deliberative mini-publics and their impact on democratic government. Irish Political Studies, 37(2), 285–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., & Stone, P. (2020). Sortition and mini-publics: A different kind of representation. In R. Rohrschneider, & J. Thomassen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political representation in liberal democracies (pp. 228–246). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., & Suiter, J. (2019). Reimagining democracy: Lessons in deliberative democracy from the Irish front line. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., Suiter, J., & Harris, C. (2019). ‘Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: The 2016–18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 34(1), 113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., Suiter, J., Harris, C., & Cunningham, K. (2020). The effects of mixed membership in a deliberative forum: The Irish constitutional convention of 2012–2014. Political Studies, 68(1), 54–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, D. M., Suiter, J., & O’Malley, E. (2013). Deliberative democracy in action Irish-style: The 2011 we the citizens pilot citizens’ assembly. Irish Political Studies, 28(1), 99–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felicetti, A., Niemeyer, S., & Curato, N. (2016). Improving deliberative participation: Connecting mini-publics to deliberative systems. European Political Science Review, 8(3), 427–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, L. (2018). The abortion referendum of 2018 and a timeline of abortion politics in Ireland to date. Irish Political Studies, 33(4), 608–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (Third edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, M., Schaub, H.-P., & Mueller, S. (2019). O sister, where art thou? Theory and evidence on female participation at citizen assemblies. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 2(2), 173–195.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E., & Niemeyer, S. J. (2003). When does deliberation begin? Internal reflection versus public discussion in deliberative democracy. Political Studies, 51(4), 627–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmer, J., Roberts, M. E., & Stewart, B. M. (2022). Text as data: A new framework for machine learning and the social sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, C., Farrell, D. M., Suiter, J., & Brennan, M. (2021). Women’s voices in a deliberative assembly: An analysis of gender rates of participation in Ireland’s Convention on the Constitution 2012–2014. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(1), 175–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipsos. (2022). Ipsos veracity index 2022. URL: https://www.ipsos.com/en-ie/ipsos-veracity-index-2022.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C. F., Mendelberg, T., & Shaker, L. (2012). Gender inequality in deliberative participation. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostovicova, D., & Paskhalis, T. (2021). Gender, justice and deliberation: Why women don’t influence peacemaking. International Studies Quarterly, 65(2), 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafont, C. (2015). Deliberation, participation, and democratic legitimacy: Should deliberative mini-publics shape public policy? Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(1), 40–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, P. (2013). texreg: Conversion of statistical model output in R to LaTeX and html tables. Journal of Statistical Software, 55(8), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leino, M., Kulha, K., Setälä, M., & Ylisalo, J. (2022). Expert hearings in mini-publics: How does the field of expertise influence deliberation and its outcomes? Policy Sciences, 55(3), 429–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüdecke, D. (2018). ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from regression models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(26), 772.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, A., & Norton, A. (2017). Inequality is always in the room: Language & power in deliberative democracy. Daedalus, 146(3), 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the void: The hollowing of western democracy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Muradova, L., Culloty, E., & Suiter, J. (2023). Misperceptions and minipublics: Does endorsement of expert information by a minipublic influence misperceptions in the wider public? Political Communication, online first. doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2200735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muradova, L., Walker, H., & Colli, F. (2020). Climate change communication and public engagement in interpersonal deliberative settings: Evidence from the Irish Citizens’ Assembly. Climate Policy, 20(10), 1322–1335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E., & Plümper, T. (2017). Robustness tests for quantitative research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions: Catching the deliberative wave.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2021). OECD database of representative deliberative processes and institutions. URL: https://airtable.com/shrHEM12ogzPs0nQG/tbl1eKbt37N7hVFHF/viwxQgJNyONVHkmS6?
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., De Laile, S., & Franco-Guillén, N. (2022). Mapping deliberative systems with big data: The case of the Scottish independence referendum. Political Studies, 70(3), 543–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, R., Rao, V., & Palaniswamy, N. (2019). Deliberative democracy in an unequal world: A text-as-data study of south India’s village assemblies. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 623–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilet, J.-B., Bol, D., Vittori, D., & Paulis, E. (2022). Public support for deliberative citizens’ assemblies selected through sortition: Evidence from 15 countries. European Journal of Political Research, online first. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, S.-O., Wratil, C., & Wäckerle, J. (2019). Testing the validity of automatic speech recognition for political text analysis. Political Analysis, 27(3), 339–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. J., Lightbody, R., Low, R., & Elstub, S. (2020). Experts and evidence in deliberation: Scrutinising the role of witnesses and evidence in mini-publics, a case study. Policy Sciences, 53, 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. J., Salamon, H., Reggiani, M., Lightbody, R., Reher, S., & Pirie, C. (2022). Inclusion and diversity among expert witnesses in deliberative mini-publics.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., & Tingley, D. (2019). stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(2), 1–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., Lucas, C., Leder-Luis, J., Gadarian, S. K., … Rand, D. G. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossiter, E. L. (2022). Measuring agenda setting in interactive political communication. American Journal of Political Science, 66(2), 337–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Setälä, M., Grönlund, K., & Herne, K. (2010). Citizen deliberation on nuclear power: A comparison of two decision-making methods. Political Studies, 58(4), 688–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suiter, J., Farrell, D. M., Harris, C., & Murphy, P. (2022). Measuring epistemic deliberation on polarized issues: The case of abortion provision in Ireland. Political Studies Review, 20(4), 630–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Group judgments: Statistical means, deliberation, and information markets. New York University Law Review, 80(3), 962–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, D., & Dancho, M. (2022). furrr: Apply mapping functions in parallel using futures. R package version 0.3.0.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. D., & Elkink, J. A. (2021). The dissatisfied and the engaged: Citizen support for citizens’ assemblies and their willingness to participate. Irish Political Studies, 36(4), 647–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L. D., François, R., … Yutani, H. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686.
   Google Scholar
• Wilke, C. O. (2020). cowplot: Streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for ggplot2. R Package Version 1.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Wratil, C., & Pastorella, G. (2018). Dodging the bullet: How crises trigger technocrat-led governments. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 450–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wratil, C., Wäckerle, J., & Proksch, S.-O. (2022). Government rhetoric and the representation of public opinion in international negotiations. American Political Science Review, online first. doi:10.1017/S0003055422001198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar