After Mobuoy: co-designing environmental governance in Northern Ireland?

References

• Barry, J., & Ellis, G. (2014). Beyond consensus? Agonism, republicanism and a low carbon future. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to participation (pp. 29–42). Abingdon: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Blackwood, D., Brennan, C., Doran, P., Orr, J., Hough, A., & Neal, L. (2020). The cross–cutting nature of a public inquiry into illegal waste disposal in Northern Ireland. EJNI Briefing No. 2. Retrieved from https://ejni.net/wp–content/uploads/2020/10/EJNI–Briefing–2–NI–Executive–Public–Inquiry–into–Illegal–Waste–in–NI–copy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bolger, P., Brereton, P., Grant, O., Torney, D., & Gallagher, T. (2021). Better together: Knowledge co-production for a sustainable society. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, C. (2016). The enforcement of waste law in Northern Ireland. Journal of Environmental Law, 28, 471–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, C., Purdy, R., & Hjerp, P. (2017). Political, economic and environmental crisis in Northern Ireland: The true cost of environmental governance failures and opportunities for reform. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 68(2), 123–157. doi:10.53386/nilq.v68i2.31
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Mol, P. J. A. (2003). Participation and environmental governance: Consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environmental Values, 12(2), 143–154. doi:10.3197/096327103129341261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrozza, C. (2015). Democratizing expertise and environmental governance: Different approaches to the politics of science and their relevance for policy analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(1), 108–126. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2014.914894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, R. J. (2018). Counter-governance: Citizen participation beyond collaboration. Politics and Governance, 6(1), 180–188. doi:10.17645/pag.v6i1.1221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs. (2020). Questions relating to the 1 April 2020 meeting postponed due to Covid-19. CORR/1210/2020. Belfast: Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Environment. (2015). Environmental governance in Northern Ireland: Discussion Document. Belfast: Department of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Doelle, M., & Sinclair, A. J. (2006). Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: Promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(2), 185–205. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2005.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gladkova, E. (2020). Farming intensification and environmental justice in Northern Ireland. Critical Criminology, 28, 445–461. doi:10.1007/s10612-020-09488-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley, C., Gunningham, N., & Shearing, N. (2011). The New Environmental Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, J. (2022). The road not taken: ‘Triple transformation’ towards sustainable peace in Northern Ireland (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (2022). Reflections on COP26: International diplomacy, global justice and the greening of capitalism. The Political Quarterly, 93(2), 270–277. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.13083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraff, H. (2020). A critical exploration of agonistic participatory design. The Design Journal, 23(1), 31–48. doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1684730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Paxton, M. (2018). Can agonism be institutionalised? Can institutions be agonised? Prospects for democratic design. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 20(3), 693–710. doi:10.1177/1369148118784756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, A., & Smith, G. (2014). Ends, means, beginnings: Environmental technocracy, ecological deliberation or embodied disagreement? Ethical Perspectives, 21(1), 47–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matulis, B. S., & Moyer, J. R. (2017). Beyond inclusive conservation: The value of pluralism, the need for agonism, and the case for social instrumentalism. Conservation Letters, 10(3), 279–287. doi:10.1111/conl.12281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McBride, S. (2019). Burned: The inside story of the ‘cash-for-ash’ Scandal and Northern Ireland’s secretive new elite. Athlone: Merrion Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. (2013). A review of waste disposal at the Mobuoy site and the lessons learnt for the future regulation of the waste industry in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Department of Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Assembly. (2014). Official report (Hansard) Tuesday 11th March 2014. Volume 93, No 2. Belfast: Northern Ireland Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Assembly. (2016). AQW 3434/16-21. Retrieved from http://aims.niassembly.gov.uk/questions/printquestionsummary.aspx?docid=272791.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Assembly. (2017). Official report (Hansard) Monday 23rd January 2017. Volume 123, No 3. Belfast: Northern Ireland Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Assembly. (2020). AQW 746/17-22. Belfast: Northern Ireland Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Assembly. (2021). Official report (Hansard), Tuesday 14 September 2021. Vol 142, No 3. Belfast: Northern Ireland Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Environment Agency. (2023a). FAQs last updated Jan 2023. https://www.daera-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/daera/Mobuoy%20Remediation%20Project%20-%20FAQs%20Jan%202023.DOCX.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Environment Agency. (2023b). The Mobuoy remediation project: background information and updates to the project. https://www.daera-ni.gov.uk/articles/mobuoy-remediation-project.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Environment Link. (1996). Environmental strategy for Northern Ireland. Belfast: Northern Ireland Environment Link.
   Google Scholar
• Northern Ireland Executive. (2020). New decade, new approach. Belfast: Northern Ireland Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2006). The value-added of laboratory experiments for the study of institutions and common-pool resources. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61, 149–163. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2005.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkins, J. R., & Sinclair, J. A. (2014). Patterns of elitism within participatory environmental governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(4), 746–761. doi:10.1068/c1293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petschow, U. (2005). Governance and sustainability in a dynamic world. In U. Petschow, J. Rosenau, & E. U. von Weizsacker (Eds.), Governance and sustainability (pp. 39–61). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Picciotto, S. (2008). Constitutionalizing multilevel governance? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(3-4), 457–479. doi:10.1093/icon/mon017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renewable Heat Incentive Inquiry. (2020). The report of the independent public inquiry into the non-domestic Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) scheme. Volume 1 – Chapters 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau, & E. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sacchetti, S. (2015). Inclusive and exclusive social preferences: A Deweyan framework to explain governance heterogeneity. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 473–485. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1971-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play. Actor centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., Kim, J., & Leach, W. D. (2017). Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 863–874. doi:10.1111/puar.12800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, B., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., Sanchez, G., & Tancoigne, E. (2019). Citizen science? Rethinking science and public participation. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 52–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, S. (2006). Transforming environmental governance in Northern Ireland. Part one: The process of policy renewal. Journal of Environmental Law, 18(1), 55–87.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S., & Brennan, C. (2012). Modernising environmental regulation in Northern Ireland: A case study in devolved decision-making. Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 63, 509–532. doi:10.53386/nilq.v63i4.401
   Google Scholar
• Vasilev, G. (2015). On Mouffe’s agonism: Why it is not a refutation of consensus. Democratic Theory, 2(1), 4–21. doi:10.3167/dt.2015.020102
   Google Scholar
• Whitten, S., & Gravey, V. (2021). Written evidence submitted by Ms Lisa Whitten and Dr Viviane Gravey, Queen’s University Belfast (NIP0018). London: UK Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, A. D. (2017). Why agonistic planning? Questioning Chantal Mouffe’s thesis of the ontological primary of the political. Planning Theory, 16(4), 384–403. doi:10.1177/1473095216654941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interviewee A. Interviewed on 13th January 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee B. Interviewed on 18th January 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee C. Interviewed on 10th February 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee D. Interviewed on 12th February 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee E. Interviewed on 21st February 2021.
   Google Scholar