Reflections on Planning Education and Practices in Melbourne

References

• Alexander, E., 2016. There is no planning—only planning practices: notes for spatial planning theories. Planning theory, 15 (1), 91–103. doi:10.1177/1473095215594617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australia, Department of Employment, Education and Training, Higher Education Division. 1993. National Report on Australia’s Education Sector, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., 2012. ‘Planning ethics’ and rediscovering the idea of planning. Planning theory, 11 (4), 379–399. doi:10.1177/1473095212442159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filion, P., et al., 2015. Planners’ perspectives on obstacles to sustainable urban development: implications for transformative strategies. Planning, practice and research, 30 (2), 202–221. doi:10.1080/02697459.2015.1023079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J., 2013. On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: deliberative practice and creative negotiations. Planning theory, 12 (1), 5–22. doi:10.1177/1473095212448750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J., 1987. Planning in the public domain. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, K., 2017. Planners – a silenced profession? The politicisation of planning and the need for fearless speech. Planning theory, 16 (3), 275–295. doi:10.1177/1473095215626465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., 1997. Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P., and Underwood, J., 1978. Professional ideals and planning practice. Progress in planning, 9, 73–127. doi:10.1016/0305-9006(78)90005-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A., 2010. Culture change as identity regulation: the micro-politics of producing spatial planners in England. Planning theory & practice, 11 (3), 359–374. doi:10.1080/14649357.2010.500133
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., 1983. Planning theory and practice: bridging the gap. Journal of planning education and research, 3, 35–45. doi:10.1177/0739456X8300300105
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., 2018a. “The door is now half open”. How work placement experiences better prepare planning graduates for practice – an Australian case study. In: T. Tasan-Kok and M. Oranje, eds. From student to urban planner: young practitioners’ reflections on contemporary ethical standards. Abingdon: Routledge, 152–167.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., 2018b. Neoliberalism and urban planning in Toronto: how seasoned planners adjust to their changing circumstances. International planning studies, 23 (2), 144–162. doi:10.1080/13563475.2017.1358606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., 2019. How senior Glaswegian planners are adjusting to the Scottish Government’s modernization agenda. Planning, Practice and research, 34 (2), 206–224. doi:10.1080/02697459.2019.1571855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., 2020. What do mid-career Melbourne planners profess? International planning studies, 25 (4), 393–408. doi:10.1080/13563475.2019.1626702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., 2022a. Local planning cultures? What Glasgow, Melbourne and Toronto planners say. International planning studies, 27 (3), 284–301. doi:10.1080/13563475.2022.2043148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., 2022b. Melbourne’s planning culture. Planning news, 48 (8), 20–21.
   Google Scholar
• Laws, D., and Forester, J., 2015. Conflict, improvisation, governance: street level practice for urban democracy. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Legacy, C., 2012. Achieving legitimacy through deliberative plan-making processes—lessons for metropolitan strategic planning. Planning theory & practice, 13 (1), 71–87. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.649947
   Google Scholar
• Lemon, J., 1996. Liberal dreaming and nature’s limits: great cities of North America since 1600. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, S., Grant, J., and Habib, M., 2020. Evaluating strategies for plan co-ordination: a survey of Canadian planners. International planning studies, 25 (2), 222–235. doi:10.1080/13563475.2019.1578201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, J.B., 1992. Shaping Melbourne’s future? Town planning, the State and civil society. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tasan-Kok, T., 2016. “Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee”: giving voice to planning practitioners. Planning theory & practice, 17 (4), 621–625. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1225711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, K., and Momm, S., 2022. Planning systems and cultures in global comparison. The cases of Brazil and Germany, international planning studies, 27 (3), 73–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar