The SAGE Framework for Explaining Context in Explainable Artificial Intelligence

References

• Adadi, A., and M. Berrada. 2018. Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai). IEEE Access 6:52138–32. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2870052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrieta, A. B., N. Daz-Rodrguez, J. Del Ser, A. Bennetot, S. Tabik, A. Barbado, S. Garca, S. Gil-López, D. Molina, R. Benjamins, et al. 2020. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible ai. Information Fusion 58:82–115. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya, V., R. K. Bellamy, P.-Y. Chen, A. Dhurandhar, M. Hind, S. C. Hoffman, S. Houde, Q. V. Liao, R. Luss, A. Mojsilović, et al. 2019. One explanation does not fit all: A toolkit and taxonomy of ai explainability techniques. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1909:03012.
   Google Scholar
• Ashraf, A., J. Vermeulen, D. Wang, B. Y. Lim, and M. Kankanhalli. 2018. Trends and trajectories for explainable, accountable and intelligible systems: An hci research agenda. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems, Montreal, Canada. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Atakishiyev, S., H. Babiker, N. Farruque, R. Goebel, M. Y. Kima, M. Hossein Motallebi, J. Rabelo, T. Syed, and O. R. Zaane. 2020. A multi-component framework for the analysis and design of explainable artificial intelligence. arXiv Preprint arXiv 2005:01908.
   Google Scholar
• Bahalul Haque, A. K. M., A. K. M. Najmul Islam, and P. Mikalef. 2023. Explainable artificial intelligence (xai) from a user perspective: A synthesis of prior literature and problematizing avenues for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 186:122120. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122120.
   Google Scholar
• Biran Or and Courtenay Cotton. 2017. Explanation and justification in machine learning: A survey. IJCAI-17 Workshop on Explainable AI (XAI), Melbourne, Australia, 8, 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Bobadilla, J., F. Ortega, A. Hernando, and A. Gutiérrez. 2013. Recommender systems survey. Knowledge-Based Systems 46:109–32. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. J. 1995. The stick-e document: A framework for creating context-aware applications. Electronic Publishing-Chichester- 8:259–72.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B. 2019. Artificial Intelligence in Finance. London, UK: The Alan Turing Institute. doi:10.5281/zenodo.2612537.
   Google Scholar
• Bunt, A., M. Lount, and C. Lauzon. 2012. Are explanations always important? A study of deployed, low-cost intelligent interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM international conference on intelligent user interfaces, Lisboa, Portugal, 169–78.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. 1991. The construction of explanations, AI and Cognitive Science '90: University of Ulster, Jordanstown, 337–51. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, H., C. Gan, T. Wang, Z. Zhang, and S. Han. 2019. Once-for-all: Train one network and specialize it for efficient deployment. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1908:09791.
   Google Scholar
• Carenini, G., and J. D. Moore. 1993. Generating explanations in context. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on intelligent user interfaces, Orlando, Florida, USA, 175–82.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Data. Ethics and innovation. 2020. Review into bias in algorithmic decision-making. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/957259/Review_into_bias_in_algorithmic_decision-making.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chami, R., T. F. Cosimano, and C. Fullenkamp. 2002. Managing ethical risk: How investing in ethics adds value. Journal of Banking & Finance 26 (9):1697–718. doi:10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00188-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesterman, S. 2021. Through a glass, darkly: Artificial intelligence and the problem of opacity. The American Journal of Comparative Law 69 (2):271–94. doi:10.1093/ajcl/avab012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher Bouch, D., and J. P. Thompson. 2008. Severity scoring systems in the critically ill. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain 8 (5):181–85. doi:10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn033.
   Google Scholar
• Chromik, M., M. Eiband, F. Buchner, A. Krüger, and A. Butz. 2021. I think i get your point, ai! the illusion of explanatory depth in explainable AI. In 26th International conference on intelligent user interfaces, College Station, Texas, USA, 307–17.
   Google Scholar
• Clancey, W. J. 1986. From guidon to neomycin and heracles in twenty short lessons. AI Magazine 7 (3):40–40.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, E. M., F. Lecue, and V. Bicer. 2013. Westland row why so slow? Fusing social media and linked data sources for understanding real-time traffic conditions. In Proceedings of The 2013 international conference on intelligent user interfaces, Santa Monica, California, USA, 203–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dey, A. K. 2001. Understanding and using context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5 (1):4–7. doi:10.1007/s007790170019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi-Velez, F., and B. Kim. 2017. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1702:08608.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. 2004. What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 8 (1):19–30. doi:10.1007/s00779-003-0253-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, L., and M. Veale. 2017. Slave to the algorithm: Why a right to an explanation is probably not the remedy you are looking for. Duke Law & Technology Review 16:18.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, T., A. Bigi, and M. Bonera. 2020. Think with me, or think for me? On the future role of artificial intelligence in marketing strategy formulation. The TQM Journal 32 (4):795–814. doi:10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0303.
   Google Scholar
• Freitas, A. A. 2014. Comprehensible classification models: a position paper. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 15 (1):1–10. doi:10.1145/2594473.2594475.
   Google Scholar
• Fursin, G. 2020. Enabling reproducible ml and systems research: The good, the bad, and the ugly. August. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO, 4005773.
   Google Scholar
• Gilpin, L. H., D. Bau, B. Z. Yuan, A. Bajwa, M. Specter, and L. Kagal. 2018. Explaining explanations: An overview of interpretability of machine learning. In 2018 IEEE 5th international conference on data science and advanced analytics (DSAA), Turin, Italy, 80–89. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., A. Monreale, and D. Pedreschi. 2019. The AI black box explanation problem. ERCIM News 116:12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Guidotti, R., A. Monreale, S. Ruggieri, F. Turini, F. Giannotti, and D. Pedreschi. 2018. A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51 (5):1–42. doi:10.1145/3236009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., N. Gill, and N. Schmidt. 2019. Proposed guidelines for the responsible use of explainable machine learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1906:03533.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, W., and J. Pesenti. 2017. Growing the artificial intelligence industry in the UK. UK: Department for science, innovation and technology. UK Government. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a824465e5274a2e87dc2079/Growing_the_artificial_intelligence_industry_in_the_UK.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, A. B., A. N. Islam, and P. Mikalef. 2023. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) from a user perspective: A synthesis of prior literature and problematizing avenues for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 186:122120. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122120.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. R., M. A. Cohen, and F. E. Ritter. 2009. Designs for explaining intelligent agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67 (1):90–110. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. R., G. Klein, and S. T. Mueller. 2018. Explaining explanation for “explainable ai”. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62, 197–201. Los Angeles, CA, SAGE Publications Sage CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, R. R., S. T. Mueller, G. Klein, and J. Litman. 2018. Metrics for explainable AI: Challenges and prospects. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1812:04608.
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, D., S. Wilson, and S. Stumpf. 2016. User trust in intelligent systems: A journey over time. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on intelligent user interfaces, California, USA, 164–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hotten, R. 2015. Volkswagen: The scandal explained. BBC News 10:12.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, R., P. Neaves, and J. Bedford-Roberts. 1997. Towards situated computing. In Digest of papers. first International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 146–53. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J., K. Dejaeger, C. Mues, J. Vanthienen, and B. Baesens. 2011. An empirical evaluation of the comprehensibility of decision table, tree and rule based predictive models. Decision Support Systems 51 (1):141–54. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibáñez Molinero, R., and J. Antonio Garca-Madruga. 2011. Knowledge and question asking. Psicothema 23 (1):26–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James Murdoch, W., C. Singh, K. Kumbier, R. Abbasi-Asl, and B. Yu. 2019. Definitions, methods, and applications in interpretable machine learning. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (44):22071–80. doi:10.1073/pnas.1900654116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jens Riegelsberger, M. A. S., J. D. McCarthy, and J. D. McCarthy. 2005. The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 62 (3):381–422. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jobin, A., M. Ienca, and E. Vayena. 2019. The global landscape of ai ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (9):389–99. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushal, R., K. G. Shojania, and D. W. Bates. 2003. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: A systematic review. Archives of Internal Medicine 163 (12):1409–16. doi:10.1001/archinte.163.12.1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kizilcec, R. F. 2016. How much information? Effects of transparency on trust in an algorithmic interface. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, USA, 2390–95.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G., B. Shneiderman, R. R. Hoffman, and K. M. Ford. 2017. Why expertise matters: A response to the challenges. IEEE Intelligent Systems 32 (6):67–73. doi:10.1109/MIS.2017.4531230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kononenko, I. 2001. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: History, state of the art and perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 23 (1):89–109. doi:10.1016/S0933-3657(01)00077-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulesza, T., S. Stumpf, M. Burnett, S. Yang, I. Kwan, and W.-K. Wong. 2013. Too much, too little, or just right? Ways explanations impact end users’ mental models. In 2013 IEEE symposium on visual languages and human centric computing, San Jose, California, USA, 3–10, IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lamy, J.-B., K. Sedki, and R. Tsopra. 2020. Explainable decision support through the learning and visualization of preferences from a formal ontology of antibiotic treatments. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 104:103407. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, M., D. Oster, T. Speith, H. Hermanns, L. Kästner, E. Schmidt, A. Sesing, and K. Baum. 2021. What do we want from explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)?–A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research. Artificial Intelligence 296:103473. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W. J., H. Wu, H. Yun, H. Kim, M. B. Jun, and J. W. Sutherland. 2019. Predictive maintenance of machine tool systems using artificial intelligence techniques applied to machine condition data. Procedia Cirp 80:506–11. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.019.
   Google Scholar
• Li, B.-H., B.-C. Hou, W.-T. Yu, X.-B. Lu, and C.-W. Yang. 2017. Applications of artificial intelligence in intelligent manufacturing: A review. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 18 (1):86–96. doi:10.1631/FITEE.1601885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, Z. C. 2018. The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery. Queue 16 (3):31–57. doi:10.1145/3236386.3241340.
   Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T. 2006. The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (10):464–70. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T. 2007. Simplicity and probability in causal explanation. Cognitive Psychology 55 (3):232–57. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombrozo, T., and S. Carey. 2006. Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition 99 (2):167–204. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matus, K. J., and M. Veale. 2022. Certification systems for machine learning: Lessons from sustainability. Regulation & Governance 16 (1):177–96. doi:10.1111/rego.12417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meske, C., E. Bunde, J. Schneider, and M. Gersch. 2022. Explainable artificial intelligence: Objectives, stakeholders, and future research opportunities. Information Systems Management 39 (1):53–63. doi:10.1080/10580530.2020.1849465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikalef, P., K. Conboy, J. Eriksson Lundström, and A. Popovič. 2022. Thinking responsibly about responsible AI and ‘the dark side’ of AI. European Journal of Information Systems 31 (3):257–68. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2022.2026621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R. A. 1994. Medical diagnostic decision support systems–past, present, and future: A threaded bibliography and brief commentary. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1 (1):8–27. doi:10.1136/jamia.1994.95236141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. 2019. Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence 267:1–38. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T., P. Howe, and L. Sonenberg. 2017. Explainable AI: Beware of inmates running the asylum or: How i learnt to stop worrying and love the social and behavioural sciences. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1712:00547.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, E., W. Garn, and N. Ryman-Tubb. 2022. Managing sustainability tensions in artificial intelligence: Insights from paradox theory. Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, Oxford, England, UK, 491–98.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, E., W. Garn, N. Ryman-Tubb, and C. Turner. 2023. Opportunities in real time fraud detection: An explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) research agenda. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications 14 (5). doi:10.14569/IJACSA.2023.01405121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelstadt, B., C. Russell, and S. Wachter. 2019. Explaining explanations in AI. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 279–88.
   Google Scholar
• Mohseni, S., N. Zarei, and E. D. Ragan. 2021. A multidisciplinary survey and framework for design and evaluation of explainable AI systems. Acm Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (Tiis) 11 (3–4):1–45. doi:10.1145/3387166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J. D., and W. R. Swartout. 1989. A reactive approach to explanation, 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Detroit, Michigan, USA. 1504–10.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, A. B., H.-C. Thorsen-Meyer, K. Belling, A. P. Nielsen, C. E. Thomas, P. J. Chmura, M. Lademann, P. L. Moseley, M. Heimann, L. Dybdahl, et al. 2019. Survival prediction in intensive-care units based on aggregation of long-term disease history and acute physiology: A retrospective study of the danish national patient registry and electronic patient records. Lancet Digital Health 1(2):e78–e89. doi:10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30024-X.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikolaou, V., S. Massaro, M. Fakhimi, and W. Garn. 2022. Using machine learning to detect theranostic biomarkers predicting respiratory treatment response. Life 12 (6):775. doi:10.3390/life12060775.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikolaou, V., S. Massaro, M. Fakhimi, L. Stergioulas, and W. Garn. 2021. Covid-19 diagnosis from chest x-rays: Developing a simple, fast, and accurate neural network. Health Information Science and Systems 9 (1):1–11. doi:10.1007/s13755-021-00166-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozaki, N., E. Konno, M. Sato, M. Sakairi, T. Shibuya, Y. Kanazawa, and S. Georgescu. 2017. Application of artificial intelligence technology in product design. Fujitsu Scientific & Technical Journal 53 (4):43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda, S. 2018. Impact of AI in Manufacturing Industries. International Research Journal of Engineering & Technology (IRJET) 5 (11): 1765–1767.
   Google Scholar
• Pazzani, M. J. 2000. Knowledge discovery from data? IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 15 (2):10–12. doi:10.1109/5254.850821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, P., and C. Li. 2007. Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems. Knowledge-Based Systems 20 (6):542–56. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2007.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin, B., R. Eisner, D. Szafron, P. Lu, R. Greiner, D. S. Wishart, A. Fyshe, B. Pearcy, C. MacDonell, and J. Anvik. 2006. Visual explanation of evidence with additive classifiers. In Proceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence, 21, 1822. Menlo Park, CA; Cambridge, MA; London, AAAI Press; MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preece, A., D. Harborne, D. Braines, R. Tomsett, and S. Chakraborty. 2018. Stakeholders in explainable ai. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1810:00184.
   Google Scholar
• Prokopenko, O., L. Shmorgun, V. Kushniruk, M. Prokopenko, M. Slatvinska, and L. Huliaieva. 2020. Business process efficiency in a digital economy. International Journal of Management (IJM) 11 (3):122–132.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. 1978. Meaning and the moral sciences (routledge revivals). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ras, G., M. van Gerven, and P. Haselager. 2018. Explanation methods in deep learning: Users, values, concerns and challenges. In Explainable and interpretable models in computer vision and machine learning. The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning, ed. H. Escalante, I. Guyon and S. Escalera, 19–36. New York, NY, USA: Springer, Cham. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98131-4-2.
   Google Scholar
• Redden, J., J. Brand, I. Sander, H. Warne, and Data Justice Lab. 2022. Automating Public Services - learning from cancelled systems.Dunfermline, Fife, Scotland: Carnegie UK. https://carnegieuktrust.org.uk/publications/automating-public-services-learning-from-cancelled-systems/.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, M. T., S. Singh, and C. Guestrin. 2016. Why should i trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, San Francisco, California, USA, 1135–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ribera, M., and A. Lapedriza. 2019. Can we do better explanations? A proposal of user-centered explainable AI. Joint Proceedings of the ACM IUI 2019 Workshops, Los Angeles, USA, 2327:38.
   Google Scholar
• Ruben, D.-H. 2012. Explaining explanation. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315634739.
   Google Scholar
• Rudin, C. 2019. Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (5):206–15. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rüping, S. 2006. Learning interpretable models. PhD thesis, University of Dortmund.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, N. S., J. Pascoe, and D. R. Morse. 1998. Enhanced Reality Fieldwork: the Context Aware Archaeological Assistant. In Archaeology in the Age of the Internet - CAA97. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, ed. S.Dingwall, S. Exon, V.Gaffney, S. Laflin and M.van Leusen, 269–274. Oxford, UK: Archaeopress.
   Google Scholar
• Ryman-Tubb, N. F., P. Krause, and W. Garn. 2018. How artificial intelligence and machine learning research impacts payment card fraud detection: A survey and industry benchmark. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 76:130–57. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2018.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleema, A., M. Chickering, S. M. Drucker, B. Lee, P. Simard, and J. Suh. 2015. Modeltracker: Redesigning performance analysis tools for machine learning. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 337–46.
   Google Scholar
• Samek, W., G. Montavon, A. Vedaldi, L. Kai Hansen, and K.-R. Müller. 2019. Explainable AI: Interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning, vol. 11700, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Switzerland: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Sanneman, L., and J. A. Shah. 2020. ”The Situation Awareness Framework for Explainable AI (SAFE-AI) and Human Factors Considerations for XAI Systems.” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 38 , 1772–1788. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2081282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilit, B. N., and M. M. Theimer. 1994. Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts. IEEE Network 8 (5):22–32. doi:10.1109/65.313011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R., J. Dodge, N. A. Smith, O. Etzioni, and G. Ai. 2020. Green AI. Communications of the ACM 63 (12):54–63. doi:10.1145/3381831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, R., and K. Swearingen. 2002. The role of transparency in recommender systems. CHI ‘02 Human Factors in Computing Systems. Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA. 830–31.
   Google Scholar
• Sokol, K., and P. Flach. 2020. Explainability fact sheets: A framework for systematic assessment of explainable approaches. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency, Barcelona, Spain, 56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Sørmo, F., J. Cassens, and A. Aamodt. 2005. Explanation in case-based reasoning–perspectives and goals. Artificial Intelligence Review 24 (2):109–43. doi:10.1007/s10462-005-4607-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinner, T., U. Schlegel, H. Schafer, and M. El-Assady. 2019. Hanna Schäfer, and Mennatallah El-Assady. explainer: A visual analytics framework for interactive and explainable machine learning. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 26 (1):1064–74. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strubell, E., A. Ganesh, and A. McCallum. 2019. Energy and policy considerations for deep learning in NLP. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1906:02243.
   Google Scholar
• Swartout, W. R. 1983. Xplain: A system for creating and explaining expert consulting programs. Artificial Intelligence 21 (3):285–325. doi:10.1016/S0004-3702(83)80014-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomsett, R., D. Braines, D. Harborne, A. Preece, and S. Chakraborty. 2018. Interpretable to whom? A role-based model for analyzing interpretable machine learning systems. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1806:07552.
   Google Scholar
• Tulio Ribeiro, M., S. Singh, and C. Guestrin. 2016. Model-agnostic interpretability of machine learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1606:05386.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccaro, M. A. 2019. Algorithms in human decision-making: A case study with the compas risk assessment software. PhD thesis, Harvard College.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg, R., E. Awh, and W. Ji Ma. 2014. Factorial comparison of working memory models. Psychological Review 121 (1):124. doi:10.1037/a0035234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wynsberghe, A. 2021. Sustainable AI: Ai for sustainability and the sustainability of ai. AI and Ethics 1 (3):213–18. doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00043-6.
   Google Scholar
• Wachter, S., B. Mittelstadt, and L. Floridi. 2017. Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the general data protection regulation. International Data Privacy Law 7 (2):76–99. doi:10.1093/idpl/ipx005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., and I. Benbasat. 2007. Recommendation agents for electronic commerce: Effects of explanation facilities on trusting beliefs. Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (4):217–46. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222230410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., E. Churchill, P. Maes, X. Fan, B. Shneiderman, Y. Shi, and Q. Wang. 2020. From human-human collaboration to human-AI collaboration: Designing AI systems that can work together with people. In CHI ‘20: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Extended abstracts of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D. S., and L. Floridi. 2021. The explanation game: a formal framework for interpretable machine learning.Synthese 198:9211–9242. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02629-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, A. 2019. Transparency: Motivations and challengesExplainable AI: Interpreting, explaining and visualizing deep learning, ed. W. Samek, G. Montavon, A. Vedaldi, L. K. Hansen and K-R. Muller, 23–40. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wick, M. R. 1992. Expert system explanation in retrospect: A case study in the evolution of expert system explanation. Journal of Systems and Software 19 (2):159–69. doi:10.1016/0164-1212(92)90068-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick, M. R., P. Dutta, T. Wineinger, and J. Conner. 1995. Reconstructive explanation: A case study in integral calculus. Expert Systems with Applications 8 (4):463–73. doi:10.1016/0957-4174(94)E0036-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wick, M. R., and W. B. Thompson. 1992. Reconstructive expert system explanation. Artificial Intelligence 54 (1–2):33–70. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(92)90087-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixom, B. H., and P. A. Todd. 2005. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research 16 (1):85–102. doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff Anthony, L. F., B. Kanding, and R. Selvan. 2020. Carbontracker: Tracking and predicting the carbon footprint of training deep learning models. arXiv Preprint arXiv 2007:03051.
   Google Scholar
• Wuest, T., A. Kusiak, T. Dai, and S. R. Tayur. 2020. Impact of COVID-19 on manufacturing and supply networks–the case for ai-inspired digital transformation. Available at SSRN 3593540.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., K. Song, and Y. Sun. 2019. Sarah Tan, and Madeleine Udell. “Why should you trust my explanation?” Understanding uncertainty in lime explanations. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1904:12991.
   Google Scholar
• Zintgraf, L. M., T. S. Cohen, T. Adel, and M. Welling. 2017. Visualizing deep neural network decisions: Prediction difference analysis. arXiv Preprint arXiv 1702:04595.
   Google Scholar