475
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

The use and impact of self-monitoring on substance use outcomes: A descriptive systematic review

, PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , MS, , MA & , PhD

References

  • DiClemente CC, Corno CM, Graydon MM, Wiprovnick AE, Knoblach DJ. Motivational interviewing, enhancement, and brief interventions over the last decade: a review of reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. Psychol Addict Behav. 2017;31(8):862–887.
  • Gates PJ, Sabioni P, Copeland J, Foll Gowing LB. Psychosocial interventions for cannabis use disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2016(5):CD005336.
  • Patnode CD, Henderson JT, Thompson JH, Senger CA, Fortmann SP, Whitlock EP. Behavioral counseling and pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco cessation in adults, including pregnant women: a review of reviews for the U.S. preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(8):608–621.
  • Heckman BW, Dahne J, Germeroth LJ, et al. Does cessation fatigue predict smoking-cessation milestones? A longitudinal study of current and former smokers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018;86(11):903–914.
  • Kenford SL, Smith SS, Wetter DW, Jorenby DE, Fiore MC, Baker TB. Predicting relapse back to smoking: contrasting affective and physical models of dependence. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70(1):216–227.
  • Hendershot CS, Witkiewitz K, George WH, Marlatt GA. Relapse prevention for addictive behaviors. Subst Abuse Treat Pr. 2011;6(1):17.
  • Mathew AR, Garrett-Mayer E, Heckman BW, Wahlquist AE, Carpenter MJ. One-year smoking trajectories among established adult smokers with low baseline motivation to quit. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;20(1):50–57.
  • Magill M, Apodaca TR, Borsari B, et al. A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing process: technical, relational, and conditional process models of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018;86(2):140–157.
  • Gleeson-Kreig JM. Self-monitoring of physical activity: effects on self-efficacy and behavior in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2006;32(1):69–77.
  • Gronvall E, Berdezoto N. Beyond self-monitoring: understanding non-functional aspects of home-based healthcare technology. In: Mattern F, Santini S, eds. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery; 2013:587–596.
  • Myers S, Grant RW, Lugn NE, Holbert B, Kvedar JC. Inpact of home-based monitoring on the care of patients with congestive heart failure. Home Health Care Management & Practice. 2006;18(6):444–451.
  • Rothbaum BO, Meadows EA, Resick P, Foy DW. Cognitive-behavioral therapy. In: Foa EB, Keane TM, Friedman MJ, eds., Effective Treatments for PTSD: Practice Guidelines from the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2000:320–325.
  • Simpson TL, Kivlahan DR, Bush KR, McFall ME. Telephone self-monitoring among alcohol use disorder patients in early recovery: a randomized study of feasibility and measurement reactivity. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79(2):241–250.
  • Bernstein JA, Bernstein E, Heeren TC. Mechanisms of change in control group drinking in clinical trials of brief alcohol intervention: implications for bias toward the null. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29(5):498–507.
  • Karoly P, Kanfer FH. Self-Management and Behavior Change: From Theory to Practice. Vol. 106. New York, NY: Pergamon Press; 1982.
  • Fazzino TL, Rose GL, Helzer JE. An experimental test of assessment reactivity within a web-based brief alcohol intervention study for college students. Addict Behav. 2016;52:66–74.
  • Meier E, Miller MB, Lombardi N, Leffingwell T. Assessment reactivity: a randomized controlled trial of alcohol-specific measures on alcohol-related behaviors. Addict Behav. 2017;67:44–48.
  • Worden BL, McCrady BS, Epstein EE. Assessment reactivity to follow-up in a study of women's treatment for alcohol dependence. Addict Behav. 2008;33(6):831–835.
  • Kaminer Y, Burleson JA, Burke RH. Can assessment reactivity predict treatment outcome among adolescents with alcohol and other substance use disorders? Subst Abus. 2008;29(2):63–69.
  • Magill M, Kahler CW, Monti P, Barnett NP. Do research assessments make college students more reactive to alcohol events? Psychol Addict Behav. 2012;26(2):338–344.
  • Maisto SA, Clifford PR, Davis CM. Alcohol treatment research assessment exposure subject reactivity effects: part II. Treatment engagement and involvement. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007;68(4):529–533.
  • Ogborne AC, Annis HM. The reactive effects of follow-up assessment procedures: an experimental study. Addict Behav. 1988;13(2):123–129.
  • Abrams DB, Wilson GT. Self-monitoring and reactivity in the modification of cigarette smoking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1979;47(2):243–251.
  • Helzer JE, Badger GJ, Rose GL, Mongeon JA, Searles JS. Decline in alcohol consumption during two years of daily reporting. J Stud Alcohol. 2002;63(5):551–558.
  • McCarthy DE, Piasecki TM, Fiore MC, Baker TB. Life before and after quitting smoking: an electronic diary study. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006;115(3):454–466.
  • Burke LE, Wang J, Sevick MA. Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(1):92–102.
  • Safren SA, Otto MW, Worth JL, et al. Two strategies to increase adherence to HIV antiretroviral medication: life-steps and medication monitoring. Behav Res Ther. 2001;39(10):1151–1162.
  • van Heuckelum M, van den Ende CHM, Houterman AEJ, Heemskerk CPM, van Dulmen S, van den Bemt BJF. The effect of electronic monitoring feedback on medication adherence and clinical outcomes: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0185453.
  • Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KV. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(3):561–587.
  • Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schimid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(7):1159–1171.
  • Rachlin H. Self-control. Behaviorism. 1974;2(1):94–107.
  • Tiffany ST. A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychol Rev. 1990;97(2):147–168.
  • Leigh BC, Gillmore MR, Morrison DM. Comparison of diary and retrospective measures for recording alcohol consumption and sexual activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(2):119–127.
  • Gwaltney CJ, Bartolomei R, Colby SM, Kahler CW. Ecological momentary assessment of adolescent smoking cessation: a feasibility study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(7):1185–1190.
  • Legault L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford TK, eds. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing AG; 2016:1–4.
  • Locastro JS, Potter JS, Donovan DM, Couper D, Pope KW. Characteristics of first-time alcohol treatment seekers: the COMBINE study. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69(6):885–895.
  • Maas J, Hietbrink L, Rinck M, Keijsers GP. Changing automatic behavior through self-monitoring: does overt change also imply implicit change? J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013;44(3):279–284.
  • Rowan PJ, Cofta-Woerpel L, Mazas CA, et al. Evaluating reactivity to ecological momentary assessment during smoking cessation. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2007;15(4):382–389.
  • Effective Public Health Practice Project. 1998. Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Hamilton, ON: Effective Public Health Practice Project. Available from: https://merst.ca/ephpp/.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS. 2009;339:b2700.
  • Bewick BM, West RM, Barkham M, et al. The effectiveness of a web-based personalized feedback and social norms alcohol intervention on united kingdom university students: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e137.
  • Harris KB, Miller WR. Behavioral self-control training for problem drinkers: components of efficacy. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1990;4(2):82–90.
  • Hasin DS, Aharonovich E, O'Leary A, et al. Reducing heavy drinking in HIV primary care: a randomized trial of brief intervention, with and without technological enhancement. Addiction. 2013;108(7):1230–1240.
  • Helzer JE, Rose GL, Badger GJ, et al. Using interactive voice response to enhance brief alcohol intervention in primary care settings. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008;69(2):251–258.
  • Hufford MR, Shields AL, Shiffman S, Paty J, Balabanis M. Reactivity to ecological momentary assessment: an example using undergraduate problem drinkers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2002;16(3):205–211.
  • Johnson EI, Grondin O, Barrault M, et al. Computerized ambulatory monitoring in psychiatry: a multi-site collaborative study of acceptability, compliance, and reactivity. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009;18(1):48–57.
  • Kennedy RW, Gilbert GS, Thoreson R. A self-control program for drinking antecedents: the role of self-monitoring and control orientation. J Clin Psychol. 1978;34(1):238–243.
  • Rosenberg H. Coping strategies, reasons for driving, and the effect of self-monitoring in drinking-driving situations. Addict Behav. 1988;13(1):97–100.
  • Samo JA, Tucker JA, Vuchinich RE. Agreement between self-monitoring, recall, and collateral observation measures of alcohol consumption in older adults. Behavioral Assessment. 1989;11(4):391–409.
  • Sobell MB, Bogardis J, Schuller R, Leo GI, Sobell LC. Is self-monitoring of alcohol consumption reactive? Behavioral Assessment. 1989;11(4):447–458.
  • Suffoletto B, Kristan J, Chung T, et al. An interactive text message intervention to reduce binge drinking in young adults: a randomized controlled trial with 9-month outcomes. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142877.
  • Sugarman DE, Carey KB. Drink less or drink slower: the effects of instruction on alcohol consumption and drinking control strategy use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2009;23(4):577–585.
  • Tucker JA, Roth DL, Huang J, Crawford MS, Simpson CA. Effects of interactive voice response self-monitoring on natural resolution of drinking problems: utilization and behavioral economic factors. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2012;73(4):686–698.
  • Walters ST, Vader AM, Harris TR, Jouriles EN. Reactivity to alcohol assessment measures: an experimental test. Addiction. 2009;104(8):1305–1310.
  • Frederiksen LW, Epstein LH, Kosevsky BP. Reliability and controlling effects of three procedures for self-monitoring smoking. Psychol Rec. 1975;25(2):255–264.
  • Karoly P, Doyle WW. Effects of outcome expectancy and timing of self-monitoring on cigarette smoking. J Clin Psychol. 1975;31(2):351–355.
  • Kilmann PR, Wagner MK, Sotile WM. The differential impact of self-monitoring on smoking behavior: an exploratory study. J Clin Psychol. 1977;33(3):912–914.
  • Lamontagne Y, Annable L, Gagnon MA. Acupuncture for smokers: lack of long-term therapeutic effect in a controlled study. Can Med Assoc J. 1980;122(7):787–790.
  • Lipinski D, Black JL, Nelson RO, Ciminero AR. Influence of motivational variables on the reactivity and reliability of self-recording. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1975;43(5):637–646.
  • Magnan RE, Koblitz AR, McCaul KD, Dillard AJ. Self-monitoring effects of ecological momentary assessment on smokers' perceived risk and worry. Psychol Assess. 2013;25(2):416–423.
  • McCarthy DE, Minami H, Yeh VM, Bold KW. An experimental investigation of reactivity to ecological momentary assessment frequency among adults trying to quit smoking. Addiction. 2015;110(10):1549–1560.
  • McFall RM. Effects of self-monitoring on normal smoking behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1970;35(2):135–142.
  • Moss RA, Prue DM, Lomax D, Martin JE. Implications of self-monitoring for smoking treatment: effects on adherence and session attendance. Addict Behav. 1982;7(4):381–385.
  • Schmitz JM, Grabowski J, Rhoades H. The effects of high and low doses of methadone on cigarette smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1994;34(3):237–242.
  • Shiffman S, Engberg JB, Paty JA, et al. A day at a time: predicting smoking lapse from daily urge. J Abnorm Psychol. 1997;106(1):104–116.
  • Wray JM, Gass JC, Miller EI, Wilkins DG, Rollins DE, Tiffany ST. A comparative evaluation of self-report and biological measures of cigarette use in nondaily smokers. Psychol Assess. 2016;28(9):1043–1050.
  • Aharonovich E, Hatzenbuehler ML, Johnston B, et al. A low-cost, sustainable intervention for drinking reduction in the HIV primary care setting. AIDS Care. 2006;18(6):561–568.
  • Aharonovich E, Sarvet A, Stohl M, et al. Reducing non-injection drug use in HIV primary care: a randomized trial of brief motivational interviewing, with and without HealthCall, a technology-based enhancement. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;74:71–79.
  • Freedman MJ, Lester KM, McNamara C, Milby JB, Schumacher JE. Cell phones for ecological momentary assessment with cocaine-addicted homeless patients in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30(2):105–111.
  • Moore TM, Seavey A, Ritter K, McNulty JK, Gordon KC, Stuart GL. Ecological momentary assessment of the effects of craving and affect on risk for relapse during substance abuse treatment. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(2):619–624.
  • Reback CJ, Runger D, Fletcher JB, Swendeman D. Ecological momentary assessments for self-monitoring and counseling to optimize methamphetamine treatment and sexual risk reduction outcomes among gay and bisexual men. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018;92:17–26.
  • Tucker JA, Blum ER, Xie L, Roth DL, Simpson CA. Interactive voice response self-monitoring to assess risk behaviors in rural substance users living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(2):432–440.
  • Schwarzer R. Modeling health behaviour change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol. 2008;57(1):1–29.
  • Aharonovich E, Stohl M, Cannizzaro D, Hasin D. HealthCall delivered via smartphone to reduce co-occurring drug and alcohol use in HIV-infected adults: a randomized pilot trial. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;83:15–26.
  • Buu A, Yang S, Li R, Zimmerman MA, Cunningham RM, Walton MA. Examining measurement reactivity in daily diary data on substance use: results from a randomized experiment. Addict Behav. 2020;102:106198.
  • Welsch SK, Smith SS, Wetter DW, Jorenby DE, Fiore MC, Baker TB. Development and validation of the Wisconsin Smoking Withdrawal Scale. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999;7(4):354–361.
  • Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychl. 1988;54(6):1063–1070.
  • Condiotte MM, Lichtenstein E. Self-efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation programs. J Consult Clin Psych. 1981;49(5):648–658.
  • Ward RM, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, Fava JL, Prochaska JO. Factorial invariance and internal consistency for the Decisional Balance Inventory-Short Form. Addict Behav. 2004;29(5):953–958.
  • Velicer WF, Diclemente CC, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO. Relapse situations and self-efficacy: an integrative model. Addict Behav. 1990;15(3):271–283.
  • Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline follow-back. In: Litten RZ, Allen JP, eds. Measuring Alcohol Consumption. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 1992.
  • Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804.
  • Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, Fihn SD, Bradley KA. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Ambulatory care quality improvement project (ACQUIP). Alcohol use disorders identification test. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158(16):1789–1795.
  • Eisenhauer CM, Hageman PA, Rowland S, Becker BJ, Barnason SA, Pullen CH. Acceptability of mHealth technology for self-monitoring eating and activity among rural men. Public Health Nurs. 2017;34(2):138–146.
  • Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. Am J Health Promot. 1997;12(1):38–48.
  • Helsel DL, Jakicic JM, Otto AD. Comparison of techniques for self-monitring eating and exercse behaviors on weight loss in a correspondance-based intervention. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2007;107(10):1807–1810.
  • Miller WR, Rose GS. Motivational interviewing and decisional balance: contrasting responses to client ambivalence. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2015;43(2):129–141.
  • Kanejima Y, Kitamura M, Izawa KP. Self-monitoring to increase physical activity in patients with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(2):163–173.
  • Painter SL, Ahmed R, Hill JO, et al. What matters in weight loss? An in-depth analysis of self-monitoring. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(5):e160.
  • Tucker KL, Sheppard JP, Stevens R, et al. Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14(9):e1002389.
  • Greenwald AG. Within-subjects designs: to use or not to use? Psych Bull. 1976;83(2):314–320.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.