Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies on opioid use disorder

References

• Han B, Compton WM, Blanco C, Crane E, Lee J, Jones CM. Prescription opioid use, misuse, and use disorders in US adults: 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(5):293–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedegaard H, Warner M, Miniño AM. Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999-2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2017;(294):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bohnert ASB, Guy GP, Jr, Losby JL. Opioid prescribing in the United States before and after the centers for disease control and prevention’s 2016 opioid guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(6):367–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedegaard H, Miniño AM, Warner M. Drug overdose deaths in the United States, 1999–2017. NCHS Data Brief. 2018;(329):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Jones CM, Paulozzi LJ, Mack KA. Sources of prescription opioid pain relievers by frequency of past-year nonmedical use United States, 2008–2011. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(5):802–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderks CE. Trends in the use of methadone, buprenorphine, and extended-release naltrexone at substance abuse treatment facilities: 2003–2015 (Update). In: The CBHSQ Report. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (US); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kampman K, Jarvis M. American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) national practice guideline for the use of medications in the treatment of addiction involving opioid use. J Addict Med. 2015;9(5):358–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond DC, Perryman K. Psychosocial Interventions in Pharmacotherapy of Opioid Dependence: A Literature Review. London, St George’s University of London, Division of Mental Health, Section of Addictive Behaviour. 2007. http://www.who.int/entity/substance_abuse/activities/psychosocial_interventions.pdf. Accessed March 18, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Amato L, Minozzi S, Davoli M, Vecchi S. Psychosocial and pharmacological treatments versus pharmacological treatments for opioid detoxification. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(9):CD005031.
   Google Scholar
• Amato L, Minozzi S, Davoli M, Vecchi S. Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(10):CD004147.
   Google Scholar
• The ASAM National Practice Guideline for the treatment of opioid use disorder: 2020 focused update. J Addict Med. 2020;14(2S):1.
   Google Scholar
• Jellison S, Roberts W, Bowers A, et al. Evaluation of spin in abstracts of papers in psychiatry and psychology journals. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2019:178–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yavchitz A, Ravaud P, Altman DG, et al. A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75:56–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islamaj Dogan R, Murray GC, Névéol A, Lu Z. Understanding PubMed® user search behavior through log analysis. Database. 2009;2009(0):bap018.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boutron I, Altman DG, Hopewell S, Vera-Badillo F, Tannock I, Ravaud P. Impact of spin in the abstracts of articles reporting results of randomized controlled trials in the field of cancer: the SPIIN randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(36):4120–4126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds-Vaughn V, Riddle J, Brown J, Schiesel M, Wayant C, Vassar M. Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of emergency medicine randomized controlled trials. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;2019:423–431.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper CM, Gray HM, Ross AE, et al. Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of otolaryngology randomized controlled trials. Laryngoscope. 2018;129(9):2036–2040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinder NC, Weaver MD, Wayant C, Vassar M. Presence of “‘spin’ in the abstracts and titles of anaesthesiology randomised controlled trials” . Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(1):e13–e14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin J, Smith C, Natarajan K, Som M, Wayant C, Vassar M. Evaluation of spin within abstracts in obesity randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional review. Clin Obes. 2019;9(2):e12292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donohoe TJ, Dhillon R, Bridson TL, Tee J. Reporting quality of systematic review abstracts published in leading neurosurgical journals: a research on research study. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendrababu V, Pulikkotil SJ, Sultan OS, Jayaraman J, Peters OA. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in endodontics. J Endod. 2018;44(6):903–913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maticic K, Krnic Martinic M, Puljak L. Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tan WK, Wigley J, Shantikumar S. The reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery needs improvement: a systematic review. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1262–1265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcerak G, Shepard S. Spin in opioid use disorder. June 2020. https://osf.io/6k8tn/. Accessed June 22, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murad MH, Wang Z. Guidelines for reporting meta-epidemiological methodology research. Evid Based Med. 2017;22(4):139–142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rayyan QCRI. https://rayyan.qcri.org/reviews/81224. Accessed September 10, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introduction to Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis | Coursera. Coursera. https://www.coursera.org/learn/systematic-review. Accessed June 13, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358:j4008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz RC, Matthias K, Pieper D, et al. A psychometric study found AMSTAR 2 to be a valid and moderately reliable appraisal tool. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019;114:133–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beller EM, Glasziou PP, Altman DG, et al. PRISMA for Abstracts: reporting systematic reviews in journal and conference abstracts. PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottwell R, Rogers TC, Michael Anderson J, Johnson A, Vassar M. Evaluation of spin in the abstracts of systematic reviews and meta-analyses focused on the treatment of acne vulgaris: cross-sectional analysis. JMIR Dermatol. 2020;3(1):e16978.
   Google Scholar
• Ma J, Bao Y-P, Wang R-J, et al. Effects of medication-assisted treatment on mortality among opioids users: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24(12):1868–1883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magwood O, Salvalaggio G, Beder M, et al. The effectiveness of substance use interventions for homeless and vulnerably housed persons: a systematic review of systematic reviews on supervised consumption facilities, managed alcohol programs, and pharmacological agents for opioid use disorder. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan M, Patnode CD, Berkman ND, et al. Assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. In: Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum SE, Glenton C, Cracknell J. User experiences of evidence-based online resources for health professionals: user testing of The Cochrane Library. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2008;8:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrah K, Young K, Tunis MC, Zhao L. Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry HC, Ebell MH, Shaughnessy AF, Slawson DC, Nietzke F. Family physicians’ use of medical abstracts to guide decision making: style or substance? J Am Board Fam Pract. 2001;14(6):437–442.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fornai F, Longone P, Cafaro L, et al. Lithium delays progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(6):2052–2057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamez J, Salvado M, Martínez de la Ossa A, Badia M. Lithium for treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: much ado about nothing. Neurología. 2016;31(8):550–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieb K, von der Osten-Sacken J, Stoffers-Winterling J, Reiss N, Barth J. Conflicts of interest and spin in reviews of psychological therapies: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e010606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento DP, Gonzalez GZ, Araujo AC, Moseley AM, Maher CG, Costa LOP. Eight out of every ten abstracts of low back pain systematic reviews presented spin and inconsistencies with the full text: an analysis of 66 systematic reviews. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;50(1):17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PRISMA. http://www.prisma-statement.org/. Accessed June 22, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tunis AS, McInnes MDF, Hanna R, Esmail K. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement? Radiology. 2013;269(2):413–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Han L, Shields L, Tian J, Wang J. A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews of nursing published in the Cochrane Library and paper-based journals. Medicine (Baltimore)). 2019;98(49):e18099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-García F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque M, et al. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moseley AM, Elkins MR, Herbert RD, Maher CG, Sherrington C. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1021–1030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT GS. ed. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar