Emotional reactions of trained overdose responders who use opioids following intervention in an overdose event

References

• Hedegaard H, Miniño AM, Warner M. Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States. NCHS Data Brief. 1999–2018. Published online 2020.
   Google Scholar
• European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European Drug Report 2019: Trend and Developments. Published 2019. Accessed March 3, 2021. https://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/edr/trends-developments/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Provisional Drug Overdose Death Counts. Published 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Lagu T, Anderson BJ, Stein M. Overdoses among friends: drug users are willing to administer naloxone to others. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006;30(2):129–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer KA. Strategies for preventing heroin overdose. BMJ. 2003;326(7386):442–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang J, Best D, Man L-H, Noble A, Gossop M. Peer-initiated overdose resuscitation: fellow drug users could be mobilised to implement resuscitation. Int J Drug Policy. 2000;11(6):437–445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tracy M, Piper TM, Ompad D, et al. Circumstances of witnessed drug overdose in New York City: implications for intervention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;79(2):181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner KD, Liu L, Davidson PJ, Cuevas-Mota J, Armenta RF, Garfein RS. Association between non-fatal opioid overdose and encounters with healthcare and criminal justice systems: identifying opportunities for intervention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;153:215–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yealy DM, Paris PM, Kaplan RM, Heller MB, Marini SE. The safety of prehospital naloxone administration by paramedics. Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(8):902–905.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer KA, Firestone J, Isaacs SM. Out-of-hospital treatment of opioid overdoses in an Urban Setting. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(7):660–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermeling DP. Review of naloxone safety for opioid overdose: practical considerations for new technology and expanded public access. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2015;6(1):20–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark AK, Wilder CM, Winstanley EL. A systematic review of community opioid overdose prevention and naloxone distribution programs. J Addict Med. 2014;8(3):153–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis C, Chang S, D C, Hernandez-Delgado H. Legal interventions to reduce overdose mortality: Naloxone access and overdose Good Samaritan laws. Published 2018. Accessed March 5, 2021. https://www.networkforphl.org/_asset/qz5pvn/legal-interventions-to-reduce-overdose.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Albert S, Brason FW, Sanford CK, Dasgupta N, Graham J, Lovette B. Project Lazarus: community-based overdose prevention in Rural North Carolina. Pain Med. 2011;12(suppl 2):S77–S85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Strang J. Are take-home naloxone programmes effective? Systematic review utilizing application of the Bradford Hill criteria. Addiction. 2016;111(7):1177–1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banjo O, Tzemis D, Al-Qutub D, Amlani A, Kesselring S, Buxton JA. A quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the British Columbia Take Home Naloxone program. C. Cmaj Open. 2014;2(3):E153–E161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walley AY, Xuan Z, Hackman HH, et al. Opioid overdose rates and implementation of overdose education and nasal naloxone distribution in Massachusetts: interrupted time series analysis. BMJ. 2013;346(5):f174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bird SM, Mcauley A, Perry S, Hunter C. Effectiveness of Scotland’s National Naloxone Programme for reducing opioid-related deaths: a before (2006–10) versus after (2011–13) comparison. Addiction. Published Online. 2016;111(5):883–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler E, Jones TS, Gilbert MK, Davidson PJ. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Opioid overdose prevention programs providing naloxone to Laypersons – United States, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(23):631–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald R, Campbell ND, Strang J. Twenty years of take-home naloxone for the prevention of overdose deaths from heroin and other opioids-Conception and maturation. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;178:176–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Opioid Overdose: Reducing Preventing and ­ Opioid Overdose Mortality. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• EMCDDA. Preventing Opioid Overdose Deaths with Take-Home Naloxone. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Lambdin BH, Zibbell J, Wheeler E, Kral AH. Identifying gaps in the implementation of naloxone programs for laypersons in the United States. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;52:52–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman PR, Hankosky ER, Lofwall MR, Talbert JC. The changing landscape of naloxone availability in the United States, 2011–2017. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;191:361–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green TC, Heimer R, Grau LE. Distinguishing signs of opioid overdose and indication for naloxone: an evaluation of six overdose training and naloxone distribution programs in the United States. Addiction. Published Online. 2008;103(6):979–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller SR, Walley AY, Calcaterra SL, Glanz JM, Binswanger IA. A review of opioid overdose prevention and naloxone prescribing: implications for translating community programming into clinical practice. Subst Abus. 2015;36(2):240–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang J, Manning V, Mayet S, et al. Overdose training and take-home naloxone for opiate users: prospective cohort study of impact on knowledge and attitudes and subsequent management of overdoses. Addiction. 2008;103(10):1648–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett T, Holloway K. The impact of take-home naloxone distribution and training on opiate overdose knowledge and response: an evaluation of the THN Project in Wales. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2012;19(4):320–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JD, Roux P, Stancliff S, Matthews W, Comer SD. Brief overdose education can significantly increase accurate recognition of opioid overdose among heroin users. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25(1):166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietze PM, Draper B, Olsen A, et al. Does training people to administer take-home naloxone increase their knowledge? Evidence from Australian programs. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2018;37(4):472–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley A, Munro A, Taylor A. “Once I’d done it once it was like writing your name”: lived experience of take-home naloxone administration by people who inject drugs. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;58:46–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolla G, Strike C. ‘It’s too much, I’m getting really tired of it’: overdose response and structural vulnerabilities among harm reduction workers in community settings. Int J Drug Policy. 2019;74:127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett N, Xin D, Zhang H, Huang B. A qualitative evaluation of a peer-implemented overdose response pilot project in Gejiu, China. Int J Drug Policy. 2011;22(4):301–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway K, Hills R, May T. Fatal and non-fatal overdose among opiate users in South Wales: a qualitative study of peer responses. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;56:56–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankenau SE, Wagner KD, Silva K, et al. Injection drug users trained by overdose prevention programs: responses to witnessed overdoses. J Community Health. 2013;38(1):133–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale J, Brown C, Campbell ANC, et al. How competent are people who use opioids at responding to overdoses? Qualitative analyses of actions and decisions taken during overdose emergencies. Addiction. 2019;114(4):708–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington N, Piper TM, Galea S, Rosenthal D. Opiate users’ knowledge about overdose prevention and naloxone in New York City: a focus group study. Harm Reduct J. 2006;3:19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neale J, Kalk NJ, Parkin S, et al. Factors associated with withdrawal symptoms and anger among people resuscitated from an opioid overdose by take-home naloxone: exploratory mixed methods analysis. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020;117:108099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones JD, Campbell AN, Brandt L, Castillo F, Abbott R, Comer SD. Intervention in an opioid overdose event increases interest in treatment among individuals with opioid use disorder. Subst Abus. 2020;2020:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• VERBI Software. MAXQDA 2019. Computer Program. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Thorne S. Interpretive Description. New York: Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qual Res Psychol. 2020;18(3):328–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale J. Iterative categorisation (IC) (part 2): interpreting qualitative data. Addiction. 2021;116(3):668–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korstjens I, Moser A. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: trustworthiness and publishing. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):120–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rome A, Shaw A, Boyle K. Reducing Drug Users’ Risk of Overdose. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner KD, Davidson PJ, Iverson E, et al. “I felt like a superhero”: the experience of responding to drug overdose among individuals trained in overdose prevention. Int J Drug Policy. 2014;25(1):157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin S, Neale J, Brown C, et al. A qualitative study of repeat naloxone administrations during opioid overdose intervention by people who use opioids in New York City. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;87:102968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstanley EL. The bell tolls for thee & thine: compassion fatigue & the overdose epidemic. Int J Drug Policy. 2020;85:102796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauly B(B), Mamdani Z, Mesley L, et al. “It’s an emotional roller coaster… But sometimes it’s fucking awesome”: meaning and motivation of work for peers in overdose response environments in British Columbia. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;88:103015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal KH, Thawley R, Gee L, et al. Naloxone distribution and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for injection drug users to prevent heroin overdose death: a pilot intervention study. J Urban Health. 2005;82(2):303–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner KD, Valente TW, Casanova M, et al. Evaluation of an overdose prevention and response training programme for injection drug users in the Skid Row area of Los Angeles, CA. Int J Drug Policy. 2010;21(3):186–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardwell G, Fleming T, Collins AB, Boyd J, McNeil R. Addressing intersecting housing and overdose crises in Vancouver, Canada: opportunities and challenges from a tenant-led overdose response intervention in single room occupancy hotels. J Urban Health. 2019;96(1):12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall C, Perreault M, Archambault L, Milton D. Experiences of peer-trainers in a take-home naloxone program: results from a qualitative study. Int J Drug Policy. 2017;41:19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace B, Barber K, Pauly B. Sheltering risks: implementation of harm reduction in homeless shelters during an overdose emergency. Int J Drug Policy. 2018;53:83–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heavey SC, Burstein G, Moore C, Homish GG. Overdose education and naloxone distribution program attendees: who attends, what do they know, and how do they feel? J Public Heal Manag Pract. 2018;24(1):63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neale J, Strang J. Naloxone-does over-antagonism matter? evidence of iatrogenic harm after emergency treatment of heroin/opioid overdose. Addiction. 2015;110(10):1644–1652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright N, Oldham N, Francis K, Jones L. Homeless drug users’ awareness and risk perception of peer “take home naloxone” use-a qualitative study. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006;1:28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin S, Neale J, Brown C, et al. Opioid overdose reversals using naloxone in New York City by people who use opioids: implications for public health and overdose harm reduction approaches from a qualitative study. Int J Drug Policy. 2020;79:102751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozaghi E, Maynard R, Dadakhah-Chimeh Z, Yake K, Blyth S. The synthetic opioid epidemic and the need for mental health support for first responders who intervene in overdose cases. Can J Public Health. 2018;109(2):231–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones J, Campbell A, Metz V, Brandt L, Martinez S, Comer S. A Prospective longitudinal study of different overdose education and naloxone distribution models among individuals with opioid use disorder. Published 2020. https://d2p55c5k0gw6a2.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/CPDD-Oral-Late-Breaking-Abstracts_KM_JH_JJC.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Henman AR, Paone D, Des Jarlais DC, Kochems LM, Friedman SR. Injection drug users as social actors: a stigmatized community’s participation in the syringe exchange programmes of New York City. AIDS Care - Care. 1998;10(4):397–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen N, Labonté R. “Everything is perfect, and we have no problems”: detecting and limiting social desirability bias in qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2020;30(5):783–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? Field Methods. 2006;18(1):59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagaman AK, Wutich A. How many interviews are enough to identify metathemes in multisited and cross-cultural research? Another perspective on Guest, Bunce, and Johnson’s (2006) Landmark Study. Field Methods. 2017;29(1):23–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar