MIRRORS program: Helping pregnant and postpartum women and families with substance use problems

References

• Clark HW. Residential substance abuse treatment for pregnant and postpartum women and their children: treatment and policy implications. Child Welfare. 2001;80(2):179–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holleman WL, Bray JH, Davis L, Holleman MC. Innovative ways to address the mental health and medical needs of marginalized patients: collaborations between family physicians, family therapists, and family psychologists. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2004;74(3):242–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2017 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lipari RN, Van Horn SL. Children living with parents who have a substance use disorder. In: CBHSQ Report. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Dakof GA, Quille TJ, Tejeda MJ, Alberga LR, Bandstra E, Szapocznik J. Enrolling and retaining mothers of substance-exposed infants in drug abuse treatment. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71(4):764–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAMHSA. Addressing Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders (FASD). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Information Gateway. Parental Substance Use and the Child Welfare System. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Grella CE, Hser Y-I, Huang Y-C. Mothers in substance abuse treatment: differences in characteristics based on involvement with child welfare services. Child Abuse Negl. 2006;30(1):55–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard M, McKeganey N. The impact of parental problem drug use on children: what is the problem and what can be done to help? Addiction. 2004;99(5):552–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Information Gateway. Protecting Children in Families Affected by Substance Use Disorders. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Blending Perspectives on Building Common Ground. A Report to Congress on Substance Abuse and Child Protection. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan JP, Marsh JC, Testa MF, Louderman R. Integrating substance abuse treatment and child welfare services: findings from the Illinois alcohol and other drug abuse waiver demonstration. Soc Work Res. 2006;30(2):95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith BD, Test MF. The risk of subsequent maltreatment allegations in families with substance-exposed infants. Child Abuse Negl. 2002;26(1):97–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman NE, DeCoste C, Leigh D, Borelli J. Reflective functioning in mothers with drug use disorders: implications for dyadic interactions with infants and toddlers. Attach Hum Dev. 2010;12(6):567–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanueva C, Ringeisen H, Wilson E, Smith K, Dolan M. NSCAW II Baseline Report: Child Well-Being. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels BH. Introduction-addressing trauma to promote social and emotional well-being: a child welfare imperative. Child Welfare. 2011;90(6):19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp SP, Marcenko MO, Hoagwood K, Vesneski W. Engaging parents in child welfare services: bridging family needs and child welfare mandates. Child Welfare. 2009;88(1):101–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcenko MO, Lyons SJ, Courtney M. Mothers’ experiences, resources and needs: the context for reunification. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(3):431–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemtob CM, Griffing S, Tullberg E, Roberts E, Ellis P. Screening for trauma exposure, and posttraumatic stress disorder and depression symptoms among mothers receiving child welfare preventive services. Child Welfare. 2011;90(6):109–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fluke JD, Shusterman GR, Hollinshead DM, Yuan Y-YT. Longitudinal analysis of repeated child abuse reporting and victimization: multistate analysis of associated factors. Child Maltreat. 2008;13(1):76–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenfield L, Burgdorf K, Chen X, Porowski A, Roberts T, Herrell J. Effectiveness of long-term residential substance abuse treatment for women: findings from three national studies. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2004;30(3):537–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein NB, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The McMaster family assessment device. J Marital Fam Ther. 1983;9(2):171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White W. Recovery Capital Scale. http://www.williamwhitepapers.com/pr/dlm_uploads/Recovery-Capital-Scale.pdf. Published 2009. Accessed March 22, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Bavolek SJ, Keene RG. Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory: AAPI-2: Assessing High-Risk Parenting Attitudes and Behaviors. Park City, UT: Family Development Resources, Incorporated; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington EM. I. Coping with marital transitions: a family systems perspective. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1992;57(2–3):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. CSAT GPRA Client Outcome Measures for Discretionary Programs. Rockville, MD: CSAT; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Levin S. The McMaster model of family functioning. J Marital Fam Ther. 1978;4(4):19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller IW, Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Keitner GI. The McMaster family assessment device: reliability and validity. J Marital Fam Ther. 1985;11(4):345–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield AK, Keitner GI, Dealy J. The family assessment device: an update. Fam Process. 2015;54(1):82–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridenour TA, Daley J, Reich W. Factor analyses of the family assessment device. Fam Process. 1999;38(4):497–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenniger WFm, Hageman WJJM, Arrindell WA. Cross-national validity of dimensions of family functioning: first experiences with the Dutch version of the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Pers Individ Dif. 1993;14(6):769–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guada J, Brekke JS, Floyd R, Barbour J. Assessing the family functioning of inner-city African-American families living with schizophrenia with the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Soc Work Ment Health. 2010;8(3):238–253.
   Google Scholar
• Roncone R, Rossi L, Muiere E, et al. The Italian version of the family assessment device. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33(9):451–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groshkova T, Best D, White W. The Assessment of Recovery Capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2013;32(2):187–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilsaint CL, Kelly JF, Bergman BG, Groshkova T, Best D, White W. Development and validation of a Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;177:71–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavolek SJ, Keene RG. Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI-2) Assessing High-Risk Parenting Attitudes and Behaviors: AAPI Online Development Handbook. Park City, UT: Family Development Resources, Incorporated; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Najavits LM. Seeking safety: an evidence-based model for substance abuse and trauma/PTSD. In: Therapist’s Guide to Evidence-Based Relapse Prevention. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2007:141–167.
   Google Scholar
• SAMHSA. National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bavolek SJ. Nurturing the families of Hawaii: Program to build nurturing parenting skills for the prevention of child abuse and neglect. Final Report for FY 2008-09 submitted to Department of Human Services, Honolulu, HI. August, 2009
   Google Scholar
• DiClemente CC. Prevention and harm reduction for chemical dependency: a process perspective. Clin Psychol Rev. 1999;19(4):473–486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, et al. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Heal Psychol. 1994;13(1):39–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Published June 23, 2014. Accessed March 22, 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823.
   Google Scholar
• Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6):2134–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray JH, Adams GJ, Getz JG, Baer PE. Developmental, family, and ethnic in influences on adolescent alcohol usage: a growth curve approach. J Fam Psychol. 2001;15(2):301–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb JA, Bray JH, Getz JG, Adams G. Gender, perceived parental monitoring, and behavioral adjustment: influences on adolescent alcohol use. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2002;72(3):392–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melemis SM. Relapse prevention and the five rules of recovery. Yale J Biol Med. 2015;88(3):325–332. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26339217
   PubMedGoogle Scholar