How Can Accounting Reformulate the Debate on Natural Capital and Help Implement Its Ecological Approach?

References

• Aiken, M., and W. Lu. 1998. “The Evolution of Bookkeeping in China: Integrating Historical Trends with Western Influences.” Abacus 34 (2): 220–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00858.x
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, S. S. 1950. “Income Measurement in a Dynamic Economy.” In Five Monographs on Business Income, edited by, 1–95. New York: American Institute of Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N. 1983. Tell It like It Was: A Conceptual Framework for Financial Accounting. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, E., A. Markandya, and D. Pearce. 1990. “Environmental Sustainability and Cost-Benefit Analysis.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 22 (9): 1259–1266. https://doi.org/10.1068/a221259
   Google Scholar
• Barbier, E. B. 2014. “Ecosystems as Assets.” In Handbook of Sustainable Development, edited by G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, E. Neumayer, and M. Agarwala, 72–90. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, R. 2019. “Corporate Natural Capital Accounting.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 35 (1): 68–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gry031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barter, N. 2015. “Natural Capital: Dollars and Cents/Dollars and Sense.” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 6 (3): 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2014-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., R. Gray, C. Hibbitt, and E. Kirk. 2001. Full Cost Accounting: An Agenda for Action.London: ACCA Research Report.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., H. Österblom, B. Crona, J.-B. Jouffray, C. Larrinaga, S. Russell, and B. Scholtens. 2019. “Accounting and Accountability in the Anthropocene.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 33 (1): 152–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-11-2018-3745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford, N. M. 2014. “Reviewer’s Corner: The Foundations of Accounting Measurement.” In The Development of Accounting Theory, First Edition, edited by M. J. R. Gaffikin and M. J. Aitken, 270–282. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2002. “Introduction.” In Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change, edited by F. Berkes, J. Colding, and C. Folke, 1–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bezemer, D. J. 2010. “Understanding Financial Crisis Through Accounting Models.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (7): 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, A., M. Ivanyna, W. Oman, and N. Stern. 2021. “Climate Action to Unlock the Inclusive Growth Story of the 21st Century.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2021/05/26/Climate-Action-to-Unlock-the-Inclusive-Growth-Story-of-the-21st-Century-50219.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, F. A. 1981. Accounting Theory. Richmond: Robert F Dame Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Blok, A., and T. E. Jensen. 2011. Bruno Latour: Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm-Bawerk, E. von. 1890. Capital and Interest: A Critical History of Economic Theory. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnifet, F. 2020. “Le sursaut ou le chaos….sous 3665 jours [The Start or the Chaos….within 3665 Days].” Linkedin.Com. Accessed July 30, 2020. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/le-sursaut-ou-chaossous-3665-jours-fabrice-bonnifet/?trackingId=79IQx4UvVM4WVYzntPdB6A%3D%3D.
   Google Scholar
• Braudel, F. 1982. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th-18th Century, Vol. II: The Wheels of Commerce. London: William Colins.
   Google Scholar
• Burk, J. 1992. Values in the Marketplace. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 2007. “What Does It Mean to Say That Economics is Performative?” In Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. A. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 311–357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Cambourg, P., C. Gardes, and V. Viard. 2019. Ensuring the Relevance and Reliability of Non-Financial Corporate Information: An Ambition and a Competitive Advantage for a Sustainable Europe. Paris: Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances.
   Google Scholar
• Cange, D., P. Bénédictins, L. Carpentier, L. Henschel, and L. Favre. 2020. “Capitale.” Glossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis. Accessed July 30, 2020. http://ducange.enc.sorbonne.fr.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. 1976. “Réflexions sur le ‘développement’ et la ‘rationalité’[Reflections on ‘Development’ and ‘Rationality’].” Esprit 457: 897–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. 1988. “Individu, société, rationalité, histoire” [Individual, Society, Rationality, History]. Esprit 2:89–113.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. 1998. The Imaginary Institution of Society. Translated by K. Blamey. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Castoriadis, C. 2013. “La ‘rationalité’ du capitalisme” [The ‘Rationality’ of Capitalism]. Quelle Démocratie? Tome 2 - Ecrits Politiques 1945-1997, 627–56. Paris: Editions du Sandre.
   Google Scholar
• Castree, N. 2003. “Environmental Issues: Relational Ontologies and Hybrid Politics.” Progress in Human Geography 27 (2): 203–11. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph422pr
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centore, F. F. 1997. Confusions and Clarifications: An Introduction to Philosophy for the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. J. 1971. “Income and Capital: Fisher’s Legacy.” Journal of Accounting Research 9 (1): 137–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. J. 1978. “The Use and Abuse of a Notation: A History of an Idea.” Abacus 14 (2): 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1978.tb00062.x
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. 1994. The Wager of Lucien Goldmann: Tragedy, Dialectics, and a Hidden God, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, J. R. 1924. Legal Foundations of Capitalism. London: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, C. 1992. “The Non and Nom of Accounting for (M)other Nature.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 5 (3): 16–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579210017361
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., G. Alperovitz, H. E. Daly, J. Farley, C. Franco, T. Jackson, I. Kubiszewski, et al. 2013. Building a Sustainable and Desirable Economy-in-Society-in-Nature. Canberra: ANU E Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, A. B., C. A. Adams, M. N. Nugent, and K. Hayne. 2015. “Exploring Metaphors of Capitals and the Framing of Multiple Capitals: Challenges and Opportunities for < IR>.” Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal 6 (3): 290–314. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2015-0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dajoz, R. 2006. Précis d’Ecologie [Ecology Simmary]. 8th ed. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, H. E., and J. Farley. 2004. Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debaise, D. 2007. “Introduction.” In Vie et Expérimentation Peirce, James, Dewey, edited by D. Debaise, 7–15. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Descola, P. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ege, R. 2014. “La question de l’interdiction de l’intérêt dans l’histoire européenne” [The Question of the Prohibition of Interest in European History]. Revue économique Vol. 65 (2): 391–417. https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.652.0391
   Google Scholar
• Etzion, D., and F. Ferraro. 2010. “The Role of Analogy in the Institutionalization of Sustainability Reporting.” Organization Science 21 (5): 1092–107. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, J. 2004. “Exploring (False) Dualisms for Environmental Accounting Praxis.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15 (8): 1061–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00207-1
   Google Scholar
• Farinelli, F. 2004. “Map and Territory.” http://www.amaze.it/AMAZE/node/41.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, K., and B. Bednar-Friedl. 2010. Intertemporal Resource Economics. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Feger, C., and L. Mermet. 2017. “A Blueprint Towards Accounting for the Management of Ecosystems.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 30 (7): 1511–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feger, C., and L. Mermet. 2021. “Innovations comptables pour la biodiversité et les écosystèmes: une typologie axée sur l’exigence de résultat environnemental” [Accounting Innovations for Biodiversity and Ecosystems: A Typology Focused on the Requirement for Environmental Results]. Comptabilité Contrôle Audit Tome 27 (1): 13–50. https://doi.org/10.3917/cca.271.0013
   Google Scholar
• Feger, Clément, Laurent Mermet, Bhaskar Vira, Prue F. E. Addison, Richard Barker, Frank Birkin, John Burns, Stuart Cooper, Denis Couvet, Thomas Cuckston, et al. 2018. “Four Priorities for New Links between Conservation Science and Accounting Research.” Conservation Biology: The Journal of the Society for Conservation Biology 33 (4): 972–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetter, F. A. 1937. “Reformulation of the Concepts of Capital and Income in Economics and Accounting.” The Accounting Review 12:3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, I. 1906. The Nature of Capital and Income. New York: Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., and O. Dekens. 2004. Qu’est-Ce Que Les Lumières? [What is Enlightenment?] Paris: Bréal.
   Google Scholar
• Fuzet, H., and H. Deschamps. 1926. Commerce et Comptabilité [Commerce and Accounting]. Paris: Librairie Delagrave.
   Google Scholar
• Gallhofer, S. 2018. “Going beyond Western Dualism: Towards Corporate Nature Responsibility Reporting.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 31 (8): 2110–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2015-2358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamersfelder, S. 1570. Buchhalten Durch Zwey Bücher Nach Italianischer Art Und Weise Gestellet [Accounting through Two Books Prepared in the Italian Way]. Danzig: Jakub Rhode.
   Google Scholar
• Gladwin, T. N., J. J. Kennelly, and T.-S. Krause. 1995. “Shifting Paradigms for Sustainable Development: Implications for Management Theory and Research.” The Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 874–907. https://doi.org/10.2307/258959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goody, J. 2004. Capitalism and Modernity: The Great Debate. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. 1992. “Accounting and Environmentalism: An Exploration of the Challenge of Gently Accounting for Accountability, Transparency and Sustainability.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (5): 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90038-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. 1994. “Corporate Reporting for Sustainable Development: Accounting for Sustainability in 2000AD.” Environmental Values 3 (1): 17–45. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327194776679782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R. 2010. “Is Accounting for Sustainability Actually Accounting for Sustainability… and How Would We Know? An Exploration of Narratives of Organisations and the Planet.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 35 (1): 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., A. Brennan, and J. Malpas. 2014. “New Accounts: Towards a Reframing of Social Accounting.” Accounting Forum 38 (4): 258–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2013.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Hache, E. 2011. Ce à Quoi Nous Tenons [That Which We Value]. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Hawken, P., A. B. Lovins, and L. H. Lovins. 2010. Natural Capitalism. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1946. Value and Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J. R. 1974. “Capital Controversies: Ancient and Modern.” American Economic Review 64 (2): 307–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hines, R. D. 1991. “On Valuing Nature.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 4 (3): 27–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579110144802
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. 2014. “What is Capital? Economists and Sociologists Have Changed Its Meaning: Should It Be Changed Back?” Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (5): 1063–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudis, P. 2012. Marx’s Concept of the Alternative to Capitalism. Leiden: BRILL.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, M. 2002. “Reconstructing the Origins of Interest-Bearing Debt and the Logic of Clean States.” In Debt and Economic Renewal in the Ancient near East, edited by M. Hudson and M. Van De Mieroop, 7–58. Bethedsa, MA: CDL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ijiri, Y. 1967. The Foundations of Accounting Measurement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• International Integrated Reporting Council. 2013. The International < IR > Framework. Report. https://integratedreporting.ifrs.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/InternationalIntegratedReportingFramework.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirzner, I. M. 1976. “The Theory of Capital.” In The Foundations of Modern Austrian Economics, edited by E. G. Dolan, New York: Sheed & Ward.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. 1935. “The Theory of Investment Once More: Mr. Boulding and the Austrians.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 50 (1): 36–67. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882342
   Google Scholar
• KPMG, Fauna & Flora International and Association of Chartered Certified Accountants. 2012. “Is Natural Capital a Material Issue ?” https://www.accaglobal.com/content/dam/acca/global/PDF-technical/environmental-publications/natural-capital.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakou, D. 2006. “Views of Sustainability: Elements of a Synthesis.” In Global Sustainability: The Impact of Local Cultures, edited by P.A. Wilderer, E.D. Schroeder, and H. Kopp, 65–85. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lab Capital Naturel 2022. “Méthodologie CARE.” Accessed February 23, 2023. https://lab-capital-naturel.fr/methodologie-care
   Google Scholar
• Lane, F. C. 1977. “Double Entry Bookkeeping and Resident Marchants.” Journal of European Economic History 6:177–91.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1985. “Les “vues” de l’esprit: Une introduction à l’anthropologie des sciences et des techniques [The “Views” of the Mind: An Introduction to the Anthropology of Science and Technology].” Culture et Technique 14:4–30.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1998. “To Modernise or Ecologise? That is the Question.” In Remaking Reality, Nature at the Millenium, edited by B. Braun and N. Castree, 357–92. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999a. Pandora’s Hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1999b. “For David Bloor … and Beyond: A Reply to David Bloor’s ‘Anti-Latour’.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30A (1): 113–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2009. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2010. On the Modern Cult of the Factish Gods. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2012a. We Never Have Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2012b. Enquête Sur Les Modes d’existence, L’enquête Ontologique: Du Mode d’existence Des Objets Sociaux [Investigation into Modes of Existence: The Ontological Investigation of the Mode of Existence of Social Objects]. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2014. “Another Way to Compose the Common World.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 301–7. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau4.1.016
   Google Scholar
• Lee, G. A. 1972. “The Oldest European Account Book: A Florentine Bank Ledger of 1211.” Nottingham Medieval Studies 16 (16): 28–60. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.NMS.3.55
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T. A. 1975. Income and Value Measurement: Theory and Practice. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Ravalec, M., A. Rambaud, and V. Blum. 2022. “Taking Climate Change Seriously: Time to Credibly Communicate on Corporate Climate Performance.” Ecological Economics 200 (c): 107542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107542
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, A. C. 1926. “Evolution of the Ledger Account.” Accounting Review 1:12–23.
   Google Scholar
• Littleton, A. C. 1929. “Value and Price in Accounting.” Accounting Review 4 (3): 147–54.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, G. M. 2019. “The Ecology of Natural Capital Accounting.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 35 (1): 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gry023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzoni, D. 1554. Quaderno Doppio Col Suo Giornale, Nouamente Composto, & Diligentissimamente Ordinato, Secondo Il Costume Di Venetia [Double Notebook with its Paper, Newly Composed, & Very Diligently Ordered, According to the Custom of Venice]. Venice: Comin da Trino.
   Google Scholar
• Milne, M. J. 1991. “Accounting, Environmental Resource Values, and Non-market Valuation Techniques for Environmental Resources: A Review.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 4 (3): 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579110003583
   Google Scholar
• Missemer, A. 2018. “Natural Capital as an Economic Concept, History and Contemporary Issues.” Ecological Economics 143:90–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell Innes, A. 1914. “The Credit Theory of Money.” Banking Law Journal 31:151–68.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J. W. 2017. “Introduction - Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism.” In Anthropocene or Capitalocene?: Nature, History, and the Crisis of Capitalism, edited by J. W. Moore, 1–11. Binghamton, NY: PM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, R. 2019. “Sustainable Cost Accounting – An Introduction.” Taxresearch.Org.Uk. Accessed July 30, 2020. https://www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2019/06/27/sustainable-cost-accounting-an-introduction/
   Google Scholar
• Natural Capital Protocol 2016. “Natural Capital Coalition.” Accessed July 30, 2020. https://naturalcapitalcoalition.org/the-coalition/
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. 2010. Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nitzan, J., and S. Bichler. 2009. Capital as Power: A Study of Order and Creorder, Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. 2015. “Accounting for Capital: The Evolution of an Idea.” Accounting and Business Research 45 (4): 413–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2015.1033130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, B. G. 1991. Toward Unity among Environmentalists. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. G. 1992. “Epistemology and Environmental Values.” Monist 75 (2): 208–226. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19927528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, B. G. 2005. Sustainability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Notat, N., and J.-D. Senard. 2018. L’entreprise, Objet d’intérêt Collectif [The Enterprise, an Object of Collective Interest]. Paris: Ministères de la Transition Ecologique et Solidaire, de la Justice, de l’Economie et des Finances, du Travail. https://minefi.hosting.augure.com/Augure_Minefi/r/ContenuEnLigne/Download?id=FAA5CFBA-6EF5-4FDF-82D8-B46443BDB61B&filename=entreprise_objet_interet_collectif.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pacioli, L. 1523. Summa de Arithmetica, Geometria, Proportioni et Proportionalita [Summary of Arithmetic, Geometry, Proportion and Proportionality]. Venice: Paganino de Paganini.
   Google Scholar
• Paredis, E. 2007. The Concept of Ecological Debt : Its Meaning and Applicability in International Policy. Cambridge, MA: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, D. 1988. “Economics, Equity and Sustainable Development.” Futures 20 (6): 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(88)90002-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, D., A. Markandya, and E. B. Barbier. 1989. Blueprint for a Green Economy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Pekkarinen, J. 1979. On the Generality of Keynesian Economics. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
   Google Scholar
• Perman, R., Y. Ma, J. McGilvray, and M. Common. 2003. Natural Resource and Environmental Economics. 3rd ed. London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pigou, A. C. 1941. “Maintaining Capital Intact.” Economica 8 (31): 271–5. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549333
   Google Scholar
• Piron, S. 2004. “L ’apparition du resicum en Méditerranée occidentale, XIIe-XIIIe siècles” [The Appearance of Resicum in the Western Mediterranean, 12th–13th Centuries]. In Pour Une Histoire Culturelle Du Risque. Genèse, Évolution, Actualité Du Concept Dans Les Sociétés Occidentales, edited by E. Collas-Heddeland, M. Coudry, O. Kammerer, A. J. Lemaître, and B. Martin, 59–76. Paris: Editions Histoire et Anthropologie.
   Google Scholar
• Poitras, G. 2016. Equity Capital. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Previts, G. J. 1975. “American Accountancy, an Overview, 1900–1925.” Business and Economic History 4:109–19.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, J. D. 2009. Envisioning Nature, Science, and Religion. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quattrone, P. 2009. “Books to Be Practiced: Memory, the Power of the Visual, and the Success of Accounting.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (1): 85–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaud, A. 2022. “CARE: repenser la comptabilité sur des bases écologiques” [CARE: Rethinking Accounting on Ecological Bases]. L'Economie politique 93 (1): 34–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rambaud, A., and H. Chenet. 2021. “How to Re-conceptualise and Re-integrate Climate-Related Finance into Society Through Ecological Accounting?” Bankers, Markets & Investors 166:20–43. https://doi.org/10.54695/bmi.166.3366
   Google Scholar
• Rambaud, A., and C. Feger. 2020. “Method 3 - Comprehensive Accounting with Respect to Ecology (CARE) Model.” In Improving Nature’s Visibility in Financial Accounting. London: Capitals Coalition. https://www.chaire-comptabilite-ecologique.fr/Natural-capital-visibility-in-financial-accounting-Method-3-Extended-Version?lang=fr
   Google Scholar
• Rambaud, A., and J. Richard. 2015. “The ‘Triple Depreciation Line’ Instead of the ‘Triple Bottom Line’: Towards a Genuine Integrated Reporting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 33:92–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaud, A., and J. Richard. 2017. “The ‘Triple Depreciation Line’ Accounting Model and Its Application to the Human Capital.” In Finance and Economy for Society: Integrating Sustainability, edited by S. Alijani and C. Karyotis. 225–251. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, J. 2005. “The Concept of Fair Value in French and German Accounting Regulations from 1673 to 1914 and Its Consequences for the Interpretation of the Stages of Development of Capitalist Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 (6): 825–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2003.06.008
   Google Scholar
• Richard, J. 2012. Comptabilité et Développement Durable [Accounting and Sustainable Development]. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, J. 2015. “The Dangerous Dynamics of Modern Capitalism: From Static to IFRS’ Futuristic Accounting.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 30:9–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, J., and A. Rambaud. 2022. Capital in the History of Accounting and Economic Thought: Capitalism, Ecology and Democracy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Richens, J. 2015. “How Natural Capital Accounting Can Become Your Newest Communications Tool.” Sustainablebrands.Com. Accessed July 30, 2020. https://sustainablebrands.com/read/defining-the-next-economy/how-natural-capital-accounting-can-become-your-newest-communications-tool.
   Google Scholar
• De Roover, R. 1938. “Characteristics of Bookkeeping before Paciolo.” Accounting Review 13:144–149.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, D. B. 1992. “Bridging the Gap between Green Accounting and Black Ink.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 17 (5): 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(92)90044-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, S., M. J. Milne, and C. Dey. 2017. “Accounts of Nature and the Nature of Accounts: Critical Reflections on Environmental Accounting and Propositions for Ecologically Informed Accounting.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 30 (7): 1426–1458. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-07-2017-3010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruta, G., and K. Hamilton. 2007. “The Capital Approach to Sustainability.” In Handbook of Sustainable Development, edited by G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, E. Neumayer and M. Agarwala, 45–62, 2nd ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Samkin, G., A. Schneider, and D. Tappin. 2014. “Developing a Reporting and Evaluation Framework for Biodiversity.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 27 (3): 527–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Serafy, S. 1991. “The Environment as Capital.” In Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, edited by R. Costanza, 168–175. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• El Serafy, S. 2013. Macroeconomics and the Environment: Essays on Green Accounting. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, W. R., D. S. Steingard, and D. E. Fitzgibbons. 2002. “Sustainable Stakeholder and Accounting beyond Complementarity and Towards Integration in Environmental Accounting.” In Research in Corporate Sustainability, edited by S. Sharma and M. Starik, 257–294. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sidorkin, A. M. 2002. “Ontology, Anthropology, and Epistemology of Relation.” Counterpoints 173:91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Skaggs, N. 2003. “H.D. Macleod and the Origins of the Theory of Fnance in Economic Development.” History of Political Economy 35 (3): 361–84. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-35-3-361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snailum, W. W. 1926. Fifteen Studies in Book-Keeping with a Selection of Worked and Unworked Examination Papers. Cambridge: CUP Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Solomons, D. 1961. “Economic and Accounting Concepts of Income.” Accounting Review 36:374–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, D. I. 1997. “The Capital Theory Approach to Sustainability: A Critical Appraisal.” Journal of Economic Issues 31 (1): 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1997.11505895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S., and M. Hannis. 2017. “Mathematics Maybe, but Not Money’: On Balance Sheets, Numbers and Nature in Ecological Accounting.” Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 30 (7): 1459–1480. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2017-2963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, H. W. 1933. “Capital.” Accounting Review 8 (185–199): 254–264.
   Google Scholar
• TNFD 2022. “The LEAP Nature Risk Assessment Approach: Tools Catalogue.” Accessed February 24, 2023. https://framework.tnfd.global/the-leap-nature-risk-assessment-process/tools-catalogue/
   Google Scholar
• Toms, S. 2009. “Capitalism.” In The Routledge Companion to Accounting History, edited by J. R. Edwards and S. P. Walker, 341–353. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. K. 1999. “The Place of Economic Values in Environmental Valuation.” In Valuing Environmental Preferences, edited by I. J. Bateman and K. G. Willis, 17–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuttle, C. A. 1903. “The Real Capital Concept.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 18 (1): 54–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882775
   Google Scholar
• Victor, P. A. 2007. “Nature as Capital: Concerns and Considerations.” In A Canadian Priorities Agenda: Policy Choices to Improve Economic and Social Well-Being, edited by J. Leonard, C. Ragan, and F. St-Hilaire, 171–178. Montreal: IRPP.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 2012. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. North Chelmsford, MA: Courier Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wildman, W. J. 2010. “An Introduction to Relational Ontology.” In The Trinity and an Entangled World, edited by J. Polkinghorne, 55–73. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. J. 1978. “A New Perspective on the Evolution of Double-Entry Bookkeeping.” Accounting Historians Journal 5 (1): 29–39. https://doi.org/10.2308/0148-4184.5.1.29
   Google Scholar
• Wood, D. 2002. Medieval Economic Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar