Publication Cover
Inhalation Toxicology
International Forum for Respiratory Research
Volume 11, 1999 - Issue 6-7
22
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A UNIFIED APPROACH TO RISK CHARACTERIZATION

Pages 575-578 | Published online: 01 Oct 2008

REFERENCES

  • Allen, B. C., Kaylock, R. J., Kimmel, C. A., and Faustman, E. M. 1994. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity. II. Comparison of generic benchmark dose estimates with no observed adverse effect levels. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 23:487–495.
  • Anderson, E. L., and the Carcinogen Assessment Group of the U.S. EPA. 1983. Quantitative approaches in use to assess cancer risk. Risk Anal. 3: 277–295.
  • Barnes, D. G., and Dourson, M. 1988. Reference dose (RfD): Description and use in health risk assessments. ReguL Toxicol. Pharmacol. 8:471–486.
  • Chen, J. J., and Kodell, R. L. 1989. Quantitative risk assessment for teratological effects.]. Am. Stat. Assoc. 84:966–971.
  • Crump, K. S. 1984. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundam. Appl. ToxicoL 4:854–871.
  • Crump, K. S. 1996. The linearized multistage model and the future of quantitative risk assessment. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 15:787–798.
  • Crump, K. S., Clewell, H. J., and Andersen, M. E. 1997. Cancer and non-cancer risk assessment should be harmonized. Hum. Ecolog. Risk Assess. 3:495–499.
  • Dourson, M. L., Hertzberg, R. C., Hartung, R., and Blackburn, K. 1985. Novel methods for the esti-mation of acceptable daily intake. Toxicol. Ind. Health 1:23–33.
  • Gaylor, D. W. 1992. Incidence of developmental defects at the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL). ReguL Toxicol. PharmacoL 15:151–160.
  • Kimmel, C. A., and Gaylor, D. W. 1988. Issues in qualitative and quantitative risk analysis for devel-opmental toxicology. Risk Anal. 8:15–20.
  • Lehman, A. J., and Fitzhugh, 0. G. 1954.100-fold margin of safety. Assoc. Food Drug Offic. U.S. Q. Bull. 18: 33–35.
  • Leisenring, W., and Ryan, L. 1992. Statistical properties of the NOAEL. ReguL ToxicoL PharmacoL 15:161–171.
  • Munro, I., and Krewski, D. 1981. Risk assessment and regulatory decision making. Food Cosmet. Toxicol. 19:549–560.
  • National Research Council. 1995. Carcinogens and anticarcinogens in the human diet: A comparison of naturally occurring and synthetic substances. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Pease, W. S. 1992. The role of cancer risk in the regulation of industrial pollution. Risk Anal. 12 :253–265.
  • Pease, W. S., Zeise, L., and Kelter, A. 1990. Risk assessment for carcinogens under California's Proposition 65. Risk Anal. 10:255–271.
  • Purchase, I. F. H., and Auton, R. T. 1995. Thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis. Regul. ToxicoL PharmacoL 22:199–205.
  • Rodricks, J. V., Brett, S., and Wrenn, G. 1987. Significant risk decisions in federal regulatory agencies. Regu 1. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 7:307–320.
  • Travis, C. C., Richter, S. A., Crouch, E. A. C., Wilson, R., and Klema, E. D. 1996. Cancer risk man-agement. Environ. ScL TechnoL 21:415–420.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1996. Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment: Notice. Fed. Reg. 61(79)1 7995–18011.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.