Mutual combination of selected principles and technologies of Industry 4.0 and quality management methods - case study

References

• Abele, E., M. Metternich, G. Tisch, W. Chryssolouris, H. Sihn, V. ElMaraghy, F. Hummel and, and Ranz, J. 2015. Learning factories for research, education and training. Procedia CIRP 32 (32):1–6. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.187.
   Google Scholar
• AIAG (Automotive Industry Action Group). 2019. AIAG & VDA failure mode and effects analysis - FMEA handbook. 1st ed. Southfild (MI): AIAG.
   Google Scholar
• Albers, A., B. Gladysz, T. Pinner, V. Butenko, and T. Stürmlinger. 2016. Procedure for defining the system of objectives in the initial phase of an industry 4.0 project focusing on intelligent quality control systems. Procedia CIRP 52 (52):262–7. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.067.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, C., A. Hees, S. Braunreuther, and G. Reinhart. 2016. Characterization of cyber-physical sensor systems. Procedia CIRP 41 (41):638–43. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.019.
   Google Scholar
• Berisha, B., E. Mëziu, and I. Shabani. 2022. Big data analytics in cloud computing: An overview. Journal of Cloud Computing 11 (1):2–10. doi:10.1186/s13677-022-00301-w.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C., H. Wang, and S. J. Hu. 2013. Product architecting for personalization. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 32 (3):404–11. doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T. T. 2017. Cloud intelligence in manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28 (5):1057–9. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1122-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagli, C. H. 2016. Engineering cyber physical systems: Applying theory to practice preface. Procedia Computer Science 95:7–8. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.285.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, A., A. Carvalho, and P. Sampaio. 2022. Quality 4.0: Literature review analysis, definition and impacts of the digital transformation process on quality. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 39 (6):1312–35. doi:10.1108/IJQRM-07-2021-0247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francalanza, E., M. Mercieca, and A. Fenech. 2018. Modular system design approach for cyber physical production systems. Procedia CIRP 72 (72):486–91. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.090.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. 2017. Industry 4.0 testlabs in Australia. Preparing for the future. A report of the Prime Minister’s industry 4.0 taskforce – Industry 4.0 testlabs workstream. Hawthorn: Swinburne Research. https://www.industry.gov.au/publications/industry-40-testlabs-australia.
   Google Scholar
• García-Valls, M., C. Calva-Urrego, A. Juan, and A. Alonso. 2017. Adjusting middleware knobs to assess scalability limits of distributed cyber-physical systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces 51:95–103. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2016.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo, M. 2018. The future of manufacturing industry: A strategic roadmap toward industry 4.0. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 29 (6):910–36. doi:10.1108/JMTM-02-2018-0057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray-Hawkins, M., L. Michalkova, P. Suler, and N. A. Zhuravleva. 2019. Real-time process monitoring in industry 4.0 manufacturing systems: Sensing, smart, and sustainable technologies. Economics, Management, and Financial Markets 14 (4):30–6. doi:10.22381/emfm14420194.
   Google Scholar
• Habib, M. K., and C. I. Chukwuemeka. 2022. CPS: Role, characteristics, architectures and future potentials. Procedia Computer Science 200 (2):1347–58. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.336.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, E., and M. Rüsch. 2017. Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry 89 (89):23–34. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, S. J. 2013. Evolving paradigm of manufacturing: From mass production to mass customization and personalization. Procedia CIRP 7 (7):3–8. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Huo, B., Y. Ye, X. Zhao, and K. Zhu. 2019. Supply chain quality integration: A taxonomy perspective. International Journal of Production Economics 207:236–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivezic, N., V. Kulvatunyou, and B. Srinivasan. 2014. On architecting and composing through-life engineering information services to enable smart manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 22 (22):45–52. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.004.
   Google Scholar
• Jiao, J. X., M. Tseng, G. D. Vincent, and F. H. Lin. 1998. Product family modeling for mass customization. Computers & Industrial Engineering 35 (3-4):495–8. doi:10.1016/S0360-8352(98)00142-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D., C. Snider, A. Nassehi, J. Yon, and B. Hicks. 2020. Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 29 (29):36–52. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2020.02.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kamble, S. S., S. A. Gunasekaran, and A. Gawankar. 2018. Sustainable industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 117:408–25. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, X. T. R., H. Luo, G. Q. Huang, and X. Yang. 2019. Industrial wearable system: The human-centric empowering technology in industry 4.0. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 30 (8):2853–69. doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1416-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristal, M., X. Huang, and R. G. Schroeder. 2010. The effect of quality management on mass customization capability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 30 (9):900–22. doi:10.1108/01443571011075047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasi, H., H. G. Fettke, T. Kemper, T. M. Feld, and P. Hoffman. 2014. Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering 6 (4):239–42. doi:10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., B. Bagheri, and H. A. Kao. 2015. A cyber physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing system. Manufacturing Letters 3 (3):18–23. doi:10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Leloglu, E. 2017. A review of security concerns in internet of things. Journal of Computer and Communications 5 (1):121–36. doi:10.4236/jcc.2017.51010.
   Google Scholar
• Longo, F., L. Nicoletti, and A. Padovano. 2017. Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context. Computers & Industrial Engineering 113:144–59. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeuf, A., R. Pellerin, S. Lamouri, S. Tamayo-Giraldo, and R. Barbaray. 2018. The industrial management of SMEs in the era of industry 4.0. International Journal of Production Research 56 (3):1118–36. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1372647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ning, H., and H. Liu. 2012. Cyber-physical-social based security architecture for future internet of things. Advances in Internet of Things 2 (1):1–7. doi:10.4236/ait.2012.21001.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, J., B. Carvalho, J. Cabral, and G. Bernardino. 2020. Failure mode and effect analysis for cyber-physical systems. Future Internet 12 (11):205. doi:10.3390/fi12110205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oztemel, E., and S. Gursev. 2020. Literature review of industry 4.0 and related technologies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 31 (1):127–82. doi:10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, L., S. Rodríguez-Jiménez, N. Rodríguez, R. Usamentiaga, and D. F. García. 2020. Digital twin and virtual reality-based methodology for multi-robot manufacturing cell commissioning. Applied Sciences 10:3633. doi:10.3390/app10103633.
   Google Scholar
• Popkova, E. G., Y. V. Ragulina, and A. V. Bogoviz. 2019. Fundamental differences of transition to industry 4.0 from previous industrial revolutions. In Industry 4.0: Industrial revolution of the 21st century, ed. E. G. Popkova, Y. V. Ragulina, A. V. Bogoviz, 21–9. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-94310-7_3.8
   Google Scholar
• Puviyarasu, S. A., and C. da Cunha. 2021. Smart factory: From concepts to operational sustainable outcomes using testbeds. LogForum 17 (1):7–23. doi:10.17270/J.LOG.2021.545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, J., Y. Liu, and R. Grosvenor. 2016. A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia CIRP 52 (52):173–8. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Radziwill, N. M. 2020. Connected, intelligent, automated: The definitive gguide to digital transformation and quality 4.0. 1st ed. Milwaukee, WI: Quality Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radziwill, N. M. 2018. Quality 4.0: Let’s get digital: The many ways the fourth industrial revolution is reshaping the way we think about quality. Quality Progress 51:24–29. doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.07829
   Google Scholar
• Rezaee, J. M., A. Salimi, and S. Yousefi. 2017. Identifying and managing failures in stone processing industry using cost-based FMEA. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 88 (9–12):3329–42. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-9019-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riahi, Y., and S. Riahi. 2018. Big data and big data analytics: Concepts, types and technologies. International Journal of Research and Engineering 5 (9):524–8. doi:10.21276/ijre.2018.5.9.5.
   Google Scholar
• Sahli, A., R. Evans, and A. Manohar. 2021. Predictive maintenance in industry 4.0: current themes. Procedia CIRP 104:1948–53. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2021.11.329.
   Google Scholar
• Sanislav, T., and L. Miclea. 2012. Cyber-physical systems - concept, challenges and research areas. Control Engineering and Applied Informatics 14 (2):28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, A., S. Erol, and W. Sihn. 2016. A maturity model for assessing industry 4.0 readiness and maturity of manufacturing enterprises. Procedia CIRP 52:161–6. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.040.
   Google Scholar
• Shahrubudin, N., T. C. Lee, and R. Ramlan. 2019. An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials and applications. Procedia Manufacturing 35:1286–96. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.089.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, K. D., and S. Srivastava. 2018. Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) implementation: A literature review. Journal of Advance Research in Aeronautics and Space Science 5 (1-2):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sheth, A., S. Bhosale, and H. Kadam. 2021. “Research Paper on Cloud Computing.” contemporary research in India. Special Issue. 87–92. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352477780.
   Google Scholar
• Shirase, K., and K. Nakamoto. 2013. Simulation technologies for the development of an autonomous and intelligent machine tool. International Journal of Automation Technology 7 (1):6–15. doi:10.20965/ijat.2013.p0006.
   Google Scholar
• Sipsas, K., K. Alexopoulos, V. Xanthakis, and G. Chryssolouris. 2016. Collaborative maintenance in flow-line manufacturing environments: An industry 4.0 approach. Procedia CIRP 55 (55):236–41. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.013.
   Google Scholar
• Sony, M., J. Antony, and J. A. Douglas. 2020. Essential ingredients for the implementation of quality 4.0: A narrative review of literature and future directions for research. The TQM Journal 32 (4):779–93. doi:10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0275.
   Google Scholar
• Stergiou, C., K. E. Psannis, B. Kim, and B. Gupta. 2018. Secure integration of IoT and cloud computing. Future Generation Computer Systems 78 (78 (Part 3):964–75. doi:10.1016/j.future.2016.11.031.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Z. 2018. “Innovation and entrepreneurship in the 4th industrial revolution.” Paper Presented at the Joint Workshop on Entrepreneurship, Lae, PNG, July 18. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.28929.97127.
   Google Scholar
• Thoben, K. D., S. Wiesner, and T. Wuest. 2017. Industrie 4.0” and smart manufacturing – a review of research issues and application examples. International Journal of Automation Technology 11 (1):4–16. doi:10.20965/ijat.2017.p0004.
   Google Scholar
• Vasarainen, M., S. Paavola, and L. Vetoshkina. 2021. A systematic literature review on extended reality: Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in working life. International Journal of Virtual Reality 21 (2):1–28. doi:10.20870/IJVR.2021.21.2.4620.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K. S. 2013. Towards zero-defect manufacturing (ZDM) - a data mining approach. Advances in Manufacturing 1 (1):62–74. doi:10.1007/s40436-013-0010-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K. S. 2014. Intelligent and integrated RFID (II-RFID) system for improving traceability in manufacturing. Advances in Manufacturing 2 (2):106–20. doi:10.1007/s40436-014-0053-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., H. S. Ma, J. H. Yang, and K. S. Wang. 2017. Industry 4.0: A way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Advances in Manufacturing 5 (4):311–20. doi:10.1007/s40436-017-0204-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webert, H., L. Döß, S. Kaupp, and T. Simons. 2022. Fault handling in industry 4.0: Definition, process and applications. Sensors 22 (6):2205. doi:10.3390/s22062205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, M., P. Noessler, and J. Metternich. 2016. Development of bottleneck detection methods allowing for an effective fault repair prioritization in machining lines of the automobile industry. Production Engineering 10 (3):329–36. doi:10.1007/s11740-016-0672-9.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., W. Liu, and W. Nie. 2021. Literature review and prospect of the development and application of FMEA in manufacturing industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 112 (5–6):1409–36. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-06425-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L. D., L. Xu, and E. L. Li. 2018. Industry 4.0: State of the art and future trends. International Journal of Production Research 56 (8):2941–62. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav, N., R. Shankar, and S. P. Singh. 2020. Impact of industry 4.0/ICTs, lean six sigma and quality management systems on organisational performance. The TQM Journal 32 (4):815–35. doi:10.1108/TQM-10-2019-0251.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q., W. Zhao, X. Guo, K. Zhang, and M. Yu. 2022. A dynamic customer requirement mining method for continuous product improvement. Autonomous Intelligent Systems 2 (1):1–17. doi:10.1007/s43684-022-00032-4.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, F., Y. Ji, and R. J. Jiao. 2013. Affective and cognitive design for mass personalization: status and prospect. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 24 (5):1047–69. doi:10.1007/s10845-012-0673-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonta, T., C. A. da Costa, R. Righi, M. J. de Lima, E. S. da Trindade, and G. P. Li. 2020. Predictive maintenance in the industry 4.0: a systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering 150:106889. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar