Reevaluating the performance of control charts based on ranked-set sampling

References

• Abujiya, M. A., and H. Muttlak. 2004. Quality control chart for the mean using double ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistics 31 (10):1185–201. doi:10.1080/0266476042000285549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, R. W., H. Wolff, W. Besenfelder, and R. Baxley, Jr. 1999. EWMA control charts for the smallest and largest observations. Journal of Quality Technology 31 (2):189–206. doi:10.1080/00224065.1999.11979914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, T. R., and J. L. Clutter. 1972. Ranked set sampling theory with order statistics background. Biometrics 28 (2):545–55. doi:10.2307/2556166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halls, L. S., and T. R. Dell. 1966. Trial of ranked set sampling for forage yields. Forest Science 12 (1):22–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, G. A. 1952. A method of unbiased selective sampling using ranked sets. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 3 (4):385–90. doi:10.1071/AR9520385.
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood, R., M. Riaz, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2013. Control charts for location based on different sampling schemes. Journal of Applied Statistics 40 (3):483–94. doi:10.1080/02664763.2012.740624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood, R., M. Riaz, and R. J. M. M. Does. 2014. Quality quandaries: On the application of different ranked set sampling schemes. Quality Engineering 26 (3):370–8. doi:10.1080/08982112.2014.903971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadkhani, A., A. Amiri, and M. B. C. Khoo. 2023. A review of ranked set sampling and modified methods in designing control charts. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 39 (4):1465–93. doi:10.1002/qre.3282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muttlak, H. A. 1997. Median ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistical Sciences 6:245–55.
   Google Scholar
• Muttlak, H., and W. Al-Sabah. 2003. Statistical quality control based on ranked set sampling. Journal of Applied Statistics 30 (9):1055–78. doi:10.1080/0266476032000076173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. R., Jr., and Z. G. Stoumbos. 1999. A CUSUM chart for monitoring a proportion when inspecting continuously. Journal of Quality Technology 31 (1):87–108. doi:10.1080/00224065.1999.11979900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. R., Jr., and Z. G. Stoumbos. 2004a. Control charts and the efficient allocation of sampling resources. Technometrics 46 (2):200–14. doi:10.1198/004017004000000257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M. R., Jr., and Z. G. Stoumbos. 2004b. Should observations be grouped for effective process monitoring? Journal of Quality Technology 36 (4):343–66. doi:10.1080/00224065.2004.11980283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. W. 1959. Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1 (3):239–50. doi:10.1080/00401706.1959.10489860.
   Google Scholar
• Salazar, R. D., and A. K. Sinha. 1997. Control chart X-bar based on ranked set sampling. Comunicacion Tecica 1 (97):9.
   Google Scholar
• Samawi, H. M., M. S. Ahmed, and W. Abu-Dayyeh. 1996. Estimating the population mean using extreme ranked set sampling. Biometrical Journal 38 (5):577–86. doi:10.1002/bimj.4710380506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewhart, W. A. 1939. Statistical method from the viewpoint of quality control. Graduate School of the Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. (Republished in 1986 by Dover Publications, Inc., Mineola, NY.)
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, S. L. 1977. Ranked set sampling with concomitant variables. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods 12 (6):1207–11.
   Google Scholar
• Takahasi, K., and K. Wakimoto. 1968. On the unbiased estimates of the population mean based on the sample stratified by means of ordering. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 20 (1):1–31. doi:10.1007/BF02911622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwetsloot, I., and W. H. Woodall. 2021. A review of some sampling and aggregation strategies for basic statistical process monitoring (with discussion). Journal of Quality Technology 53 (1):1–16. doi:10.1080/00224065.2019.1611354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar