Evidential FMEA method for human reliability assessment

References

• Baloch, A., and H. Mohammadian. 2016. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy Vikor and Data Envelopment Analysis‐based fuzzy AHP. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences 3 (8):23–30. doi:10.21833/ijaas.2016.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Y., X. Lu, X. Su, Y. Hu, and Y. Deng. 2016. New failure mode and effects analysis: An evidential downscaling method. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 32 (2):737–46. doi:10.1002/qre.1753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., and H. Prade. 1986. A SET-THEORETIC VIEW OF BELIEF FUNCTIONS Logical operations and approximations by fuzzy sets. International Journal of General Systems 12 (3):193–226. doi:10.1080/03081078608934937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, D., and H. Prade. 1992. On the combination of evidence in various mathematical frameworks. In Reliability data collection and analysis, edited by J. Flamm and T. Luisi, 213–41. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Fei, L., J. Lu, and Y. Feng. 2020. An extended best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method by belief functions and its applications in hospital service evaluation. Computers & Industrial Engineering 142:106355. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Q., Y. Song, C.-l. Fan, L. Lei, and X. Wang. 2020. Evidential model for intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making. Soft Computing 24 (10):7615–35. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04389-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, X., L. Pan, and Y. Deng. 2022. Quantum pythagorean fuzzy evidence theory: A negation of quantum mass function view. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 30 (5):1313–27. doi:10.1109/TFUZZ.2021.3057993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, K., and W. Li. 2011. Combination rule of D–S evidence theory based on the strategy of cross merging between evidences. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (10):13360–6. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, F. H. 1988. Human factors in flight: Gower Technical Press, Aldershot, Hants, 1987, 360 pp. Applied Ergonomics 19 (4):337. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(88)90093-2.
   Google Scholar
• Helton, J. C. 1997. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 57 (1–4):3–76. doi:10.1080/00949659708811803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, F., and L. Martinez. 2000. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8 (6):746–52. doi:10.1109/91.890332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., L. Gou, X. Deng, and W. Jiang. 2021. Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-linguistic terms and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 37 (3):920–34. doi:10.1002/qre.2773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Z. Li, and H.-C. Liu. 2017. New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 167:302–9. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izhakian, Y. 2017. Expected utility with uncertain probabilities theory. Journal of Mathematical Economics 69:91–103. doi:10.1016/j.jmateco.2016.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, C., Y. Ran, and G. Zhang. 2021. Interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy FMEA application to improve risk evaluation process of tool changing manipulator. Applied Soft Computing 104:107192. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khakzad, N. 2019. System safety assessment under epistemic uncertainty: Using imprecise probabilities in Bayesian network. Safety Science 116:149–60. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan, B. 1992. Human error identification in human reliability assessment. Part 1: Overview of approaches. Applied Ergonomics 23 (5):299–318. doi:10.1016/0003-6870(92)90292-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Q.-L., D.-J. Wang, W.-G. Lin, and H.-C. Liu. 2014. Human reliability assessment for medical devices based on failure mode and effects analysis and fuzzy linguistic theory. Safety Science 62:248–56. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-C., X.-Q. Chen, C.-Y. Duan, and Y.-M. Wang. 2019. Failure mode and effect analysis using multi-criteria decision making methods: A systematic literature review. Computers & Industrial Engineering 135:881–97. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.06.055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H.-C., L. Liu, Q.-H. Bian, Q.-L. Lin, N. Dong, and P.-C. Xu. 2011. Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications 38 (4):4403–15. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, M., S. Adams, M. Woloshynowych, and C. Vincent. 2004. Human reliability analysis in healthcare: A review of techniques. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine 16:223–37.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, C. K. 2000. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decision Support Systems 29 (1):1–9. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(99)00084-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukumar, A., and K. Krishnamurthy. 2021. Bus body manufacturing system via FEMA and fuzzy logic controller. Soft Computing 25 (5):3889–901. doi:10.1007/s00500-020-05414-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, L., Y. Zhu, W. Zheng, and L. Yan. 2021. An information fusion FMEA method to assess the risk of healthcare waste. Journal of Management Science and Engineering 6 (1):111–24. doi:10.1016/j.jmse.2021.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Sayyadi Tooranloo, H., and S. Saghafi. 2021. Assessing the risk of hospital information system implementation using IVIF FMEA approach. International Journal of Healthcare Management 14 (3):676–89. doi:10.1080/20479700.2019.1688504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmeidler, D. 1989. Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57 (3):571–87. doi:10.2307/1911053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senot, C., A. Chandrasekaran, P. T. Ward, A. L. Tucker, and S. D. Moffatt-Bruce. 2016. The impact of combining conformance and experiential quality on hospitals’ readmissions and cost performance. Management Science 62 (3):829–48. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentz, K., and S. Ferson. 2002. Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory, 96. Medium: ED, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sezer, S. I., E. Akyuz, and O. Arslan. 2022. An extended HEART Dempster-Shafer evidence theory approach to assess human reliability for the gas freeing process on chemical tankers. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 220:108275. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.108275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafer, G. 1976. A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, G., and R. N. Rai. 2021. Failure modes based censored data analysis for repairable systems and its industrial perspective. Computers & Industrial Engineering 158:107439. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Si, A., S. Das, and S. Kar. 2023. Picture fuzzy set-based decision-making approach using Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence and grey relation analysis and its application in COVID-19 medicine selection. Soft Computing 27 (6):3327–41. doi:10.1007/s00500-021-05909-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, W., J. Li, H. Li, and X. Ming. 2020. Human factors risk assessment: An integrated method for improving safety in clinical use of medical devices. Applied Soft Computing 86:105918. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., Y. Chen, and D. Zhou. 2022. Measuring uncertainty in the negation evidence for multi-source information fusion. Entropy 24 (11):1596. doi:10.3390/e24111596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uflaz, E., S. I. Sezer, E. Akyuz, O. Arslan, and R. E. Kurt. 2022. A human reliability analysis for ship to ship LNG bunkering process under D-S evidence fusion HEART approach. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 80:104887. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2022.104887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahdani, B., M. Salimi, and M. Charkhchian. 2015. A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 77 (1–4):357–68. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6466-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., X. Liu, X. Chen, and Y. Qin. 2019. Risk assessment based on hybrid FMEA framework by considering decision maker’s psychological behavior character. Computers & Industrial Engineering 136:516–27. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., X. Liu, J. Qin, and S. Liu. 2019. An extended generalized TODIM for risk evaluation and prioritization of failure modes considering risk indicators interaction. IISE Transactions 51 (11):1236–50. doi:10.1080/24725854.2018.1539889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., X. Liu, Y. Qin, and Y. Fu. 2018. A risk evaluation and prioritization method for FMEA with prospect theory and Choquet integral. Safety Science 110:152–63. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yager, R. R. 1987. On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules. Information Sciences 41 (2):93–137. doi:10.1016/0020-0255(87)90007-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yener, Y., and G. Feryal Can. 2021. A FMEA based novel intuitionistic fuzzy approach proposal: Intuitionistic fuzzy advance MCDM and mathematical modeling integration. Expert Systems with Applications 183:115413. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong, D., S. WenKang, Z. ZhenFu, and L. Qi. 2004. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence. Decision Support Systems 38 (3):489–93. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2004.04.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A., F. Gao, M. Yang, and W. Bi. 2020. Belief rule-based dependence assessment method under interval uncertainty. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 36 (7):2459–77. doi:10.1002/qre.2708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Y. Dong, I. Palomares-Carrascosa, and H. Zhou. 2019. Failure mode and effect analysis in a linguistic context: A consensus-based multiattribute group decision-making approach. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 68 (2):566–82. doi:10.1109/TR.2018.2869787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F. J., Z. J. Zhou, C. H. Hu, L. L. Chang, Z. G. Zhou, and G. L. Li. 2018. A new evidential reasoning-based method for online safety assessment of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems 48 (6):954–66. doi:10.1109/TSMC.2016.2630800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, K., L. Li, Z. Chen, R. Sun, G. Yuan, and J. Li. 2022. A survey: Optimization and applications of evidence fusion algorithm based on Dempster–Shafer theory. Applied Soft Computing 124:109075. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zolfaghari, S., and S. M. Mousavi. 2021. A new risk evaluation methodology based on FMEA, MULTIMOORA, TPOP, and interval-valued hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets with an application to healthcare industry. Kybernetes 50 (9):2521–47. doi:10.1108/K-03-2020-0184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar