57
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Availability and cost models for sequentially inspected systems with dependent catastrophic and soft failures

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Alaswad, S., and Y. Xiang. 2017. A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 157:54–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.08.009.
  • Bao, X., and L. Cui. 2010. An analysis of availability for series Markov repairable system with neglected or delayed failures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 59 (4):734–43. doi: 10.1109/TR.2010.2055915.
  • Berrade, M. D., P. A. Scarf, C. A. V. Cavalcante, and R. A. Dwight. 2013. Imperfect inspection and replacement of a system with a defective state: A cost and reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 120:80–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.02.024.
  • Cha, J. H., M. Finkelstein, and G. Levitin. 2017. On preventive maintenance of systems with lifetimes dependent on a random shock process. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 168:90–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.023.
  • Chen, Y. L., and C. C. Chang. 2022. Optimum sequential preventive maintenance first or last policies with imperfect maintenance for a system subject to shocks. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 51 (1):162–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.005.
  • Cui, L., X. Zhao, J. Shen, and Y. Xu. 2010. An availability model for storage products under periodical inspections. International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 17 (2):89–103. doi: 10.1142/S0218539310003688.
  • Das Adhikary, D., G. K. Bose, D. K. Jana, D. Bose, and S. Mitra. 2016. Availability and cost-centered preventive maintenance scheduling of continuous operating series systems using multi-objective genetic algorithm: A case study. Quality Engineering 28 (3):352–7. doi: 10.1080/08982112.2015.1086001.
  • Gao, P., L. Xie, and J. Pan. 2019. Reliability and availability models of belt drive systems considering failure dependence. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 32 (1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s10033-019-0342-x.
  • Hu, J., Q. Sun, and Z. S. Ye. 2021. Condition-based maintenance planning for systems subject to dependent soft and hard failures. IEEE Transactions on Reliability 70 (4):1468–80. doi: 10.1109/TR.2020.2981136.
  • Jiang, R. Y. 2010. Optimization of alarm threshold and sequential inspection scheme. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95 (3):208–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2009.09.012.
  • Khati, A., and S. B. Singh. 2021. Reliability assessment of replaceable shuffle-exchange network by using interval-valued universal generating function. In The handbook of reliability, maintenance, and system safety through mathematical modeling, 419–55. UK: Academic Press. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819582-6.00011-3.
  • Khati, A., and S. B. Singh. 2022. Reliability assessment of replaceable shuffle exchange network with an additional stage using interval-valued universal generating function. In Reliability and maintainability assessment of industrial systems, 189–238. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-93623-5_9.
  • Khati, A., and S. B. Singh. 2023. Interval-valued availability of a standby system with imperfect switch incorporating uncertainty & multiple failure modes. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 21 (1):72–87. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2023.2165288.
  • Khati, A., N. Chantola, and S. B. Singh. 2022. Availability modeling of systems incorporating uncertainty & multiple failure modes using critical repair time & copula. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation :1–15. doi: 10.1080/03610918.2022.2156544.
  • Kumar, A., S. Pant, and S. B. Singh. 2017. Availability and cost analysis of an engineering system involving subsystems in series configuration. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 34 (6):879–94. doi: 10.1108/IJQRM-06-2016-0085.
  • Li, J., L. Y. Xiong, L. Q. Liu, H. R. Wang, and B. M. Wang. 2017. Reliability and availability analysis of a 10 kW@ 20 K helium refrigerator. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 171 (1):012004. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/171/1/012004.
  • Li, J., Y. Chen, Y. Zhang, and H. Huang. 2019. Availability modeling for periodically inspection system with different lifetime and repair-time distribution. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 32 (7):1667–72. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2019.03.025.
  • Liao, H., E. A. Elsayed, and L. Y. Chan. 2006. Maintenance of continuously monitored degrading systems. European Journal of Operational Research 175 (2):821–35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.017.
  • Liu, J., B. Song, and Y. Zhang. 2018. Competing failure model for mechanical system with multiple functional failures. Advances in Mechanical Engineering 10 (5):168781401877315. doi: 10.1177/1687814018773155.
  • Murthy, D. N. P., and D. G. Nguyen. 1985. Study of two‐component system with failure interaction. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 32 (2):239–47. doi: 10.1002/nav.3800320205.
  • Pant, H., and S. B. Singh. 2022. Availability and cost assessment of systems with dormant failure undergoing sequential inspections. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 28 (3):533–44. doi: 10.1108/JQME-10-2020-0112.
  • Peng, K. L., and C. Y. Huang. 2017. Reliability analysis of on-demand service-based software systems considering failure dependencies. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing 10 (3):423–35. doi: 10.1109/TSC.2015.2473843.
  • Qiu, Q., and L. Cui. 2019. Availability analysis for periodically inspected systems subject to multiple failure modes. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics 6 (3):258–71. doi: 10.1080/23302674.2017.1384961.
  • Qiu, Q., B. Liu, C. Lin, and J. Wang. 2021. Availability analysis and maintenance optimization for multiple failure mode systems considering imperfect repair. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 235 (6):982–97. doi: 10.1177/1748006X211012792.
  • Qiu, Q., L. Cui, and D. Kong. 2019. Availability and maintenance modeling for a two-component system with dependent failures over a finite time horizon. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part O: Journal of Risk and Reliability 233 (2):200–10. doi: 10.1177/1748006X18768713.
  • Qiu, Q., L. Cui, and H. Gao. 2017. Availability and maintenance modelling for systems subject to multiple failure modes. Computers & Industrial Engineering 108:192–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.04.028.
  • Qiu, Q., L. Cui, and J. Shen. 2018. Availability and maintenance modeling for systems subject to dependent hard and soft failures. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry 34 (4):513–27. doi: 10.1002/asmb.2319.
  • Qiu, Q., L. Cui, and J. Shen. 2019. Availability analysis and maintenance modelling for inspected Markov systems with down time threshold. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management 16 (4):478–95. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2018.1465228.
  • Ross, S. M. 1989. Introduction to probability models. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Sarkar, J., and S. Sarkar. 2000. Availability of a periodically inspected system under perfect repair. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 91 (1):77–90. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00128-2.
  • Taghipour, S., D. Banjevic, and A. K. S. Jardine. 2010. Periodic inspection optimization model for a complex repairable system. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95 (9):944–52. doi: 10.1080/0740817X.2011.618176.
  • Wang, W. 2008. Delay time modelling. In Complex system maintenance handbook, 345–70. London: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84800-011-7_5.
  • Woo, S. W., and D. L. O’Neal. 2016. Improving the reliability of a domestic refrigerator compressor subjected to repetitive loading. Engineering 8 (3):99–115. doi: 10.4236/eng.2016.83012.
  • Zhao, X., Q. Zheng, X. Jia, C. Qian, S. Mizutani, and M. Chen. 2022. Periodic and sequential inspection policies with mission failure probabilities. Quality and Reliability Engineering International 38 (4):1539–57. doi: 10.1002/qre.2868.
  • Zhou, X., L. Xi, and J. Lee. 2006. A dynamic opportunistic maintenance policy for continuously monitored systems. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 12 (3):294–305. doi: 10.1108/13552510610685129.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.