1,247
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Farmers’ perceptions on organic fertilisers towards circularity – a case study in Sweden

, , , &
Article: 2290247 | Received 31 Aug 2023, Accepted 27 Nov 2023, Published online: 11 Jan 2024

References

  • Akram U, Quttineh N-H, Wennergren U, Tonderski K, Metson GS. 2019. Enhancing nutrient recycling from excreta to meet crop nutrient needs in Sweden – a spatial analysis. Sci Rep. 9(1):10264. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46706-7.
  • Awasthi MK, Sarsaiya S, Wainaina S, Rajendran K, Kumar S, Quan W, Duan Y, Awasthi SK, Chen H, Pandey A, et al. 2019. A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 111:115–131. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.017.
  • Barquet K, Järnberg L, Rosemarin A, Macura B. 2020. Identifying barriers and opportunities for a circular phosphorus economy in the Baltic Sea region. Water Res. 171:115433. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115433.
  • Birkmose TS. 2009. Nitrogen recovery from organic manures: improved slurry application techniques and treatment-the Danish scenario. Proceedings-International Fertiliser Society (No. 656). International Fertiliser Society.
  • Brady MV, Andersen MS, Andersson A, Kilis E, Saarela SR, Hvarregaard Thorsøe M. 2022. Strengthening the policy framework to resolve lax implementation of the Baltic Sea Action Plan for agriculture. Ambio. 51(1):69–83. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01573-3.
  • Cai A, Xu M, Wang B, Zhang W, Liang G, Hou E, Luo Y. 2019. Manure acts as a better fertilizer for increasing crop yields than synthetic fertilizer does by improving soil fertility. Soil Tillage Res. 189:168–175. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2018.12.022.
  • Case SDC, Oelofse M, Hou Y, Oenema O, Jensen LS. 2017. Farmer perceptions and use of organic waste products as fertilisers – a survey study of potential benefits and barriers. Agric Sys. 151:84–95. doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.11.012.
  • Chadwick D, Sommer S, Thorman R, Fangueiro D, Cardenas L, Amon B, Misselbrook T. 2011. Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 166-167:514–531. doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.036.
  • Christensen ML, Sommer SG. 2013. Manure characterisation and inorganic chemistry. Anim Manure Recycl: Treat Manag. 41–65. doi: 10.1002/9781118676677.ch4.
  • Ellen McArthur Foundation. 2023. What is circular economy? [accessed 2023 Oct 20]. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview.
  • European Commision. 2015. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Closing the loop – an EU action plan for the Circular Economy (No. COM (2015) 614 final) (Brussels).
  • European Commission. 2012. Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe (COM (2012) 60 final).
  • Eurostat. 2013. Eurostat regional yearbook 2013. Statistical books: General and regional statistics.
  • Fangueiro D, Hjorth M, Gioelli F. 2015. Acidification of animal slurry– a review. J Environ Manag. 149:46–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.001.
  • Ferreira PAA, Ceretta CA, Lourenzi CR, De Conti L, Marchezan C, Girotto E, Tiecher TL, Palermo NM, Parent L-É, Brunetto G. 2022. Long-term effects of animal manures on nutrient recovery and soil quality in acid typic hapludalf under no-till conditions. Agronomy. 12(2):243. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12020243.
  • Fertilizers Europe. 2020. Industry facts and figures. https://www.fertilizerseurope.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Industry-Facts-and-Figures-2020-spreads.pdf.
  • Foged HL, Flotats X, Blasi AB, Palatsi J, Magri A, Schelde KM. 2011. Inventory of manure processing activities in Europe. Technical Report No. I concerning “Manure Processing Activities in Europe” to the European Commission, Directorate-General Environment. 138 pp.
  • Gerke J. 2022. The central role of soil organic matter in soil fertility and carbon storage. Soil Syst. 6(2):33. doi: 10.3390/soilsystems6020033.
  • Guilayn F, Jimenez J, Rouez M, Crest M, Patureau D. 2019. Digestate mechanical separation: efficiency profiles based on anaerobic digestion feedstock and equipment choice. Bioresource Technol. 274:180–189. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.090.
  • Hamnér K. 2016. Micronutrients in cereal crops: impact of nutrient management and soil properties. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
  • HELCOM. 2021. Baltic Sea Action Plan – 2021 update. Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission, [accessed 2021 Oct].
  • Hjorth M, Christensen K, Christensen M, Sommer S. 2010. Solid—liquid separation of animal slurry in theory and practice. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 30:153–180. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009010.
  • Hou Y, Velthof GL, Case SDC, Oelofse M, Grignani C, Balsari P, Zavattaro L, Gioelli F, Bernal MP, Fangueiro D, et al. 2018. Stakeholder perceptions of manure treatment technologies in Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain. J Cleaner Prod. 172:1620–1630. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.162.
  • Jensen LS. 2013. Animal manure fertiliser value, crop utilisation and soil quality impacts. Anim Manure Recycl: Treat Manag. 295–328. doi: 10.1002/9781118676677.ch15.
  • Jordbruksverket. 2020. Jordbruksföretagens driftsinriktning efter Produktionsområde, Kategori, Variabel och År. [accessed 2022 Mar 24]. https://statistik.sjv.se/PXWeb/pxweb/sv/Jordbruksverkets%20statistikdatabas/Jordbruksverkets%20statistikdatabas__Jordbruksforetag__Svensk%20Typologi/JO0105P02.px/table/tableViewLayout2/.
  • Jordbruksverket. 2021. Jordbruksstatistisk sammanställning 2021. [accessed 2022 Mar 09]. https://jordbruksverket.se/om-jordbruksverket/jordbruksverkets-officiella-statistik/jordbruksverkets-statistikrapporter/statistik/2021-08-16-jordbruksstatistisk—sammanstallning-2021.
  • Jordbruksverket. 2023. Facts about Swedish Agriculture. [accessed 2023 Oct 20]. https://www2.jordbruksverket.se/webdav/files/SJV/trycksaker/Pdf_ovrigt/ovr2gb.pdf.
  • Kai P, Pedersen P, Jensen JE, Hansen MN, Sommer SG. 2008. A whole-farm assessment of the efficacy of slurry acidification in reducing ammonia emissions. Eur J Agron. 28:148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.06.004.
  • Kleinman PJ, Sharpley AN, Withers PJ, Bergström L, Johnson LT, Doody DG. 2015. Implementing agricultural phosphorus science and management to combat eutrophication. Ambio. 44(Suppl 2):297–310. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0631-2.
  • Konrad M, Nielsen H, Pedersen A, Elofsson K. 2019. Drivers of farmers’ investments in nutrient abatement technologies in five Baltic Sea countries. Ecol Econ. 159:91–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.022.
  • Kuhn T, Kokemohr L, Holm-Müller K. 2018. A life cycle assessment of liquid pig manure transport in line with EU regulations: a case study from Germany. J Environ Manag. 217:456–467. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.082.
  • Leip A, Billen G, Garnier J, Grizzetti B, Lassaletta L, Reis S, Simpson D, Sutton MA, de Vries W, Weiss F, Westhoek H. 2015. Impacts of European livestock production: nitrogen, sulphur, phosphorus and greenhouse gas emissions, land-use, water eutrophication and biodiversity. Environ Res Lett. 10:115004. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/115004.
  • Manitoba Government. 2015. Properties of manure, 36 pp [accessed 2023 Jul 27]. https://www.gov.mb.ca/agriculture/environment/nutrient-management/pubs/properties-of-manure.pdf.
  • Melo TM, Bottlinger M, Schulz E, Leandro WM, Oliveira Sd, Filho AdA, El-Naggar A, Bolan N, Wang H, Ok YS, Rinklebe J. 2019. Management of biosolids-derived hydrochar (Sewchar): effect on plant germination, and farmers’ acceptance. J Environ Manage. 237:200–214. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.042.
  • Montes F, Meinen R, Dell C, Rotz A, Hristov AN, Oh J, Waghorn G, Gerber PJ, Henderson B, Makkar HPS. 2013. Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management options. J Anim Sci. 91:5070–5094. doi: 10.2527/jas.2013-6584.
  • Puech T, Stark F. 2023. Diversification of an integrated crop-livestock system: agroecological and food production assessment at farm scale. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 344:108300. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108300.
  • Rojas-Downing AP, Nejadhashemi T, Harrigan SA. 2017. Woznicki climate change and livestock: impacts, adaptation, and mitigation. Clim Risk Manag. 16:145–163.
  • Scarlat N, Fahl F, Dallemand J-F, Monforti F, Motola V. 2018. A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 94:915–930. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.035.
  • Scholtz M. 2017. Creating a circular economy for phosphorus fertilizers [accessed 2019 Sep 1]. http://ostara.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Scholz_FF_Sept_Oct_2017.pdf.
  • Sommer SG, Hutchings NJ. 2001. Ammonia emission from field applied manure and its reduction—invited paper. Eur J Agron. 15:1–15. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00112-5.
  • Svanbäck A, McCrackin ML, Swaney DP, Linefur H, Gustafsson BG, Howarth RW, Humborg C. 2019. Reducing agricultural nutrient surpluses in a large catchment – links to livestock density. Sci Total Environ. 648:1549–1559. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.194.
  • Swain R. 2017. Environmental challenges in the Baltic region: an introduction. In: Swain R, editor. Environmental challenges in the Baltic region, 1–13. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Tur-Cardona J, Bonnichsen O, Speelman S, Verspecht A, Carpentier L, Debruyne, L., Marchand, F., Jacobsen, B.H. and Buysse, J. 2018. Farmers’ reasons to accept bio-based fertilizers: a choice experiment in seven different European countries. J Cleaner Prod. 197:406–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.172.
  • WWF. 2023. Eutrophication. [accessed 2023 Jun 22]. https://www.wwfbalticfarmer.org/eutrophication/.
  • Zhang Y, Zhang T, Wang Y, Tan C, Zhang L, He X, Welacky T, Che X, Tang X, Wang Z. 2021. Crop production and phosphorus legacy with long-term phosphorus- and nitrogen-based swine manure applications under corn-soybean rotation. Agronomy. 11(8):1548. doi: 10.3390/agronomy11081548.