Environmental parameters and management as factors affecting greenhouse gas emissions from clay soil

References

• Abdalla M, Osborne B, Lanigan G, Forristal D, Williams M, Smith P, Jones MB. 2013. Conservation tillage systems: a review of its consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Use Manage. 29:199–209. doi:10.1111/sum.12030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badagliacca G, Benítez E, Amato G, Badalucco L, Giambalvo D, Laudicina VA, Ruisi P. 2018. Long-term no-tillage application increases soil organic carbon, nitrous oxide emissions and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) yields under rain-fed Mediterranean conditions. Sci Tot Environ. 639:350–359. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnke GD, Villamil MB. 2019. Cover crop rotations affect greenhouse gas emissions and crop production in Illinois, USA. Field Crops Res. 241. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bregaglio S, Mongiano G, Ferrara RM, Ginaldi F, Lagomarsino A, Rana G. 2022. Which are the most favourable conditions for reducing soil CO2 emissions with no-tillage? Results from a meta-analysis. Int Soil Water Conserv Res. 10(3):497–506. doi:10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.05.003.
   Google Scholar
• Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M, Kiese R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. 2013. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 368(1621). doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapuis-Lardy L, Wrage N, Metay A, Chotte J, Bernoux M. 2007. Soils, a sink for N2O? A review. Global Change Biol. 13(1):1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01280.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chataut G, Bhatta B, Joshi D, Subedi K, Kafle K. 2023. Greenhouse gases emission from agricultural soil: a review. J Agric Food Res. 11. doi:10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100533.
   Google Scholar
• Döring T. 2015. Grain legume cropping systems in temperate climates. In: Handbook of plant breeding. p. 401–434. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2797-5_13.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2022. Factsheet - a Greener and Fairer CAP [online]. European Commission [viewed 26 September 2023]. Available from: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-2023-27_en.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2023. Approved 28 CAP Strategic Plans (2023–2027). Summary overview for 27 Member States [online]. European Commission [viewed 26 September 2023]. Available from: https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-06/approved-28-cap-strategic-plans-2023-27.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2022. Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture in Europe [online]. European Environment Agency [viewed 25 September 2023]. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2000. Manual on integrated soil management and conservation practices (Vol. 8) [online]. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [viewed 25 September 2023]. Available from: https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/65457/390_FAO_l_w_bulletin_8.pdf?sequence=1.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2016. Save and Grow in practice: maize, rice, wheat. A guide to sustainable cereal production [online]. Rome: Italy. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations [viewed 25 September 2023]. Available from: https://www.fao.org/3/i4009e/i4009e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. 2021. The share of food systems in total greenhouse gas emissions. Global, regional and country trends 1990–2019. Rome: Italy. FAOSTAT Analytical brief series No. 31. 12 p. e-ISSN 2709-0078.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorini A, Boselli R, Maris SC, Santelli S, Ardenti F, Capra F, Tabaglio V. 2020. May conservation tillage enhance soil C and N accumulation without decreasing yield in intensive irrigated croplands? Results from an eight-year maize monoculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 296:106926, ISSN 106926-8809. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2020.106926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, et al. 2007. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [online]. New York: USA: Cambridge University Press [viewed 25 September 2023]. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4-wg1-chapter2-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs P. 2007. Paper presented at international workshop on increasing wheat yield potential, Cimmyt, Obregon, Mexico, 20–24 MARCH 2006 conservation agriculture: what is it and why is it important for future sustainable food production? J Agric Sci. 145(2):127. doi:10.1017/S0021859607006892.
   Google Scholar
• Imer D, Merbold L, Eugster W, Buchmann N. 2013. Temporal and spatial variations of soil CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes at three differently managed grasslands. Biogeosciences. 10(9):5931–5945. doi:10.5194/bg-10-5931-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2019. Refinement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories [online]. Switzerland. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [viewed 25 September 2023]. Available from: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2019rf/vol4.html.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2023. AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023 [online]. Panel’s 58th Session, 13–19 March 2023. Interlaken: Switzerland. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [viewed 25 September 2023]. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2023. Summary for Policymakers [online]. Geneva: Switzerland. Climate change 2023: synthesis report. contribution of working groups I, Ii and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, p. 1–34 [viewed 25 September 2023]. Available from: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_SYR_SPM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang C, Yu G, Fang H, Cao G, Li Y. 2010. Short-term effect of increasing nitrogen deposition on CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Atmospheric Environ. 44(24):2920–2926. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R. 2003. Global potential of soil carbon sequestration to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 22(2):151–184. doi:10.1080/713610854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Plaza-Bonilla D, Coulter JA, Kutcher HR, Beckie HJ, Wang L, Floc’h JB, Hamel C, Siddique KHM, Li L, et al. (2022). Chapter Six - Diversifying crop rotations enhances agroecosystem services and resilience. In: Sparks DL, editor. Advances in agronomy. Academic Press; Vol. 173, p. 299–335, ISSN 0065-2113, ISBN 9780323989558. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2022.02.007.
   Google Scholar
• Lötjönen S, Ollikainen M. 2017. Does crop rotation with legumes provide an efficient means to reduce nutrient loads and GHG emissions? Rev Agric Food Environ Stud. 98(4):283–312. doi:10.1007/s41130-018-0063-z.
   Google Scholar
• LVĢMC. n.d. Climate of Latvia, [online]. Latvijas Vides, ģeoloģijas un Meteoroloģijas centrs. Latvian Environment, Geology and Meteorology Centre [viewed 25 September 2023]. Available from: https://videscentrs.lvgmc.lv/lapas/latvijas-klimats.
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Rueda I, Muñoz-Guerra L, Yunta F, Esteban E, Tenorio JL, Lucena JJ. 2007. Tillage and crop rotation effects on barley yield and soil nutrients on a Calciortidic Haploxeralf. Soil Tillage Res. 92(1–2):1–9. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei K, Wang Z, Huang H, Zhang C, Shang X, Dahlgren R, Zhang M, Xia F. 2018. Stimulation of N2O emission by conservation tillage management in agricultural lands: a meta-analysis. Soil Tillage Res. 182:86–93. doi:10.1016/j.still.2018.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra S, Waßmann R, Jain M, Pathak H. 2002. Properties of rice soils affecting methane production potentials: 2. Differences in topsoil and subsoil. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst. 64(1/2):183–191. doi:10.1023/A:1021175404418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oertel C, Matschullat J, Zurba K, Zimmermann F, Erasmi S. 2016. Greenhouse gas emissions from soils—a review. Geochemistry. 76(3):327–352. doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2016.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson BL, Hanna LLH, Steiner JL. 2019. Reduced soil disturbance: positive effects on greenhouse gas efflux and soil N losses in winter wheat systems of the southern plains. Soil Tillage Res. 191:317–326. doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.03.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza-Bonilla D, Nogué-Serra I, Raffaillac D, Cantero-Martínez C, Justes E. 2018. Carbon footprint of cropping systems with grain legumes and cover crops: a case-study in SW France. Agric Syst. 167:92–102. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaza-Bonilla D, Nolot JM, Raffaillac D, Justes E. 2017. Innovative cropping systems to reduce N inputs and maintain wheat yields by inserting grain legumes and cover crops in southwestern France. Eur J Agronomy. 82(Part B):331–341, ISSN 1161-0301. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.05.010.
   Google Scholar
• Powlson D, Stirling C, Jat M, Gerard BG, Palm CA, Sanchez PA, Cassman KG. 2014. Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nat Clim Change. 4:678–683. doi:10.1038/nclimate2292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu C, Chen J-S, Wang H-D, Virk AL, Zhao X, Zhang H-L. 2022. Greenhouse gas emissions from the wheat-maize cropping system under different tillage and crop residue management practices in the North China Plain. Sci Tot Environ. 819. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renwick LL, Deen WM, Silva LCR, Gilbert ME, Maxwell TM, Bowles TM, Gaudin ACM. 2021. Long-term crop rotation diversification enhances maize drought resistance through soil organic matter. Environ Res Lett. 16(8). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac1468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigon JPG, Calonego JC. 2020. Soil carbon fluxes and balances of crop rotations under long-term no-till. Carbon Balance Manage. 15:19. doi:10.1186/s13021-020-00154-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakoor A, Shahbaz M, Farooq TH, Sahar NE, Shahzad SM, Altaf MM, Ashraf M. 2021. A global meta-analysis of greenhouse gases emission and crop yield under no-tillage as compared to conventional tillage. Sci Tot Environ. 750:142299. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KA, Ball T, Conen F, Dobbie KE, Massheder J, Rey A. 2018. Exchange of greenhouse gases between soil and atmosphere: interactions of soil physical factors and biological processes. Eur J Soil Sci. 69(1):142299–142320. doi:10.1111/ejss.12539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, O’Mara F, Rice C, et al. 2008. Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philos Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci. 363(1492):789–813. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan Y, Wu D, Bol R, Wu W, Meng F. 2019. Conservation farming practices in winter wheat–summer maize cropping reduce GHG emissions and maintain high yields. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 272:266–275. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2018.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbore SE. 1997. Potential responses of soil organic carbon to global environmental change. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 94(16):8284–8291. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.16.8284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valujeva K, Pilecka J, Frolova O, Berzina L, Grinfelde I. 2017. Measurement time estimation of CO2, CH4, N2O and NH3 in closed chambers and recirculation system with picarro g2508 analyser. Int Multidiscip Sci GeoConference Surveying Geol Mining Ecol Manage SGEM. 41(41):519–526. doi:10.5593/sgem2017/41/S19.066.
   Google Scholar
• Valujeva K, Pilecka-Ulcugaceva J, Skiste O, Liepa S, Lagzdins A, Grinfelde I. 2022. Soil tillage and agricultural crops affect greenhouse gas emissions from Cambic Calcisol in a temperate climate. Acta Agric Scand Sect B — Soil Plant Sci. 72(1):835–846. doi:10.1080/09064710.2022.2097123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bygaart AJ, Angers DA. 2006. Towards accurate measurements of soil organic carbon stock change in agroecosystems. Can J Soil Sci. 86(3):465–471. doi:10.4141/S05-106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venter ZS, Jacobs K, Hawkins H. 2016. The impact of crop rotation on soil microbial diversity: a meta-analysis. Pedobiologia. 59(4):215–223. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venterea RT, Halvorson AD, Kitchen NR, Liebig MA, Cavigelli MA, Del Grosso SJ, Collins H. 2012. Challenges and opportunities for mitigating nitrous oxide emissions from fertilized cropping systems. Front Ecol Environ. 10(10):562–570. doi:10.1890/120062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virk AL, Liu WS, Chen Z, N’Dri Bohoussou Y, Cheema MA, Khan KS, Zhao X, Zhang HL. 2022. Effects of different tillage systems and cropping sequences on soil physicochemical properties and greenhouse gas emissions. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 335:108010, ISSN 108010-8809. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2022.108010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner SW, Reicosky DC, Alessi RS. 1997. Regression models for calculating Gas fluxes measured with a closed chamber. Agronomy J. 89:279–284. doi:10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900020021x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhao J, Feng Y, Shang M, Bo X, Gao Z, Chen F, Chu Q. 2021a. Optimizing tillage method and irrigation schedule for greenhouse gas mitigation, yield improvement, and water conservation in wheat–maize cropping systems. Agric Water Manage. 248:106762, ISSN 106762-3774. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Amon B, Schulz K, Mehdi B. 2021b. Factors that influence nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils as well as their representation in simulation models: a review. Agronomy. 11:770. doi:10.3390/agronomy11040770.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Ti J, Zou J, Wu Y, Rees RM, Harrison MT, Li W, Huang W, Hu S, Liu K, et al. 2023. Optimizing crop rotation increases soil carbon and reduces GHG emissions without sacrificing yields. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 342:108220, ISSN 108220-8809. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2022.108220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue K, Fornara DA, Heděnec P, Wu Q, Peng Y, Peng X, Ni X, Wu F, Peñuelas J. 2023. No tillage decreases GHG emissions with no crop yield tradeoff at the global scale. Soil Tillage Res. 228:105643, ISSN 0167-1987. doi:10.1016/j.still.2023.105643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar