304
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Transposing emotions to conserve nature? The positive politics of the metrics of ecosystem services

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2010) The Promise of Happiness (Durham: Duke University Press).
  • Anderson, B. (2014) Encountering Affect: Capacities, Apparatuses, Conditions (Farnham: Ashgate).
  • Asdal, K. (2011) The office: The weakness of numbers and the production of non-authority, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36(1), pp. 1–9.
  • Beisel, U. and Boëte, C. (2013) The flying public health tool: Genetically modified mosquitoes and malaria control, Science as Culture, 22(1), pp. 38–60.
  • Besky, S. (2017) Tea as hero crop? Embodied algorithms and industrial reform in India, Science as Culture, 26(1), pp. 11–31.
  • Boonman-Berson, S., Driessen, C. and Turnhout, E. (2019) Managing wild minds: From control by numbers to a multinatural approach in wild boar management in the Veluwe, the Netherlands, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(1), pp. 2–15.
  • Braidotti, R. (2006) Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics (Cambridge: Polity).
  • Brooks, E. (2017) Number narratives: Abundance, scarcity, and sustainability in a California water world, Science as Culture, 26(1), pp. 32–55.
  • Brunet, L. (2020a) Face à l’angoisse écologique: stratégies émotionnelles et engagements épistémiques en sciences de l’environnement, Tracés. Revue de Sciences humaines, 38, pp. 103–122.
  • Brunet, L. (2020b) Un transfert de sol incertain. Les surprises de la restauration et de la compensation écologique, Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances, 14(14-4).
  • Brunet, L., Tuomisaari, J., Lavorel, S., Crouzat, E., Bierry, A., Peltola, T. and Arpin, I. (2018) Actionable knowledge for land use planning: Making ecosystem services operational, Land Use Policy, 72, pp. 27–34.
  • Brunet, L., Arpin, I. and Peltola, T. (2019) Governing research through affects: The case of ecosystem services science, Science and Public Policy, 46(6), pp. 866–875. https://journals.openedition.org/rac/11641
  • Büscher, B. and Fletcher, R. (2019) Towards convivial conservation, Conservation & Society, 17(3), pp. 283–296.
  • Daston, L. (1995) The moral economy of science, Osiris, 10, pp. 2–24.
  • Espeland, W. N. and Sauder, M. (2016) Engines of Anxiety: Academic Rankings, Reputation, and Accountability (New York: Russell Sage Foundation).
  • Fiske, A. (2017) Natural resources by numbers: The promise of “El uno por mil” in Ecuador’s Yasuní-ITT oil operations, Environment and Society, 8(1), pp. 125–143.
  • Flam, H. and Kleres, J. (Eds) (2015) Methods of Exploring Emotions (Abingdon: Routledge).
  • Friese, C. and Clarke, A. E. (2012) Transposing bodies of knowledge and technique: Animal models at work in reproductive sciences, Social Studies of Science, 42(1), pp. 31–52.
  • Glaser, B. and Strauss, A. (1967) Grounded theory: The discovery of grounded theory, Sociology The Journal Of The British Sociological Association, 12, pp. 27–49.
  • Head, L. and Harada, T. (2017) Keeping the heart a long way from the brain: The emotional labour of climate scientists, Emotion, Space and Society, 24, pp. 34–41.
  • Hébert, K. and Brock, S. (2017) Counting and counter-mapping: Contests over the making of a mining district in Bristol Bay, Alaska, Science as Culture, 26(1), pp. 56–87.
  • Hochschild, A. R. (2003) The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling, with a new afterword (Berkeley: University of California Press).
  • Ipbes,. 2019. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.
  • Kimura, A. H. (2018) Fukushima ETHOS: Post-disaster risk communication, affect, and shifting risks, Science as Culture, 27(1), pp. 98–117.
  • Lambin, É. (2009) Une écologie du bonheur (Paris: le Pommier).
  • Latour, B. (2011) Love your monsters, Breakthrough Journal, 2(11), pp. 21–28.
  • Loconto, A., Prudam, S. and Wolf, S. (this issue) Environmental governance through metrics, Science as Culture.
  • Lorimer, J. (2008) Counting corncrakes: The affective science of the UK corncrake census, Social Studies of Science, 38(3), pp. 377–405.
  • McElwee, P. (2017) The metrics of making ecosystem services, Environment and Society, 8(1), pp. 96–124.
  • Mennicken, A. and Espeland, W. N. (2019) What’s new with numbers? Sociological approaches to the study of quantification, Annual Review of Sociology, 45, pp. 223–245.
  • Merry, S. E. (2016) The Seductions of Quantification: Measuring Human Rights, Gender Violence, and Sex Trafficking (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis (Washington, DC: Island Press).
  • Nordhaus, T. and Shellenberger, M. (2007) Breakthrough: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt).
  • Parcs Nationaux de France. 2011. Etude «Approche Des Elements De Valeur Du Parc National De Port-Cros».
  • Parcs Nationaux de France. 2014. Les parcs nationaux, une valeur sûre pour les territoires.
  • Parker, J. N. and Hackett, E. J. (2012) Hot spots and hot moments in scientific collaborations and social movements, American Sociological Review, 77(1), pp. 21–44.
  • Parker, J. N. and Hackett, E. J. (2014) The sociology of science and emotions, in: J. E. Stets, and J. H Turner (Eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Emotions, Vol. 2 (New York: Springer).
  • Porter, T. (1995) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
  • Robertson, M. (2012) Measurement and alienation: Making a world of ecosystem services, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(3), pp. 386–401.
  • Rutland, T. (2015) Enjoyable life: Planning, amenity and the contested terrain of urban biopolitics, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(5), pp. 850–868.
  • Schönbauer, S. M. (2020) ‘From bench to stage’ how life scientists’ leisure groups build collective self-care, Science as Culture, 29(4), pp. 524–545.
  • Sellar, S. (2015) A feel for numbers: Affect, data and education policy, Critical Studies in Education, 56(1), pp. 131–146.
  • Turnhout, E., Neves, K. and de Lijster, E. (2014) ‘Measurementality’ in biodiversity governance: Knowledge, transparency, and the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services (IPBES), Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(3), pp. 581–597.
  • Turnhout, E., Tuinstra, W. and Halffman, W. (2019) Environmental Expertise: Connecting Science, Policy and Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  • Turnhout, E., Waterton, C., Neves, K. and Buizer, M. (2013) Rethinking biodiversity: From goods and services to “living with”, Conservation Letters, 6(3), pp. 154–161.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.