Data-driven governance and performances of accountability: critical reflections from US agri-environmental policy

References

• 110th Congress. 2008. Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Asdal, K. (2008) Enacting things through numbers: Taking nature into account/ing, Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 39, pp. 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asdal, K. (2011) The office: The weakness of numbers and the production of non-authority, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, pp. 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barral, S. (2019) Metrics and public accountability, the case of species credits in the USA, Journal of Rural Studies, 92, pp. 492–501. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.022
   Google Scholar
• Batie, S. S. (2005) The demand for economic policy analysis: Is anyone listening?, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 34, pp. 123–130. doi:10.1017/S1068280500008303
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, K., Peplow, S., Rausser, G. and Simon, L. (2008) Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison, Ecological Economics, 65, pp. 753–764. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P. and Waldorf, D. (1981) Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling, Sociological Methods & Research, 10, pp. 141–163. doi:10.1177/004912418101000205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E. (1997) Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T. (Eds.), 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, anniversary edition The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. (2007) Sustaining the unsustainable: Symbolic politics and the politics of simulation, Environmental Politics, 16, pp. 251–275. doi:10.1080/09644010701211759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. and Deflorian, M. (2019) Environmental Governance as Performance, in: Agni Kalfagianni, Doris Fuchs, and Anders Hayden (Eds) Routledge Handbook of Global Sustainability Governance. pp. 26–37. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. and Star, S. L. (2000) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences, (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Busch, L. (2011) Standards: Recipes for Reality. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, R., Cattaneo, A. and Johansson, R. (2008) Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice, Ecological Economics, 65, pp. 737–752. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, J. A., Gantzer, C. J. and Sassenrath, G. F. (2020) Soil and Water Conservation: A Celebration of 75 Years). (IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society Ankeny).
   Google Scholar
• Doering, I., Otto, C., Lawrence, D. J. and Helms, J. D. 2013. Agricultural Conservation & Environmental Programs: The Challenge of Data-Driven Conservation. Choices Quarter 2.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. N. (2013) A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming (Cambridge: The MIT Press).
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N. and Stevens, M. L. (1998) Commensuration as a social process, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp. 313–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espeland, W. N. and Stevens, M. L. (2008) A sociology of quantification, European Journal of Sociology, 49, pp. 401–436. doi:10.1017/S0003975609000150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, M. and Healy, K. (2016) Seeing like a market, Socio-Economic Review, 15(1), pp. 9–29. doi:10.1093/ser/mww033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidberg, S. (2014) Footprint technopolitics, Geoforum, 55, pp. 178–189. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidberg, S. (2017) Big food and little data: The slow harvest of corporate food supply chain sustainability initiatives, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107, pp. 1547–1547. doi:10.1080/24694452.2017.1349522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, R. and Wolf, S. (2021) Hybrid governance and performances of environmental accounting, Journal of Environmental Management, 284, pp. 111995. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111995. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479721000578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1990) The Taming of Chance. (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Hearings before Agriculture Committee’s Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, Energy, and Research (Testimony of Rep Tim Holden). 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Horan, R. D., Shortle, J. S. and Abler, D. G. (1999) Green payments for nonpoint pollution control, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, pp. 1210–1215. doi:10.2307/1244109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, L. (2005) Reframing social groups, closure, and stabilization in the social construction of technology, Social Epistemology, 19, pp. 231–253. doi:10.1080/02691720500145449
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2017) Virtual, visible, and actionable: Data assemblages and the sightlines of justice, Big Data & Society, 4, pp. 205395171772447. doi:10.1177/2053951717724477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, D. R., Winiwarter, W., Bodirsky, B. L., Bouwman, L., Boyer, E., Buckle, S., Compton, J. E., Dalgaard, T., de Vries, W., Leclère, D., Leip, A., Müller, C., Popp, A., Raghuram, N., Rao, S., Sutton, M. A., Tian, H., Westhoek, H., Zhang, X. and Zurek, M. (2020) A framework for nitrogen futures in the shared socioeconomic pathways, Global Environmental Change, 61, pp. 102029. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102029. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959378019306235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K. and Kleinman, D. L. (2002) The social construction of technology: structural considerations, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27, pp. 28–52. doi:10.1177/016224390202700102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. and Pinch, T. (1996) Users as agents of technological change: The social construction of the automobile in the rural United States, Technology and Culture, 37, pp. 763–795. doi:10.2307/3107097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampland, M. 2010. False numbers as formalizing practices. Social Studies of Science. doi:10.1177/0306312709359963.
   Google Scholar
• Levidow, L. (2018) Natural capital accounting (NCA): Roles in corporate environmental stewardship, in: Elia Apostolopoulou and Jose A. Cortes-Vazquez (Eds) The Right to Nature: Social Movements, Environmental Justice and Neoliberal Natures, pp. 185–199. (New York, NY: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Lippert, I. (2015) Environment as datascape: Enacting emission realities in corporate carbon accounting, Geoforum, 66, pp. 126–135. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E. and Stripple, J. (2011) Making climate change governable: accounting for carbon as sinks, credits and personal budgets, Critical Policy Studies, 5, pp. 187–200. doi:10.1080/19460171.2011.576531
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd ed, (Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990) Governing economic life, Economy and Society, 19, pp. 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. and Nik-Khah, P. (2008) Markets made flesh: performativity, and a problem in science studies, augmented with consideration of the FCC auctions, in: D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu (Eds) Do Economists Make Markets? pp. 190–224. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Muniesa, F. (2014) The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn, 1st ed: (New York, NY: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. J. and Bijker, W. E. (1984) The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or How the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other, Social Studies of Science, 14, pp. 399–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polasky, S., Tallis, H. and Reyers, B. (2015) Setting the bar: Standards for ecosystem services, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, pp. 7356–7361. doi:10.1073/pnas.1406490112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T. M. (1996) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Ribaudo, M. O., Zilberman, D., Taylor, R. and Gordon, B. (2017) Conservation programs Can accomplish more with less by improving cost-effectiveness, (Choices, New York, NY), 32, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, M. (2006) The nature that capital can see: science, state, and market in the commodification of ecosystem services, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, pp. 367–387. doi:10.1068/d3304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N. (1991) Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16, pp. 673–692. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(91)90019-B
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D. 2013. Data before the fact, Raw Data” is an Oxymoron, pp. 15–40.
   Google Scholar
• Rosin, C., Campbell, H. and Reid, J. (2017) Metrology and sustainability: Using sustainability audits in New Zealand to elaborate the complex politics of measuring, Journal of Rural Studies, 52, pp. 90–99. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. and Rubin, I. (2005) Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data, 2nd ed: (Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications).
   Google Scholar
• Shukla, P. R., Skeg, J., Buendia, E. C., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D. C., Zhai, P., Slade, R., Connors, S. and Van Diemen, S. 2019. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems.
   Google Scholar
• Stubbs, M. (2014) Conservation Provisions in the 2014 Farm Bill (No. 7–5700) (Washington, D.C.: Congressional Research Service).
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, S. (2013) Banking nature? The spectacular financialisation of environmental conservation, Antipode, 45, pp. 198–217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.00989.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (1984) Rules and implements: investment in forms, Social Science Information, 23, pp. 1–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. (2018) Environmental governance – from public to private?, Ecological Economics, 148, pp. 170–177. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, M. T., Dosskey, M., Khanna, M., Miller, J., Tomer, M. and Wiens, J. (2007) The science of targeting within landscapes and watersheds to improve conservation effectiveness, in: M. Schnepf, and C. Cox (Eds) Managing Agricultural Landscapes for Environmental Quality: Strengthening the Science Base, pp. 63–89. (IA: Soil and Water Conservation Society Ankeny).
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (2007) The development of bureaucracy and its relation to Law, in: W.G. Runciman (Eds) Weber: Selections in Translation, pp. 341–354. (New York: Cambridge University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Winner, L. (1980) Do artifacts have politics?, Daedalus, 109, pp. 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, M. N. (1997) The Values of Precision (HY: Princeton University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. A. (2017) Accountability, rationality, and politics: critical analysis of agri-environmental policy reform in USA, in: A. Bonanno, and S.A. Wolf (Eds) Resistance to the Neoliberal Agri-Food Regime: A Critical Analysis, pp. 50–63. (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge).
   Google Scholar