Design of integrated manufacturing information systems for reconfigurability and adaptability by modularizing the system architecture

References

• Baldwin, C. Y., and K. B. Clark. 2003. “Managing in an Age of Modularity.” Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations 149: 84–93.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C. Y., and K. B. Clark. 2006. “Modularity in the Design of Complex Engineering Systems.” In Complex Engineered Systems, 175–205. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32834-3_9.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, A., P. Konana, A. B. Whinston, and F. Yin. 2004. “An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value.” MIS Quarterly 28 (4): 585–620. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville, R., F. Rowe, and F. C. Wolff. 2018. “Integration of Information Systems and Cybersecurity Countermeasures: An Exposure to Risk Perspective.” ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 49 (1): 33–52. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184444.3184448.
   Google Scholar
• Bonvoisin, J., F. Halstenberg, T. Buchert, and R. Stark. 2016. “A Systematic Literature Review on Modular Product Design.” Journal of Engineering Design 27 (7): 488–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2016.1166482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, T. R. 2001. “Applying the Design Structure Matrix to System Decomposition and Integration Problems: A Review and New Directions.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48 (3): 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.946528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buede, D. M. and W. D. Miller, 2016. The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Caires, B., and J. S. Cardoso. 2006. “Using Semantic Web Technologies to Build Adaptable Enterprise Information Systems.” International Journal of Interoperability in Business Information System 3 (1): 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, L. K., and M. L. Wu. 2002. “Quality Function Deployment: A Comprehensive Review of Its Concepts and Methods.” Quality Engineering 15 (1): 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1081/QEN-120006708.
   Google Scholar
• Childerhouse, P., and D. R. Towill. 2003. “Simplified Material Flow Holds the Key to Supply Chain Integration.” Omega 31 (1): 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00062-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., R. Alamoudi, and S. Asfour. 2009. “Interaction-Based Complexity Measure of Manufacturing Systems Using Information Entropy.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 22 (10): 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511920902951393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S., K. Jung, B. Kulvatunyou, and K. C. Morris. 2016. “An Analysis of Technologies and Standards for Designing Smart Manufacturing Systems.” Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 121: 422. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.121.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimini, C., F. Pirola, R. Pinto, and S. Cavalieri. 2020. “A Human-In-The-Loop Manufacturing Control Architecture for the Next Generation of Production Systems.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 54: 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S., R. Harrison, T. Millea and L. Sun, 2003, August. Challenges of Highly Adaptable Information Systems. In Proceedings of the international workshop on ELISA, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Applied Software Engineering Research Group University of Reading, 128–133.
   Google Scholar
• Dahmus, J. B., J. P. Gonzalez-Zugasti and K. N. Otto, 2000, September. Modular Product Architecture. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, 35142, 225–235. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Deen, S.M. 2013. Agent-Based Manufacturing: Advances in the Holonic Approach. ed. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Efatmaneshnik, M., S. Shoval, and L. Qiao. 2018. “A Standard Description of the Terms Module and Modularity for Systems Engineering.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 67 (2): 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2018.2878589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enos, J. R., J. V. Farr, and R. R. Nilchiani. 2019. “Identifying and Quantifying Critical Ilities in the Acquisition of DoD Systems.” Defense AR Journal 26 (1): 18–43. https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.18-799.26.01.
   Google Scholar
• Eppinger, S. D., and T. R. Browning. 2012. Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8896.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Faulconbridge, R. I., and M. J. Ryan. 2014. Systems Engineering Practice. Canberra, Australia: Argos Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fayard, D., L. S. Lee, R. A. Leitch, and W. J. Kettinger. 2012. “Effect of Internal Cost Management, Information Systems Integration, and Absorptive Capacity on Inter-Rganizational Cost Management in Supply Chains.” Accounting, Organizations & Society 37 (3): 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2012.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formentini, G., F. Bouissiere, C. Cuiller, P. E. Dereux, and C. Favi. 2022. “Conceptual Design for Assembly Methodology Formalization: Systems Installation Analysis and Manufacturing Information Integration in the Design and Development of Aircraft Architectures.” Journal of Industrial Information Integration 26:100327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, E., and G. Cohen, 2020, January. A RAMS Journey for Microturbine Power Generation. In 2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), 1–7. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gaiardelli, S., S. Spellini, M. Panato, M. Lora and F. Fummi, 2022, March. A Software Architecture to Control Service-Oriented Manufacturing Systems. In 2022 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), Department of Computer Science – University of Verona, Verona, Italy, 40–43. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenson, J. K., G. J. Prasad, and Y. Zhang. 2003. “Product Modularity: Definitions and Benefits.” Journal of Engineering Design 14 (3): 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954482031000091068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gronau, N. and M. Rohloff, 2007. Managing Change: Business/IT Alignment and Adaptability of Information Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, P., M. Hashemian, and A. Y. Nee. 2004. “Adaptable design.” CIRP Annals 53 (2): 539–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. 2019. “Modularity Enablers: A Tool for Industry 4.0.” Life Cycle Reliability and Safety Engineering 8 (2): 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41872-018-0067-3.
   Google Scholar
• Harhalakis, G., C. P. Lin, L. Mark, and P. R. Muro-Medrano. 1991. “Information Systems for Integrated Manufacturing (INSIM): A Design Methodology.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 4 (6): 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511929108944513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto, K., N. A. Chiriac, D. Lysy, and E. Suk Suh. 2012. “Comparative Analysis of Coupling Modularity Metrics.” Journal of Engineering Design 23 (10–11): 790–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2012.701728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölttä-Otto, K., and O. De Weck. 2007. “Degree of Modularity in Engineering Systems and Products with Technical and Business Constraints.” Concurrent Engineering 15 (2): 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X07078931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Y. Li, X. Chu, and D. Chu. 2015. “An Integrated Top-Down Design Process Evaluation Approach of Complex Products and Systems Based on Hierarchical Design Structure Matrix.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 28 (10): 1015–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilevbare, I. M., D. Probert, and R. Phaal. 2013. “A Review of TRIZ, and Its Benefits and Challenges in Practice.” Technovation 33 (2–3): 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., S. Cook, and T. L. Ferris. 2015. “A Generic State-Machine Model of System Resilience.” Insight 18 (1): 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H. J., C. W. Kang, and B. H. Kim. 2018. “Requirements Development Process for Manufacturing Information Systems Based on Quality Function Deployment.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 31 (2): 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192X.2017.1407448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, S., and T. W. Simpson. 2017. “New Modularity Indices for Modularity Assessment and Clustering of Product Architecture.” Journal of Engineering Design 28 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2016.1252835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. C., I. C. Jong, G. N. Rim, I. J. Kwon, U. G. Ryu, J. C. Pak, and J. C. Kim. 2023. “Information System-Theoretic View on the Architecture of Smart Manufacturing Systems: A Case Study in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchhof, J. C., J. Michael, B. Rumpe, S. Varga and A. Wortmann, 2020, October. Model-Driven Digital Twin Construction: Synthesizing the Integration of Cyber-Physical Systems with Their Information Systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems, Virtual Event, Canada, 90–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kruchten, P. B. 1995. “The 4+ 1 View Model of Architecture.” IEEE Software 12 (6): 42–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.469759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M. and J. Franke, 2020, January. Smart Manufacturing Traceability for Automotive E/E Systems Enabled by Event-Driven Microservice Architecture. In 2020 IEEE 11th International Conference on Mechanical and Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies (ICMIMT), Cape town, South Africa, 142–148. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lameche, K., N. M. Najid, P. Castagna, and K. Kouiss. 2017. “Modularity in the Design of Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems.” IFAC-Papersonline 50 (1): 3511–3516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.939.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., B. Bagheri, and H. A. Kao. 2015. “A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems.” Manufacturing Letters 3:18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, P., Y. Sun and W. Li, 2015, June. Service-Oriented Manufacturing Information System: Concept, Architecture and Focus of Future Research. In 2015 12th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM), Guangzhou, China, 1–6. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W. D. and M. Y. Low, 2020, December. Concept Design of a System Architecture for a Manufacturing Cyber-Physical Digital Twin System. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM), Singapore, Singapore, 1320–1324. IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., C. Hu, Y. Li, & L. Jia 2014a. The Advanced Data Service Architecture for Modern Enterprise Information System. Paper presented at the Information Science and Applications (ICISA), 2014 International Conference on, Seoul, Korea (South).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., C. Hu, Y. Li, & L. Jia 2014b. The Advanced Data Service Architecture for Modern Enterprise Information System. Paper presented at the 2014 International Conference on Information Science & Applications (ICISA), Seoul, Korea (South).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., W. Ke, K. K. Wei, and Z. Hua. 2013. “The Impact of IT Capabilities on Firm Performance: The Mediating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Supply Chain Agility.” Decision Support Systems 54 (3): 1452–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Y., K. Liu and S. Huang, 2010, April. Notice of Retraction: A Control Strategy for Large-Scale System Based on the Synergy Among Material Flow, Energy Flow and Information Flow. In 2010 2nd International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology (Vol. 4, pp. V4–312). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Lyadova, L. 2009. “Metamodelling and Multilevel Metadata as a Basis of Technology That is Intended for Development of Adaptable Information Systems.” Information Technologies & Knowledge 3 (1): 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Maiga, A. S., A. Nilsson, and C. Ax. 2015. “Relationships Between Internal and External Information Systems Integration, Cost and Quality Performance, and Firm Profitability.” International Journal of Production Economics 169:422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, A. F., H. L. Napitupulu, and R. Ginting. December, 2020. “Comparison and Integration of Axiomatic Design with Quality Function Deployment as a Design Method: A Literature Review.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science & Engineering 1003 (1): 012017. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1003/1/012017.
   Google Scholar
• Marselina, A., M. Radja and F. L. Witi, 2021, March. Comparison of Enterprise Framework Architecture in Msmes Manufacturing Sector. In The 3rd International Conference on Banking, Accounting, Management and Economics (ICOBAME 2020), Online, 78–84. Atlantis Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, T., K. G. Murphy, and N. S. Jones. 2018. “Quantitative Approaches to Energy and Glucose Homeostasis: Machine Learning and Modelling for Precision Understanding and Prediction.” Journal of the Royal Society Interface 15 (138): 20170736. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola, J. H. 2006. “Capturing the Degree of Modularity Embedded in Product Architectures.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 (2): 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00188.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola, J. H., and O. Gassmann. 2003. “Managing Modularity of Product Architectures: Toward an Integrated Theory.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50 (2): 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.810826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollajan, A., and S. H. Iranmanesh. 2021. “Modularisation of System Architecture to Improve System Recoverability: A Unique Application of Design Structure Matrix.” Journal of Engineering Design 32 (12): 703–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2021.1971634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollajan, A., H. Iranmanesh, A. Khezri, and A. Abazari. 2022. “Effect of Applying Independence Axiom of Axiomatic Design Theory on Performance of an Integrated Manufacturing Information System: A Computer Simulation Modeling Approach.” SIMULATION 98 (7): 535–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/00375497211062892.
   Google Scholar
• Mollajan, A., S. H. Iranmanesh, and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam. 2021. “A Systems Approach to Improve Reliability of a Contract by Modularising Contract’s Information Flow Architecture: A New Contribution to Risk Mitigation in Projects Management.” Enterprise Information Systems 17 (4): 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2021.1971773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monostori, L., J. Váncza, and S. R. Kumara. 2006. “Agent-Based Systems for Manufacturing.” CIRP Annals 55 (2): 697–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2006.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., and W. Beitz. 1984. Engineering Design. Vol. 984. edited by Wallace, K. London: Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Segre, M. 1994. “Peano's Axioms in Their Historical Context.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 48: 201–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiger, R., L. Malburg, B. Weber, and R. Bergmann. 2022. “Integrating Process Management and Event Processing in Smart Factories: A Systems Architecture and Use Cases.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 63:575–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sękala, A., A. Gwiazda, and A. D. DOBRZAŃSKA-DANIKIEWICZ. 2014. “Model of the E-Manufacturing Environment as the Multi-Agent System.” Applied Mechanics & Materials 657 (657): 854–858. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.657.854.
   Google Scholar
• Setia, P., and P. C. Patel. 2013. “How Information Systems Help Create OM Capabilities: Consequents and Antecedents of Operational Absorptive Capacity.” Journal of Operations Management 31 (6): 409–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.013.S.M.,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, N., V. Ivezic, and V. Srinivasan. 2016. “On Architecting and Composing Engineering Information Services to Enable Smart Manufacturing.” Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 16 (3): 031002. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, D. V. 1981. “The Design Structure System: A Method for Managing the Design of Complex Systems.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 3: 71–74.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, R. B., K. L. Wood, and R. H. Crawford. 2000. “A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures.” Design Studies 21 (1): 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(99)00003-4.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. 2001. Axiomatic Design: Advances and Applications. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, F., Y. Cheng, L. Zhang, and A. Y. Nee. 2017. “Advanced Manufacturing Systems: Socialization Characteristics and Trends.” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 28 (5): 1079–1094. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1042-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarenskeen, D., 2016, April. Conceptual Independence as an Architecture Pattern for Adaptable Systems. In Proceedings of the 10th Travelling Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, Netherlands, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Traganos, K., P. Grefen, I. Vanderfeesten, J. Erasmus, G. Boultadakis, and P. Bouklis. 2021. “The HORSE Framework: A Reference Architecture for Cyber-Physical Systems in Hybrid Smart Manufacturing.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems 61:461–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. T., and S. D. Eppinger. 2008. “Identifying Customer Needs.” Product Design and Development 54.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C. Y., and R. E. Fulton. 1994. “Information System Design for Optical Fibre Manufacturing Using an Object-Oriented Approach.” International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 7 (1): 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511929408944595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasson, C. S. 2015. System Engineering Analysis, Design, and Development: Concepts, Principles, and Practices. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K., and H. Zhang A Comparison of TRIZ and Axiomatic Design. Proceedings of ICAD2000, 1st International Conference on Axiomatic Design, Cambridge, MA – 21–23 June 2000
   Google Scholar
• Yu, T. L., A. A. Yassine, and D. E. Goldberg. 2007. “An Information Theoretic Method for Developing Modular Architectures Using Genetic Algorithms.” Research in Engineering Design 18 (2): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-007-0030-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdravković, M., H. Panetto, and G. Weichhart. 2022. “AI-Enabled Enterprise Information Systems for Manufacturing.” Enterprise Information Systems 16 (4): 668–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2021.1941275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. C., X. D. Chen, M. M. Gupta and Y. H. Lin, 2014. “A comparison of axiomatic design theory and systematic design procedure in the design of a solid state fermenter.” Doctoral dissertation, University of Saskatchewan.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. J., Z. R. Xu, S. H. Zhao, J. F. Jiang, Y. B. Wang, and X. H. Yan. 2006. “Optimization of Process Parameters for Reduction of Gossypol Levels in Cottonseed Meal by Candida tropicalis ZD-3 During Solid Substrate Fermentation.” Toxicon 48 (2): 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.05.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar