Recent advances in microfluidic technology of arterial thrombosis investigations

References

• Costa PF, Albers HJ, Linssen JEA, Middelkamp HHT, van der Hout L, Passier R, van den Berg A, Malda J, van der Meer AD. Mimicking arterial thrombosis in a 3D-printed microfluidic in vitro vascular model based on computed tomography angiography data. Lab Chip. 2017;17(16):2785–20. doi:10.1039/C7LC00202E.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson SP. Arterial thrombosis–insidious, unpredictable and deadly. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1423–36. doi:10.1038/nm.2515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ZL, Ku DN, Aidun CK. Mechanobiology of shear-induced platelet aggregation leading to occlusive arterial thrombosis: a multiscale in silico analysis. J Biomech. 2021;120:110349. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KAREL MFA, Lemmens TP, TUllemans BME, WIelders SJ, Gubbins E, van Beurden D, van Rijt S, Cosemans JM. Characterization of atherosclerotic plaque coating for thrombosis microfluidics assays. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2022;15(1):55–65. doi:10.1007/s12195-021-00713-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita A, Asada Y. Underlying mechanisms of thrombus formation/growth in atherothrombosis and deep vein thrombosis. Pathol Int. 2023;73(2):65–80. doi:10.1111/pin.13305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahidi M. Thrombosis and von Willebrand factor. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;906:285–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dopheide SM, Maxwell MJ, Jackson SP. Shear-dependent tether formation during platelet translocation on von Willebrand factor. Blood. 2002;99(1):159–67. doi:10.1182/blood.V99.1.159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell MJ, Dopheide SM, Turner SJ, Jackson SP. Shear induces a unique series of morphological changes in translocating platelets: effects of morphology on translocation dynamics. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26(3):663–9. doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000201931.16535.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt WS, Tovar-lopez FJ, Westein E, Harper IS, Jackson SP. A multimode-TIRFM and microfluidic technique to examine platelet adhesion dynamics. Methods Mol Biol. 2013;1046:39–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maxwell MJ, Westein E, Nesbitt WS, Giuliano S, Dopheide SM, Jackson SP. Identification of a 2-stage platelet aggregation process mediating shear-dependent thrombus formation. Blood. 2007;109(2):566–76. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-07-028282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt WS, Kulkarni S, GIuliano S, GOncalves I, Dopheide SM, Yap CL, Harper IS, Salem HH, Jackson SP. Distinct glycoprotein Ib/V/IX and integrin αIIbβ3-dependent calcium signals cooperatively regulate platelet adhesion under flow. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(4):2965–72. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110070200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umerah CO, Momodu II. Anticoagulation [M]. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Sondag D, Verhoeven S, Löwik D, van Geffen M, Veer CV, van Heerde WL, Boltje TJ, Rutjes FPJT. Activity sensing of coagulation and fibrinolytic proteases. Chemistry. 2023;29(18):e202203473. doi:10.1002/chem.202203473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin MT, Kim D, Ku DN. Shear-induced platelet aggregation: 3D-grayscale microfluidics for repeatable and localized occlusive thrombosis. Biomicrofluidics. 2019;13(5):054106. doi:10.1063/1.5113508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovar-lopez FJ, Rosengarten G, Nasabi M, Sivan V, Khoshmanesh K, Jackson SP, Mitchell A, Nesbitt WS. An investigation on platelet transport during thrombus formation at micro-scale stenosis. PloS One. 2013;8(10):e74123. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colace TV, Tormoen GW, MCcarty OJ, Diamond SL. Microfluidics and coagulation biology. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2013;15(1):283–303. doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karel M, Hechler B, Kuijpers M, Cosemans J. Atherosclerotic plaque injury-mediated murine thrombosis models: advantages and limitations. Platelets. 2020;31(4):439–46. doi:10.1080/09537104.2019.1708884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg S, Heuck G, IP S, Ramsay E. Microfluidics: a transformational tool for nanomedicine development and production. J Drug Target. 2016;24(9):821–35. doi:10.1080/1061186X.2016.1198354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvepalli DP, Schmidtke DW, Nollert MU. Design considerations for a microfluidic device to quantify the platelet adhesion to collagen at physiological shear rates. Ann Biomed Eng. 2009;37(7):1331–41. doi:10.1007/s10439-009-9708-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku CJ, D’Amico Oblak T, Spence DM. Interactions between multiple cell types in parallel microfluidic channels: monitoring platelet adhesion to an endothelium in the presence of an anti-adhesion drug. Anal Chem. 2008;80(19):7543–8. doi:10.1021/ac801114j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim D, Finkenstaedt-Quinn S, Hurley KR, Buchman JT, Haynes CL. On-chip evaluation of platelet adhesion and aggregation upon exposure to mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Analyst (Lond). 2014;139(5):906–13. doi:10.1039/C3AN01679J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotz F, Helmer D, Rapp BE. Emerging technologies and materials for high-resolution 3D printing of microfluidic chips. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2022;179:37–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amirifar L, Besanjideh M, Nasiri R, Shamloo A, Nasrollahi F, de Barros NR, Davoodi E, Erdem A, Mahmoodi M, Hosseini V, et al. Droplet-based microfluidics in biomedical applications. Biofabrication. 2022;14(2):022001. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ac39a9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destefano P, BIanchi E, Dubini G. The impact of microfluidics in high-throughput drug-screening applications. Biomicrofluidics. 2022;16(3):031501. doi:10.1063/5.0087294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regmi S, Poudel C, Adhikari R, Luo KQ. Applications of microfluidics and organ-on-a-chip in cancer research. Biosensors (Basel). 2022;12(7):459. doi:10.3390/bios12070459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galateanu B, Hudita A, Biru EI, Iovu H, Zaharia C, Simsensohn E, Costache M, Petca R-C, Jinga V. Applications of polymers for organ-on-chip technology in urology. Polym (Basel). 2022;14(9):1688. doi:10.3390/polym14091668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chliara MA, Elezoglou S, Zergioti I. Bioprinting on organ-on-chip: development and applications. Biosensors (Basel). 2022;12(12):1135. doi:10.3390/bios12121135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Safhi AY. Three-dimensional (3D) printing in cancer therapy and diagnostics: Current status and future perspectives. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15(6):678. doi:10.3390/ph15060678.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cordes DB, Lickiss PD, Rataboul F. Recent developments in the chemistry of cubic polyhedral oligosilsesquioxanes. Chem Rev. 2010;110(4):2081–173. doi:10.1021/cr900201r.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Zhu J, Ma Q, Ma J, Bai H, Chen L, Mu S. Two-Dimensional MoS(2): Structural properties, synthesis methods, and regulation strategies toward oxygen reduction. Micromachines. 2021;12(3):240. doi:10.3390/mi12030240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monia Kabandana GK, Zhang T, Chen C. Emerging 3D printing technologies and methodologies for microfluidic development [J]. Anal Methods. 2022;14(30):2885–906. doi:10.1039/D2AY00798C.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Fang NX. Micro 3D printing using a digital projector and its application in the study of soft materials mechanics. J Vis Exp. 2012;69:e4457. doi:10.3791/4457.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald NP, Cabot JM, Smejkal P, Guijt RM, Paull B, Breadmore MC. Comparing microfluidic performance of three-dimensional (3D) printing platforms. Anal Chem. 2017;89(7):3858–66. doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro AS, Tekko IA, Jomaa MH, Vora L, McAlister E, Volpe-Zanutto F, Nethery M, Baine PT, Mitchell N, McNeill DW. et al. Two-Photon polymerisation 3D printing of microneedle array templates with versatile designs: application in the development of polymeric drug delivery systems. Pharm Res. 2020;37(9):174. doi:10.1007/s11095-020-02887-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Ma X, Gou M, Mei D, Zhang K, Chen S. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;40:40)103–12. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2016.03.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au AK, Huynh W, Horowitz LF, Folch A. 3D-printed microfluidics. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2016;55(12):3862–81. doi:10.1002/anie.201504382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HE Y, Vallières C, Alexander MR, Wildman R, Avery S. Inkjet 3D printing of polymers resistant to fungal attachment. Bio Protoc. 2021;11(9):e4016. doi:10.21769/BioProtoc.4016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fina F, Madla CM, Goyanes A, Zhang J, Gaisford S, Basit AW. Fabricating 3D printed orally disintegrating printlets using selective laser sintering. Int J Pharm. 2018;541(1–2):101–7. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.02.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahak BK, MIshra A, Preetam S, Tiwari A. Advances in organ-on-a-chip materials and devices. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2022;5(8):3576–607. doi:10.1021/acsabm.2c00041.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jalili A, Bagheri M, Shamloo A, Kazemipour Ashkezari AH. A plasmonic gold nanofilm-based microfluidic chip for rapid and inexpensive droplet-based photonic PCR. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):23338. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-02535-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sackmann EK, Fulton AL, Beebe DJ. The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research. Nature. 2014;507(7491):181–9. doi:10.1038/nature13118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Fang H, Zhang J, Yan S. Modular microfluidics for life sciences. J Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21(1):85. doi:10.1186/s12951-023-01846-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian JY, Hou CW, Li XJ, Jin Z-J. Actuation mechanism of microvalves: a review. Micromachines. 2020;11(2):172. doi:10.3390/mi11020172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araci IE, Quake SR. Microfluidic very large scale integration (mVLSI) with integrated micromechanical valves. Lab Chip. 2012;12(16):2803–6. doi:10.1039/c2lc40258k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai X, Yang M, Wu H, Li D. Modular microfluidics: current status and future prospects. Micromachines. 2022;13(8):1363. doi:10.3390/mi13081363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyama TG, Oyama K, Taguchi M. A simple method for production of hydrophilic, rigid, and sterilized multi-layer 3D integrated polydimethylsiloxane microfluidic chips. Lab Chip. 2020;20(13):2354–63. doi:10.1039/D0LC00316F.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt WS, Westein E, Tovar-lopez FJ, Tolouei E, Mitchell A, Fu J, Carberry J, Fouras A, Jackson SP. A shear gradient–dependent platelet aggregation mechanism drives thrombus formation. Nat Med. 2009;15(6):665–73. doi:10.1038/nm.1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggeri ZM. Platelet adhesion under flow. Microcirculation (New York, NY: 1994). 2009;16(1):58–83. doi:10.1080/10739680802651477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokarev AA, Butylin AA, Ataullakhanov FI. Platelet adhesion from shear blood flow is controlled by near-wall rebounding collisions with erythrocytes. Biophys J. 2011;100(4):799–808. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranmer SL, Ashworth KJ, Yao Y, Berndt MC, Ruggeri ZM, Andrews RK, Jackson SP. High shear–dependent loss of membrane integrity and defective platelet adhesion following disruption of the GPIbα-filamin interaction. Blood. 2011;117(9):2718–27. doi:10.1182/blood-2010-07-296194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson SP. The growing complexity of platelet aggregation. Blood. 2007;109(12):5087–95. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-12-027698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casa LD, Deaton DH, Ku DN. Role of high shear rate in thrombosis. J Vas Sur. 2015;61(4):1068–80. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2014.12.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggeri ZM, Mendolicchio GL. Adhesion mechanisms in platelet function. Cir Remodel cannot bes. 2007;100(12):1673–85. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000267878.97021.ab.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Ku DN, Forest CR. Microfluidic system for simultaneous optical measurement of platelet aggregation at multiple shear rates in whole blood. Lab Chip. 2012;12(7):1355–62. doi:10.1039/c2lc21145a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman SM, Hlady V. Downstream platelet adhesion and activation under highly elevated upstream shear forces. Acta Biomater. 2019;91:135–43. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracka M, Lima R, Miranda JM, Student S, Melka B, Ostrowski Z. Red blood cells tracking and cell-free layer formation in a microchannel with hyperbolic contraction: a CFD model validation. Comp Met Prog Biomed. 2022;226:107117. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.107117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tovar-Lopez FJ, Rosengarten G, Westein E, Khoshmanesh K, Jackson SP, Mitchell A, Nesbitt WS. A microfluidics device to monitor platelet aggregation dynamics in response to strain rate micro-gradients in flowing blood. Lab Chip. 2010;10(3):291–302. doi:10.1039/B916757A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman SM, Eichinger CD, Hlady V. Effects of upstream shear forces on priming of platelets for downstream adhesion and activation. Acta Biomater. 2018;73:228–35. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhussupbekov M, Méndez rojano R, Wu WT, Massoudi M, Antaki JF. A continuum model for the unfolding of von Willebrand factor. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021;49(9):2646–58. doi:10.1007/s10439-021-02845-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T, Liu L, Huang X, Gao X, Chen D, Huan X, He C, Li Y. Application of microfluidic chip technology to study the inhibitory effect of tetramethylpyrazine on platelet aggregation, activation, and phosphatidylserine exposure mediated by pathological high shear rate. Blood Coagul Fib. 2023;34(1):47–60. doi:10.1097/MBC.0000000000001179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muravlev IA, Dobrovolsky AB, Antonova OA, Khaspekova SG, Mazurov AV. Effects of platelets activated by different agonists on fibrin formation and thrombin generation. Platelets. 2023;34(1):2139365. doi:10.1080/09537104.2022.2139365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi QM, Dunne E, Oglesby I, Schoen I, Ricco AJ, Kenny D, Shaqfeh ESG. In vitro measurement and modeling of platelet adhesion on VWF-Coated surfaces in channel flow. Biophy J. 2019;116(6):1136–51. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De witt SM, Swieringa F, Cavill R, Lamers MME, van Kruchten R, Mastenbroek T, Baaten C, Coort S, Pugh N, Schulz A, et al. Identification of platelet function defects by multi-parameter assessment of thrombus formation. Nat Commun. 2014;5(1):4257. doi:10.1038/ncomms5257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeon HJ, Qureshi MM, LEE SY, Badadhe JD, Cho H, Chung E. Laser speckle decorrelation time-based platelet function testing in microfluidic system. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16514. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-52953-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luna DJ, Pandian RNK, Mathur T, Bui J, Gadangi P, Kostousov V, Hui SKR, Teruya J, Jain A. Tortuosity-powered microfluidic device for assessment of thrombosis and antithrombotic therapy in whole blood. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):5742. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62768-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ting LH, Feghhi S, Taparia N, Smith AO, Karchin A, Lim E, John AS, Wang X, Rue T, White NJ. et al. Contractile forces in platelet aggregates under microfluidic shear gradients reflect platelet inhibition and bleeding risk. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1204. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09150-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee H, Na W, Lee BK, Lim CS, Shin S. Recent advances in microfluidic platelet function assays: moving microfluidics into clinical applications. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2019;71(2):249–66. doi:10.3233/CH-189416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Lu J, Zhang C, Hsia I, Yu X, Marecki L, Marecki E, Asmani M, Jain S, Neelamegham S. et al. Microclot array elastometry for integrated measurement of thrombus formation and clot biomechanics under fluid shear. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2051. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10067-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li R, Panckeri KA, Fogarty PF, Cuker A, Diamond SL. Recombinant factor VIIa addition to haemophilic blood perfused over collagen/tissue factor can sufficiently bypass the factor IXa/VIIIa defect to rescue fibrin generation. Hae J Off World Fed Hemo. 2017;23(5):759–68. 10.1111/hae.13259.
   Google Scholar
• Kornblith LZ, Kutcher ME, Redick BJ, Calfee CS, Vilardi RF, Cohen MJ. Fibrinogen and platelet contributions to clot formation: implications for trauma resuscitation and thromboprophylaxis. J Trauma Acute Care Sur. 2014;76(2). discussion 62-3. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindarajan V, Zhu S, LI R, Lu Y, Diamond SL, Reifman J, Mitrophanov AY. Impact of tissue factor localization on blood clot structure and resistance under venous shear. Biophy J. 2018;114(4):978–91. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2017.12.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judith RM, Fisher JK, Spero RC, Fiser BL, Turner A, Oberhardt B, Taylor RM, Falvo MR, Superfine R. Micro-elastometry on whole blood clots using actuated surface-attached posts (ASAPs). Lab Chip. 2015;15(5):1385–93. doi:10.1039/C4LC01478B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Diamond SL. Detection of platelet sensitivity to inhibitors of COX-1, P2Y₁, and P2Y₁₂ using a whole blood microfluidic flow assay. Thromb Res. 2014;133(2):203–10. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2013.10.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castrichini M, Luzum JA, Pereira N. Pharmacogenetics of antiplatelet therapy. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2023;63:211–29. doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-051921-092701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson AD. Antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(2):154–69. doi:10.1038/nrd2957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcucci R, Berteotti M, Gragnano F, Galli M, Cavallari I, Renda G, Capranzano P, Santilli F, Capodanno D, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Monitoring antiplatelet therapy: where are we now? J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2023;24(Suppl 1):24–35. doi:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001406.
   Google Scholar
• Angiolillo DJ, Rollini F, Storey RF, Bhatt DL, James S, Schneider DJ, Sibbing D, So DYF, Trenk D, Alexopoulos D, et al. International expert consensus on switching platelet P2Y12Receptor–inhibiting therapies. Circulation. 2017;136(20):1955–75. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pîrlog BO, Grotta JC. The applicability of thromboelastography in acute ischemic stroke: a literature review. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2022;48(7):842–9. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1753529.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharifi-rad J, Sharopov F, Ezzat SM, Zam W, Ademiluyi AO, Oyeniran OH, Adetunji CO, Roli OI, Živković J, Martorell M, et al. An updated review on glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors as antiplatelet agents: basic and clinical perspectives. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2023;30(2):93–107. doi:10.1007/s40292-023-00562-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis LRA, MIllington-burgess SL, Rahman T, Harper MT. Q94 is not a selective modulator of proteinase-activated receptor 1 (PAR1) in platelets. Platelets. 2022;33(7):1090–5. doi:10.1080/09537104.2022.2026911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao T, Ren S, Bao J, Gao D, Sun R, Gu X, Gao J, Chen S, Jin J, Wei L, et al. Vorapaxar proven to be a promising candidate for pulmonary fibrosis by intervening in the PAR1/JAK2/STAT1/3 signaling pathway-an experimental in vitro and vivo study. Eur J Pharmacol. 2023;943:175438. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Q, Zhang X, Liao S, Huang X, Wan CC, Wang Y. Potential anticoagulant of traditional Chinese medicine and novel targets for anticoagulant drugs. Phytomedicine. 2023;116:154880. doi:10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidbuchel H, Verhamme P, Alings M, Antz M, Diener H-C, Hacke W, Oldgren J, Sinnaeve P, Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, et al. updated European heart rhythm association practical guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(10):1467–507. doi:10.1093/europace/euv309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawetaji S, Aggarwal KK. A non-competitive serpin-like thrombin inhibitor isolated from moringa oleifera exhibit a high affinity for thrombin. Protein J. 2023;42(4):305–15. doi:10.1007/s10930-023-10116-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen O, Ageno W. Coming soon to a pharmacy near you? FXI and FXII inhibitors to prevent or treat thromboembolism. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2022;2022(1):495–505. doi:10.1182/hematology.2022000386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredenburgh JC, Weitz JI. New anticoagulants: moving beyond the direct oral anticoagulants. J Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2021;19(1):20–9. doi:10.1111/jth.15126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia MA. Streptokinase: An Efficient Enzyme in Cardiac Medicine. Ppl. 2020;27(2):111–19. doi:10.2174/0929866526666191014150408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen M, Wang Y, Hu F, Lv L, Chen K, Xing G. Thrombolytic agents: nanocarriers in targeted release. Molecules. 2021;26(22):6776. doi:10.3390/molecules26226776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt DL, Lopes RD, Harrington RA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes: a review. JAMA. 2022;327(7):662–75. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.0358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi E, Mahnam K, Jahanian-najafabadi A, Sadeghi HMM. Design and production of new chimeric reteplase with enhanced fibrin affinity: a theoretical and experimental study. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021;39(4):1321–33. doi:10.1080/07391102.2020.1729865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Warden AR, Ding X. Recent advances in microfluidics for drug screening. Biomicrofluidics. 2019;13(6):061503. doi:10.1063/1.5121200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Shi S, Liu Y, Zhang Q, Lam RHW, Lim CT, Hu J. Recent progress of organ-on-a-chip towards cardiovascular diseases: advanced design, fabrication, and applications. Biofabrication. 2023;15(4). doi:10.1088/1758-5090/acdaf9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris LF, Rainey P, Castro-López V, O’Donnell JS, Killard AJ. A microfluidic anti-factor xa assay device for point of care monitoring of anticoagulation therapy. Analyst (Lond). 2013;138(17):4769–76. doi:10.1039/c3an00401e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyau S, Ho-Tin-Noé B, Bourrienne MC, Boulaftali Y, Jandrot-Perrus M. Microfluidic modeling of thrombolysis. ATVB. 2018;38(11):2626–37. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311178.
   Google Scholar
• Meador S, Dyke S, Togami J, Kuskov B, Burnett AE. Antithrombosis stewardship efforts to de-escalate inappropriate combined therapy in outpatient clinics. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022;53(2):436–45. doi:10.1007/s11239-021-02551-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZX, Schroeder-Tanka J, Stooker W, Wissen S, Khorsand N. Management of combined oral antithrombotic therapy by an antithrombotic stewardship program: a prospective study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;88(9):4092–9. doi:10.1111/bcp.15346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevisan BM, Porada CD, Atala A, Almeida-Porada G. Microfluidic devices for studying coagulation biology. Sem Cell Develop Bio. 2021;112:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Panckeri KA, Ivanciu L, Camire RM, Coxon CH, Cuker A, Diamond SL. Microfluidic hemophilia models using blood from healthy donors. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2020;4(1):54–63. doi:10.1002/rth2.12286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astermark J, Donfield SM, Dimichele DM, Gringeri A, Gilbert SA, Waters J, Berntorp E. A randomized comparison of bypassing agents in hemophilia complicated by an inhibitor: the FEIBA NovoSeven comparative (FENOC) study. Blood. 2007;109(2):546–51. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-04-017988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Fries S, Li X, Grosser T, Diamond SL. Microfluidic assay of platelet deposition on collagen by perfusion of whole blood from healthy individuals taking aspirin. Clin Chem. 2013;59(8):1195–204. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2012.198101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman SM, Hlady V. Microfluidic assay of antiplatelet agents for inhibition of shear-induced platelet adhesion and activation. Lab Chip. 2021;21(1):174–83. doi:10.1039/D0LC00756K.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn K, Suchodolski K, Schäfer A, Sahlmann B, Küster U, Echtermeyer F, Calmer S, Theilmeier G, Johanning K. Effect of clopidogrel on thrombus formation in an ex vivo parallel plate flow chamber model cannot be reversed by addition of platelet concentrates or vWF concentrate. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(4):1091–8. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000001903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herfs L, Swieringa F, Jooss N, Kozlowski M, Heubel-Moenen FCJ, van Oerle R, Machiels P, Henskens Y, Heemskerk JWM. Multiparameter microfluidics assay of thrombus formation reveals increased sensitivity to contraction and antiplatelet agents at physiological temperature. Thromb Res. 2021;203:46–56. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2021.04.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onasoga-jarvis AA, Leiderman K, Fogelson AL, Wang M, Manco-Johnson MJ, Di Paola JA, Neeves KB. The effect of factor VIII deficiencies and replacement and bypass therapies on thrombus formation under venous flow conditions in microfluidic and computational models. PloS One. 2013;8(11):e78732. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colace TV, Fogarty PF, Panckeri KA, Li R, Diamond SL. Microfluidic assay of hemophilic blood clotting: distinct deficits in platelet and fibrin deposition at low factor levels. J Thromb Haemost. 2014;12(2):147–58. doi:10.1111/jth.12457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar