Finding and following: a deep learning-based pipeline for tracking platelets during thrombus formation in vivo and ex vivo

References

• Ono A, Westein E, Hsiao S, Nesbitt WS, Hamilton JR, Schoenwaelder SM, Jackson SP. Identification of a fibrin-independent platelet contractile mechanism regulating primary hemostasis and thrombus growth. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 2008;112(1):90–10. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-12-127001.
   Google Scholar
• Frenette PS, Johnson RC, Hynes RO, Wagner DD. Platelets roll on stimulated endothelium in vivo: an interaction mediated by endothelial P-selectin. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1995;92(16):7450–4. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.16.7450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claesson K, Lindahl TL, Faxälv L. Counting the platelets: a robust and sensitive quantification method for thrombus formation. Thromb Haemostasis. 2016;115(6):1178–90. doi:10.1160/TH15-10-0799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigert M, Royer L, Jug F, Myers G, editors. Isotropic reconstruction of 3D fluorescence microscopy images using convolutional neural networks. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; 2017; Quebec (Canada): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Falk T, Mai D, Bensch R, Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Marrakchi Y, Böhm A, Deubner J, Jäckel Z, Seiwald K, et al. U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat Methods. 2019;16(1):67–70. doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0261-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert J, von Eysmondt H, Chatterjee M, Gawaz M, Schäffer TE. Effect of oxidized LDL on platelet shape, spreading, and migration investigated with deep learning platelet morphometry. Cells. 2021;10(11):2932. doi:10.3390/cells10112932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhazmi L, Rokaya D. Detection of WBC, RBC, and platelets in blood samples using deep learning. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:1–0. doi:10.1155/2022/1499546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker JC, Grier DG. Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J Colloid Interface Sci. 1996;179(1):298–310. doi:10.1006/jcis.1996.0217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T, editors. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18; 2015; Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cui W. Visual analytics: a comprehensive overview. IEEE Access. 2019;7:81555–73. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2923736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson P, Tarlac V, Wang T-Y, Bonnard T, Hagemeyer CE, Hamilton JR, Medcalf RL, Cody SH, Boknäs N. Scanning laser-induced endothelial injury: a standardized and reproducible thrombosis model for intravital microscopy. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):3955. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07892-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell MJ, Yuan Y, Anderson KE, Hibbs ML, Salem HH, Jackson SP. SHIP1 and Lyn kinase negatively regulate integrin αIIbβ3 signaling in platelets. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(31):32196–204. doi:10.1074/jbc.M400746200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurr Y, Sperr A, Volz J, Beck S, Reil L, Kusch C, Eiring P, Bryson S, Sauer M, Nieswandt B, et al. Platelet lamellipodium formation is not required for thrombus formation and stability. Blood J Am Society Hematol. 2019;134(25):2318–29. doi:10.1182/blood.2019002105.
   Google Scholar
• Kingma DP, Ba J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:14126980. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Paszke A, Gross S, Massa F, Lerer A, Bradbury J, Chanan G, Killeen T, Lin Z, Gimelshein N, Antiga L, et al. Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. arXiv preprint arXiv:191201703. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sofroniew N, Lambert T, Evans K, Nunez-Iglesias J, Bokota G, Winston P, Peña-Castellanos G, Yamauchi K, Bussonnier M, Pop DD, et al. Napari: a multi-dimensional image viewer for Python. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.8076424. 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Walt S, Schönberger JL, Nunez-Iglesias J, Boulogne F, Warner JD, Yager N, Gouillart E, Yu T. Scikit-image: image processing in Python. PeerJ. 2014;2:e453. doi:10.7717/peerj.453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong D, Fonseca J. Quantification of the morphology of shelly carbonate sands using 3D images. Géotechnique. 2018;68(3):249–61. doi:10.1680/jgeot.16.P.278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan DB, Caswell T, Keim NC, van der Wel CM. trackpy: Trackpy v0. 4.1. Geneva (Switzerland): Zenodo CERN; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Virtanen P, Gommers R, Oliphant TE, Haberland M, Reddy T, Cournapeau D, Burovski E, Peterson P, Weckesser W, Bright J, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat Methods. 2020;17(3):261–72. doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waskom ML. seaborn: statistical data visualization. J Open Source Softw. 2021;6(60):3021. doi:10.21105/joss.03021.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter JD. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput Sci Eng. 2007;9(3):90–5. doi:10.1109/MCSE.2007.55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen M, Poggiali D, Whitaker K, Marshall TR, Kievit RA. Raincloud plots: a multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Res. 2019;4:4. doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fabian N, Moreland K, Thompson D, Bauer AC, Marion P, Gevecik B, Rasquin M, Jansen KE, editors. The paraview coprocessing library: A scalable, general purpose in situ visualization library. 2011 IEEE Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization; 2011; Providence (RI): IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Meilă M. Comparing clusterings—an information based distance. J Multivar Anal. 2007;98(5):873–95. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2006.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulanger J, Kervrann C, Bouthemy P, Elbau P, Sibarita J-B, Salamero J. Patch-based nonlocal functional for denoising fluorescence microscopy image sequences. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;29(2):442–54. doi:10.1109/TMI.2009.2033991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matula P, Maška M, Sorokin DV, Matula P, Ortiz-de-Solórzano C, Kozubek M. Cell tracking accuracy measurement based on comparison of acyclic oriented graphs. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0144959. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massberg S, Gawaz M, Grüner S, Schulte V, Konrad I, Zohlnhöfer D, Heinzmann U, Nieswandt B. A crucial role of glycoprotein VI for platelet recruitment to the injured arterial wall in vivo. J Exp Med. 2003;197(1):41–9. doi:10.1084/jem.20020945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson SP. The growing complexity of platelet aggregation. Blood J Am Soc Hematol. 2007;109(12):5087–95. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-12-027698.
   Google Scholar
• Kuwahara M, Sugimoto M, Tsuji S, Matsui H, Mizuno T, Miyata S, Yoshioka A. Platelet shape changes and adhesion under high shear flow. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(2):329–34. doi:10.1161/hq0202.104122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin E-K, Park H, Noh J-Y, Lim KM, Chung JH. Platelet shape changes and cytoskeleton dynamics as novel therapeutic targets for anti-thrombotic drugs. Biomol Ther. 2017;25(3):223. doi:10.4062/biomolther.2016.138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesbitt WS, Westein E, Tovar-Lopez FJ, Tolouei E, Mitchell A, Fu J, Carberry J, Fouras A, Jackson SP. A shear gradient–dependent platelet aggregation mechanism drives thrombus formation. Nat Med. 2009;15(6):665–73. doi:10.1038/nm.1955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar