Improving performance management in local government: Lessons from South Korea

References

• Agasisti, T., Agostino, D., & Soncin, M. (2020). Implementing performance measurement systems in local governments: Moving from the ‘how’ to the ‘why’. Public Performance and Management Review, 43, 1100–1128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki, N., & Rawat, S. (2020). Performance-based pay: Investigating its international prevalence in light of national contexts. American Review of Public Administration, 50, 865–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ateh, M. Y., Berman, E., & Prasojo, E. (2020). Intergovernmental strategies advancing performance management use. Public Performance & Management Review, 43, 993–1024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevan, G., & Hood, C. (2006). What’s measured is what matters: Targets and gaming in the English public health care system. Public Administration, 84, 517–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C. (2010). Improving performance and fostering accountability in the public sector through system dynamics modelling: From an ‘external’ to an ‘internal’ perspective. Systems Research & Behavioral Science, 27, 361–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Rivenbark, W. C. (2012). A comparative analysis of performance management systems: The cases of Sicily and North Carolina. Public Performance & Management Review, 35, 509–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, C., & Tomaselli, S. (2015). A dynamic performance management approach to support local strategic planning. International Review of Public Administration, 20, 370–385.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørnholt, B., Bækgaard, M., & Houlberg, K. (2016). Does fiscal austerity affect political decision-makers’ use and perception of performance information? Public Performance & Management Review, 39, 560–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., Mills, J., Wilcox, M., Neely, A., & Platts, K. (2000). Designing, implementing and updating performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20, 754–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavalluzzo, K. S., & Ittner, C. D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Menifield, C. E., & Stewart, L. M. (2018). Policy diffusion and performance-based budgeting. International Journal of Public Administration, 41, 528–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, L., & Uslu, P. G. (2011). Investigation of the impact of ‘payment by results’ on performance measurement and management in NHS trusts. Management Accounting Research, 22, 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lancer Julnes, P., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61, 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13, 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooren, W. V. (2011). Better performance management: Some single- and double-loop strategies. Public Performance & Management Review, 34, 420–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasiello, R., Rivenbark, W. C., & Bianchi, C. (2022). Exploring the shift from output measures to outcome measures of service delivery: Insights from municipal research. Public Performance & Management Review, 45, 428–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folz, D. H., Abdelrazek, R., & Chung, Y. (2009). The adoption, use, and impacts of performance measures in medium-size cities: Progress toward performance management. Public Performance & Management Review, 33, 63–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, E. R., Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2013). The diffusion of policy diffusion research in political science. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 673–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., Mullins, L. B., Ferreira, M., & Hoontis, P. (2016). Implementing performance budgeting at the state level: Lessons learned from New Jersey. International Journal of Public Administration, 39, 95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoontis, P., & Kim, T. (2012). Antecedents to municipal performance measurement implementation: A case study of two New Jersey municipalities. Public Performance & Management Review, 36, 158–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur, M. H. (2013). Korea’s government performance evaluation system and operating experience. Prime Minister’s Office.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. L. F., & Mortensen, P. B. (2016). Rules and the doctrine of performance management. Public Administration Review, 76, 302–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, T., & Siverbo, S. (2009). Explaining the utilization of relative performance evaluation in local government: A multi-theoretical study using data from Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management, 25, 197–224.
   Google Scholar
• Keerasuntonpong, P., Cordery, C., & Smith, T. (2018). How might normative and mimetic pressures improve local government service performance reporting? Accounting & Finance, 58, 1169–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen, M. B. (2015). Management by objectives and results in the Nordic countries: Continuity and change, differences and similarities. Public Performance & Management Review, 38, 542–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2013). The other type of performance information: Nonroutine feedback, its relevance and use. Public Administration Review, 73, 265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A. (2015). Explaining the use of performance information by public managers: A planned-behaviour approach. American Review of Public Administration, 45, 201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2015). Does training matter? Evidence from performance management reforms. Public Administration Review, 75, 411–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S. (2010). Performance measurement in European local governments: A comparative analysis of reform experiences in Great Britain, France, Sweden and Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76, 331–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., & Li, W. (2016). Divergence and convergence in the diffusion of performance management in China. Public Performance & Management Review, 39, 630–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. (2008). Managing the design of performance measures: The role of agencies. Public Performance & Management Review, 32, 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mauro, S. G., Cinquini, L., & Grossi, G. (2018). External pressures and internal dynamics in the institutionalization of performance-based budgeting: An endless process? Public Performance & Management Review, 41, 224–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65, 180–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montesinos, V., Brusca, I., Rossi, F. M., & Aversano, N. (2013). The usefulness of performance reporting in local government: Comparing Italy and Spain. Public Money and Management, 33, 171–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2009). Through a class, darkly: Understanding the effects of performance regimes. Public Performance & Management Review, 32, 592–603.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 849–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neely, A., Richards, H., Mills, J., Platts, K., & Bourne, M. (1997). Designing performance measures: A structured approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 17, 1131–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K., & Caudle, S. (2011). Public performance management systems: Embedding practices for improved success. Public Performance & Management Review, 35, 108–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. (2015). The numerical psychology of performance information: Implications for citizens, managers, and policy-makers. Public Performance & Management Review, 39, 100–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasha, O., & Poister, T. H. (2017). Exploring the change in strategy formulation and performance measurement practices under turbulence. Public Performance & Management Review, 40, 504–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59, 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2013). The logics of performance management. Evaluation, 19, 346–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulakos, E. D., Mueller-Hanson, R., & Arad, S. (2019). The evolution of performance management: Searching for value. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 249–271.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C., Fasiello, R., & Adamo, S. (2019). Exploring performance management in Italian local government: The necessity of outcome measures and citizen participation. The American Review of Public Administration, 49, 545–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2001). Performance management, evaluation and learning in ‘modern’ local government. Public Administration, 79, 297–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. B. (2008). From measurement to management: Breaking through the barriers to state and local performance. Public Administration Review, 68, 570–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 840–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2012). Policy diffusion: Seven lessons for scholars and practitioners. Public Administration Review, 72, 788–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stannard, T. (2011). A ‘fruitless obsession with accuracy’: The uses of sensemaking in public sector performance management. Local Government Studies, 37, 335–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Berman, E. (2001). Hypotheses about performance measurement in counties: Findings from a survey. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 403–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S., & Torneo, A. R. (2016). Government performance management and evaluation in South Korea: History and current practices. Public Performance & Management Review, 39, 279–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetano, A. (2013). What drives the institutionalization of performance measurement and management in local government? Public Performance & Management Review, 37, 59–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar