Evaluating commodification and commodifying evaluation

References

• Boardman, A., & Vining, A. (2017). There are many (well, more than one) paths to Nirvana: The economic evaluation of social policies. In B. Greve (Ed.), Handbook of social policy evaluation (pp. 77–99). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bottis, M., & Bouchagiar, G. (2018). Personal data v. big data: challenges of commodification of personal data. Open Journal of Philosophy, 8(3), 206–215.
   Google Scholar
• Catan, L. (2002). Making research useful: experiments from the Economic and Social Research Council’s youth research programme. Youth & Policy, 76, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Chau, R. C. M., & Yu, S. W. K. (2023). Using a time conditions framework to explore the impact of government policies on the commodification of public goods and women’s defamilization risks. Public Money & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2246756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, M. (2018). The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification. New Media & Society, 20(1), 88–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larson, P. (2006). Evaluation after disenchantment? Five issues shaping the role of evaluation in society. In I. Shaw, J. Greene, & M. Mark (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 141–160). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, P., Newcomer, K., & Soydan, H. (2006). Government as structural context for evaluation. In I. Shaw, J. Greene, & M. Mark (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 164–183). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Transport. (2013). The Brown review of the rail franchising programme. Cm 8526. TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, D., Roberts, S., & Stafford, B. (2010). Accessing customer services in Jobcentre Plus: a qualitative study. DWP Research Report No. 651. CDS.
   Google Scholar
• Exworthy, M., Lunt, N., Tuck, P., & Mistry, R. (2023). From commodification to entrepreneurialism: how commercial income is transforming the English NHS. Public Money & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2243775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C. (2007). Commodification and instrumentality in cultural policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 13(2), 203–215.
   Google Scholar
• Henkel, M. (1991). The new evaluative state. Public Administration, 69(1), 121–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2020). Magenta Book: Central government guidance on evaluation. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/879438/HMT_Magenta_Book.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, R. (2010). Saving the Royal Mail’s universal postal service in the digital age: An update of the 2008 independent review of the postal services sector. Cm 7937. TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, R., Hutton, D., & Smith, I. (2008). Modernise or decline: Policies to maintain the universal postal service in the United Kingdom. An independent review of the UK postal services sector. Cm 7529. TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Laidlaw Inquiry. (2012). Report of the Laidlaw Inquiry: Inquiry into the lessons learned for the Department for Transport from the InterCity West Coast Competition. HC 809. TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, D., Bivand, P., Quecedo, C., Vaid, L., & McCallum, A. (2018). Greater Manchester Working Well: Early impact assessment. Research Report No. 946. DWP.
   Google Scholar
• NAO. (2013). Evaluation in government. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/10331-001-Evaluation-in-government_NEW.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NAO. (2014). The privatization of Royal Mail. HC 1182. Session 2013-14. https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/The-privatisation-of-royal-mail.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• NAO. (2021). Evaluating government spending. Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. Session 2021-22. HC 860. https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/evaluating-government-spending/.
   Google Scholar
• Neave, G. (1988). On the cultivation of quality, efficiency and enterprise: an overview of recent trends in higher education in Western Europe, 1986-1988. European Journal of Education, 23(1-2), 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• ONS. (2022). Trust in government, UK: 2022. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/bulletins/trustingovernmentuk/2022#:~:text=42%25%20of%20the%20population%20reported,and%20legal%20system%20(68%25).
   Google Scholar
• Pawson, R. (2005). Evidence-based policy: A realistic perspective. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1993). Occasional excursions: a brief history of policy evaluation in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 46(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, S., & Pollitt, C. (1994). Audit or evaluation? A National Audit Office VFM study. Public Administration, 72, 527–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutter, J. (2012). Evidence and evaluation in policy making: A problem of supply or demand? Institute for Government. https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/evidence-and-evaluation-policy-making.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W., Cook, T. & Leviton, C. (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Segerholm, C. (2003). To govern in silence? An essay on the political in national evaluations of the public schools in Sweden. Studies in Educational Policy and Educational Philosophy, 2003(2). https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108016522729.2003.11803867.
   Google Scholar
• Sevignani, S. (2013). The commodification of privacy on the internet. Science and Public Policy, 40(6), 733–739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheaff, R., Ellis-Paine, A., Exworthy, M., Hardwick, R., & Smith, C. (2023). Commodification and healthcare in the third sector in England: from gift to commodity—and back? Public Money & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2244350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulha, L., & Cousins, J. (1997). Evaluation Use: theory, research, and practice since 1986. Evaluation Practice, 18(3), 195–208.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, J., & Wood, J. (2011). Youth work and research: Editorial. Youth & Policy, 10, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Spicker, P. (2023). The effect of treating public services as commodities. Public Money & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2240641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahler, G. (1995). Improving the quality of evaluations of federal human services national demonstration programs. Evaluation and Program Planning, 18(2), 129–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J., & Thomas, D. (2006). Intellectual Contexts. In I. Shaw, J. Greene, & M. Mark (Eds.), The Sage handbook of evaluation (pp. 200–224). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• UK Evaluation Society. (2018). Guidelines for good practice in evaluation. https://www.evaluation.org.uk/app/uploads/2019/04/UK-Evaluation-Society-Guidelines-for-Good-Practice-in-Evaluation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (2012). Six models of evaluation. In E. Araral, S. Fritzen, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh, & X. Wu (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public policy (pp. 385–400). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. (2001). Great expectations: can social science evaluate New Labour's policies? Evaluation, 7(3).
   Google Scholar
• Walter, I., Nutley, S., Percy-Smith, J., McNeish, D., & Frost, S. (2004). Improving the use of research in social care practice. Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1998). Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation, 19(1), 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. (1999). The interface between evaluation and public policy. Evaluation, 5(4), 468–486.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, P. (2007). New Labour and evidence based policy making: 1997-2007. People, Place & Policy Online: 1/1, pp. 22-29. https://extra.shu.ac.uk/ppp-online/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/new_labour_evidence_base_1997-2007.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Young, K., Ashby, D., Boaz, A., & Grayson, L. (2002). Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy & Society, 1(3), 215–224.
   Google Scholar