280
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Problematising the emergence of outbreak science in the governance of global health: making time for slow dis-ease

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Adams, V., Murphy, M., & Clarke, A. E. (2009). Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity, 28(1), 246–265. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2009.18
  • Anderson, W. (2021). The model crisis, or how to have critical promiscuity in the time of Covid-19. Social Studies of Science, 51(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312721996053
  • Anderson, B., Grove, K., Rickards, L., & Kearnes, M. (2020). Slow emergencies: Temporality and the racialized biopolitics of emergency governance. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519849263
  • Bacchi, C. (2018). Drug problematizations and politics: Deploying a poststructural analytic strategy. Contemporary Drug Problems, 45(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450917748760
  • Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural policy analysis. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8
  • Bedford, J., Farrar, J., Ihekweazu, C., Kang, G., Koopmans, M., & Nkengasong, J. (2019). A new twenty-first century science for effective epidemic response. Nature, 575(7781), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1717-y
  • Beer, E. M., Rao, V. B., & Holbrook, M. R. (2019). A systematic review of the epidemiology of human monkeypox outbreaks and implications for outbreak strategy. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 13(10), e0007791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007791
  • Boddice, R., & Hitzer, B. (Eds.). (2022). Feeling dis-ease in modern history: Experiencing medicine and illness. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Brooks-Pollock, E., Danon, L., Jombart, T., & Pellis, L. (2021). Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 376(1829), 20210001.
  • Caduff, C. (2019). Great anticipations. In A. H. Kelly, F. Keck, & C. Lynteris (Eds.), The anthropology of epidemics (pp. 43–58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429461897-3
  • Chatterjee, P., Nair, P., Chersich, M., Terefe, Y., Chauhan, A. S., Quesada, F., & Simpson, G. (2021). One health, “disease X” & the challenge of “unknown” unknowns. Indian Journal of Medical Research, 153(3). https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_601_21
  • Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge. University of California Press.
  • Fearnley, L. (2020). Virulent zones: Animal disease and global health at China’s pandemic epicenter. Duke University Press.
  • Fitch, C., Stimson, G. V., Rhodes, T., & Poznyak, V. (2004). Rapid assessment: An international review of diffusion, practice and outcomes in the substance use field. Social Science & Medicine, 59(9), 1819–1830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.028
  • Fox, N. J. (2022). Coronavirus, capitalism and a ‘thousand tiny dis/advantages’: A more-than-human analysis. Social Theory & Health, 20(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-022-00179-3
  • George, D. B., Taylor, W., Shaman, J., Rivers, C., Paul, B., O’Toole, T., Johansson, M.A., Hirschman, L., Biggerstaff, M., Asher, J. & Reich, N.G. (2019). Technology to advance infectious disease forecasting for outbreak management. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3932.
  • Ghebreyesus, T. A. (2022). Why the monkeypox outbreak constitutes a public health emergency of international concern. BMJ, 378, o1978. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1978
  • Graham, S. S. (2011). Dis-ease or disease? Ontological rarefaction in the medical-industrial complex. Journal of Medical Humanities, 32(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-011-9137-5
  • Gray-Cosgrove, C., Liboiron, M., & Lepawsky, J. (2015). The challenges of temporality to depollution & remediation. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society, 8(1). http://journals.openedition.org/sapiens/1740
  • Greenhalgh, T., Fisman, D., Cane, D. J., Oliver, M., & Macintyre, C. R. (2022). Adapt or die: How the pandemic made the shift from EBM to EBM+ more urgent. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 27(5), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111952
  • Hinchliffe, S., Manderson, L., & Moore, M. (2021). Planetary healthy publics after COVID-19. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(4), e230–e236. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00050-4
  • Houlihan, C. F., & Whitworth, J. A. G. (2019). Outbreak science: Recent progress in the detection and response to outbreaks of infectious diseases. Clinical Medicine, 19(2), 140. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-140
  • Johnson, G. A., & Vindrola-Padros, C. (2017). Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: A systematic review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 189, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.029
  • Jovanovic, M. (2014). Creating the ‘dis-ease’ of high cholesterol: A sociology of diagnosis reception analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 101, 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.008
  • Kamradt-Scott, A., & McInnes, C. (2012). The securitisation of pandemic influenza: Framing, security and public policy. Global Public Health, 7(sup2), S95–S110. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2012.725752
  • Kasturi, C. S. (2022). ‘Never give up’: Why the world’s struggle against polio is not over. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2022/aug/02/never-give-up-why-the-worlds-struggle-against-polio-is-not-over
  • Kippax, S., & Race, K. (2003). Sustaining safe practice: Twenty years on. Social Science & Medicine, 57(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-95360200303-9
  • Kippax, S., & Stephenson, N. (2016). Socialising the biomedical turn in HIV prevention. Anthem Press.
  • Lakoff, A. (2019). What is an epidemic emergency? In A. H. Kelly, F. Keck, & C. Lynteris (Eds.), The anthropology of epidemics (pp. 59–69). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429461897-4
  • Lakoff, A., Collier, S. J., & Kelty, C. (2015). Introduction: Ebola’s ecologies. LIMN.
  • Lancaster, K., & Rhodes, T. (2020). What prevents health policy being ‘evidence-based’? New ways to think about evidence, policy and interventions in health. British Medical Bulletin, 135(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa026
  • Lancaster, K., & Rhodes, T. (2022). The thing we call evidence: Toward a situated ontology of evidence in policy. In S. Ehlers & S. Esselborn (Eds.), Evidence in action between science and society: Constructing, validating and contesting knowledge (pp. 145–164). Routledge.
  • Lancaster, K., Rhodes, T., & Rosengarten, M. (2020). Making evidence and policy in public health emergencies: Lessons from COVID-19 for adaptive evidence-making and intervention. Evidence & Policy, 16(3), 477–490. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426420X15913559981103
  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
  • Law, J., & Urry, J. (2004). Enacting the social. Economy and Society, 33(3), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/0308514042000225716
  • Limb, M. (2022). Covid-19: Is the government dismantling pandemic systems too hastily? BMJ, 376, o515. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o515
  • Manderson, L., & Aaby, P. (1992). An epidemic in the field? Rapid assessment procedures and health research. Social Science & Medicine, 35(7), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-95369290098-B
  • Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. A word and some questions. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x
  • Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384151
  • Morgan, O. (2019). How decision makers can use quantitative approaches to guide outbreak responses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1776), 20180365.
  • Nelson, B. (2022). What poo tells us: Wastewater surveillance comes of age amid covid, monkeypox, and polio. BMJ, 378, o1869. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o1869
  • Nguyen, V.-K. (2017). Viral speed: Infrastructure, connectivity, ontogeny; or, notes on the molecular epidemiology of epidemics. Cultural Anthropology, 32(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca32.1.04
  • Nguyen, V.-K. (2019). Of what are epidemics the symptom? Speed, interlinkage, and infrastructure in molecular anthropology. In A. H. Kelly, F. Keck, & C. Lynteris (Eds.), The anthropology of epidemics (pp. 154–177). Routledge.
  • Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press.
  • Oppenheim, B., Gallivan, M., Madhav, N. K., Brown, N., Serhiyenko, V., Wolfe, N. D., & Ayscue, P. (2019). Assessing global preparedness for the next pandemic: Development and application of an epidemic preparedness index. BMJ Global Health, 4(1), e001157.
  • Parker, M., MacGregor, H., & Akello, G. (2020). COVID-19, public authority and enforcement. Medical Anthropology, 39(8), 666–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2020.1822833
  • Patel, M., & Cochi, S. (2017). Addressing the challenges and opportunities of the polio endgame: lessons for the future. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 216(suppl_1), S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix117
  • Pearson, H. (2021). How COVID broke the evidence pipeline. Nature, 593(7858), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01246-x
  • Polonsky, J. A., Baidjoe, A., Kamvar, Z. N., Cori, A., Durski, K., Edmunds, W. J., Eggo, R. M., Funk, S., Kaiser, L., Keating, P., de Waroux, O. L. P., Marks, M., Moraga, P., Morgan, O., Nouvellet, P., Ratnayake, R., Roberts, C. H., Whitworth, J., & Jombart, T. (2019). Outbreak analytics: A developing data science for informing the response to emerging pathogens. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1776), 20180276. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0276
  • Prince, R. (2019). Pandemic publics: How epidemics transform social and political collectives of public health. In A. H. Kelly, F. Keck, & C. Lynteris (Eds.), The anthropology of epidemics (pp. 135–153). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429461897-9
  • Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Raftery, P., Hossain, M., & Palmer, J. (2021). An innovative and integrated model for global outbreak response and research - a case study of the UK Public Health Rapid Support Team (UK-PHRST). BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1378. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11433-0
  • Rhodes, T., & Lancaster, K. (2019). Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing. Social Science and Medicine, 238, 112488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112488
  • Rhodes, T., & Lancaster, K. (2022a). Making pandemics big: On the situational performance of Covid-19 mathematical models. Social Science & Medicine, 301, 114907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114907
  • Rhodes, T., & Lancaster, K. (2022b). Uncomfortable science: How mathematical models, and consensus, come to be in public policy. Sociology of Health & Illness, 44(9), 1461–1480. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13535
  • Rhodes, T., & Lancaster, K. (2023). Early warnings and slow deaths: A sociology of outbreak and overdose. International Journal of Drug Policy, 117, 104065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104065
  • Rivers, C., Chretien, J.-P., Riley, S., Pavlin, J.A., Woodward, A., Brett-Major, D., Maljkovic Berry, I., Morton, L., Jarman, R.G., Biggerstaff, M., Johansson, M.A., Reich, N. G., Meyer, D., Snyder, M. R., & Pollett, S. (2019). Using “outbreak science” to strengthen the use of models during epidemics. Nature Communications, 10(1), 3102.
  • Rivers, C., Martin, E., Meyer, D., Inglesby, T., Cicero, A., & Cizek, J. (2020). Modernizing and expanding outbreak science to support better decision making during public health crises: Lessons for COVID-19 and beyond https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/pubs_archive/pubs-pdfs/2020/200324-outbreak-science.pdf
  • Rose, N., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105900
  • Rose, D. B., van Dooren, T., & Chrulew, M. (Eds.). (2017). Extinction studies: Stories of time, death, and generations. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/van-17880
  • Roth, E. (2020). Epidemic temporalities: A concise literature review. Anthropology Today, 36(4), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8322.12590
  • Sandset, T. (2021). The necropolitics of COVID-19: Race, class and slow death in an ongoing pandemic. Global Public Health, 16(8–9), 1411–1423. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2021.1906927
  • Savransky, M., & Rosengarten, M. (2016). What is nature capable of? Evidence, ontology and speculative medical humanities. Medical Humanities, 42(3), 166–172. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2015-010858
  • Speed, E., Carter, S., & Green, J. (2022). Pandemics, infection control and social justice: Challenges for policy evaluation. Critical Public Health, 32(1), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2022.2029195
  • Stengers, I. (2018). Another science is possible: A manifesto for slow science. Polity Press.
  • Sweetman, P. (2003). Twenty-first century dis-ease? Habitual reflexivity or the reflexive habitus. The Sociological Review, 51(4), 528–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2003.00434.x
  • Tam, C., & Haas, W. (2016). Outbreak investigations. Infectious Disease Epidemiology, 35. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198719830.003.0003
  • van Dooren, T., Kirksey, E., & Münster, U. (2016). Multispecies studies: Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities, 8(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3527695
  • Van Kerkhove, M. D., Ryan, M. J., & Ghebreyesus, T. A. (2021). Preparing for “Disease X”. Science: Advanced Materials and Devices, 374(6566), 377. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm7796
  • WHO. (2022). Monkeypox. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/monkeypox
  • Wigen, E., Azak, A. N., Eskild, I., Jordeim, H., Lie, A. K., Yerlioglu, A. E., & Ytreberg, E. (2022). Temporal technologies of epidemics. Medical Humanities, 48(4), e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2021-012253
  • Woolgar, S., & Lezaun, J. (2013). The wrong bin bag: A turn to ontology in science and technology studies? Social Studies of Science, 43(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713488820

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.