934
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

More than one crisis: COVID-19 response actors navigating multi-dimensional crises in Flanders, Belgium

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 566-578 | Received 25 Jan 2023, Accepted 25 Jun 2023, Published online: 10 Aug 2023

References

  • Bildtgård, T. (2008). Trust in food in modern and late-modern societies. Social Science Information, 47(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018407085751
  • Brownlie, J., & Howson, A. (2005). ‘Leaps of faith’ and MMR: An empirical study of trust. Sociology, 39(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505050536
  • Bunton, V., & Gilding, M. (2013). Confidence at the expense of trust: The mass adoption of the human papillomavirus vaccine in Australia. Health Sociology Review, 22(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2013.22.1.88
  • Bussink-Voorend, D., Hautvast, J. L. A., Vandeberg, L., Visser, O., & Hulscher, M. E. J. L. (2022). A systematic literature review to clarify the concept of vaccine hesitancy. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(12), 1634–1648. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01431-6
  • Carley, S., Horner, D., Body, R., & Mackway-Jones, K. (2020). Evidence-based medicine and COVID-19: What to believe and when to change. Emergency Medicine Journal, 37(9), 572–575. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-210098
  • Dalmiya, V. (2016). Caring to know: Comparative care ethics, feminist epistemology, and the Mahābhārata. Oxford University Press.
  • David, P.-M., & Le Dévédec, N. (2019). Preparedness for the next epidemic: Health and political issues of an emerging paradigm. Critical Public Health, 29(3), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1447646
  • Durbach, N. (2005). Bodily matters: The anti-vaccination movement in England, 1853–1907. Duke University Press.
  • Evans, R. (2022). SAGE advice and political decision-making: ‘Following the science’ in times of epistemic uncertainty. Social Studies of Science, 52(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211062586
  • Eysenbach, G. (2020). How to fight an infodemic: The four pillars of infodemic management. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6), e21820. https://doi.org/10.2196/21820
  • Freeden, M. (2017). Crisis? How is that a crisis?!: Reflections on an overburdened word. Contributions to the History of Concepts, 12(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2017.120202
  • Fuller, S. (2018). Post-truth: Knowledge as a power game. Anthem Press.
  • Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
  • Goldenberg, M. J. (2021). Vaccine hesitancy: Public trust, expertise, and the war on science. University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Gostin, L. O., Salmon, D. A., & Larson, H. J. (2021). Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines. JAMA, 325(6), 532–533. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26553
  • Grasswick, H. E. (2010). Scientific and lay communities: Earning epistemic trust through knowledge sharing. Synthese, 177(3), 387–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9789-0
  • Green, J., Fischer, E. F., Fitzgerald, D., Harvey, T. S., & Thomas, F. (2022). The publics of public health: Learning from COVID-19. Critical Public Health, 32(5), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2022.2077701
  • Harambam, J. (2020). Contemporary conspiracy culture: Truth and knowledge in an era of epistemic instability. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429327605
  • Jouanna, J. (2005). Cause and crisis in historians and medical writers of the classical period. In P. J. van der Eijk (Ed.), Hippocrates in context: Papers read at the XIth international hippocrates colloquium, University of newcastle upon Tyne, 27-31 August 2002 (pp. 3–27). Brill.
  • Kattumana, T. (2022). Trust, vaccine hesitancy, and the COVID-19 pandemic: A phenomenological perspective. Social Epistemology, 36(5), 641–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2022.2115325
  • Kattumana, T., & Byrne, T. (2023). On dissent against public health interventions: A phenomenological perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic. In T. Byrne & M. Wenning (Eds.), The right to resist: Philosophies of dissent (pp. 207–233). Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Koselleck, R. (2002). Some questions regarding the conceptual history of “Crisis“. In T. S. Presner (Ed.), The practice of conceptual history: Timing history, spacing concepts (pp. 236–247). Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619104
  • Larson, H. J. (2020). Stuck: How vaccine rumors start — and why they don’t go away. Oxford University Press.
  • Larson, H. J. (2022). Defining and measuring vaccine hesitancy. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(12), 1609–1610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01484-7
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
  • Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.
  • Leach, M., MacGregor, H., Ripoll, S., Scoones, I., & Wilkinson, A. (2022). Rethinking disease preparedness: Incertitude and the politics of knowledge. Critical Public Health, 32(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2021.1885628
  • Luhmann, N. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94–107). Basil Blackwell.
  • Martin, G. P., Hanna, E., McCartney, M., & Dingwall, R. (2020). Science, society, and policy in the face of uncertainty: Reflections on the debate around face coverings for the public during COVID-19. Critical Public Health, 30(5), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2020.1797997
  • McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11483.001.0001
  • O’Connor, C., & Weatherall, J. O. (2019). The misinformation age: How false beliefs spread. Yale University Press.
  • O’Neill, O. (2002). Autonomy and trust in bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Oreskes, N. (2019). Why trust science? Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691189932
  • Pearson, H. (2021). How COVID broke the evidence pipeline. Nature, 593(7858), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-01246-x
  • Peretti-Watel, P., Larson, H. J., Ward, J. K., Schulz, W. S., & Verger, P. (2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Clarifying a theoretical framework for an ambiguous notion. PLoS Currents, 7. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.6844c80ff9f5b273f34c91f71b7fc289
  • Pertwee, E., Simas, C., & Larson, H. J. (2022). An epidemic of uncertainty: Rumors, conspiracy theories and vaccine hesitancy. Nature Medicine, 28(3), 456–459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01728-z
  • Roitman, J. (2014). Anti-crisis. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822377436
  • Scherer, L. D., Shaffer, V. A., Patel, N., & Zikmund-Fisher, B. J. (2016). Can the vaccine adverse event reporting system be used to increase vaccine acceptance and trust? Vaccine, 34(21), 2424–2429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.087
  • Shank, J. B. (2008). Crisis: A useful category of post–social scientific historical analysis? The American Historical Review, 113(4), 1090–1099. https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr.113.4.1090
  • Shelton, T. (2020). A post-truth pandemic? Big Data & Society, 7(2), 2053951720965612. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720965612
  • Sismondo, S. (2021). Epistemic corruption, the pharmaceutical industry, and the body of medical science. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.614013
  • Smith, R., Cubbon, S., & Wardle, C. (2020). Under the surface: Covid-19 vaccine narratives, misinformation & data deficits on social media. First Draft. https://firstdraftnews.org/vaccinenarratives-full-report-november-2020
  • Spier, R. E. (2001). Perception of risk of vaccine adverse events: A historical perspective. Vaccine, 20, S78–S84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00306-1
  • Taskforce Operationalization of the vaccination strategy. (2020). Advice for the operationalization of the COVID-19 vaccination strategy for Belgium. Government Commissioner’s Office for Corona. https://d34j62pglfm3rr.cloudfront.net/downloads/Note_TF_Strategy_Vaccination_NL_0312_post_press.pdf
  • Van Dooren, W., & Noordegraaf, M. (2020). Staging science: Authoritativeness and fragility of models and measurement in the COVID-19 crisis. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13219
  • Ward, J. K., Gauna, F., Gagneux-Brunon, A., Botelho-Nevers, E., Cracowski, J.-L., Khouri, C., Launay, O., Verger, P., & Peretti-Watel, P. The French health pass holds lessons for mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. (2022). Nature Medicine, 28(2), 232–235. Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01661-7
  • Weisberg, D. S., Landrum, A. R., Hamilton, J., & Weisberg, M. (2021). Knowledge about the nature of science increases public acceptance of science regardless of identity factors. Public Understanding of Science, 30(2), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520977700
  • World Health Organization. (2014, November 12). Report of the SAGE working group on vaccine hesitancy. https://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/SAGE_working_group_revised_report_vaccine_hesitancy.pdf
  • World Health Organization. (2020, December 31). Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Herd immunity, lockdowns and COVID-19. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/herd-immunity-lockdowns-and-covid-19
  • World Health Organization. (2022). Infodemic. https://www.who.int/health-topics/infodemic