‘I will play this tokenistic game, I just want something useful for my community’: experiences of and resistance to harms of peer research

References

• Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, S., Aggleton, P., & Gibson, A. (2021). Peer research in health and Social development: International perspectives on participatory research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boechler, L., Renwick, S., Alabi, A., de la Torre, H., Kumar, S., Singh, H., Xavier, R., Hector, D., McTaggart, L., & Shrubsole, J. (2021). Beyond the role of participant: A firsthand account of the experiences of a patient-oriented research team. Research Involvement and Engagement, 7(1), 79–79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00323-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa, L., Voronka, J., Landry, D., Reid, J., Mcfarlane, B., Reville, D., & Church, K. (2012). “Recovering our stories”: A small act of resistance. Studies in Social Justice, 6(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v6i1.1070
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (2017). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Groot, B., Haveman, A., & Abma, T. (2022). Relational, ethically sound co-production in mental health care research: Epistemic injustice and the need for an ethics of care. Critical Public Health, 32(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2020.1770694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guta, A., Flicker, S., & Roche, B. (2013). Governing through community allegiance: A qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 432–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2012.761675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heney, V., & Poleykett, B. (2021). The impossibility of engaged research: Complicity and accountability between researchers, ‘publics’ and institutions. Sociology of Health & Illness, 44(S1), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (1998). Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 19(1), 173–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, M. S. (2019). When madness meets madness: Insider reflections on doing mental health research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691983535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919835356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logie, C., James, L., Tharao, W., & Loutfy, M. R. (2012). Opportunities, ethical challenges, and lessons learned from working with peer research assistants in a multi-method HIV community-based research study in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(4), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.4.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, K. R., Guta, A., Voronka, J., Pilling, M., Williams, C. C., Strike, C., & Ross, L. E. (2021). The political economy of peer research: Mapping the possibilities and precarities of paying people for lived experience. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(3), 888–906. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mingus, M. (2011, February 12). Changing the framework: Disability justice. How our communities can move beyond access to wholeness. Leaving Evidence. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/changing-the-framework-disability-justice/
   Google Scholar
• Papoulias, C., & Callard, F. (2022). Material and epistemic precarity: It’s time to talk about labour exploitation in mental health research. Social Science & Medicine, 306, 115102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepzna-Samarasinha, L. L. (2018). Care work: Dreaming disability justice. Arsenal Pulp Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, L., & Sariola, S. (2018). The ethics and politics of community engagement in global health research. Critical Public Health, 28(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2018.1449598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, S. D., Malow, R. M., & Jolly, C. (2010). Community-based participatory research (CBPR): A new and not-so-new approach to HIV/AIDS prevention, care, and treatment. AIDS Education and Prevention, 22(3), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2010.22.3.173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, B., Guta, A., & Flicker, S. (2010). Peer research in action I: Models of practice. Community based research working paper series. The Wellesley Institute. https://www.wellesleyinstitute.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Models_of_Practice_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. E., Pilling, M., Pitt, K.-A., & Voronka, J. (2024). Even with the best of intentions: An accounting of failures in a participatory research project. In C. Carter, C. T. Jones, & C. Janzen (Eds.), Contemporary vulnerabilities: Reflections on social justice methodologies (pp. 168–185). University of Alberta Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, C., & Cain, R. (2001). The involvement of people living with HIV/AIDS in community-based organizations: Contributions and constraints. Aids Care-Psychological & Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv, 13(4), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120120057950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalk, S. (2018). Bodyminds reimagined: (Dis)ability, race and gender in black women’s speculative fiction. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sins Invalid. (2015, September 17). 10 principles of disability Justice. Sins Invalid: An unshamed claim to beauty in the face of invisibility. https://www.sinsinvalid.org/blog/10-principles-of-disability-justice.
   Google Scholar
• Thulien, M., Anderson, H., Douglas, S., Dykeman, R., Horne, A., Howard, B., Sedgemore, K., Charlesworth, R., & Fast, D. (2022). The generative potential of mess in community-based participatory research with young people who use(d) drugs in Vancouver. Harm Reduction Journal, 19(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-022-00615-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truman, C., & Raine, P. (2001). Involving users in evaluation: The social relations of user participation in health research. Critical Public Health, 11(3), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590110066667
   Google Scholar
• Tseris, E., Franks, S., & Hart, E. B. (2022). Beyond binaries: Complex roles and identities in critical mental health research. Disability & Society, 37(4), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2034111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voronka, J. (2016). The politics of ‘people with lived experience’ experiential authority and the risks of strategic essentialism. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 23(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1353/ppp.2016.0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voronka, J. (2019). The mental health worker as peer informant: Performing authenticity and the paradoxes of passing. Disability & Society, 34(4), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2018.1545113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voronka, J., & King, C. (2023). Reflections on peer research: Power, pleasures, pains. British Journal of Social Work, 53(3), 1692–1699. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, J. (2013). Only your calamity: The beginnings of activism by and for people with AIDS. American Journal of Public Health, 103(10), 1788–1798. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar