229
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentaries

Critical posthuman ethnography: grappling with human-more-than-human interconnection for critical public health

ORCID Icon
Pages 848-855 | Received 24 Aug 2022, Accepted 14 Oct 2023, Published online: 30 Oct 2023

References

  • Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world (1st ed.). Pantheon Books.
  • Andrews, G. J., & Duff, C. (2019). Matter beginning to matter: On posthumanist understandings of the vital emergence of health. Social Science & Medicine, 226, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.045
  • Åsberg, C., & Braidotti, R. (Eds.). (2018). A feminist companion to the posthumanities (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing.
  • Barad, K. M. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  • Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
  • Braidotti, R. (2006). Posthuman, all too human: Towards a new process ontology. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(7–8), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276406069232
  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity.
  • Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge. Polity Press.
  • Castañeda, Q. E. (2006). The invisible theatre of ethnography: Performative principles of fieldwork. Anthropological Quarterly, 79(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2006.0004
  • Castree, N., & Nash, C. (2006). Posthuman geographies. Social & Cultural Geography, 7(4), 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360600825620
  • Chao, S., Bolender, K., & Kirksey, E. (Eds.). (2022). The promise of multispecies justice. Duke University Press.
  • Charron, D. F. F. (2012). Ecohealth research in practice: Innovative applications of an ecosystem approach to health. Springer.
  • Chen, M. Y. (2012). Animacies: Biopolitics, racial mattering, and queer affect. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822395447
  • Cohn, S., & Lynch, R. (2017). Posthuman perspectives: Relevance for a global public health. Critical Public Health, 27(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1302557
  • Collins, K. (accepted). Onto-epistemic entanglements and ecological grief: Toward a theory of crip posthumanism. In S. Adam & E. Gold (Eds.), Entangled (im)materialities: Transdisciplinary posthuman interventions. University of Toronto Press.
  • Craddock, S., & Hinchliffe, S. (2015). One world, one health? Social science engagements with the one health agenda. Social Science & Medicine, 129, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.11.016
  • De Line, S. (2016). All my/our relations: Can posthumanism be decolonized? Open! Platform for Art, Culture & the Public Domain. https://onlineopen.org/all-my-our-relations
  • Dernikos, B. P., Ferguson, D. E., & Siegel, M. (2020). The possibilities for “humanizing” posthumanist inquiries: An intra-active conversation. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 20(5), 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708619829793
  • De Wolff, K. (2017). Plastic naturecultures: Multispecies ethnography and the dangers of separating living from nonliving bodies. Body & Society, 23(3), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X17715074
  • Elton, S. (2021a). Growing methods: Developing a methodology for identifying plant agency and vegetal politics in the city. Environmental Humanities, 13(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-8867219
  • Elton, S. (2021b). Relational health: Theorizing plants as health-supporting actors. Social Science & Medicine, 281, 114083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114083
  • Ferrando, F. (2019). Philosophical posthumanism. Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Friese, C., & Nuyts, N. (2017). Posthumanist critique and human health: How nonhumans (could) figure in public health research. Critical Public Health, 27(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1294246
  • García, M. E. (2019). Death of a guinea pig: Grief and the limits of multispecies ethnography in Peru. Environmental Humanities, 11(2), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-7754512
  • Gillespie, K. (2016). Witnessing animal others: Bearing witness, grief, and the political function of emotion. Hypatia, 31(3), 572–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12261
  • Gillespie, K. A. (2019). For a politicized multispecies ethnography: Reflections on a feminist geographic pedagogical experiment. Politics and Animals, 5, 17–32. https://journals.lub.lu.se/pa/article/view/17703
  • Green, J. (2012). ‘One health, one medicine’ and critical public health. Critical Public Health, 22(4), 377–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2012.723395
  • Gullion, J. S. (2018). Diffractive ethnography: Social sciences and the ontological turn. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351044998
  • Hamilton, L., & Taylor, N. (2017). Ethnography after humanism: Power, politics and method in multi-species research. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hancock, T. (2015). Global change and public health: Addressing the ecological determinants of health. Canadian Public Health Association. https://www.cpha.ca/sites/default/files/assets/policy/edh-discussion_e.pdf
  • Hansen, H., Holmes, S., & Lindemann, D. (2013). Ethnography of health for social change: Impact on public perception and policy. Social Science & Medicine, 99, 116–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.001
  • Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  • Harrison, S., Kivuti-Bitok, L., Macmillan, A., & Priest, P. (2019). EcoHealth and one health: A theory-focused review in response to calls for convergence. Environment International, 132, 105058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105058
  • Herbrechter, S. (2018). Critical posthumanism. In R. Braidotti & M. Hlavajova (Eds.), Posthuman glossary (pp. 94–96). Bloomsbury Academic.
  • Ingold, T. (2011). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Jackson, Z. I. (2021). Becoming human: Matter and meaning in an antiblack world. New York University Press.
  • Kearney, G. P., Corman, M. K., Hart, N. D., Johnston, J. L., & Gormley, G. J. (2019). Why institutional ethnography? Why now? Institutional ethnography in health professions education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0499-0
  • King, T. L. (2017). Humans involved: Lurking in the lines of posthumanist flight. Critical Ethnic Studies, 3(1), 162. https://doi.org/10.5749/jcritethnstud.3.1.0162
  • Kirksey, S. E., & Helmreich, S. (2010). The emergence of multispecies ethnography. Cultural Anthropology, 25(4), 545–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2010.01069.x
  • Kleinman, A. (2012). ‘Intra-actions’ (Interview of Karen Barad by Adam Kleinman). Mousse, 34, 76–81.
  • Kopnina, H. (2017). Beyond multispecies ethnography: Engaging with violence and animal rights in anthropology. Critique of Anthropology, 37(3), 333–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X17723973
  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
  • Lennon, S. (2017). Re-turning feelings that matter using reflexivity and diffraction to think with and through a moment of rupture in activist work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(6), 534–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1263885
  • Lillvis, K. (2017). Posthuman blackness and the black female imagination. The University of Georgia Press.
  • Luciano, D., & Chen, M. Y. (2019). Queer inhumanisms. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian & Gay Studies, 25(1), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-7275600
  • Morgan, L. H. (1868). The American beaver and his works. J.B. Lippincott & Co.
  • Newnham, E., Small, K., & Allen, J. (2021). Critical ethnography in maternity care research: Bridging creativity and rigour – A discussion paper. Midwifery, 99, 103014–103014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.103014
  • Niccolini, A. D., & Ringrose, J. (2020). Feminist posthumanism. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE research methods foundations. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036807161
  • Nyong’o, T. (2015). Little monsters: Race, sovereignty, and queer inhumanism in beasts of the southern wild. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian & Gay Studies, 21(2–3), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684-2843335
  • Ogden, L. A., Hall, B., & Tanita, K. (2013). Animals, plants, people, and things: A review of multispecies ethnography. Environment and Society, 4(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2013.040102
  • Pels, P., & Salemink, O. (1994). Introduction: Five theses on ethnography as colonial practice. History and Anthropology, 8(1–4), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757206.1994.9960856
  • Pigg, S. L. (2013). On sitting and doing: Ethnography as action in global health. Social Science & Medicine, 99, 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.018
  • Povinelli, E. A. (2016). Geontologies: A requiem to late liberalism. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822373810
  • Rock, M. (2013). Pet bylaws and posthumanist health promotion: A case study of urban policy. Critical Public Health, 23(2), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2012.749343
  • Rock, M. J. (2017). Who or what is “the public” in critical public health? Reflections on posthumanism and anthropological engagements with one health. Critical Public Health, 27(3), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1288287
  • Rock, M. J., Degeling, C., & Blue, G. (2014). Toward stronger theory in critical public health: Insights from debates surrounding posthumanism. Critical Public Health, 24(3), 337–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2013.827325
  • Roger, F., Caron, A., Morand, S., Pedrono, M., Garine-Wichatitsky, M., de Chevalier, V., Tran, A., Gaidet, N., Figuié, M., de Visscher, M. N., & Binot, A. (2016). One health and EcoHealth: The same wine in different bottles? Infection Ecology & Epidemiology, 6(1), 30978. https://doi.org/10.3402/iee.v6.30978
  • Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S. L. (2020). The new materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3–4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135
  • Ruck, A., & Mannion, G. (2020). Fieldnotes and situational analysis in environmental education research: Experiments in new materialism. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 1373–1390. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1594172
  • Sanjek, R. (1993). Anthropology’s hidden colonialism: Assistants and their ethnographers. Anthropology Today, 9(2), 13–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/2783170
  • Schadler, C. (2016). How to define situated and ever-transforming family configurations? A new materialist approach. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 8(4), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12167
  • Schadler, C. (2019). Enactments of a new materialist ethnography: Methodological framework and research processes. Qualitative Research, 19(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117748877
  • Schmitz, S., & Ahmed, S. (2014). Affect/emotion: Orientation matters. A conversation between Sigrid Schmitz and Sara Ahmed. Freiburger Zeitschrift Für GeschlechterStudien, 22(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.3224/fzg.v20i2.17137
  • Shih, P. (2019). Critical ethnography in public health: Politicizing culture and politicizing methodology. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 223–236). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_60
  • Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013486067
  • Swanson, C. (2023). Monuments and Megachile: Lessons from the insect Graveyard. Ecocene: Cappadocia Journal of Environmental Humanities, 4(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.46863/ecocene.97
  • Taylor, C. A., & Fairchild, N. (2020). Towards a posthumanist institutional ethnography: Viscous matterings and gendered bodies. Ethnography and Education, 15(4), 509–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2020.1735469
  • Todd, Z. (2016). An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: “ontology” is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology, 29(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/johs.12124
  • Tuck, E., & McKenzie, M. (2015). Relational validity and the “where” of inquiry: Place and land in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 21(7), 633–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800414563809
  • Van Dooren, T. (2019). The wake of crows: Living and dying in shared worlds. Columbia University Press.
  • Verlie, B. (2021). Learning to live with climate change: From anxiety to transformation. Routledge.
  • Wall, S. S. (2015). Focused ethnography: A methodological adaptation for social research in emerging contexts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-16.1.2182
  • Warfield, K. (2019). Becoming method(ologist): A feminist posthuman autoethnography of the becoming of a posthuman methodology. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 10(2–3), 147–172. https://doi.org/10.7577/rerm.3674
  • Watson, M. C. (2016). On multispecies mythology: A critique of animal Anthropology. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(5), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276416637128
  • Zinsstag, J. (2012). Convergence of ecohealth and one health. EcoHealth, 9(4), 371–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-013-0812-z

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.