Managing attention: more mindful team decision-making

References

• Arbaugh, J. B., & Benbunan-Finch, R. (2006). An investigation of epistemological and social dimensions of teaching in online learning environments. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2006.23473204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H., Loewenstein, G., & Moore, D. A. (2002). Why good accountants do bad audits. Harvard Business Review, 80(11), 96–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.3.312.15162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, C. J. (1993). Nothing special: Living Zen. Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biocca, F., Owen, C., Tang, A., & Bohil, C. (2007). Attention issues in spatial information systems: Directing mobile users’ visual attention using augmented reality. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(4), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & Cleland, A. A. (2000). Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75(2), B13–B25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00081-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, G. J., and Massey , A. P. (2009). Introduction to JAIS special issue on collaboration engineering. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, R. O., de Vreede, G. J., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2003). Collaboration engineering with ThinkLets to pursue sustained success with group support systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19 (4), 31–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, B. S., & Gray, P. H. (2006). Reliability, mindfulness, and information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byington, E., & Felps, W. (2010). Why do IQ scores predict job performance?: An alternative, sociological explanation. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 175–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidambaram, L. (1996). Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quarterly, 20(2), 143–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/249476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidambaram, L., & Tung, L. L. (2005). Is out of sight, out of mind? An empirical study of social loafing in technology-supported groups. Information Systems Research, 16(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power and analyses for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D., Marcolin, B., Kelley, H., & Higgins, C. (2012). Research commentary —generalizability of information systems research using student subjects—A reflection on our practices and recommendations for future research. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1093–1109. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, S. (2020). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on information systems management. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 327–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1820636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3), 346–371. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, A. M., Dennis, A. R., & McNamara, K. O. (2017). From monologue to dialogue: Performative objects to promote collective mindfulness in computer-mediated team discussions. MIS Quarterly, 41(2), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.2.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The attention economy. Ubiquity, 2001(May), 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/375348.376626
   Google Scholar
• DeChurch, L. A., & Mesmer-Magnus, J. R. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R. (1996). Information exchange and use in group decision-making: You can lead a group to information, but you can’t make it think. MIS Quarterly, 20(4), 433–455. https://doi.org/10.2307/249563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., Hilmer, K. M., & Taylor, N. J. (1997-1998). Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision-making: Effect of minority influence. Journal of Information Management Systems, 14(3), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1997.11518175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1994). Group, sub-group, and nominal group idea generation: New rules for a new media? Journal of Management, 20(4), 723–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639402000402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 167–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vreede, G. J., & Briggs, R. O. (2018). Collaboration engineering: Reflections on 15 years of research & practice. Proceedings of HICSS, Waikoloa HI
   Google Scholar
• Duhon, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, C. L., Gerard, G. J., & Grabski, S. V. (2011). Diagrammatic attention management and the effect of conceptual model structure on cardinality validation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(8), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2004). Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SORE.0000027408.72713.45
   Google Scholar
• Fay, N., Garrod, S., & Carletta, J. (2000). Group discussion as interactive dialogue or as serial monologue: The influence of group size. Psychological Science, 11(6), 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, L. (2020). Conducting information systems research in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities and challenges. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 256–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1814460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjermestad, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (1998). An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(3), 7–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fréchette, G. R. (2015). Laboratory experiments: Professionals versus students. In G. R. Fréchette & A. Schotter (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economic methodology (pp. 360–390). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fréchette, G. R. (2016). Experimental economics across subject populations. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 435–480). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gabryelczyk, R. (2020). Has COVID-19 accelerated digital transformation? Initial lessons learned for public administrations. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1820633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 959–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, M. E., Slade, L. A., & Schmitt, N. (1986). The “science of the sophomore” revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 191–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge‐based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J., Vom Brocke, J., Handali, J., Otto, M., & Schneider, J. (2020). Virtually in this together–how web-conferencing systems enabled a new virtual togetherness during the COVID-19 crisis. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that Work (and those that don’t). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J. R., & Kaplan, R. E. (1974). Interventions into group process: An approach to improving the effectiveness of groups. Decision Sciences, 5(3), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1974.tb00631.x
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund, J., Ilgen, D. R., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (1998). Decision accuracy in computer-mediated versus face-to-face decision-making teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(1), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heninger, W. G., Dennis, A. R., & Hilmer, K. M. (2006). Research note: Individual cognition and dual-task interference in group support systems. Information Systems Research, 17(4), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herath, T., & Herath, H. S. (2020). Coping with the new normal imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons for technology management and governance. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1818902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hightower, R., & Sayeed, L. (1996). Effects of communication mode and pre-discussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.4.451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilmer, K. M., & Dennis, A. R. (2001). Stimulating thinking in decision-making: Cultivating better decisions with groupware one individual at a time. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 93–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 623–655. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolfschoten, G. L. (2011). Cognitive load in collaboration – brainstorming. Proceedings of the 44thHawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Jan 4, 2011, Honolulu, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W., & Ilgen, D. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krancher, O., Dibbern, J., & Meyer, P. (2018). How social media-enabled communication awareness enhances project team performance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(9), 3. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumkale, G. T., & Albarracin, D. (2004). The sleeper effect in persuasion: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, E. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2000). The construct of mindfulness. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, T. C., Hsu, T. S. C., Cheng, K. T., & Wu, S. (2012). Understanding the role of behavioural integration in ISD teams: An extension of transactive memory systems concept. Information Systems Journal, 22(3), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2011.00383.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Hung, Y. T. (2003). Because time matters: Temporal coordination in global virtual project teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 129–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 41, 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, K., Dennis, A. R., & Carte, T. A. (2008). It’s the thought that counts: the mediating effects of information processing in virtual team decision making. Information Systems Management, 25(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530701777123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997a). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanism. Psychological Review, 104(1), 3–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997b). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psychological Review, 104(4), 749–791. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minas, R. K., Dennis, A. R., Potter, R. F., Bartelt, V., & Bae, S. (2014). Putting on the thinking cap: Using neuroIS to understand information processing biases in virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(4), 49–82. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222300403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, S. M., & Saunders, C. S. (2003). The social construction of meaning: An alternative perspective on information sharing. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.1.87.14765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed, S., & Dumville, B. C. (2001). Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1997). The impact of organizational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, D. G., & Lamm, H. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83(4), 602–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mykytyn, P. P. (2020). COVID-19 and its impacts on managing information systems. Information Systems Management, 37(4), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2020.1818900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C. (1986). Differential contributions of minority and majority influence. Psychological Review, 93(1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunamaker, J. F.,sJr., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., & George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 40–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, S. L., & Zhang, S. (2020). From fighting COVID-19 pandemic to tackling sustainable development goals: An opportunity for responsible information systems research. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H. E. (1994). Dual-Task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratkanis, A. R., Greenwald, A. G., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1988). In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead: Long live the sleeper effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019). Virtual work: Bridging research clusters. The Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 308–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, T., Russell, T., & Roland, C. (2017). Groups and teams in organizations. The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Reiter-Palmon, R., Sinha, T., Gevers, J., Odobez, J. M., & Volpe, G. (2017). Theories and models of teams and groups. Small Group Research, 48(5), 544–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L., & Dennis, A. R. (2005). The paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, L., Dennis, A. R., & Ahuja, M. (2008). Social capital and knowledge integration in digitally enabled teams. Information Systems Research, 19(3), 314–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruedy, N. E., & Schweitzer, M. (2010). In the moment: The effect of mindfulness on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 73–87.
   Google Scholar
• Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training.
   Google Scholar
• Santanen, E. L., Briggs, R. O., & De Vreede, G. J. (2000). The cognitive network model of creativity: A new causal model of creativity and a new brainstorming technique. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Jan 4, Maui, (pp. 10). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Scheidel, T. M. (1986). Divergent and convergent thinking in group decision-making. In Communication and group decision-making (pp. 113–132). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. B., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Massey, A. (2001). New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 575–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., Weinmann, M., & Vom Brocke, J. (2018). Digital nudging: Influencing choices by using interface design. Communications of the ACM, 61(7), 67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaft, T. M., & Vessey, I. (2006). The role of cognitive fit in the relationship between software comprehension and modification. MIS Quarterly Quarterly, 30(1), 29–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spender, J. C. (1996). Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: Three concepts in search of a theory. Journal of Organizational Change Management 9(1), 63–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanko, T. L., & Beckman, C. M. (2015). Watching you watching me: Boundary control and capturing attention in the context of ubiquitous technology use. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 712–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, D. S., & Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Information Systems Journal, 18(6), 617–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G. (1992). Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A thought experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52(1), 156–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 426–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Images of mindfulness. The Journal of Social Issues, 56(1), 11–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streufert, S., & Streufert, S. C. (1978). Behavior in the complex environment. VH Winston & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H., Fang, Y., & Zou, H. M. (2017). Choosing a fit technology: Understanding mindfulness in technology adoption and use. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(6), 337–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R., & Hastie, R. (2014). Making dumb groups smarter. Harvard Business Review, 92(12), 90–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J. B., Wright, R. T., Sun, H., Zagenczk, T., & Kelin, R. (2018). Mindfulness in information technology use: Definitions, distinctions and a new measure. MIS Quarterly, 42(3), 831–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. L. (1991). Information exchange in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinokur, A., Trope, Y., & Burnstein, E. (1975). A decision-making analysis of persuasive argumentation and the choice-shift effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11(2), 127–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller, M. J., Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., & Giambatista, R. C. (2002). Watching the clock: Group pacing behavior under dynamic deadlines. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1046–1055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-Mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23 (1), 3–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2009). Knowledge transfer in virtual settings: The role of individual virtual competency. Information Systems Journal, 19(6), 571–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2006). Mindfulness and the quality of organizationalattention. Organization Science, 17(4), 514–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, B. C., & Valacich, J. S. (1996). Facilitation, GSS, and training as sources of process restrictiveness and guidance for structured group decision-making: An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 429–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar