Dynamic capabilities for transitioning from product platform ecosystem to innovation platform ecosystem

References

• Boudreau, K. J. (2010). Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. Devolving control. Management Science, 56(10), 1849–1872. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J. (2017). Platform boundary choices & governance: Opening-up while still coordinating and orchestrating. Advances in Strategic Management, 37, 227–297. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220170000037009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccagnoli, M., Forman, C., Huang, P., & Wu, D. J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 263–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., & Santaló, J. (2019). Generativity tension and value creation in platform ecosystems. Organization Science, 30(3), 617–641. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciborra, C. U., Braa, K., Cordella, A., Dahlom, B., Failla, A., Hanseth, O., Hepso, V., Ljungberg, J., Monteiro, E., & Simon, K. (2000). From control to drift: The dynamics of corporate information infastructures. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. A., & Gawer, A. (2002). The elements of platform leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(3), 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, M. A., Gawer, A., & Yoffie, D. B. (2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation and power. Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• de Reuver, M., Sørensen, C., & Basole, R. C. (2018). The digital platform: A research agenda. Journal of Information Technology, 33(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2015). Distributed tuning of boundary resources: The case of apple’s iOS service system. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case-study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105:AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Alstyne, M. W. V. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schuetz, S. W., & Heinzl, A. (2019). Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvagno, M., & Dalli, D. (2014). Theory of value co-creation: A systematic literature review. Managing Service Quality, 24(6), 643–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/Msq-09-2013-0187
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2009). Platform dynamics and strategies: From products to services. In A. Gawer (Ed.), Platforms, markets and innovation (pp. 45–57). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging Differing Perspectives On Technological Platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239–1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2008). How companies become platform leaders. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(2), 28–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry platforms and ecosystem innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: The boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A., & Altman, E. (2017). Finding the platform in your product. Harvard Business Review, 95(4), 94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, A., Schreieck, M., Riasanow, T., Soto Setzke, D., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2020). Digital platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 30, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00377-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfat, C. E., & Raubitschek, R. S. (2018). Dynamic and integrative capabilities for profiting from innovation in digital platform-based ecosystems. Research Policy, 47, 1391–1399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henfridsson, O., & Bygstad, B. (2013). The generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 907–931. https://doi.org/10.25300/Misq/2013/37.3.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Q., Chen, X., Ou, C. X., Davison, R. M., & Hua, Z. (2017). Understanding buyers’ loyalty to a C2C platform: ThE roles of social capital, satisfaction and perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms. Information Systems Journal, 27, 91–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, P., Tafti, A., & Mithas, S. (2018). Platform sponsor investments and user contributions in knowledge communities: The role of knowledge seeding. MIS Quarterly, 42(1), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.25300/Misq/2018/13490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, T. L., Kude, T., & Dibbern, J. (2017). Governance practices in platform ecosystems: Navigating tensions between cocreated value and governance costs. Information Systems Research, 28(3), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017). Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and android smartphone ecosystems. Organization Science, 28(3), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi, J., & Walter, Z. (2015). The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: A factor-based study of the newspaper industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(1), 39–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1029380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, H. K., & Myers, M. D. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, R., Eriksson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2015). Managing Identity tensions during mobile ecosystem evolution. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusch, R. F., & Nambisan, S. (2015). Service innovation: A service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malgonde, O., Zhang, H., Padmanabhan, B., & Limayem, M. (2020). Taming complexity in search matching: Two-sided recommender systems on digital platforms. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 49–84. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matzner, M., Pauli, T., Marx, E., Anke, J., Poeppelbuss, J., Fielt, E., Gregor, S., Sun, R., Hydle, K. M., & Aas, T. H. (2021). Transitioning to platform-based services and business models in a B2B environment. Journal of Service Management Research (SMR), 5(3), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.15358/2511-8676-2021-3-143
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Hubermann, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, C.S.-P, & Gable, G. G. (2010). Maintaining ERP packaged software–a revelatory case study. Journal of Information Technology, 25(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., Koh, B., & Raghunathan, S. (2015). Value appropriation between the platform provider and app developers in mobile platform mediated networks. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Disruption in platform-based ecosystems. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1203–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy and how to make them work for you. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., Van Alstyne, M., & Jiang, X. (2017). Platform ecosystems: how developers invert the firm. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.25300/Misq/2017/41.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2010). The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443–471. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, A. F., Storbacka, K., & Frow, P. (2008). Managing the co-creation of value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0070-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan, K. R., & Read, S. (2016). Value co-creation: Concept and measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(3), 290–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0397-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietveld, J., & Schilling, M. A. (2021). Platform competition: A systematic and interdisciplinary review of the literature. Journal of Management, 47(6), 1528–1563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320969791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, J., Holmström, J., & Lyytinen, K. (2020). Digitization and phase transitions in platform organizing logics: Evidence from the process automation industry. MIS Quarterly, 44(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/14520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Sahaym, A., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2012). Exploring value cocreation in relationships between an ERP vendor and its partners: A revelatory case study. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O., Songcui, H. U., & Helfat, C. E. (2018). Quo vadis, dynamic capabilities? A content-analytic review of the current state of knowledge and recommendations for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 12(1), 390–439. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, M., Haki, K., Tanriverdi, H., & Aier, S. (2021). Taming complexity in business ecosystems: Investigating the role of platforms. 42nd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2021), Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2021). Capabilities for value co-creation and value capture in emergent platform ecosystems: A longitudinal case study of SAP’s cloud platform. Journal of Information Technology, 36(4), 365–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211023780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., & Krcmar, H. (2022). From product platform ecosystem to innovation platform ecosystem: An institutional perspective on the governance of ecosystem transformations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, (42), Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00764
   Google Scholar
• Selander, L., Henfridsson, O., & Svahn, F. (2013). Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems. Journal of Information Technology, 28(3), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2013.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang, S., & Seddon, P. B. (2002). Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: The business manager’s perspective. Information Systems Journal, 12(4), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2002.00132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staehr, L., Shanks, G., & Seddon, P. B. (2012). An explanatory framework for achieving business benefits from ERP systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(6), 424–465. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonig, J., Schmid, T., & Müller-Stewens, G. (2022). From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition. Strategic Management Journal, Open Access, Strategic Management Journal, Open Access, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3390
   Google Scholar
• Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., & Lindgren, R. (2017). Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quarterly, 41(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, B., Pan, S. L., Lu, X. H., & Huang, L. H. (2015). The role of is capabilities in the development of multi-sided platforms: The digital ecosystem strategy of Alibaba.Com. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 16(4), 248–280. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J. (2017). Dynamic capabilities and (digital) platform lifecycles. In J. Furman, A. Gawer, B. Silverman, & S. Stern (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, innovation, and platforms (advances in strategic management) (Vol. 37, pp. 211–225). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0742-332220170000037008
   Google Scholar
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509:AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, L. D. W., Autio, E., & Gann, D. M. (2014). Architectural leverage: Putting platforms in context. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(2), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2011.0105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K., & Sørensen, C. (2010). Digital infrastructures: The missing is research agenda. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 748–759. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2014). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. (2015). Platform desertion by app developers. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(4), 40–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1138365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. A. (2010). Platform evolution: coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2016). Institutions and Axioms: AN extension and update of service-dominant logic. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0456-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2017). Service-dominant logic 2025. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatraman, N., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P., & Bharadwaj, A. (2014). Theorizing digital business innovation: Platforms and capabilities in ecosystems, (pp.15-080). Fox School of Business Research.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P. (2021). Connecting the parts with the whole: Toward an information ecology theory of digital innovation ecosystems. MIS Quarterly, 45(1), 397–422. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/15864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wareham, J., Fox, P. B., & Giner, J. L. C. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4), 1195–1215. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S. G. (2003). Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 991–995. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yoffie, D. B., Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2019). A study of more than 250 platforms reveals why most fail. Harvard Business Review.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2010). The new organizing logic of digital innovation: An agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Tong, T. W. (2022). Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors. Strategic Management Journal, 43(3), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, F., & Furr, N. (2016). Products to Platforms: Making the leap. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 72–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar