Virtual collaboration as co-enacting intercorporeality

References

• Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2007). Constructing mystery: Empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1265–1281. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. (1971). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baralou, E., & Tsoukas, H. (2015). How is new organizational knowledge created in a virtual context? An ethnographic study. Organization studies, 36(5), 593–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614556918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barley, S., & Kunda, G. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organization Science, 12(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beane, M., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2015). What difference does a robot make? The material enactment of distributed coordination. Organization Science, 26(6), 1553–1573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.1004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, V. (2020). Phenomenology of online spaces: Interpreting late modern spatialities. Human studies, 43(4), 603–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-020-09545-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experimental nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.2307/257090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatelet, G. (1999). Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics and physics. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chughtai, H. (2021). Taking the human body seriously. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1746202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuffari, E., & Streck, J. (2017). Taking the world by hand: How (some) gestures mean. In C. Meyer, J. Streck, & S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. (pp. 18). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness theory and structural design. Management science, 32(5), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, K. (2000). Anatomising embodiment and organization theory. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Diprose, R. (2002). Corporeal generosity: On giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezal, L. (2020). Intercroporeality and social distancing. The Philosopher, 180(3), 18–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, H. L. (2008). On the internet (thinking in action). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dubé, L., & Robey, D. (2009). Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. Information Systems Journal, 19(1), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2008.00313.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einola, K., & Alvesson, M. (2019). The making and unmaking of teams. Human Relations, 72(12), 1891–1919. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekdahl, D. (2021). Mechanical keyboards and crystal arrows: Incorporation in esports. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 28(5–6), 30–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekdahl, D., & Ravn, S. (2022). Social bodies in virtual worlds: Intercorporeality in esports. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 21(2), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-021-09734-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, A., Slaughter, S., Kraut, R., & Herbsleb, J. (2007). Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development. Organization Science, 18(4), 613–630. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayard, A. L., & Metiu, A. (2014). The role of writing in distributed collaboration. Organization Science, 25(5), 1391–1413. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2004). Active and passive bodies: Comments on don Ihde’s bodies in technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 7(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2003725
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T. (2009). Phenomenology and psychopathology. In D. Schmicking & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 546–573). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T. (2014). The virtual other: Empathy in the age of virtuality. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5(2), 152–173.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (1995). Body schema and intentionality. In J. Bermúdez, N. Eilan, & A. Marcel (Eds.), The body and the self (pp. 225–244). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Cole, J. (1995). Body image and body schema in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 16 (4), 369–390.
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (2006). Composing qualitative research. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafermalz, E., & Riemer, K. (2020). Interpersonal connectivity work: Being there with and for geographically distant others. Organization studies, 41(12), 1627–1648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620973664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, P. (2008). Embodied generosity and an ethics of organization. Organization studies, 29(10), 1357–1373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608093545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Luff, P. (1992). Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in London underground control rooms. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: An International Journal, 1(1–2), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00752451
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P., & Kiesler, S. (2002). Distributed work. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, M. J. (2006). The life-giving gift of acknowledgement. Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Introna, L. (2017). Phenomenological Approaches to Ethics and Information Technology. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Introna, L. D., & Hayes, N. (2011). On sociomaterial imbrications: What plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters. Information and Organization, 21(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keating, E. (2017). Challenges of conducting interaction with technologically mediated bodies. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. (pp. 18). Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57–80). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2001). Phenomenology of digital-being. Human studies, 24(1–2), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010763028785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küpers, W. (2014). Phenomenology of the embodied organization. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, D. (2013). Merleau-Ponty and the paradoxes of expression. Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Langer , S. 1953 Felling and Form: A Theory of Art (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons)
   Google Scholar
• Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., & Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1096–1099. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann, G., & Schünemann, D. (2020). Presence in digital spaces. A phenomenological concept of presence in mediatized communication. Human studies, 43(4), 627–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-020-09567-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loenhoff, J. (2017). Intercorporeality as a foundational dimension of human communication. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck, & J. Scott (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction. (pp. 24). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2014). Enhancing performance of geographically distributed teams through targeted use of information and communication technologies. Human Relations, 67(4), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713495284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., Carman, R., & Lott, V. (2001). Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing- Rocketdyne. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(2), 229–249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, C., & O’Donohoe, S. (2019). Homo prostheticus? Intercorporeality and the emerging adult-smartphone assemblage. Information Technology & People, 32(2), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2017-0209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, A. N., & Baym, N. K. (2009). Introduction: Making Smart Choices on Shifting Ground. In Markham, A.N., Baym, N.K. (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Sense and non-sense. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). Signs. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964c). The primacy of perception: And other essays on phenomenological psychology, the philosophy of art, history, and politics. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1973). The prose of the world. Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metiu, A. (2006). Owning the code: Status closure in distributed groups. Organization Science, 17(4), 418–435. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metiu, A., & Rothbard, N. P. (2013). Task bubbles, artifacts, shared emotion, and mutual focus of attention: A comparative study of the microprocesses of group engagement. Organization Science, 24(2), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, D. (2017). Lived body, intersubjectivity, and intercorporeality: The body in phenomenology. In L. Dolezal & D. Petherbridge (Eds.), Body/self/other: The phenomenology of social encounter (pp. 269–311). State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, M. (2013). Qualitative research in business & management. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nardi, B., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83–112). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama, O., & Lee, A. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21(2), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/249417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noland, C. (2009). Digital gestures. In A. Morris & T. Swiss (Eds.), New media poetics: Contexts, technotexts, and theories (pp. 24). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014). Beyond being there: The symbolic role of communication and identification in perceptions of proximity to geographically dispersed colleagues. Management Information Systems Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 38(4), 1219–1244. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.4.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osler, L. (2020). Feeling togetherness online: A phenomenological sketch of online communal experiences. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-019-09627-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radley, A. (1991). Body and social psychology. Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Robey, D., Schwaig, K. S., & Jin, L. (2003). Intertwining material and virtual work. Information and Organization, 13(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-7727(02)00025-8
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E., & Escudero, V. (2004). Relational communication: An interactional perspective to the study of process and form. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410609656
   Google Scholar
• Rotman, B. (2008). Becoming beside ourselves: The alphabet, ghosts, and distributed human being. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schinoff, B. S., Ashforth, B., & Corley, K. (2019). Virtually (in)separable: The centrality of relational cadence in the formation of virtual multiplex relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 63(5), 1395–1424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze, U. (2014). Performing embodied identity in virtual worlds. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(1), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze, U., & Brooks, J. A. M. (2019). An interactional view of social presence: Making the virtual other “real”. Information Systems Journal, 29(3), 707–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultze, U., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2001). Metaphors of virtuality: Shaping an emergent reality. Information & Organization, 11(1), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1471-7727(00)00003-8
   Google Scholar
• Shotter, J. (2008). Dialogism and polyphony in organizing theorizing in organization studies: Action guiding anticipations and the continuous creation of novelty. Organization studies, 29(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608088701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springgay, S. (2005). Thinking through bodies: Bodied encounters and the process of meaning making in an E-mail generated art project. Studies in Art Education, 47(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2005.11652812
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, M., & Schultze, U. (2019). Producing solidarity in social media activism: The case of my stealthy freedom. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todes, S. (2001). Body and world. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vidolov, S. (2022). “Uncovering the affective affordances of videoconference technologies”, Information Technology & People, Vol. 35 No. 6, pp. 1782–1803. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2021-0329
   Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. (2000). The paradox of expression. In F. Evans & L. Lawlor (Eds.), Chiasms: Merleau-Ponty’s notion of flesh (pp. 89–102). Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in is research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4(2), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.1995.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham, G. (2006). Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (1995). Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organization Science, 6(2), 186–203. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B., & D’Addario, K. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J., Van Der Heide, B., Ramirez, A., Burgoon, J., & Pena, J. (2015). Interpersonal and hyperpersonal dimensions of computer-mediated communication. In S. Sundar (Ed.), The handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 3–22). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G. (1999). Body images: Embodiment as intercorporeality. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G. (2008). Ambiguity. In R. Diprose (Ed.), Merleau-Ponty: Key concepts (pp. 132–141). Acumen Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., Crisp, B., & Mortensen, M. (2013). Extending construal-level theory to distributed groups: Understanding the effects of virtuality. Organization Science, 24(2), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. M., O’Leary, M., Metiu, A., & Jett, Q. (2008). Perceived proximity in virtual work: Explaining the paradox of far-but-close. Organization studies, 29(7), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607083105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Adison-Wesley Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar