The role of managerial activities in achieving Information technology ambidexterity and new product development performance in small and medium-sized enterprises

References

• Adler, P., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43–68. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi, R., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala, H., Massey, A., & Montoya, M. (2017). The effects of process orientations on collaboration technology use and outcomes in product development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 34(2), 520–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2017.1334494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J.-M., Klein, K., & Wetzels, M. (2012). Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using reflective-formative type models. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 359–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, J., Castillo, A., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). IT-enabled knowledge ambidexterity and innovation performance in small US firms: The moderator role of social media capability. Information & Management, 55(1), 131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2017.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, J., Henseler, J., Castillo, A., & Schuberth, F. (2020). How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares? Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Information & Management, 57(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez, J., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). How information technology influences opportunity exploration and exploitation firm’s capabilities. Information & Management, 55(4), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj, A. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt, G., & Grover, V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boumgarden, P., Nickerson, J., & Zenger, T. R. (2012). Sailing into the wind: Exploring the relationships among ambidexterity, vacillation, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 33(6), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781–796. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, L., Mohan, K., Ramesh, B., & Sarkar, S. (2013). Evolution of governance: Achieving ambidexterity in IT outsourcing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222300305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran, A., Linderman, K., & Schroeder, R. (2012). Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations. Journal of Operations Management, 30(1), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W. W. (2010). How to write up and report PLS analyses. In W. C. V. Esposito, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications (pp. 655–690). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, D., & Spence, M. (2005). The internationalisation of “high performing” UK high-tech SMEs: A study of planned and unplanned strategies. International Business Review, 14(2), 167–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Business Innovation Skills. (2011). Small and medium sized enterprise statistics for the UK and regions, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32514/bpe_2010_-_statistical_release.pdf, Retrieved January 19, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Diskienė, D., Tamaševičius, V., & Kalvaitytė, A. (2018). Managerial roles in SMEs and their effect on perceived managerial effectiveness in Lithuania. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 9(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.15388/omee.2018.10.00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druskat, V., & Wheeler, J. (2003). Managing from the boundary: The effective leadership of self-managing work teams. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebben, J. J., & Johnson, A. C. (2005). Efficiency, flexibility, or both? Evidence linking strategy to performance in small firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(13), 1249–1259. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Economist Intelligence Unit. (2009). A new ranking of the world’s most innovative countries. The Economist, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J., & Lambert, L. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological methods, 12(1), 1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassott, G., Henseler, J., & Coelho, P. (2016). Testing moderating effects in PLS path models with composite variables. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1887–1900. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-06-2016-0248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M., & Pentland, B. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florén, H. (2006). Managerial work in small firms: Summarising what we know and sketching a research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 12(5), 272–288. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550610687646
   Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., Kaganer, E., Henfridsson, O., & Ruch, T. (2018). IT consumerization and the transformation of IT governance. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1225–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., & Keil, M. (2014). Blending bureaucratic and collaborative management styles to achieve control ambidexterity in is projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(3), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2013.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory, R., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., & Mahring, M. (2015). Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2014.0554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati, R., & Puranam, P. (2009). Renewal through reorganization: The value of inconsistencies between formal and informal organization. Organization Science, 20(2), 422–440. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Hult, G. M., Ringle, M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2018). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, C., & Tamangani, Z. (1996). An investigation of the relationship between organizational structure, managerial role expectations and managers’ work activities. Journal of Management Studies, 33(6), 731–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00170.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, J., & King, W. (2008). The role of user participation in information systems development: Implications from a meta-analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(1), 301–331. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222250111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hempel, P., Zhang, Z., & Han, Y. (2012). Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. Journal of Management, 38(2), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., & Dijkstra, T. (2015). ADANCO 2 professional for windows. Composite Modeling GmbH & Co. www.compositemodeling.com
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D., Ketchen, D., Hair, F., Hult, G., & Calatone, R. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS: Comments on Ronkko and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (2019). 2018 annual report and 2019 proxy statement. Hewlett Packard Report, https://s2.q4cdn.com/602190090/files/doc_financials/annual/HP-2019-Proxy-Statement-and-2018-Annual-Report-Final-As-Filed-Combo-2.26.19.pdf, Retrieved July 15, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• He, Z., & Wong, P. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoang, H., & Rothaermel, F. (2010). Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance. Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 734–758. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, G., & Rai, A. (2014). IT-enabled coordination for ambidextrous interorganizational relationships. Information Systems Research, 25(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamali, M. A., Voghouei, H., & Mohd nor, N. G. (2015). Information technology and survival of SMEs: An emprical study on Malaysian manufacturing sector. Information Technology and Management, 16(2), 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-014-0180-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J., Van Den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing, Z., Jianshi, G., Jinlian, L., & Yao, T. (2017). A case study of the promoting strategies for innovation contest within a company. Science Research Management, 38(11), 57–65.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., & Snell, S. (2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46(1), 65–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathuria, A., & Konsynski, B. (2012). Juggling paradoxical strategies: The emergent role of IT capabilities. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, USA, pp. 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Rai, A., & Liu, S. (2013). How user risk and requirements risk moderate the effects of formal and informal control on the process performance of IT projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 22(6), 650–672. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korica, M., Nicolini, D., & Johnson, B. (2017). In search of managerial work: Past, present and future of an analytical category. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. (2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 109–155. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416521003691287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., Sambamurthy, V., Lim, K., & Wei, K. (2015). How does IT ambidexterity impact organizational agility? Information Systems Research, 26(2), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidner, D., Lo, J., & Preston, D. (2011). An empirical investigation of the relationship of is strategy with firm performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(4), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonhardt, D., Haffke, I., Kranz, J., & Benlian, A. (2017). Reinventing the IT function: The role of IT agility and IT ambidexterity in supporting digital business transformation. In Twenty-Fifth Eurpean Conference of Information Sysytems, Portugal, pp. 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D., & March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(S2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M., Welsh, M., Dehler, G., & Green, S. (2002). Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of project management. Academy of Management Journal, 45(3), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, H., Wang, N., & Xue, Y. (2022). Juggling information technology (IT) exploration and exploitation: A proportional balance view of IT ambidexterity. Information Systems Research, in press, 33(4), 1386–1402. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2022.1105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, M., & Whitney, D. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorinkova, N., Pearsall, M., & Sims, H. (2013). Examining the differential longitudinal performance of directive versus empowering leadership in teams. Academy of Management Journal, 56(2), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small-to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646–672. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206306290712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2011). Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: Integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), 293–334. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson, J., Koutsikouri, D., & Paivarinta, T. (2020). Efficiency creep and shadow innovation: Enacting ambidextrous IT governance in the public sector. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1740617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marín-Idárraga, D. A., & González, J. M. H. (2021). Organizational structure and convergent change: Explanatory factors in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 28(6), 908–926. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2020-0347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, M. (2020). Como alcanzar el exito profesional en las empresas ambidiestras. Expansion, March 10, 2020, https://www.expansion.com/expansion-empleo/desarrollo-de-carrera/2020/03/10/5e67d900468aeba5018b4638.html
   Google Scholar
• Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2010). Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(5), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklian, J., & Hoelscher, K. (2022). SMEs and exogenous shocks: A conceptual literature review and forward research agenda. International Small Business Journal, 40(2), 178–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/02662426211050796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithas, S., & Rust, R. (2016). How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: Conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Quarterly, 40(1), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.1.10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montealegre, R., Iyengar, K., & Sweeney, J. (2019). Understanding ambidexterity: Managing contradictory tensions between exploration and exploitation in the evolution of digital infrastructure. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(5), 647–680. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napier, N., Mathiassen, L., & Robey, D. (2011). Building contextual ambidexterity in a software company to improve firm-level coordination. European Journal of Information Systems, 20(6), 674–690. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oke, A., Burke, G., & Myers, A. (2007). Innovation types and performance in growing UK SMEs. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(7), 735–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710756974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2004). The ambidextrous organisation. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C., & Tushman, M. (2011). Organizational ambidexterity in action: How managers explore and exploit. California Management Review, 53(4), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.53.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P., & El Sawy, O. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–227. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, G., & Li, L. (2003). Profitability of small‐and medium‐sized enterprises in high‐tech industries: The case of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9), 881–887. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz, M., Tallon, P., Sharma, R., & Coltman, T. (2018). The role of IT application orchestration capability in improving agility and performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 27(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rueda, L., Benitez, J., & Braojos, J. (2017). From traditional education technologies to student satisfaction in management education: A theory on the role of social media applications. Information & Management, 54(8), 1059–1071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rustagi, S., King, W., & Kirsch, L. (2008). Predictors of formal control usage in IT outsourcing partnerships. Information Systems Research, 19(2), 126–143. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvato, C. (2009). Capabilities unveiled: The role of ordinary activities in the evolution of product development processes. Organization Science, 20(2), 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 2(27), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530
   Google Scholar
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriesheim, C., & Kerr, S. (1974). Psychometric properties of the Ohio State leadership scales. Psychological Bulletin, 81(11), 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemsen, E., Roth, A., & Oliveira, P. (2010). Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods, 13(3), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109351241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W., & Tushman, M. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A. (2006). The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoel, M. D., & Muhanna, W. A. (2009). IT capabilities and firm performance: A contingency analysis of the role of industry and IT capability type. Information & Management, 46(3), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani, M. (2004). How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 45–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, T. A., Blome, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020a). Impact of IT ambidexterity on new product development speed: Theory and empirical evidence. Decision Sciences, 51(3), 655–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, T. A., Blome, C., & Papadopoulos, T. (2020b). Resolving paradoxes in IT success through IT ambidexterity: The moderating role of uncertain environments. Information & Management, 57(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, T. A., Wiener, M., Mehmood, F., & Abdelrahman, M. (2021). Control-style ambidexterity and information systems project performance: An expanded view of control activities. European Journal of Information Systems, in press, 32(3), 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1977728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai, J., Wang, E., & Yeh, H. (2019). A study of is assets, is ambidexterity, and is alignment: The dynamic managerial capability perspective. Information & Management, 56(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2018.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: A resource‐based view. Strategic Management Journal, 31(8), 892–902. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N., Swart, J., & Maylor, H. (2013). Mechanisms for managing ambidexterity: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, N., Swart, J., Maylor, H., & Antonacopoulou, E. (2016). Making it happen: How managerial actions enable project-based ambidexterity. Management Learning, 47(2), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507615610028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (1996). The ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushman, M., & O’Reilly, C. (1997). Winning through innovation. Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Looy, B., Martens, T., & Debackere, K. (2005). Organizing for continuous innovation: On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2005.00341.x
   Google Scholar
• Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601061011040221
   Google Scholar
• Voss, G. B., & Voss, Z. G. (2013). Strategic ambidexterity in small and medium-sized enterprises: Implementing exploration and exploitation in product and market domains. Organization Science, 24(5), 1459–1477. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E., & Newell, S. (2007). Exploring the importance of participation in the post-implementation period of an ES project: A neglected area. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(10), 508–524. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, Z., Yi, Y., & Guo, H. (2014). Organizational learning ambidexterity, strategic flexibility, and new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 832–847. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijewardena, H., Nanayakkara, G., & De Zoysa, A. (2008). The owner/manager’s mentality and the financial performance of SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(1), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000810850892
   Google Scholar
• Windeler, J., Maruping, L., & Venkatesh, V. (2017). Technical systems development risk factors: The role of empowering leadership in lowering developers’ stress. Information Systems Research, 28(4), 775–796. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S., Faraj, S., & Sims, H. P., Jr. (2005). Contingent leadership and effectiveness of trauma resuscitation teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1288–1296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Lynch, J., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar