The value of being systemically important: event study on regulatory announcements for banks

References

• Angbazo, L. and Saunders, A. (1996) The effect of TBTF deregulation on bank cost of funds, Working Paper No. S/96/39, New York University, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Athavale, M. (2000) Uninsured deposits and the too-big-to-fail policy in 1984 and 1991, American Business Review, 18, 123–8.
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2011) Global systemically important banks: assessment methodology and the additional loss absorbency requirement, Consultative Document, Bank of International Settlements, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2013) Global systemically important banks: updated assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement, Consultative Document, Bank of International Settlements, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Black, H. A., Collins, M. C., Robinson, B. et al. (1997) Changes in market perception of riskiness: the case of too-big-to-fail, The Journal of Financial Research, 20, 389–406.
   Google Scholar
• Boehmer, E., Masumeci, J. and Poulsen, A. B. (1991) Event-study methodology under conditions of event-induced variance, Journal of Financial Economics, 30, 253–72. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(91)90032-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. and Forsythe, A. B. (1974) Robust tests for the equality of variances, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364–7. doi:10.1080/01621459.1974.10482955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. J. and Warner, J. B. (1980) Measuring security price performance, Journal of Financial Economics, 8, 205–58. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(80)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. J. and Warner, J. B. (1985) Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies, Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 3–31. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S. J. and Weinstein, M. I. (1985) Derived factors in event studies, Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 491–5. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(85)90010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W. and MacKinlay, A. C. (1997) The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Carow, K. and Kane, E. (2002) Event-study evidence of the value of relaxing long-standing regulatory restraints on banks, 1970–2000, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 42, 439–63. doi:10.1016/S1062-9769(01)00127-2
   Google Scholar
• Carrington, T. (1984) U.S. won’t let 11 biggest banks in nation fail, Wall Street Journal, 20, A2.
   Google Scholar
• Corrado, C. J. (1989) A nonparametric test for abnormal security-price performance in event studies, Journal of Financial Economics, 23, 385–95. doi:10.1016/0304-405X(89)90064-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, A. (1992) Nonparametric event study tests, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2, 343–58. doi:10.1007/BF00939016
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, K. (1999) Too big to fail? Long-term capital management and the federal reserve, Cato Institute Briefing Papers No. 52, Cato Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1965) The behavior of stock-market prices, The Journal of Business, 38, 34–105. doi:10.1086/294743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1970) Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work, The Journal of Finance, 25, 383–417. doi:10.2307/2325486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. (1991) Efficient capital markets: II, The Journal of Finance, 46, 1575–617. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04636.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. C. et al. (1969) The adjustment of stock prices to new information, International Economic Review, 10, 1–21. doi:10.2307/2525569
   Google Scholar
• Fama, E. F. and French, K. R. (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns, The Journal of Finance, 47, 427–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board. (2011) Policy measures to address systemically important financial institutions – G-Sifis: for which the resolution-related requirements will need to be met by end-2012, Financial Stability Board, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board. (2012) Update of group of global systemically important banks (G-SIB), Financial Stability Board, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Board. (2013) Global systemically important banks: updated assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement, Bank for International Settlements, Basel.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G. (1980) Accounting policy decisions and capital market research, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2, 29–62. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(80)90014-2
   Google Scholar
• Goerke, B. (2009) Event studies, in Methodik der Empirischen Forschung, 3rd edn, Albers, S., Klapper, D., Konradt, U. et al. (Eds), Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp. 467–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hirshleifer, D., Lim, S. and Teoh, S. (2009) Driven to distraction: extraneous events and underreaction to earnings news, The Journal of Finance, 64, 2289–325. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01501.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, T. A. (2010) Changing market perceptions of who is ‘too big to fail’ during the financial crisis of 2007–2008, Working Paper DePaul University – Department of Finance, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P. and Davies, P. J. (2009) Thirty financial groups on systemic risk list, Financial Times UK, 30, November 2009, 30.
   Google Scholar
• Joines, A. (2010) Signals to the market: too big to fail banks and the recent crisis, Working Paper, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• Lintner, J. (1965) The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 13–37. doi:10.2307/1924119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz, H. (1952) Portfolio selection, The Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, A. and Siegel, D. (1997) Event studies in management research: theoretical and empirical issues, The Academy of Management Journal, 40, 626–57. doi:10.2307/257056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody’s (2011) Weekly Credit Outlook. Available at www.moodys.com (accessed 25 July 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. P. (2002) Rating banks: risk and uncertainty in an opaque industry, American Economic Review, 92, 874–88.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. P. and Stiroh, K. J. (2005) Too big to fail after all these years, FRB of New York, Staff Report No. 220, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. D. (2011) Systemic risks and the ‘too-big-to-fail’ problem, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27, 498–516. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grr020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossin, J. (1966) Equilibrium in a capital asset market, Econometrica, 34, 768–83. doi:10.2307/1910098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, M. and Shaw, W. (1990) Deposit insurance and wealth effects: the value of being ‘too big to fail’, The Journal of Finance, 45, 1587–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packin, N. G. (2013) The case against the dodd-frank act’s living wills: contingency planning following the financial crisis, Berkeley Business Law Journal, 9, 29–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pop, A. and Pop, D. (2009) Requiem for market discipline and the specter of TBTF in Japanese banking, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49, 1429–59. doi:10.1016/j.qref.2009.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, F. (1946) An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components, Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110–14. doi:10.2307/3002019
   Google Scholar
• Sauernheimer, K. (2011) Greece: bail-out packages, current account and foreign debt, CESifo Forum, 12, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A., Schnabel, I. and Weder di Mauro, B. (2013) Financial sector reform after the crisis: has anything happened?, Working Paper, University of Mainz, Mainz.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, W. F. (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk, The Journal of Finance, 19, 425–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheskin, D. J. (2011) Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, 5th edn, CRC Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Solow, R. M. (2010) The bigger they are …, Daedalus, 139, 22–30. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storm, R. and Warner (2001) Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung, mathematische Statistik und statistische Qualitätskontrolle, 11th edn, Fachbuchverlag, Leipzig, Munich/Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Swary, I. (1986) Stock market reaction to regulatory action in the Continental Illinois crisis, The Journal of Business, 59, 451–73. doi:10.1086/296347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, J. B. (2009) On systemically important financial institutions and progressive systemic mitigation, Policy Discussion Papers No. 27, FRB of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Turk, G. and Swicegood, P. (2012) Assessing the market’s reaction to the Dodd-Frank act, Journal of Business & Economics Research, 10, 569–77.
   Google Scholar
• Uranaka, T. (2010) Japan regulators make list of top 60 SIFIs. Available at de.reuters.com/article/idUKTKX00714220101228 (accessed 29 December 2013).
   Google Scholar
• US Congress (1984) House of Representatives – Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs Inquiry into Continental Illinois Corporation and Continental Illinois National Bank – Hearing, 18–19 September and 4 October 1984, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• von Hayek, F. A. (1976) Law, Legislation and Liberty – A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. Vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• von Mises, L. (1949) Human Action, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, B. L. (1947) The generalization of ‘student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved, Biometrika, 34, 28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. and Karim, K. E. (2004) Is too-big-to-fail policy effective for US banks in an international currency crisis?, Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets & Policies, 7, 311–33. doi:10.1142/S0219091504000196
   Google Scholar