Food fraud detection and reporting by food control officers in Finland

References

• [ACFE] Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. 2022. Occupational fraud 2022: a report to the nations. Austin (TX): Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. https://acfepublic.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/2022+Report+to+the+Nations.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Beaumont PB. 1979. The limits of inspection: A study of the workings of the government wages inspectorate. Public Admin. 57(2):203–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.1979.tb00363.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bierstaker JL, Brody RG, Pacini C. 2006. Accountants’ perceptions regarding fraud detection and prevention methods. Manag Audit J. 21(5):520–535. doi: 10.1108/02686900610667283.
   Google Scholar
• Customs. 2023. Harmaan talouden ja talousrikollisuuden torjunnan toimenpideohjelma. Viranomaishankkeen 4.1.F loppuraportti [Strategy and action plan for tackling grey economy and economic crime. Final report of the 4.1.F project]. Helsinki: Finnish Customs. Finnish. https://www.vero.fi/globalassets/harmaa-talous-ja-talousrikollisuus/torjunta/kuvat-videot-ja-tiedostot/loppuraportti-viranomaisyhteistyöhanke-4.1.f.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Di Pinto A, Mottola A, Marchetti P, Savarino A, Tantillo G. 2019. Fraudulent species substitution in e-commerce of protected denomination origin (pdo) products. J Food Compos Anal. 79:143–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2019.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning D, Heath C, Suls JM. 2004. Flawed self-assessment: implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychol Sci Pub Int. 5(3):69–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• du Rées H. 2001. Can criminal law protect the environment? J Scand Stud Criminol Crime Prev. 2(2):109–126. doi: 10.1080/140438501753737606.
   Google Scholar
• Dyck A, Morse A, Zingales L. 2010. Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? J Financ. 65(6):2213–2253. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01614.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC 178/2002. 2002. Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2002/178/oj.
   Google Scholar
• EC 2017/625. 2017. Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council on official controls and other official activities performed to ensure the application of food and feed law, rules on animal health and welfare, plant health and plant protection products. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/625/oj.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2018. Special eurobarometer 471. Fairness, inequality and intergenerational mobility. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2166.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission. 2021. Food fraud- what does it mean?; [accessed 2021 Oct 14]. https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/agri-food-fraud/food-fraud-what-does-it-mean_en.
   Google Scholar
• [EC] European Commission, Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. 2022. Alert and cooperation network. 2021 annual report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi: 10.2875/328358.
   Google Scholar
• [Evira] Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira. 2015. Elintarvikehuoneiston riskiperusteinen valvonta [Risk-based control of food establishments]. Evira guideline 16044/1. Helsinki: Finnish Food Safety Authority Evira. Finnish. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/globalassets/tietoa-meista/asiointi/oppaat-ja-lomakkeet/yritykset/elintarvikeala/elintarvikehuoneistot/eviran_ohje_16044_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [FAO] Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. 2022. Thinking about the future of food safety – a foresight report. Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. doi: 10.4060/cb8667en.
   Google Scholar
• [FFA] Finnish Food Authority. 2020a. Elintarviketurvallisuus Suomessa 2019 [Food safety in Finland in 2019]. Seinäjoki: Finnish Food Authority. Finnish. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/globalassets/tietoa-meista/julkaisut/julkaisusarjat/julkaisuja/julkaisuja_2_2020_elintarviketurvallisuus_suomessa_2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [FFA] Finnish Food Authority. 2020b. Elintarvikeketjun monivuotinen kansallinen valvontasuunnitelma 2021-2024, osa 3: Elintarviketurvallisuus, rehut ja luonnonmukainen tuotanto [Perennial national control plan of the food chain 2021-2024, part 3: Food safety, feedstuffs, and organic production]; [accessed 2023 May 3]. Finnish. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/tietoa-meista/oppaat/elintarvikeketjun-monivuotinen-kansallinen-valvontasuunnitelma-2021-2024-osa-3/osa3/.
   Google Scholar
• [FFA] Finnish Food Authority. 2021. Assessing the reliability of food companies; [accessed 2023 May 3]. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/en/foodstuffs/food-sector/control/assessing-the-reliability-of-food-companies/.
   Google Scholar
• [FFA] Finnish Food Authority. 2022a. Elintarviketurvallisuus Suomessa 2021 [Food safety in Finland in 2021]. Seinäjoki: Finnish Food Authority. Finnish. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/globalassets/tietoa-meista/julkaisut/julkaisusarjat/julkaisuja/julkaisuja_3_2022_elintarviketurvallisuus_suomessa_2021.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• [FFA] Finnish Food Authority. 2022b. Collaboration is key in uncovering food fraud accessed 2023 25 June. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/en/foodstuffs/food-sector/latest-news/collaboration-is-key-in-uncovering-food-fraud/.
   Google Scholar
• [FFA] Finnish Food Authority. 2022c. Elintarvikehuoneiston ja kontaktimateriaalitoiminnan riskiluokitus ja elintarvikelainsäädännön mukaisen valvontatarpeen määrittäminen [Risk rating and defining the need for food control in food establishments and food contact material operators]; [accessed 2023 May 3]. Finnish. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/yritykset/oppaat/riskiluokitusohje/elintarvikehuoneiston-ja-kontaktimateriaalitoiminnan-riskiluokitus-ja-elintarvikelainsaadannon-mukaisen-valvontatarpeen-maarittaminen/.
   Google Scholar
• [FFA] Finnish Food Authority. 2023. Oiva evaluation guidelines; [accessed 2023 May 3]. https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/en/foodstuffs/food-sector/instructions-and-legislation/oiva-evaluation-guidelines/.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish Government. 2021. Hyvinvointialueille ehdotetaan siirrettäväksi ympäristöterveydenhuollon tehtäviä 1.1.2026 [The duties of environmental health services proposed to transfer to wellbeing service counties on 1.1.2026]. [accessed 2022 Aug 12]. Finnish. https://soteuudistus.fi/-//10623/hyvinvointialueille-ehdotetaan-siirrettavaksi-ymparistoterveydenhuollon-tehtavia-1.1.2026.
   Google Scholar
• Food Act 297/2021. 2021. https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2021/en20210297.
   Google Scholar
• Guntzburger Y, Théolier J, Barrere V, Peignier I, Godefroy S, de Marcellis-Warin N. 2020. Food industry perceptions and actions towards food fraud: Insights from a pan-Canadian study. Food Contrl. 113:107182. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gussow KE. 2020. Finding food fraud: explaining the detection of food fraud in the Netherlands [dissertation]. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• HM Government. 2014. Elliott review into the integrity and assurance of food supply networks - final report: a national food crime prevention framework. London: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs and Food Standards Agency. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/elliott-review-into-the-integrity-and-assurance-of-food-supply-networks-final-report.
   Google Scholar
• Joenperä J, Koskela T, Lundén J. 2022. Incidence and characteristics of food-related criminal cases in Finland. Food Control. 134:108425. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhila K. 2021. Teemoittelu [Thematic analysis]. In: Vuori J, editor. Research methods guidebook. Tampere: Finnish social science data archive. Finnish. https://www.fsd.tuni.fi/fi/palvelut/menetelmaopetus/
   Google Scholar
• Kartano M, Niemelä M, Brotherus H, Hannula K. 2018. Elintarvikelain muutostarpeet [Needs for change in the Food Act]. Helsinki: Tax Administration. Report No.: 22/2018. Finnish. https://www.vero.fi/globalassets/harmaa-talous-ja-talousrikollisuus/laajuus/2018_022-elintarvikelain-muutostarpeet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kaskela J, Sund R, Lundén J. 2021. Efficacy of disclosed food safety inspections in restaurants. Food Control. 123:107775. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettunen K, Pesonen S, Lundén J, Nevas M, Lundén J. 2017. Challenges in using administrative enforcement measures in local food control. Food Control. 76:34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela T, Joenperä J, Lundén J. 2022. Elintarvikepetosten tosiseikaston arvioinnin haasteet [Challenges in assessing the facts and circumstances of food fraud]. Edilex. 2022/43 Finnish. https://www.edilex.fi/artikkelit/28367.
   Google Scholar
• Kosola M, Kiviniemi K, Lundén J. 2022. Factors affecting effectiveness of food control inspections in food production establishments in Finland. Sci Rep. 12(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08204-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koubová J, Samková E, Hasonová L. 2018. Food fraud detection by Czech agricultural and food inspection authority in retail market. Brit Food J. 120(4):930–938. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-07-2017-0367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuukasjärvi KM, Rikkilä S, Kankaanranta T. 2022. ”Matalat kynnykset on helpointa ylittää” - Työperäisen hyväksikäytön ja ihmiskaupan torjunta moniviranomaistoiminnassa. Poliisiammattikorkeakoulun raportteja 142. [“Low thresholds are the easiest to cross over” - the prevention of labour exploitation and human trafficking in multi-authority action. Reports of the Police University College]. Tampere: Police University College. Finnish. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2022061045567.
   Google Scholar
• Minnens F, Luijckx NL, Verbeke W. 2019. Food supply chain stakeholders’ perspectives on sharing information to detect and prevent food integrity issues. Foods. 8(6):225. doi: 10.3390/foods8060225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [NFCU and SFCIU] National Food Crime Unit and Scottish Food Crime and Incidents Unit. 2020. Food crime strategic assessment 2020. [place unknown]: Food Standards Agency and Food Standards Scotland. https://www.food.gov.uk/sites/default/files/media/document/food-crime-strategic-assessment-2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Thomas KJ. 2004. ”Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Med Res Methodol. 4(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-25.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts MT, Viinikainen T, Bullon C. 2022. International and national regulatory strategies to counter food fraud. Rome: FAO and UCLA. doi: 10.4060/cb9035en.
   Google Scholar
• Sahramäki I, Kankaanranta T. 2014. Ympäristörikollisuuden torjunta ja valvonta Suomessa: kohti vihreämpää viranomaisyhteistyötä? [The prevention and control of environmental crime in Finland: towards more active cooperation between authorities?]. Tampere: Police University College. Study No.: 42. Finnish. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-815-267-8.
   Google Scholar
• [SF] Statistics Finland. 2022. Offences recorded and their solving by offence heading according to the investigating authority, 2006-2021; [accessed 2022 May 12]. Statistics Finland’s Free-of-Charge Statistical Databases. https://pxdata.stat.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__rpk/statfin_rpk_pxt_13gw.px/.
   Google Scholar
• Soon JM, Manning L. 2017. Whistleblowing as a countermeasure strategy against food crime. Brit Food J. 119(12):2630–2652. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-01-2017-0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spink J, Moyer DC. 2011. Defining the public health threat of food fraud. J Food Sci. 76(9):R157–R163. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02417.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tähkäpää S, Maijala R, Korkeala H, Nevas M. 2015. Patterns of food frauds and adulterations reported in the EU rapid alarm system for food and feed and in Finland. Food Control. 47:175–184. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [TENK] Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. 2019. Guidelines for ethical review in human sciences. Helsinki: Finnish National Board on Research Integrity TENK. https://tenk.fi/en/ethical-review/ethical-review-human-sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Tuomi J, Sarajärvi A. 2018. Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi [Qualitative research and content analysis]. Revised 1st edition ed. Helsinki: Tammi.
   Google Scholar
• Ulberth F. 2020. Tools to combat food fraud – a gap analysis. Food Chem. 330:127044. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtonen E, Koskela T, Valros A, Hänninen L. 2021. Animal welfare control − inspection findings and the threshold for requesting a police investigation. Front Vet Sci. 8(September). doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.736084.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Ruth SM, Huisman W, Luning PA. 2017. Food fraud vulnerability and its key factors. Trends In Food Sci Technol. 67:70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski A, Buschulte A. 2019. How to tackle food fraud in official food control authorities in Germany. J Verbrauch Lebensm. 14(4):319–328. doi: 10.1007/s00003-019-01228-2.
   Google Scholar