Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 46, 2024 - Issue 9
Submit an article Journal homepage
113
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Prosthetics and Orthotics

Creating Adjusted Scores Targeting mobiLity Empowerment (CASTLE 1): determination of normative mobility scores after lower limb amputation for each year of adulthood

Bretta L. Fylstraa Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, Austin, TX, USAView further author information
,
Dwiesha L. Englanda Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, Austin, TX, USAView further author information
,
Phillip M. Stevensa Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, Austin, TX, USA;b Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, UT, USAView further author information
,
James H. Campbella Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, Austin, TX, USAView further author information
&
Shane R. Wurdemana Hanger Institute for Clinical Research and Education, Austin, TX, USA;c Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 1904-1910 | Received 28 Sep 2022, Accepted 22 Apr 2023, Published online: 18 May 2023

References

  • Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT I): quality of life and satisfaction are strongly related to mobility for patients with a lower limb prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(5):498–503.
  • Miller TA, Paul R, Forthofer M, et al. Reduced functional mobility is associated with a history of injurious falls in lower limb prosthesis users. Ann. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2023;66(4):101679.
  • Norvell DC, Turner AP, Williams RM, et al. Defining successful mobility after lower extremity amputation for complications of peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(2):412–419.
  • Pell JP, Donnan PT, Fowkes FG, et al. Quality of life following lower limb amputation for peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1993;7(4):448–451.
  • Hafner BJ, Gaunaurd IA, Morgan SJ, et al. Construct validity of the prosthetic limb users survey of mobility (plus-M) in adults with lower limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(2):277–285.
  • UWCORR. Prosthetic Limb Users Survey. https://plus-m.org/. 2013.
  • England DL, Miller TA, Stevens PM, et al. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 7): Normative mobility values for lower limb prosthesis users of varying age, etiology, and amputation level. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022,101(9):850–858.
  • England DL, Miller TA, Stevens PM, et al. GGEM: gender, geography, and EMployment differences based on mobility levels among lower limb prosthesis users living in the United States. Prosthet. Orthot. Int. 2023. DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000219. Online ahead of print.
  • Wurdeman SR, Miller TA, Stevens PM, et al. Stability and falls evaluations in AMPutees (SAFE-AMP 1): microprocessor knee technology reduces odds of incurring an injurious fall for individuals with diabetic/dysvascular amputation. Assist. Technol. 2022;1–6. DOI: 10.1080/10400435.2021.2010147. Online ahead of print.
  • Campbell JH, Stevens PM, Wurdeman SR. OASIS 1: retrospective analysis of four different microprocessor knee types. J. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. Eng. 2020;7:205566832096847.
  • Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility analysis of amputees (MAAT 3): matching individuals based on comorbid health reveals improved function for above-knee prosthesis users with microprocessor knee technology. Assist Technol. 2020;32(5):236–242.
  • Pinhey SR, Murata H, Hisano G, et al. Effects of walking speed and prosthetic knee control type on external mechanical work in transfemoral prosthesis users. J Biomech. 2022;134:110984.
  • Davie-Smith F, Carse B. Comparison of patient-reported and functional outcomes following transition from mechanical to microprocessor knee in the low-activity user with a unilateral transfemoral amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2021;45(3):198–204.
  • Jayaraman C, et al. Using a microprocessor knee (C-Leg) with appropriate foot transitioned individuals with dysvascular transfemoral amputations to higher performance levels: a longitudinal randomized clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2021;18:1–13.
  • Howard CL, Wallace C, Perry B, et al. Comparison of mobility and user satisfaction between a microprocessor knee and a standard prosthetic knee: a summary of seven single-subject trials. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41(1):63–73.
  • Hafner BJ, Willingham LL, Buell NC, et al. Evaluation of function, performance, and preference as transfemoral amputees transition from mechanical to microprocessor control of the prosthetic knee. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(2):207–217.
  • Jeans KA, Karol LA, Cummings D, et al. Comparison of gait after syme and transtibial amputation in children: factors that may play a role in function. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(19):1641–1647.
  • Parry JA, Neufeld E. Knee disarticulation versus transfemoral amputation: the prosthetist’s perspective. J Orthop Trauma. 2022;36(9):e358-e361. DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002364
  • Polfer EM, Hoyt BW, Bevevino AJ, et al. Knee disarticulations versus transfemoral amputations: functional outcomes. J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(6):308–311.
  • Rathi VK, McWilliams JM. First-Year report cards from the Merit-Based incentive payment system (MIPS): what will be learned and what next? JAMA. 2019;321(12):1157–1158.
  • Medicare Program Merit-Based incentive payment system (MIPS) and alternative payment model (APM) incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for Physician-Focused payment models. Final Rule with Comment Period. Fed. Regist. 2016;81:77008–77831.
  • Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT 4): classification tree analysis for probability of lower limb prosthesis user functional potential. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020;15(2):211–218.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.