Accounting Students in an Australian University Improve their Writing: But How Did it Happen?

References

• Al-Mahmood, R. and Gruba, P. (2007) Approaches to the implementation of generic graduate attributes in Australian ICT undergraduate education, Computer Science Education, 17(3), pp. 171–185.
   Google Scholar
• Andrade, M. S. (2006) International students in English-speaking universities: adjustment factors, Journal of Research in International Education, 5(2), pp. 131–154.
   Google Scholar
• Arnott, J. and Carroll, D. (2012) Graduate Outlook 2012. Report of the Graduate Outlook Survey: Employers’ Perspectives on Graduate Recruitment. Available at http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.library.uwa.edu.au/docview/866416442/fulltextPDF/13E251318CE1D7C9AAA/2?accountid=14681 (accessed 20 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Baik, C. and Greig, J. (2009) Improving the academic outcomes of undergraduate ESL students: the case for discipline-based academic skills programs, Higher Education Research and Development, 28(4), pp. 401–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, R., Hughes, K. and Mylonas, A. (2002) Developing procedures for implementing peer assessment in large classes using an action research process, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(5), pp. 427–441.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. (1989) Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: a critical analysis of findings, Higher Education, 18(5), pp. 529–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. (2006) Aligning assessment with long-term learning, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), pp. 399–413.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Cohen, R. and Sampson, J. (1999) Peer learning and assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), pp. 413–426.
   Google Scholar
• Briguglio, C. (2007) Educating the business graduate of the 21st century: communication for a globalised world, International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), pp. 8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Brindley, C. and Scoffield, S. (1998) Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes, Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), pp. 79–79.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (2005) Lightening the load: teaching in English, learning in English, in: J. Carroll and J. Ryan (Eds) Teaching International Students: Improving Learning for All, pp. 35–42 (London; New York: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• Cole, P. (1992) Constructivism revisited: a search for common ground, Educational Technology, 33(2), pp. 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• CPA Australia and Birrell, B. (2006) The Changing Face of the Accounting Profession in Australia, CPA Australia, November (Melbourne: CPA Australia).
   Google Scholar
• CPA Australia and The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia. (2012) Professional Accreditation Guidelines for Australian Accounting Degrees (Melbourne: CPA Australia and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, T. M. and Cunningham, D. J. (1996) Constructivism: implications for the design and delivery of instruction, in: D. H. Jonassen (Ed.) Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 170–199 (New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E., and Cable, D. (2011) Evidence of improvement in accounting students’ communication skills, International Journal of Educational Management, 25(4), pp. 311–327.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, E., Tindale, J., Cable, D. and Mead, S. H. (2009) Collaborative teaching in a linguistically and culturally diverse higher education setting: a case study of a postgraduate accounting program, Higher Education Research & Development, 28(6), pp. 597–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchikov, N. (1995) Peer feedback marking: developing peer assessment, Innovations in Education & Training International, 32(2), pp. 175–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, M. and Hancock, P. (2011) A brave new world: Australian learning outcomes in accounting education, Accounting Education, 20(3), pp. 265–273.
   Google Scholar
• Heldsinger, S. and Humphry, S. (2010) Using the method of pairwise comparison to obtain reliable teacher assessments, Australian Educational Researcher, 37(2), pp. 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Accounting Education Standards Board. (2010) International Education Standard 3: Professional Skills and General Education, pp. 46–52. Available at http://www.ifac.org/publications-resources/handbook-international-education-pronouncements-2010-edition (accessed 13 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Kern, R. and Schultz, J. M. (2005) Beyond orality: investigating literacy and the literacy in second and foreign language instruction, The Modern Languages Journal, 89(3), pp. 381–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. (2005) Addressing diversity in higher education: two models for facilitating student engagement and mastery. Paper presented at the HERDSA 2005 Conference, Sydney, 3–6 July 2005. Available at http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2005/.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U. (2000) Worlds apart: students’ experiences of learning introductory accounting, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11(4), pp. 479–504.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U. and Meyer, J. H. F. (2005) Towards a mapping of the student world: the identification of variation in students’ conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting, The British Accounting Review, 37, pp. 177–204.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U. and Mladenovic, R. (2006a) Reflections on accounting education research: how accounting education research on approaches to learning has contributed to educational practice, in: L. Murphy Smith (Ed.) Reflections on Accounting Education Research, pp. 46–56 (Sarisota: American Accounting Association (AAA)).
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, U. and Mladenovic, R. (2006b) Developing new ‘world views’: threshold concepts in introductory accounting, in: J. H. F. Meyer and R. Land (Eds) Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge, pp. 148–159 (Oxford: Routledge).
   Google Scholar
• McInnes, C. (2003) New realities of the student experience: how should universities respond? Paper presented at the 25th Annual Conference of the European Association for Institutional Research, Limerick, 24–27 August.
   Google Scholar
• Mello, J. A. (1993) Improving individual member accountability in small work group settings, Journal of Management Education, 17(2), pp. 253–259.
   Google Scholar
• Mowl, G. and Pain, R. (1995) Using self and peer assessment to improve students’ essay writing: a case study from geography, pp. 324–335.
   Google Scholar
• Nanjappa, A. and Grant, M. M. (2003) Constructing on constructivism: the role of technology, Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education. Available at http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume2No1/nanjappa.htm (accessed 13 May 2013).
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell, B., DeLange, P., Abraham, A., Freeman, M., Hancock, P., Howieson, B. and Watty, K. (2013) Assessment Matters: Developing Collaborative Peer Assessment Of Accounting Learning Standards (Paris: European Accounting Association Conference).
   Google Scholar
• O'Donovan, B., Price, M. and Rust, C. (2001) The student experience of criterion-referenced assessment (through the introduction of a common criteria assessment grid), Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(1), pp. 74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. (2000) When teaching meets learning: design principles and strategies for web-based learning environments that support knowledge construction. Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2000 conference, Coffs Harbour, 9–14 December, pp. 1–12. Available at http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/coffs00/.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, R. (2009) Indeterminacy in the use of preset criteria for assessment and grading, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(2), pp. 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searby, M. and Ewers, T. (1997) An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), pp. 371–383.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., Moore, P. and Gandhidasan, S. (2007) Educational acculturation and academic integrity: outcomes of an intervention subject for international post-graduate public health students, Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 1(1), pp. 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, P. R. J. (1993) Constructive learning: the role of the learner, in: T. M. Duffy, J. Lowyck and D. H. Jonassen (Eds) Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, pp. 291–313 (Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, D. and Porter, E. (2009) The management of English language support in postgraduate business education: the CEM model (contextualisation, embedding and mapping), International Journal of Management Education, 7(2), pp. 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Somervell, H. (1993) Issues in assessment, enterprise and higher education: the case for self-peer and collaborative assessment, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(3), pp. 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, J., Evans, E., Cable, D. and Mead, S. H. (2006) Operationalising collaboration, International Journal of Knowledge, Culture & Change Management, 6(4), pp. 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (1998) Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities, Review of Educational Research, 68(3), pp. 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. (2009) Peer assessment, Theory into Practice, 48(1), pp. 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topping, K. J., Smith, E. F., Swanson, I. and Elliot, A. (2000) Formative peer assessment of academic writing between postgraduate students, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(2), pp. 149–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watty, K. (2007) Quality in accounting education and low English standards among overseas students: is there a link?, People and Place, 15(1), pp. 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, C., English, L. and Bonanno, H. (1995) Collaboration in subject design: integration of the teaching and assessment of literacy skills into a first-year accounting course, Accounting Education, 4(4), pp. 335–350.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K. and Freeman, M. (2006a) Completing the learning cycle: the role of formative feedback when using self and peer assessment to improve teamwork and engagement. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Auckland University of Technology, 10–13 December 2006, pp. 751–758.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K. and Freeman, M. (2006b) Improving teamwork and engagement: the case for self and peer assessment, Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. Available at http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/2006/willey0106.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K. and Gardner, A. (2009) Using benchmarking to improve students’ learning and make assessment more student centred. Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference, University of Adelaide, 6–9 December, pp. 726–734. Available at https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/shado/2009_the_university_of_adelaide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K. and Gardner, A. (2010) Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning, European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), pp. 429–443.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K. and Gardner, A. (2011a) Building a community of practice to improve inter marker standardisation and consistency. Proceedings of the SEFI 2011 Annual Conference: Global Engineering Recognition, Sustainability, Mobility, Lisbon, Portugal, 27–30 September, pp. 666–671.
   Google Scholar
• Willey, K. and Gardner, A. (2011b) Getting tutors on the same page. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference for the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2011) – Developing Engineers for Social Justice: Community Involvement, Ethics and Sustainability, Fremantle, Western Australia, 5–7 December, pp. 454–459.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. (2006) Doing away with ‘study skills’, Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), pp. 457–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar