Differences in students’ reading comprehension of international financial reporting standards: a South African case

References

• Adelberg, A. H. (1982). An empirical evaluation of the communication of authoritative pronouncements in accounting. Accounting & Finance, 22(2), 73–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-629X.1982.tb00037.x
   Google Scholar
• Adelberg, A. H., & Razek, J. H. (1984). The Cloze procedure: A methodology for determining the understandability of Accounting textbooks. The Accounting Review, 59(1), 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, J. C. (1979). The effect on the Cloze test of changes in deletion frequency. Journal of Research in Reading, 2(2), 108–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1979.tb00198.x
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (2005). Cognitive psychology and its implications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Barac, K. (2015). Helping disadvantaged students: Findings from the Thuthuka programme. Accounting Education, 24(2), 75–101. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2015.1010171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargate, K. (2012). The readability of managerial accounting and financial management textbooks. Meditari Accounting Research, 20(1), 4–20. doi: 10.1108/10222521211234192
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E. (2008). Global financial reporting: Implications for U.S. academics. Accounting Review, 83(5), 1159–1179. doi: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.5.1159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 65–83. doi: 10.1097/00011363-200501000-00007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhorat, H., & Oosthuizen, M. (2009). Determinants of grade 12 pass rates in the post-apartheid South African schooling system. Journal of African Economies, 18(4), 634–666. doi: 10.1093/jae/ejn027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, D. (1998). Guiding the reading process: Techniques and strategies for successful instruction in K-8 classrooms. Markham, ON: Pembroke.
   Google Scholar
• Bormuth, J. R. (1966). Readability: A new approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 1, 79–132. doi: 10.2307/747021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormuth, J. R. (1968). Cloze test readability: Criterion reference scores. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5(3), 189–196. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1968.tb00625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormuth, J. R. (1969). Factor validity of Cloze tests as measures of reading comprehension ability. Reading Research Quarterly, IV(3), 358–365. doi: 10.2307/747144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray, G. B., & Barron, S. (2003). Assessing reading comprehension: The effects of text-based interest, gender and ability. Educational Assessment, 9(3), 107–128. doi: 10.1207/s15326977ea0903&4_2
   Google Scholar
• Broom, Y., & Jewson, D. D. (2013). The Stanford diagnostic reading test: Assessing English reading comprehension and vocabulary in South Africa. Per Linguam: A Journal of Language Learning, 29(2), 1–16. doi: 10.5785/29-2-553
   Google Scholar
• Butcher, K. R., & Kintsch, W. (2003). Text comprehension and discourse processing. Handbook of Psychology, 4, 575–595.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2014). Introduction to the special issue. Theories of reading: What we have learned from two decades of scientific research. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.836525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J., & Rice, M. (2004). Assessment of reading comprehension. In A. Stone, E. Silliman, B. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy (pp. 521–555). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Chatel, R. G. (2001). Diagnostic and instructional uses of the Cloze procedure. New England Reading Association Journal, 37(1), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, L. M. (2006). The psychology behind case briefing: A powerful cognitive schema. Campbell Law Review, 29, 301–323.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, S. A., & Schmulian, A. (2012). A critical analysis of the pedagogical approach employed in an introductory course to IFRS. Issues in Accounting Education, 27(1), 83–100. doi: 10.2308/iace-10220
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, S. A., Schmulian, A., & Cloete, M. (2014). The readability of the conceptual framework for financial reporting. World Congress of Accounting Educators and Researchers, Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, S. A., Schmulian, A., & Kotzé, L. (2014). Communication apprehension of South African accounting students: The effect of culture and language. Issues in Accounting Education, 29(4), 505–525. doi: 10.2308/iace-50850
   Google Scholar
• Compton, D. L., Miller, A. C., Elleman, A. M., & Steacy, L. M. (2014). Have we forsaken reading theory in the name of “quick fix” interventions for children with reading disability? Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 55–73. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.836200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornachione, E. (2004, June 30–July 2). Quality of accounting textbooks: Measuring students’ comprehension with the Cloze procedure. Paper presented at the Biennial International Research Conference for Accounting Educators, Durban, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• De Swaan, A. (2001). Words of the world: The global language system. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• DuBay, W. H. (2004). The principles of readability (pp. 1–76). Costa Mesa, CA: Impact Information.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Strachan, S. L., & Billman, A. K. (2011). Essential elements of fostering and teaching reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (Vol. 4, pp. 51–93). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Elbro, C., & Buch-Iversen, I. (2013). Activation of background knowledge for inference making: Effects on reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(6), 435–452. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2013.774005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farr, R., & Carey, R. F. (1986). Reading: What can be measured? Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, C. R. (1994). Levels of presentation in memory for discourse. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 589–607). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlet, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellert, A. S., & Elbro, A. (2013). Cloze tests may be quick, but are they dirty? Development and preliminary validation of a Cloze test of reading comprehension. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(16), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Good, M. E. (2006). Differentiated instruction: Principles and techniques for the elementary grades. San Rafael, CA: School of Business, Education, and Leadership, Dominican University of California. Retrieved June, 2, 2015, from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491580.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. B. (2001). Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse with Cloze. Journal of Research in Reading, 24(1), 82–98. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.00134
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Teaching for literacy engagement. Journal of Literacy Research, 36(1), 1–30. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3601_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadley, G., & Naaykens, J. (1999). Testing the test: Comparing SEMAC and exact word scoring on the selection deletion Cloze. The Korea TESOL Journal, 2(1), 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, T., Clayton, B. M., & Arnold, P. J. (2009). South Africa’s transition from apartheid: The role of professional closure in the experiences of black chartered accountants. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 705–721. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannon, B. (2014). Are there gender differences in the cognitive components of adult reading comprehension? Learning and Individual Differences, 32, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2014.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., & Trueman, M. (1986). The effects of the typographical layout of Cloze-tests on reading comprehension scores. Journal of Research in Reading, 9(2), 116–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1986.tb00118.x
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. D. (2003). Reading comprehension requires knowledge – of words and the world: Scientific insights into the fourth-grade slump and the nations stagnant reading comprehension scores. American Educator, 27, 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Human Science Research Council. (2009). School money: Funding the flaws. HSRC Review, 7(4). Retrieved June 10, 2015, from http://www.hsrc.ac.za/en/review/november-2009/school-money
   Google Scholar
• Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Gender differences in verbal ability: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 53–69. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.104.1.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFRS Rookies. (2015). IAS 16 Video 17 Eng Revaluation surpluses and deficits. Retrieved from http://youtu.be/3uO0I-wcnqc
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2003a). Accounting policies, changes in accounting estimates and errors. International Accounting Standard 8. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2003b). Inventories. International Accounting Standard 2. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2003c). Property, plant and equipment. International Accounting Standard 16. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2003d). Impairment of assets. International Accounting Standard 36. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2003e). Investment property. International Accounting Standard 40. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2008). Business combinations. International Financial Reporting Standard 3. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2010a). The conceptual framework for financial reporting 2010. London, UK: Author.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2010b). Framework-based teaching webcast. Retrieved May 31, 2015, from http://media.ifrs.org/FrameWork101210/files/lobby.html
   Google Scholar
• Janse van Rensburg, C., Coetzee, S. A., & Schmulian, A. (2014). South African financial reporting students’ reading comprehension of the IASB conceptual framework. Journal of Accounting Education, 32, 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2014.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59(5), 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., & Smith, M. (2014). Traditional and alternative methods of measuring the understandability of accounting narratives. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(1), 183–208. doi: 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. J. (1997). Critical appraisal of the Cloze procedure’s use in the accounting domain. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10, 105–128. doi: 10.1108/09513579710158739
   Google Scholar
• Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300. doi: 10.1080/10888430802132279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577. doi: 10.3758/BF03193491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y., & Anderson, T. (2011). Reading across the curriculum: A framework for improving the reading abilities and habits of college students. Journal of College Literacy & Learning, 37, 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Klapwijk, N. M. (2013). Cloze tests and word reading tests: Enabling teachers to measure learners’ reading-related abilities. Per Linguam: A Journal of Language Learning, 29(1), 49–62. doi: 10.5785/29-1-541
   Google Scholar
• Klare, G. R. (1988). The formative years. In B. Zakaluk & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Readability: Its past, present and future (pp. 14–33). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2010). The role of reading in fostering transcultural competence. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lei, S. A., Rhinehart, P. J., Howard, H. A., & Cho, J. K. (2010). Strategies for improving reading comprehension among college students. Reading Improvement, 47(1), 30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, R. M., & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1993). The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician, 47(3), 217–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2010). Investigating gender differences in reading. Educational Review, 62, 175–187. doi: 10.1080/00131911003637006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, R., & Mikk, J. (2009). National IQ’s predict educational attainment in math, reading and science across 56 nations. Intelligence, 37, 305–310. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 218–253. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 531–566. doi: 10.3102/00346543075004531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D. (2002). Individual differences that influence reading comprehension. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Reading comprehension instruction: Research based best practices (pp. 158–175). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 359–370. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01250.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences. (2012). Effective reading instruction. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=13468&page=10
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2010.529219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo, L. S. (2004). What every teacher needs to know about comprehension. International Reading Association, 58(3), 272–280.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquarella, A., Gottardo, A., & Grant, A. (2012). Comparing factors related to reading comprehension in adolescents who speak English as a first (L1) or second (L2) language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 475–503. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2011.593066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, C., & Day, R. (1996). The influence of cognitive style on the understandability of a professional accounting pronouncement by accounting students. The British Accounting Review, 28(2), 139–154. doi: 10.1006/bare.1996.0011
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Hamm, D. (2005). The assessment of reading comprehension: A review of practices – past, present, and future. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 13–69). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Raabe, A., Stevens, K. C., & Stevens, W. P. (1984). Tax textbooks readability: An application of the Cloze method. Journal of the American Tax Association, 6(1), 66–73.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin, E. F., & Culhane, J. W. (1969). Comparable Cloze and multiple-choice comprehension test scores. Journal of Reading, 13(3), 193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Foorman, B., Perfetti, C., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31–74. doi: 10.1111/1529-1006.00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. E., Taylor, M. A., Steffensen, M. S., Shirey, L. L., & Anderson, R. C. (1982). Cultural schemata and reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(3), 353–366. doi: 10.2307/747524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorius, K., & Sartorius, B. (2013). The comparative performance of chartered accountancy students in South Africa: The impact of historical legacies. Development Southern Africa, 30(3), 401–416. doi: 10.1080/0376835X.2013.817307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallert, D. L., & Martin, D. B. (2003). A psychological analysis of what teachers and students do in the language arts classroom. In J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. R. Squire, & J. M. Jensen (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (pp. 31–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, R. J., Stevens, K. T., & Stevens, W. P. (1993). Assessing the readability of government accounting standards: The Cloze procedure. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 23(3), 259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1988). Educational psychology: Theory into practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Spaull, N. (2013). Poverty & privilege: Primary school inequality in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(5), 436–447. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanat, P., Becker, M., Baumert, J., Lüdtke, O., & Eckhardt, A. G. (2012). Improving second language skills of immigrant students: A field trial study evaluating the effects of a summer learning program. Learning and Instruction, 22(3), 159–170. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, B. A. (1977). Content analysis and readability formulas as applied to the accounting principles board “opinions”. Journal of Business Communication, 14(3), 23–34. doi: 10.1177/002194367701400303
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, K. C., Stevens, K. T., & Stevens, W. P. (1993). A response to ‘Measuring readability: A comparison of Accounting textbooks’. Journal of Accounting Education, 11, 287–292. doi: 10.1016/0748-5751(93)90008-7
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, W. P., Stevens, K. C., & Raabe, W., Jr. (1983). Communication in accounting: Readability of FASB statements. Review of Business and Economic Research, 19, 110–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, G., & Parker, L. D. (2013). Developing the Flesch reading ease formula for the contemporary accounting communication landscape. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 10(1), 31–59. doi: 10.1108/11766091311316185
   Google Scholar
• Tabatabaei, O., & Mirzaei, E. (2014). Correlational validation of Cloze test and C-test against IELT. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(1), 345–356.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. (1957). ‘Cloze’ readability scores as indices of individual differences in comprehension and aptitude. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41(1), 19–26. doi: 10.1037/h0040591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 413–433.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. L. (1956). Recent developments in the use of the Cloze procedure. Journalism Quarterly, 33, 42–48. doi: 10.1177/107769905603300106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, C. A. (2000, August). Differentiation of instruction in the elementary grades. ERIC Digest. ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, M. J. C. (2011). Framework-based approach to teaching principle-based accounting standards. Accounting Education, 20(4), 303–316.
   Google Scholar
• Widmayer, S. A. (2005). Schema theory: An introduction. Educational Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.saber2.net/Archivos/Schema-Theory-Intro.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. S., Ari, O., & Santamaria, C. N. (2011). Measuring college students’ reading comprehension ability using Cloze tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(2), 215–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01422.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, G. L. (2008). A text readability continuum for postsecondary readiness. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(4), 602–632.
   Google Scholar
• Zoghi, M., Mustapha, R., Rizan, N., & Maasum, M. (2010). Looking into EFL reading comprehension. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 439–445. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.060
   Google Scholar