794
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The effect of language proficiency on approaches to learning and satisfaction of undergraduate accounting students

&
Pages 149-171 | Received 10 Jan 2017, Accepted 11 Oct 2017, Published online: 03 Nov 2017

References

  • Abhayawansa, S., & Fonseca, L. (2010). Conceptions of learning and approaches to learning – a phenomenographic study of a group of overseas accounting students from Sri Lanka. Accounting Education, 19(5), 527–550. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2010.502651
  • Abhayawansa, S., Tempone, I., & Pillay, S. (2012). Impact of entry mode on students’ approaches to learning: A study of accounting students. Accounting Education, 21(4), 341–361. doi: 10.1080/09639284.2012.661605
  • Abraham, A. (2006). Teaching and learning in accounting Education: Students’ perceptions of the linkages between teaching context, approaches to learning and outcomes. Faculty of Commerce-Papers, University of Wollongong, 210.
  • Arkoudis, S., Hawthorne, L., Baik, C., O'Loughlin, K., Hawthorne, G., Leach, D., & Bexley, E. (2009). The impact of english language proficiency and workplace readiness on the employment outcomes of tertiary international students. Canberra: DEEWR.
  • Ballantine, J. A., Duff, A., & McCourt Larres, P. (2008). Accounting and business students’ approaches to learning: A longitudinal study. Journal of Accounting Education, 26(4), 188–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2009.03.001
  • Ballantyne, K., & Rivera, C. (2014). Language proficiency for academic achievement in the international baccalaureate diploma programme. The Hague: International Baccalaureate Association.
  • Benzie, H. J. (2010). Graduating as a ‘native speaker’: International students and English language proficiency in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4), 447–459. doi: 10.1080/07294361003598824
  • Biggs, J. (1991). Approaches to learning in secondary and tertiary students in Hong Kong: Some comparative studies. Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 27–39.
  • Biggs, J. B. (1987a). Student approaches to learning and studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Biggs, J. B. (1987b). Study process questionnaire manual. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Biggs, J. B. (1989). Approaches to learning in two cultures. In V. Bickley (Ed.), Teaching and learning styles within and across cultures: Implications for language pedagogy (pp. 421–436). Hong Kong: Institute for Language Education.
  • Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149. doi: 10.1348/000709901158433
  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Birrell, B. (2006). Implications of low English standards among overseas students at Australian universities. People and Place, 14(4), 53–64.
  • Booth, P., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (1999). The quality of learning in accounting education: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Accounting Education, 8(4), 277–300. doi: 10.1080/096392899330801
  • Bowden, M. P., Abhayawansa, S., & Manzin, G. (2015). A multiple cross-cultural comparison of approaches to learning. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(2), 272–294. doi: 10.1080/03057925.2013.841465
  • Byrne, M., Flood, B., & Willis, P. (2002). The relationship between learning approaches and learning outcomes: A study of Irish accounting students. Accounting Education, 11(1), 27–42.
  • Chalmers, D. (2008). Teaching and learning quality indicators in Australian universities. In Outcomes of higher education: Quality relevance and impact (pp. 2–18). Paris: Programme on Institutional Management in Higher Education.
  • Chatterjee, B., & Brown, A. (2012). Embedding English language in an accounting subject: A case of interactive interdisciplinary collaboration and learning. E-Journal of Business Education and Scholarship Teaching, 6 (1), 44–50.
  • Christie, A. (2017). The top three learning and teaching challenges in higher education in Australia. Retrieved from http://blog.blackboard.com/top-three-learning-teaching-challenges-higher-education-australia/?utm_campaign=INTL_2017_APAC_NewsletterJune_190617_SGregory&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua&utm_content=INTL_2017_APAC_NewsletterJune_060617&lang=uki&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=BbAPACNewsletter&elqTrackId=d26761aba3ee4ebaac93df49683ec23b&elq=69ae8c467a1c4ebf8d005f4ab59ae900&elqaid=21018&elqat=1&elqCampaignId=11310
  • Cooper, B. J. (2004). The enigma of the Chinese learner. Accounting Education, 13(3), 289–310. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000273780
  • Cummins, J. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical rationale (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles, CA: California State University.
  • Cummins, J. (1992). Language proficiency, bilingualism and academic achievement. In P. A. Richard-Amato & M. A. Snow (Eds.), The multicultural classroom: Reading for content area teachers (pp. 58–70). White Plains, NY: Longman.
  • Donald, J., & Jackling, B. (2007). Approaches to learning accounting: A cross-cultural study. Asian Review of Accounting, 15(2), 100–121. doi: 10.1108/13217340710823341
  • Duff, A. (2004). Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: The role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement. Accounting Education, 13(4), 409–430. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306800
  • Duff, A., & McKinstry, S. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(2), 183–214.
  • Duff, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of accounting students’ approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach. The British Accounting Review, 47(3), 321–338. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2014.06.003
  • Eley, M. G. (1992). Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students. Higher Education, 23(3), 231–254. doi: 10.2307/3447375
  • Elias, R. Z. (2005). Students’ approaches to study in introductory accounting courses. Journal of Education for Business, 80(4), 194–199.
  • English, L., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Encouraging a deep approach to learning through curriculum design. Accounting Education, 13(4), 461–488. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306828
  • Entwistle, N. (2000). Promoting deep learning through teaching and assessment: Conceptual frameworks and educational contexts. ESRC teaching and learning programme conference, Leicester.
  • Eshetie, A. B. (2013). Language policies and the role of English in Ethiopia 1. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259267200_Language_Policies_and_the_Role_of_English_in_Ethiopia_1
  • Federal Ministry of Education of Ethiopia. (2016). Admission to HE institutions. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.et/heiadm
  • Flinn, R. E., & Crumbley, D. L. (2009). Measure learning rather than satisfaction in higher education. Sarasota,FL: Teaching, Learning and Curriculum Section of the American Accounting Association.
  • Gerber, A., Engelbrecht, J., Harding, A., & Rogan, J. (2005). The influence of second language teaching on undergraduate mathematics performance. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(3), 3–21. doi: 10.1007/BF03217419
  • Ghenghesh, P. (2015). The relationship between English language proficiency and academic performance of university students – should academic institutions really be concerned? International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(2), 7.
  • Gordon, C., & Debus, R. (2002). Developing deep learning approaches and personal teaching efficacy within a preservice teacher education context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 483–511. doi: 10.1348/00070990260377488
  • Gow, L., Kember, D., & Chow, R. (1991). The effects of English language ability on approaches to learning. RELC Journal, 22(1), 49–68. doi: 10.1177/003368829102200104
  • Gow, L., Kember, D., & Cooper, B. (1994). The teaching context and approaches to study of accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 9(1), 118.
  • Hall, M., Ramsay, A., & Raven, J. (2004). Changing the learning environment to promote deep learning approaches in first-year accounting students. Accounting Education, 13(4), 489–505. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306837
  • Jackson, M., Watty, K., Yu, L., & Lowe, L. (2006). Assessing students unfamiliar with assessment practices in Australian Universities. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/project-assessing-students-unfamiliar-rmit-2005
  • Justicia, F., Pichardo, M. C., Cano, F., Berbén, A. B. G., & De la Fuente, J. (2008). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses at item level. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(3), 355–372. doi: 10.1007/BF03173004
  • Kember, D. (2004). Interpreting student workload and the factors which shape students’ perceptions of their workload. Studies in Higher Education, 29(2), 165–184. doi: 10.1080/0307507042000190778
  • Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (1998). Influences upon students’ perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology, 18(3), 293–307. doi: 10.1080/0144341980180303
  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27(1), 27–52. doi: 10.1080/03075070120099359
  • Lucas, U. (2001). Deep and surface approaches to learning within introductory accounting: A phenomenographic study. Accounting Education, 10(2), 161–184.
  • Lucas, U., & Meyer, J. H. F. (2005). ‘Towards a mapping of the student world’: The identification of variation in students’ conceptions of, and motivations to learn, introductory accounting. The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 177–204. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.10.002
  • Lun, V. M.-C., Fischer, R., & Ward, C. (2010). Exploring cultural differences in critical thinking: Is it about my thinking style or the language I speak? Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 604–616. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.07.001
  • Martirosyan, N. M., Hwang, E., & Wanjohi, R. (2015). Impact of English proficiency on academic performance of international students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 60–71.
  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
  • Meyer, J. H. F., Parsons, P., & Dunne, T. T. (1990). Individual study orchestrations and their association with learning outcome. Higher Education, 20(null), 67–89.
  • Murray, N., & Hicks, M. (2016). An institutional approach to English language proficiency. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(2), 170–187.
  • QILT. (n.d.). Home page. Retrieved from https://www.qilt.edu.au/
  • Ramburuth, P., & Mladenovic, R. (2004). Exploring the relationship between students’ orientations to learning, the structure of students’ learning outcomes and subsequent academic performance. Accounting Education, 13(4), 507–527. doi: 10.1080/0963928042000306774
  • Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. Bönningstedt: SmartPLS. Retrieved from http://www.smartpls.com
  • Rosenthal, J. W. (1996). Teaching science to language minority students: Theory and practice. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Ryan, S., Bhattacharyya, A., Stratilas, K., & Goela, N. (2012). English language proficiency and learning among Australian international postgraduate accounting students. International Journal of Learning, 18(5), 237–253.
  • Sharma, D. S. (1997). Accounting students’ learning conceptions, approaches to learning, and the influence of the learning-teaching context on approaches to learning. Accounting Education, 6(2), 125–146. doi: 10.1080/096392897331532
  • Sikkema, S. E., & Sauerwein, J. A. (2015). Exploring culture-specific learning styles in accounting education. Journal of International Education in Business, 8(2), 78–91. doi: 10.1108/JIEB-08-2015-0019
  • Spurlin, Q. (1995). Making science comprehensible for language minority students. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 6(2), 71–78.
  • Sugahara, S., & Boland, G. (2010). The role of cultural factors in the learning style preferences of accounting students: A comparative study between Japan and Australia. Accounting Education, 19(3), 235–255. doi: 10.1080/09639280903208518
  • Torres, H. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2002). The effects of English language proficiency and scientific reasoning skills on the acquisition of science content knowledge by hispanic English language learners and native English language speaking students. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 1–59.
  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(null), 265–275. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1991.tb00984.x
  • Watkins, D., Biggs, J., & Regmi, M. (1991). Does confidence in the language of instruction influence a student's approach to learning? Instructional Science, 20(4), 331–339. doi: 10.1007/BF00043257
  • Watty, K. (2007). Quality in accounting education and low English standards among overseas students: Is there a link? People and Place, 15(1), 22–29.
  • Woldemariam, H. (2007). The challenges of mother-tongue education in Ethiopia: The case of north Omo area. Language Matters, 38(2), 210–235.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.