Careful knowing as an aspect of environmental justice

References

• Aitken, M., 2009. Wind power planning controversies and the construction of ‘expert’ and ‘lay’ knowledges. Science as Culture, 18 (1), 47–64. doi:10.1080/09505430802385682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., 2011. Democracy, public policy, and lay assessments of scientific testimony. Episteme, 8 (2), 144–164. doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E., 2012. Epistemic justice as a virtue of social institutions. Social Epistemology, 26 (2), 163–173. doi:10.1080/02691728.2011.652211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., 1992. Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33 (3), 267–281. doi:10.2307/2137356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casalini, B., 2020. Care and injustice. International Journal of Care and Caring, 4 (1), 59–73. doi:10.1332/239788219X15730452949174.
   Google Scholar
• Congdon, M., 2017. What’s wrong with epistemic injustice? harm, vice, objectification, misrecognition. In: J. Kidd, J. Medina, and G. Pohlhaus, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. London: Routledge, 243–253.
   Google Scholar
• Corburn, J., 2003. Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making: improving urban planning for communities at risk. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22 (4), 420–433. doi:10.1177/0739456X03022004008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, K., 2012. A cautionary tale: on limiting epistemic oppression. Frontiers: A Journal of Women’s Studies, 33 (1), 24–47. doi:10.5250/fronjwomestud.33.1.0024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson, K., 2014. Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology, 28 (2), 115–138. doi:10.1080/02691728.2013.782585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. and Tronto, J., 1990. Toward a feminist theory of caring. In: E.K. Abel and M.K. Nelson, eds. Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives. Albany: SUNY Press, 35–62.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N., 1996. Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition, and participation. The Tanner Lectures on Human Values.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M., 2007. Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R., 1992. Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In: S. Krimsky and D. Golding, eds. Social Theories of Risk. Westport, CT: Praeger, 251–273.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., and Barratt, B., 2016. Just good enough data: figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3 (2), 1–16. doi:10.1177/2053951716679677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauna, E., 1998. The environmental justice misfit: public participation and the paradigm paradox. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 17 (3), 4–72.
   Google Scholar
• Goetze, T.S., 2018. Hermeneutical dissent and the species of hermeneutical injustice. Hypatia, 33 (1), 73–90. doi:10.1111/hypa.12384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, V., 2006. The ethics of care: personal, political, global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holifield, R., 2012. Environmental justice as recognition and participation in risk assessment: negotiating and translating health risk at a superfund site in Indian Country. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 102 (3), 591–613. doi:10.1080/00045608.2011.641892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honneth, A., 2004. Recognition and justice: outline of a plural theory of justice. Acta Sociologica, 47 (4), 351–364. doi:10.1177/0001699304048668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, J., Medina, J., and Pohlhaus, G., 2017. Introduction to the Routledge Handbook of epistemic injustice. In: J. Kidd, J. Medina, and G. Pohlhaus, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice. London: Routledge, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura, A.H. and Kinchy, A., 2016. Citizen science: probing the virtues and contexts of participatory research. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, 331–361. doi:10.17351/ests2016.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kojola, E., 2019. Indigeneity, gender, and class in decision-making about risks from resource extraction. Environmental Sociology, 5 (2), 130–148. doi:10.1080/23251042.2018.1426090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuehn, R.R., 1996. The environmental justice implications of quantitative risk assessment. University of Illinois Law Review, 38, 103–172.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, S., 2005. Diamond: A Struggle for Justice in Louisiana's Chemical Corridor. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Medina, J., 2012. The epistemology of resistance: gender and racial oppression, epistemic injustice, and resistant imaginations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Advisory Council for Environmental Policy and Technology. 2016. Environmental protection belongs to the public: a vision for citizen science at EPA. https://www.epa.gov/citizen-science/nacept-2016-report-environmental-protection-belongs-public-vision-citizen-science
   Google Scholar
• O’Rourke, D. and Macey, G.P., 2003. Community environmental policing: assessing new strategies of public participation in environmental regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 22 (3), 383–414. doi:10.1002/pam.10138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottinger, G., 2013a. Refining expertise: how responsible engineers subvert environmental justice challenges. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ottinger, G., 2013b. Changing knowledge, local knowledge, and knowledge gaps: STS insights into procedural justice. Science, Technology & Human Values, 38 (2), 250–270. doi:10.1177/0162243912469669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottinger, G., 2022. Misunderstanding citizen science: hermeneutic ignorance in U.S. environmental regulation. Science as Culture, 31 (4), 504–529. doi:10.1080/09505431.2022.2035710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohlhaus, G., 2012. Relational knowing and epistemic injustice: toward a theory of willful hermeneutic ignorance. Hypatia, 27 (4), 715–735. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01222.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohlhaus, G., 2020. Epistemic agency under oppression. Philosophical Papers, 49 (2), 233–251. doi:10.1080/05568641.2020.1780149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M., 2017. Matters of care: speculative ethics in more than human worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sadasivam, N. 2021. A California law gave people the power to cut pollution. Why isn’t it working? Grist, [Accessed 21 Oct2021]. https://grist.org/equity/ab617-richmond-california-chevron-refinery-air-monitoring/
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., 2003. The justice of environmental justice: reconciling equity, recognition, and participation in a political movement. In: A. Light and A. de-Shalit, eds. Moral and political reasoning in environmental practice. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., 2004. Reconceiving environmental justice: global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13 (3), 517–540. doi:10.1080/0964401042000229025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., 2007. Defining environmental justice: theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, S., 1994. A social history of truth: civility and science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, N., Zakariya, N., and Roberts, J.A., 2017. A wary alliance: from enumerating the environment to inviting apprehension. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 3, 575–602. doi:10.17351/ests2017.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrader-Frechette, K., 2005. Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staffa, R.K., Riechers, M., and Martín-López, B., 2021. A feminist ethos for caring knowledge production in transdisciplinary sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 17, 45–63. doi:10.1007/s11625-021-01064-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temper, L., 2019. Blocking pipelines, unsettling environmental justice: from rights of nature to responsibility to territory. Local Environment, 24 (2), 94–112. doi:10.1080/13549839.2018.1536698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tironi, M. and Rodríguez-Giralt, I., 2017. Healing, knowing, enduring: care and politics in damaged worlds. The Sociological Review Monographs, 65 (2), 89–109. doi:10.1177/0081176917712874.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, J., 1995. Care as a basis for radical political judgments. Hypatia, 10 (2), 141–149. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb01376.x.
   Google Scholar
• Tsosie, R., 2012. Indigenous people and epistemic injustice: science, ethics, and human rights. Washington Law Review, 87 (4), 1133–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weißermel, S. and Chaves, K.A., 2020. Refusing ‘bare life’ - Belo Monte, the riverine population and their struggle for epistemic justice. Die Erde, 151 (2–3), 154–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, S.A., et al., 2014. Institutions for civic technoscience: how critical making is transforming environmental research. The Information Society, 30 (2), 116–126. doi:10.1080/01972243.2014.875783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I.M., 2004. Situated knowledge and democratic discussions. In: J. Andersen and B. Siim, eds. The politics of inclusion and empowerment: gender, class, and citizenship. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 19–35.
   Google Scholar