Contested discourses of a circular plastics economy in Europe: prioritizing material, economy, or society?

References

• Acaroglu, L., 2013. ‘Paper beats plastic? How to rethink environmental folklore’. TED2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ampe, K., et al., 2019. A transition in the Dutch wastewater system? The struggle between discourses and with lock-ins a transition in the Dutch wastewater system? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22, 155–169. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2019.1680275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, F. and Fontenit, G., 2021. Plastic Dinosaurs – Digging deep into the accelerating carbon lock-in of plastics. Energy Policy, 156, 112418. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens, T., 2021. Are the circular economy and economic growth compatible? A case for post-growth circularity. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 175, 105852. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens, T., Hekkert, M., and Kirchherr, J., 2020. Circular Futures: what will they look like? Ecological Economics, 175, 106703. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghofer, U., et al., 2022. Societal Relationships with Nature’: a framework for understanding nature-related conflicts and multiple values. People and Nature, 4 (2), 534–548. doi:10.1002/pan3.10305.
   Google Scholar
• Carbon Tracker, 2020. ‘The Future’s Not in Plastics: why plastics demand won’t rescue the oil sector’ The Future’s Not in Plastics - Carbon Tracker Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J.S., 1997. The politics of the earth: environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2016. The new plastics economy: rethinking the future of plastics’ The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the future of plastics. Available from: ellenmacarthurfoundation.org.
   Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2020. Upstream Innovation: a g wuide to packaging solutions, Upstream Innovation: A Guide to Packaging Solutions ( ellenmacarthurfoundation.org)
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2018. ‘A European strategy for plastics in a circular economy’ Plastics strategy. Available from: europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2020. A new circular economy action plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. Available from: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/circular-economy-action-plan_en
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency, 2021. Growth without economic growth. Available from: https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/growth-without-economic-growth/growth-without-economic-growth
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1982. The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8 (4), 777–795. doi:10.1086/448181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friant, M.C., Vermeulen, W.J., and Salomone, R., 2020. A typology of circular economy discourses: navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 161, 104917. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friant, M.C., Vermeulen, W.J., and Salomone, R., 2021. Analysing European Union circular economy policies: words versus actions. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 337–353. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GAIA, 2019. ‘Discarded: communities on the frontlines of the global plastic crisis’. Available from: Discarded-Report-April-22.pdf(wastetradestories.org)
   Google Scholar
• Genovese, A. and Pansera, M., 2021. The circular economy at a crossroads: technocratic eco-modernism or convivial technology for social revolution? Capitalism Nature Socialism, 32 (2), 95–113. doi:10.1080/10455752.2020.1763414.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., 1995. The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., 2006. Doing Discourse Analysis: coalitions, Practises, Meaning. In: M. Van den Brink and T. Metze, eds. Discourse Theory and Method in the Social Sciences. Utrecht: Netherlands Graduate School of Urban and Regional Research, 65–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. and Versteeg, W., 2005. A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7 (3), 175–184. doi:10.1080/15239080500339646.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, K. and Lynch, N., 2016. Diversifying and de-growing the circular economy: radical social transformation in a resource-scarce world. Futures, 82, 15–25. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger-Erben, M., et al., 2021. There is no sustainable circular economy without a circular society. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 168, S.105476. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacic, Z., Strand, R., and Volker, T., 2020. The circular economy in Europe: critical perspectives on policies and imaginaries. Routledge Explorations in Sustainability and Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., 2021. Transforming ecological modernization ‘from within’ or perpetuating it? The circular economy as EU environmental policy narrative. Environmental Politics, 30 (6), 1045–1067. doi:10.1080/09644016.2020.1868863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M., 2021. Pollution is Colonialism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mah, A., 2021. Future-proofing capitalism: the paradox of the circular economy for plastics. Global Environmental Politics, 21 (2), 1–22. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palm, E., et al., 2021. Narrating plastics governance: policy narratives in the european plastics strategy. Environmental Politics, 31, 1–21. doi:10.1080/09644016.2021.1915020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson, et al., 2022. Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environmental Science & Technology, 56 (3), 1510–1521. doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c04158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plastic Recyclers Europe, 2018. Plastics recycling. Available from: https://www.plasticsrecyclers.eu/plastic-recycling [Accessed March 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Plastics Europe, 2022a. The Circular Economy for Plastics: a European Overview. Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/the-circular-economy-for-plastics-a-european-overview-2/
   Google Scholar
• Plastics Europe, 2022b. ‘Major Step Towards Zero Plastic Pollution Future’. Press Release, Brussels, Plastics Europe’s Position on a Global Agreement on Plastics • Plastics Europe
   Google Scholar
• Rabiu, M., 2022. Consumer practices in a circular society. Micro-Teaching. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6598561.
   Google Scholar
• Ragaert, K., 2019. ‘Once upon a time there was a Plastics Rehab’. TEDxVlerickBusinessSchool, 2019-04-25. Available from: https://www.ted.com/talks/kim_ragaert_plastics_rehab?language=en
   Google Scholar
• Rethink Plastic, 2022. History in the making. Press Release. Available from: https://rethinkplasticalliance.eu/news/advances-on-a-global-plastics-treaty-and-a-toxic-free-future/
   Google Scholar
• Simoens, M.C. and Leipold, S., 2021. Trading radical for incremental change: the politics of a circular economy transition in the German packaging sector. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23 (6), 822–836. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2021.1931063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SusChem, 2020. ‘Sustainable Plastics Strategy’. European Technology Platform for Sustainable Chemistry. Available from: http://suschem.org/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tilsted, et al., 2022. Petrochemical transition narratives: selling fossil fuel solutions in a decarbonizing world. Energy Research & Social Science, 94, 102880. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trucost, 2016. Plastics and sustainability: a valuation of environmental benefits, costs, and opportunities for continuous improvement American Chemistry Council. Available from: https://www.americanchemistry.com/better-policy-regulation/transportation-infrastructure/corporate-average-fuel-economy-cafe-emissions-compliance/resources/plastics-and-sustainability-a-valuation-of-environmental-benefits-costs-and-opportunities-for-continuous-improvement
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Neves, K., and de Lijster, E., 2014. ‘Measurementality’in biodiversity governance: Knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy 102 Critical perspectives Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) Environment & planning A, 46 (3), 581–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., 2006. Interpretation and method: empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Zero Waste Europe, 2020. Response to the new circular economy action plan consultation. Position Briefing. Available from: https://zerowasteeurope.eu/library/zero-waste-europe-response-to-the-new-circular-economy-action-plan-consultation/
   Google Scholar