1,433
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Multi-layered differentiation in the climate regime: the gradual path from Rio to Paris

Pages 240-258 | Received 22 Aug 2022, Accepted 30 Apr 2023, Published online: 11 May 2023

References

  • Allan, J.I., 2019. Dangerous incrementalism of the Paris Agreement. Global Environmental Politics, 19 (1), 4–11. doi:10.1162/glep_a_00488.
  • Allan, J.I., et al., 2021. Making the Paris Agreement: historical processes and the drivers of institutional design. Political Studies, 003232172110492. doi:10.1177/00323217211049294.
  • Bodansky, D., 1993. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: a commentary. Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 451–558.
  • Bodansky, D., 2016. The Paris climate change agreement: a new hope. The American Journal of International Law, 110 (2), 288–319. doi:10.5305/amerjintelaw.110.2.0288.
  • Boyte, R., 2010. Common but differentiated responsibilities: adjusting the developing/developed dichotomy in international environmental law. New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law, 14, 63–102.
  • Deleuil, T., 2012. The common but differentiated responsibilities principle: changes in continuity after the Durban conference of the parties. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 21, 271–281. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9388.2012.00758.x
  • Depledge, J., 2009. The road less travelled: difficulties in moving between annexes in the climate change regime. Climate Policy, 9 (3), 273–287. doi:10.3763/cpol.2008.0599.
  • Depledge, J., 2022. The “top-down” Kyoto Protocol? Exploring caricature and misrepresentation in literature on global climate change governance. International Environmental Agreements, 22 (4), 673–692. doi:10.1007/s10784-022-09580-9.
  • Falkner, R., 2016. The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92 (5), 1107–1125. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12708.
  • Gupta, J., 2014. The history of global climate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hurrell, A. and Sengupta, S., 2012. Emerging powers, North–South relations and global climate politics. International Affairs, 88 (3), 463–484. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01084.x.
  • Khor, M., 2020. Strange outcome of Cancun climate conference. In: M. Khor and M. Raman, eds. A clash of climate change paradigms: negotiations and outcomes at the UN climate convention. Penang: Third World Network, 71–84.
  • Maljean-Dubois, S., 2016. The Paris Agreement: a new step in the gradual evolution of differential treatment in the climate regime? RECIEL, 25 (2), 151–160. doi:10.1111/reel.12162.
  • Oberthür, S. and Ott, H.E., 1999. The Kyoto protocol: international climate policy for the 21st century. Berlin: Springer.
  • Pauw, P., Mbeva, K., and van Asselt, H., 2019. Subtle differentiation of countries’ responsibilities under the Paris Agreement. Palgrave Communications, 5, 86. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0298-6
  • Rajamani, L., 2006. Differential treatment in international environmental law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rajamani, L., 2013. Differentiation in the emerging climate regime. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 14 (1), 151–172. doi:10.1515/til-2013-009.
  • Savaresi, A., 2016. The Paris Agreement: a new beginning? Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 34 (1), 16–26. doi:10.1080/02646811.2016.1133983.
  • US Congress (1997) S.Res.98 [Report No. 105-54] Expressing the sense of the Senate regarding the conditions for the United States becoming a signatory to any international agreement on greenhouse gas emissions under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Washington DC: 105th Congress (1997–1998), available online at https://www.congress.gov/bill/105th-congress 765/senate-resolution/98 (last accessed 18 August 2022).
  • Voigt, C. and Ferreira, F., 2016. Differentiation in the Paris Agreement. Climate Law, 6 (1–2), 58–74. doi:10.1163/18786561-00601004.