158
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The historical and philosophical roots of emergentism in the neurosciences

References

  • Alexander, S. 1934. Space, time and deity. The Gilford lectures at Glasgow 1916–1918. Third printing. London: MacMillan and Company.
  • Anderson, P. W. 1972. More is different. Broken symmetry and the nature of the hierarchial structure of science. Science 177:393–96. doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393.
  • Artime, O., and M. De Domenico. 2022. From the origin of life to pandemics: Emergent phenomena in complex systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 380:20200410. doi:10.1098/rsta.2020.0410.
  • Bain, A. 1870. Logic. London: Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
  • Bedau, M. A. 1997. Weak emergence. In Philosophical perspectives: Mind, causation, and world, ed. J. Tomberlin, vol. 11, 375–99. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Bedau, M. A. 2008. Downward causation and autonomy in weak emergence. In Emergence. Contemporary readings in philosophy and science, ed. M. A. Bedau and P. Humphries, 155–88. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Bedau, M. A. 2010. Weak emergence and context-sensitive reduction. In Emergence in Science and Philosophy, ed. A. Corradini and T. O’Connor, 46–63. New York: Routledge.
  • Bindra, D. 1970. The problem of subjective experience: Puzzlement on readings R. W. Sperry’s “A modified concept of consciousness.” Psychological Review 77 (6):581–84. doi:10.1037/h0029954.
  • Broad, C. D. 1925. The mind and its place in nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company.
  • Bunge, M. 1977. Emergence and the mind. Neuroscience 2:501–09. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(77)90047-1.
  • Carruth, A. 2019. Strong emergence and Alexander’s dictum. In The Routledge handbook of emergence, ed. S. Gibb, R. F. Hendry, and T. Lancaster, 87–98. London: Routledge.
  • Caston, V. 1997. Epiphenomenalisms, ancient and modern. The Philosophical Review 106:309–63. doi:10.2307/2998397.
  • Chalmers, D. J. 2006. Strong and weak emergence. In The re-emergence of emergence: The emergentist hypothesis from science to religion, ed. P. Davies and P. Clayton, 244–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chezik, D. D. 1990. Sperry’s emergent interactionism. American Psychologist 45:70. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.1.70.a.
  • Gao, J., and B. Xu. 2021. Complex systems, emergence, and multiscale analysis: A tutorial and brief survey. Applied Sciences 11:5763.
  • Gillett, C. 2017. Scientific emergentism and its move beyond (direct) downward causation. In Philosophical and scientific perspectives on downward causation, ed. M. P. Paoletti and F. Orilia, 242–62. London: Routledge.
  • Gillett, C. 2019. Emergence, downward causation, and its alternatives: Critically surveying a foundational issue. In The Routledge handbook of emergence, ed. S. Gibb, R. F. Hendry, and T. Lancaster, 99–110. London: Routledge.
  • Heil, J. 2017. Downward causation. In Philosophical and scientific perspectives on downward causation, ed. M. P. Paoletti and F. Orilia, 42–53. London: Routledge.
  • Herrick, C. J. 1956. The evolution of human nature. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  • Humphreys, P. 2016. Emergence. A philosophical account. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kim, J. 1999. Making sense of emergence. Philosophical Studies 95 (1/2):3–36. doi:10.1023/A:1004563122154.
  • Lewes, G. H. 1875. Problems of life and mind. Boston: James R. Osgood and Company.
  • MacKay, D. M. 1978. Selves and brains. Neuroscience 3 (7):599–606. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(78)90001-5.
  • MacKay, D. M. 1980. The interdependence of mind and brain. Neuroscience 5 (7):1389–91. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(80)90211-0.
  • McLaughlin, B. P. 1992. The rise and fall of British emergentism. In Emergence or reduction? Essays on the prospects for non-reductive physicalism, ed. A. Beckermann, H. Flohr, and J. Kim, 19–59. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • McLaughlin, B. P. 2019. British emergentism. In The Routledge handbook of emergence, ed. S. Gibb, R. F. Hendry, and T. Lancaster, 23–35. London: Routledge.
  • Mill, J. S. 1843. System of logic, ratiocinative and inductive. London: John W. Parker, West Strand.
  • Morgan, C. L. 1923. Emergent evolution. The Gifford lectures, delivered in the University of St. Andrews in the year 1922. London: Williams and Norgate.
  • NobelPrize.org. 1981. The Nobel prize in physiology or medicine 1981. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1981/summary.
  • O’Connor, T. 2021. Emergent properties. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy archive. Accessed August 10, 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/properties-emergent.
  • Passmore, J. 2006. Logical positivism. In The encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. P. Edwards, 524–30. New York: Macmillan.
  • Peterson, R. F. 1990. On Sperry’s mental model. American Psychologist 45 (1):70–71. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.1.70.b.
  • Popper, K., and J. C. Eccles. 1977. The self and its brain. An argument for interactionism. London: Routledge.
  • Puente, A. E. 1995. Roger Wolcott Sperry (1913–1994). American Psychologist 50 (11):940–41. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.11.940.
  • Rickles, D., P. Hawe, and A. Shiell. 2007. A guide to chaos and complexity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 61 (11):933–37. doi:10.1136/jech.2006.054254.
  • Robb, D. 2019. Emergent mental causation. In The Routledge handbook of emergence, ed. S. Gibb, R. F. Hendry, and T. Lancaster, 187–94. London: Routledge.
  • Sartenaer, O. 2016. Sixteen years later: Making sense of emergence (again). Journal for General Philosophy of Science 47 (1):79–103. doi:10.1007/s10838-015-9312-x.
  • Sartenaer, O. 2018. Flat emergence. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (Supp 1):225–50. doi:10.1111/papq.12233.
  • Sawyer, R. K. 2002. Emergence in psychology: Lessons from the history of non-reductionist science. Human Development 45 (1):2–28. doi:10.1159/000048148.
  • Silberstein, M., and J. McGeever. 1999. The search for ontological emergence. The Philosophical Quarterly 49 (195):182–200. doi:10.1111/1467-9213.00136.
  • Smart, J. J. C. 1981. Physicalism and emergence. Neuroscience 6 (2):109–13. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(81)90049-X.
  • Sperry, R. W. 1957. Review of: C. Judson Herrick. The evolution of human nature. Engineering Science 20:6–10.
  • Sperry, R. W. 1964. Problems outstanding in the evolution of brain function. James Arthur Lecture, American Museum of Natural History. In The encyclopedia of ignorance, ed. R. Duncan and M. Weston-Smith, 423–33. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  • Sperry, R. W. 1965. Mind, brain, and humanist values. In New views of the nature of man, ed. J. R. Platt, 71–92. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Sperry, R. W. 1969. A modified concept of consciousness. Psychological Review 76 (6):532–36. doi:10.1037/h0028156.
  • Sperry, R. W. 1975. Mental phenomena as causal determinants in brain function. Process Studies 5:247–56.
  • Sperry, R. W. 1976. A unifying approach to mind and brain: Ten year perspective. In Progress in brain research, ed. M. A. Corner and D. F. Swaab, vol. 45, 463–69. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Sperry, R. W. 1980. Mind‒brain interaction: Mentalism, yes; dualism no. Neuroscience 5 (2):195–206. doi:10.1016/0306-4522(80)90098-6.
  • Sperry, R. W. 1991. In defense of mentalism and emergent interaction. Journal of Mind and Behavior 12:221–46.
  • Taylor, E. 2017. Review of: Carl Gillett, Reduction and emergence in science and philosophy. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Review of Books. https://www.thebsps.org/reviewofbooks/carl-gillett-reduction-and-emergence-in-science-and-philosophy.
  • Turkheimer, F. E., P. Hellyer, A. A. Kehagia, P. Expert, L. Lord, J. Vohryzek, J. Dafflon, M. Brammer, and R. Leech. 2019. Conflicting emergences: Weak vs. strong emergence for the modeling of brain function. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 99:3–10. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.023.
  • Vandervert, L. R. 1991. A measurable and testable brain-based emergent interactionism: An alternative to Sperry’s mentalis emergent Interactionism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 12:201–20.
  • Ylikoski, P. 2018. The future of the reduction emergence debate? Metascience 27 (2):317–21. doi:10.1007/s11016-018-0310-6.
  • Zangwill, A. 2021. A mind over matter. Philip Anderson and the physics of the very many. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.