660
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Section

Gender equality or employment promotion? The politicization of parental leave policy in Finland

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Abou-Chadi, T. and Immergut, E.M., 2019. Recalibrating Social Protection: Electoral Competition and the New Partisan Politics of the Welfare State. European Journal of Political Research, 58 (2), 697–719. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12308.
  • Auth, D. and Martinek, H., 2017. Social Investment or Gender Equality? Aims, Instruments, and Outcomes of Parental Leave Regulations in Germany and Sweden. In: D. Auth, J. Hergenhan, and B. Holland-Cunz, eds. Gender and Family in European Economic Policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillian, 153–176.
  • Autto, J., 2016. When Policymakers and Parents Meet Political Discourses: Fields and Subject Positions in the Finnish Debates on Children’s Day Care. Social Politics, 23 (1), 94–118. doi:10.1093/sp/jxv012.
  • Béland, D., 2010. The Idea of Power and the Role of Ideas. Political Studies Review, 8 (2), 145–154. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2009.00199.x.
  • Béland, D., 2019. How Ideas and Institutions Shape the Politics of Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Blyth, M., 2013. Austerity. The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Boréus, K. and Bergström, G., 2017. Analyzing Text and Discourse. Eight Approaches for the Social Sciences. London: Sage.
  • Budge, I. and McDonald, M., 2006. Choices Parties Define. Policy Alternatives in Representative Elections, 17 Countries 1945-1998. Party Politics, 12 (4), 451–466. doi:10.1177/1354068806064727.
  • Danish Ministry of Employment [DME], 2022. Maternity and paternity leave. Available online: https://lifeindenmark.borger.dk/working/work-rights/leave-of-absence/maternity-and-parental-leave [Accessed 4 March 2023].
  • Dolowitz, D.P. and Marsh, D., 2000. Learning from Abroad: The Role of Policy Transfer in Contemporary Policy-Making. Governance, 13 (1), 5–23. doi:10.1111/0952-1895.00121.
  • Eduskunta, 2021. HE 129/2021 vp. Available online: https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/HallituksenEsitys/Sivut/HE_129+2021.aspx [Accessed 4 March 2023].
  • Elomäki, A., Mustosmäki, A., and Koskinen Sandberg, P., 2020. The Sidelining of Gender Equality in a Corporatist and Knowledge-Oriented Regime: The Case of Failed Family Leave Reform in Finland. Critical Social Policy, 41 (2), 294–314. doi:10.1177/0261018320947060.
  • Esping-Andersen, G., et al., 2002. Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • European Union [EU], 2021. Directive (EU) 2019/1158. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32019L1158#PP1Contents [Accessed 4 March 2023].
  • Eydal, G., Rostgaard, T., and Hiilamo, H., 2018. Family Policies in the Nordic Countries: Aiming at Equality. In: G. Eydal and T. Rostgaard, eds. Handbook in Family Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 195–208.
  • Fisher, F., 2003. Reframing Public Policy. Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Freeden, M., 1996. Ideologies and Political theory. A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Häusermann, S., 2018. The Multidimensional Politics of Social Investment in Conservative Welfare Regimes: Family Policy Reform Between Social Transfers and Social Investment. Journal of European Public Policy, 25 (6), 862–877. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1401106.
  • Hemerijck, A., 2013. Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hiilamo, H. and Kangas, O., 2009. Trap for Women or Freedom to Choose? The Struggle Over Cash for Child Care Schemes in Finland and Sweden. Journal of Social Policy, 38 (3), 457–475. doi:10.1017/S0047279409003067.
  • Hooghe, L., Marks, G., and Wilson, C.J., 2002. Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35 (8), 965–989. doi:10.1177/001041402236310.
  • Hsieh, H.-F. and Shannon, S.E., 2005. Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15 (9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687.
  • Huber, E. and Stephens, J.D., 2001. Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Hulme, R., 2005. Policy Transfer and the Internationalisation of Social Policy. Social Policy & Society, 4 (4), 417–425. doi:10.1017/S1474746405002605.
  • Kantola, J. and Lombardo, E., 2017. Gender and the Politics of the Economic Crisis in Europe. In: J. Kantola and E. Lombardo, eds. Gender and the Economic Crisis in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–27.
  • Kantola, J. and Lombardo, E., 2019. Populism and Feminist Politics: The Cases of Finland and Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 58 (4), 1108–1128. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12333.
  • Kantola, J. and Lombardo, E., 2021. Strategies of Right Populists Inopposing Gender Equality in a Polarized European Parliament. International Political Science Review, 42 (5), 565–579. doi:10.1177/0192512120963953.
  • Kela 2023. Child Home Care Allowance. Available online: https://www.kela.fi/child-home-care-allowance [Accessed 4 March 2023].
  • Korpi, W. and Palme, J., 2003. New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalization: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review, 97 (3), 425–446. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000789.
  • Koslowski, A., 2021. Capturing the Gender Gap in the Scope of Parenting Related Leave Policies Across Nations. Social Inclusion, 9 (2), 250–261. doi:10.17645/si.v9i2.3852.
  • Kuisma, M. and Ryner, M., 2012. Third Way Decomposition and the Rightward Shift in Finnish and Swedish Politics. Contemporary Politics, 18 (3), 325–342. doi:10.1080/13569775.2012.702975.
  • Lammi-Taskula, J. and Takala, P., 2009. Finland: negotiating tripartite compromises. In: S. Kamerman and P. Moss, eds. The Politics of Parental Leave Policies. Bristol: Policy Press, 87–102.
  • Leira, A., 2006. Parenthood Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia, 1970s–2000s. In: A.-L. Ellingsæter and A. Leira, eds. Politicising Parentood in Scandinavia. Bristol: Policy Press, 27–51.
  • Lombardo, E., Meier, P., and Verloo, M., 2010. Discursive Dynamics in Gender Equality Politics: What About ‘Feminist Taboos’? European Journal of Women’s Studies, 17 (2), 105–123. doi:10.1177/1350506809359562.
  • Lovenduski, J. and Norris, P., 1993. Gender and Party Politics. London: Sage.
  • Mickelsson, R., 2021. Suomen puolueet. Tampere: Vastapaino.
  • Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 2011. Memorandum of the Family Leave Reform Committee. Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
  • Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, 2022. Family Leave Reform Enters into Force in August 2022. Available from: https://stm.fi/en/-/family-leave-reform-enters-into-force-in-august-2022 [Accessed 20 December 2022].
  • Morel, N., Palier, B., and Palme, J., 2012. Beyond the Welfare State as We Knew It. In: N. Morel, B. Palier, and J. Palme, eds. Towards a Social Investment State. Bristol: Policy Press, 1–30.
  • Moss, P., Koslowski, A., and Duvander, A.-Z., 2019. Introduction: Much Work Still to Do. In: P. Moss, A.-Z. Duvander, and A. Koslowski, eds. Parental Leave and Beyond. Bristol: Policy Press, 1–17.
  • NOSOSCO, 2017. Social Protection in the Nordic Countries 2016/2016. Copenhagen: Nordic Social Statistical Committee.
  • Nyby, J., et al., 2017. Freedom of Choice, Gender Equality, or Employment Promotion? Finnish Party Positions on Childcare in the Light of Election Manifestos 2015. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39 (3), 279–297. doi:10.1080/09649069.2017.1345440.
  • Nyby, J. 2020. Politicizing family policy reform. The case of Finland. Thesis (PhD). Åbo Akademi University.
  • Nygård, M. and Duvander, A.-Z., 2021. Social Inclusion or Gender Equality? Political Discourses on Parental Leave in Finland and Sweden. Social Inclusion, 9 (2), 300–312. doi:10.17645/si.v9i2.3844.
  • Nygård, M. and Nyby, J., 2022. Ideas and Their Role in Parental Leave Policy – the Case of Gender Equality in Finland. In: I. Dobrotić, S. Blum, and A. Koslowski, eds. Research Handbook on Leave Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 115–126.
  • Nygård, M., Nyby, J., and Kuisma, M., 2019. Discarding Social Investment and Redistribution in the Name of Austerity? The Case of Finnish Family Policy Reforms 2007—2015. Policy and Society, 38 (3), 519–536. doi:10.1080/14494035.2019.1655834.
  • Parliament of Finland, 2021. Protocol 147/2021 Vp. Helsinki: Parliament of Finland.
  • Salmi, M. and Lammi-Taskula, J., 2014. Policy Goals and Obstacles for fathers’ Parental Leave in Finland. In: G. Eydal and T. Rostgaard, eds. Fatherhood in the Nordic Welfare States: Comparing Care Policies and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press, 303–324.
  • Schmidt, V., 2008. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11 (1), 303–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
  • Statistics, F. 2019. Parliamentary Elections 2019. Available from: http://www.stat.fi/til/evaa/2019/evaa_2019_2019-04-16_tie_001_en.html [Accessed 21 February 2022].
  • United Nations, 2021. Sustainable Development Goals. Goal 5: Achieve Gender Equality and Empower All Women and Girls. Available from: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/ [Accessed 21 February 2022].
  • Weckström, S., 2014. Defamilialisation Policies and Attitudes and Behaviour Among Mothers in Twelve European Countries. Do Results for Denmark, Finland and Sweden Differ from the Others? Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 49, 5–29. doi:10.23979/fypr.48418
  • Ylikännö, M., Hakovirta, M., and Salin, M., 2016. Miten perhevapaat tulisi jakaa äidin ja isän kesken? Asenteet Suomessa ja muualla Euroopassa. In: A. Haataja, I. Airio, M. Saarikallio-Torp, and M. Valaste, eds. Laulu 573566 perheestä. Lapsiperheet ja perhepolitiikka 2000-luvulla. Helsinki: Kela, 226–247.
  • Ylöstalo, H., 2022. Feminism at the Crossroads of Neoliberalism and Neoconservatism: Restructuring Women’s Labor in the Context of Family Leave Reform in Finland. Social Politics, 29 (4), 1336–1359. doi:10.1093/sp/jxac008