Do we need physical family courts?

References

• Burnett, I., Etherton, T., and McFarlane, A. 2020. Message for Circuit and District Judges Sitting in Civil and Family from the Lord Chief Justice, Master of the Rolls and President of the Family Division. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Message-to-CJJ-and-DJJ-9-April-2020.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• Byrom, N., 2020. What We Know About the Impact of Remote Hearings on Access to Justice: A Rapid Evidence Review. Briefing Paper. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory/The Legal Education Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dabhi, K., Anand, T., and Tu, T., 2022. Survey of Separated Parents. DWP Ad Hoc Research Report No 1015. Department for Work and Pensions.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G., 1988. Partisans and Mediators: Resolution of Divorce. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, I., 2015. Remote Adjudication in Immigration. Northwestern University Law Review, 109, 933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J. and Maclean, M., 2013. Family Justice: The Work of Family Judges in Uncertain Times. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M., and Beinart, S., 2000. Family Lawyers: The Divorce Work of Solicitors. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar, S., 2021. The Financial Remedies Court – the Way Forward. A Paper to consider the future use of Remote Hearings in the FRC. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Report-of-the-Farquhar-Committee-Part-1-FRC-Remote-Hearings-May-2021.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• Fuszara, M. and Kurczewski, J., 2023. Family Matters in the Polish Court: Law and Public Opinion. In: M. Maclean and R. Trelaur, eds. Research Handbook on Family Justice Systems. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• George, R., 2023. What are Family Courts For? Lessons from a Pandemic. In: M. Maclean and R. Trelaur, eds. Research Handbook on Family Justice Systems. London: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• George, R., Crane, L., and Remington, A., 2020. ‘Our Normal is Different’: Autistic Adults’ Experiences of the Family Courts. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 42 (2), 204. doi:10.1080/09649069.2020.1751928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, N. and Hynes, J., 2020. Courtwatching; Visibility, Publicness, Witnessing, and Embodiment in Legal Activism. Practising Legal Geography, 53 (4), 569. doi:10.1111/area.12690
   Google Scholar
• Hale, B., 1998. Private Lives and Public Duties: What is Family Law For? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 20 (2), 125. doi:10.1080/09649069808410239
   Google Scholar
• Hitchings, E. et al., 2023. Fair Shares? Sorting Out Money and Property on Divorce. London: Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• HMCTS, 2021a. Courts and Tribunals Data on Audio and Video Technology Use During Coronavirus Outbreak. Available from: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20200427193925/https://www.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals-data-on-audio-and-video-technology-use-during-coronavirus-outbreak [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• HMCTS, 2021b. Weekly Use of Remote Audio and Video Technologies May 2020 to May 2021. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistical-data-sets/hmcts-weekly-use-of-remote-audio-and-video-technologies-may-2020-to-may-2021 [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Justice Committee, 2019. Court and Tribunal Reforms. Second Report of Session 2019. HC 190.
   Google Scholar
• Hynes, J., Gill, N., and Tomlinson, J., 2020. In Defence of Hearings? Emerging Geographies of Publicness, Materiality, Access and Communication in Court Hearings. Geography Compass, 14 (9), e12499. doi:10.1111/gec3.12499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law Commission, 1988. Review of Child Law: Guardianship Report. Law Com No 172. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, A., 2020. The Remote Access Family Court. [Version 5]. Courts and Tribunals Judiciary. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/The-Remote-Access-Family-Court-Version-5-Final-Version-26.06.2020.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M. and Eekelaar, J., 2009. Family Law Advocacy: How Barristers Help the Victims of Family Failure. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maclean, M. and George, R., 2021. Family Practice During Covid and Access to Justice. Family Law, 226.
   Google Scholar
• Magistrates’ Association, 2022. Magistrates’ Courts and Covid-19: Magistrates’ Experiences in Criminal Courts During the Pandemic. London: HMCTS.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, A., 2018. Crisis; What Crisis? Association of Lawyers for Children Conference 2018. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Speech-by-Rt.-Hon.-Sir-Andrew-McFarlane-Association-of-Lawyers-for-Children-Conference-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, A., 2020a. COVID 19: National Guidance for the Family Court. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Presidents-Guidance_Covid-19-2.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, A. 2020b. The Family Court and COVID 19: The Road Ahead. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/The-Road-Ahead_FINAL.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, A., 2020c. A View from the President’s Chambers. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/View-NOV-2020-NON-EMBARGOED-2.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, A., 2021a. The Family Court and COVID 19: The Road Ahead 2021. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Road-Ahead-2021.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, A., 2021b. Interesting Times. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/FLBA-Manchester-final.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Justice, 2010. Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales. Consultation Paper CP12/10. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry Of Justice, 2013. Co-Operative Parenting Following Family Separation: Proposals on Enforcing Court-Ordered Child Arrangements: Summary of Consultation Responses and the Government’s Response. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry Of Justice, 2022. Family Court Statistics Quarterly. London. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/family-court-statistics-quarterly-october-to-december-2021[Accessed October to December 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry Of Justice, 2023. Supporting Earlier Resolution of Private Family Law Arrangements CP 824. London. Available from: https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/private-family-law-consultation/
   Google Scholar
• Mostyn, N. and Hess, E., 2020. Financial Remedy Courts. Available from: https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/letter-from-Mostyn-J-and-HHJ-Hess-150420-1-1.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar
• Murch, M., 1980. Justice and Welfare in Divorce. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2008. Non-Residential Parental Contact: 2007-2008 Results. London: HMSO. No 38.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics, 2018. Divorces in England and Wales 2017. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Public Law Working Group, 2021. Recommendations to Achieve Best Practice in the Child Protection and Family Justice Systems: Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, L. 2022. Important Changes to Listing at the CFC (Not FRC). Available from: https://resolution.org.uk/news/important-changes-to-listing-at-cfc-not-frc/
   Google Scholar
• Rowden, E., 2018. Distributed Courts and Legitimacy: What Do We Lose When We Lose the Courthouse? Law, Culture and the Humanities, 14 (2), 263. doi:10.1177/1743872115612966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., et al., 2020a. Remote Hearings in the Family Justice System: A Rapid Consultation. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., et al., 2020b. Remote Hearings in the Family Justice System: Reflections and Experiences. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., et al., 2021. Remote Hearings in the Family Court Post Pandemic. London: Nuffield Family Justice Observatory.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A., 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S., 2011. Why Courts Make Orders (And What This Tells Us About Damages). Current Legal Problems, 64 (1), 51. doi:10.1093/clp/cur002
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, E., et al., 2013. Enforcing Contact Orders: Problem-Solving or Punishment? Exeter: Exeter Law School.
   Google Scholar
• Trinder, E., 2014. Litigants in Person in Private Family Law Cases. Ministry of Justice, Available from:. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7e2218ed915d74e33f0448/litigants-in-person-in-private-family-law-cases.pdf [Accessed 17 January 2024].
   Google Scholar