Investigating a method as part of the action research process: education journey maps

References

• Anderson, G. L., and K. Herr. 1999. “The New Paradigm Wars: Is There Room for Rigorous Practitioner Knowledge in Schools and Universities?” Educational Researcher 28 (5): 12–21, 40. doi:10.3102/0013189X028005012.
   Google Scholar
• Annamma, S. A. 2016. “Disrupting the Carceral State through Education Journey Mapping.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 29 (9): 1210–1230. doi:10.1080/09518398.2016.1214297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annamma, S. A. 2017. “Disrupting Cartographies of Inequity: Education Journey Mapping as a Qualitative Methodology.” In Critical Race Spatial Analysis: Mapping to Understand and Address Educational Inequity, edited by D. Morrison, S. A. Annamma, and D. D. Jackson, 35–50, Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Annamma, S. A. 2018. “Mapping Consequential Geographies in the Carceral State: Education Journey Mapping as a Qualitative Method with Girls of Color with dis/abilities.” Qualitative Inquiry 24 (1): 20–34. doi:10.1177/1077800417728962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneke, M. R. 2021. “Mapping socio-spatial Constructions of Normalcy: Whiteness and Ability in Teacher Candidates’ Educational Trajectories.” Whiteness and Education 6 (1): 92–113. doi:10.1080/23793406.2020.1803123.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey, K. L., K. A. Beauchat, and H. Sweetman. 2012. “Supporting Preschool Teachers’ Vocabulary Instruction during Storybook Reading.” NHSA Dialog 15 (3): 233–245. doi:10.1080/15240754.2012.666686.
   Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., and S. Kvale. 2015. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, R. R. 2018. “Using Action Research as a Signature Pedagogy to Develop EdD Students’ Inquiry as Practice Abilities.” Impacting Education: Journal on Transforming Professional Practice 3 (1): 23–31. doi:10.5195/ie.2018.46.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, R. R. 2019. “Action Research as Inquiry in Professional Practice Doctoral Programs.” In The Wiley Handbook of Action Research in Education, edited by C. A. Mertler, 295–316. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/9781119399490.ch14.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clarà, M. 2015. “What Is Reflection? Looking for Clarity in an Ambiguous Notion.” Journal of Teacher Education 66 (3): 261–271. doi:10.1177/0022487114552028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2018. Research Methods in Education. 8th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. 2009. “The Purpose of Mess in Action Research: Building Rigour through a Messy Turn.” Educational Action Research 17 (2): 277–291. doi:10.1080/09650790902914241.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and T. C. Guetterman. 2019. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, B. 2014. “Action Research.” In Qualitative Methodology: A Practical Guide, edited by J. Mills and M. Birks, 50–66. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781473920163.n4.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. 2012. “Activity Theory and Individual and Social Transformation.” In Perspectives on Activity Theory, edited by Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, and R.-L. Punamäki, 19–38. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511812774.003.
   Google Scholar
• Feryok, A. 2020. “Perezhivanie and Experiencing in Language Teacher Development.” The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL 9 (2): 25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Futch, V. A., and M. Fine. 2014. “Mapping as a Method: History and Theoretical Commitments.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 11 (1): 42–59. doi:10.1080/14780887.2012.719070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gakonga, J. 2019. “Mentoring and Mentor Development.” In The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education, edited by S. Walsh and S. Mann, 432–445. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315659824-29.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, G. R. 2007. Analyzing Qualitative Data. London: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781849208574.
   Google Scholar
• Golombek, P. R. 2015. “Redrawing the Boundaries of Language Teacher Cognition: Language Teacher Educators’ Emotion, Cognition, and Activity.” Modern Language Journal 99 (3): 470–484. doi:10.1111/modl.12236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, B. R., and B. Arthur. 2021. ““I Am Not Alone”: The Impact of Participating in a group-level Assessment for Undergraduate Women Engineering Students.” I.e.: Inquiry in Education 13 (2): Article 10. https://digitalcommons.nl.edu/ie/vol13/iss2/10
   Google Scholar
• Hall, G. E., and S. M. Hord. 2020. Implementing Change: Patterns, Principles, and Potholes. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, H. 2018. “Difficult Questions of Difficult Questions: The Role of the Researcher and Transcription Styles.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 31 (2): 143–157. doi:10.1080/09518398.2017.1379615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, K., and G. L. Anderson. 2005. The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781452226644.
   Google Scholar
• Hord, S. M., S. M. Stiegelbauer, G. E. Hall, and A. A. George. 2006. Measuring Implementation in Schools: Innovation Configurations. Austin, TX: SEDL. https://sedl.org/cbam/ic_manual_201410.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, K. E., and P. R. Golombek. 2016. Mindful L2 Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective on Cultivating Teachers’ Professional Development. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315641447.
   Google Scholar
• Koro-Ljungberg, M., D. Yendol-Hoppey, J. J. Smith, and S. B. Hayes. 2009. “(E)pistemological Awareness, Instantiation of Methods, and Uninformed Methodological Ambiguity in Qualitative Research Projects.” Educational Researcher 38 (9): 687–699. doi:10.3102/0013189X09351980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuverink, K. R., and A. M. L. Aarts. 2019. “A Quality Assessment of Teacher Research.” Educational Action Research 27 (5): 758–777. doi:10.1080/09650792.2018.1535445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• März, V., G. Kelchtermans, and K. Vermeir. 2017. “Artifacts as Authoritative Actors in Educational Reform: Routines, Institutional Pressures, and Legitimacy in Student Data Systems.” Journal of Educational Change 18 (4): 439–464. doi:10.1007/s10833-017-9309-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, S., and T. Gregersen. 2020. Teacher Wellbeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mertler, C. A. 2020. Action Research: Improving Schools and Empowering Educators. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., and D. Burgess. 2008. “Exploring Types of Educational Action Research: Implications for Research Validity.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7 (4): 18–30. doi:10.1177/160940690800700402.
   Google Scholar
• Noffke, S. E. 2009. “Revisiting the Professional, Personal, and Political Dimensions of Action Research.” In The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. E. Noffke and B. Somekh, 6–24. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9780857021021.n2.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, D. 2011. ““A Friend Who Understand Fully”: Notes on Humanizing Research in a Multiethnic Youth Community.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 24 (2): 137–149. doi:10.1080/09518398.2010.495091.
   Google Scholar
• Phillippi, J., and J. Lauderdale. 2018. “A Guide to Field Notes for Qualitative Research: Context and Conversation.” Qualitative Health Research 28 (3): 381–388. doi:10.1177/1049732317697102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2021. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. 2010. “Qualitative Quality: Eight “big-tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (10): 837–851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeir, K., G. Kelchtermans, and V. März. 2017. “Implementing Artifacts: An Interactive Frame Analysis of Innovative Educational Practices.” Teaching and Teacher Education 63: 116–125. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1994. “The Problem of the Environment.” In The Vygotsky Reader, edited by R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, 338–354. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. doi:10.1117/12.7978673.
   Google Scholar
• Wargo, J. M. 2018. “#soundingoutmysilence: Reading a LGBTQ Youth’s Sonic Cartography as Multimodal (Counter)storytelling.” Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 62 (1): 13–23. doi:10.1002/jaal.752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster-Deakin, T. 2021. “Exploring the Fluidity of Relationships and Methodology as an ‘Insider’ Action Researcher.” Educational Action Research 29 (5): 722–737. doi:10.1080/09650792.2020.1748677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, S. Y. S. 2012. “Using Innovation Configuration Maps to Understand the Implementation of HOT in Hong Kong Classrooms.” Curriculum and Teaching 27 (2): 63–81. doi:10.7459/ct/27.2.05.
   Google Scholar