A marriage of inconvenience: the coupling of spatial planning to European environmental policy

References

• Allmendinger, P., T. Chilla, and F. Sielker. 2014. “Europeanizing Territoriality—Towards Soft Spaces?” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46 (11): 2703–2717. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130037p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbouw, G., E. Babbé, J. Brommet, N. Broodbakker, R. De Graaf, C. Kamphuis, A. Krijgsman, H. Looijen, M. Lurks, and M. De Ruijter. 2009. “Ruimtelijke planprocessen en waterkwaliteit.” Ministerie VROM. https://www.helpdeskwater.nl/algemene-onderdelen/structuur-pagina/zoeken-site/@176775/handreiking-1/.
   Google Scholar
• Asprogerakas, E., and V. Zachari. 2020. “The EU Territorial Cohesion Discourse and the Spatial Planning System in Greece.” European Planning Studies 28 (3): 583–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1628925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backes, C. 2006. Internationale Vergelijking Implementatie EU-Richtlijnen Luchtkwaliteit. Centrum Voor Omgevingsrecht en Beleid/NILOS, Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Backes, C., A. Freriks, A. Nijmeijer, and G. van Hoorick. 2006. “Article 6 Habitats Directive: A Comparative Law Study on the Implementation of art. 6 Habitats directive in some member states=Rechtsvergelijkend onderzoek implementatie artikel 6 Habitatrichtlijn.” http://edepot.wur.nl/118434.
   Google Scholar
• Backes, C., A. Keessen, and H. van Rijswick. 2012. Effectgerichte normen in het omgevingsrecht: De betekenis van kwaliteitseisen, instandhoudingsdoelstellingen en emissieplafonds voor de bescherming van milieu, water en natuur (Wageningen University & Research - Library). Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Backes, C., T. Van Nieuwerburgh, and R. Koelemeijer. 2005. “Transformation of the First Daughter Directive on air Quality in Several EU Member States and its Application in Practice.” European Energy and Environmental Law Review 14 (5): 157–164. https://doi.org/10.54648/EELR2005023
   Google Scholar
• Basta, C. 2012. “Risk and Spatial Planning.” In Handbook of Risk Theory; Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, edited by Roeser, S., R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, and M. Peterson, 267–294. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., and T. Risse. 2002. “When Europe Hits Home: Europeanization and Domestic Change.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.302768.
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E. 2010. “Cracks in the Myth: Challenges to Land Policy in the Netherlands.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 101 (3): 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2010.00604.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., M. Galle, and W. Salet. 2013. “Third-Party Appeal Rights and the Regulatory State: Understanding the Reduction of Planning Appeal Options.” Land Use Policy 35: 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., and N. Sorel. 2010. “Between the Rule of law and the Quest for Control: Legal Certainty in the Dutch Planning System.” Land Use Policy 27 (3): 983–989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, T., L. Foster, A. Bryman, and L. Sloan. 2021. Bryman’s Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colomb, C., and G. Santinha. 2014. “European Union Competition Policy and the European Territorial Cohesion Agenda: An Impossible Reconciliation? State Aid Rules and Public Service Liberalization Through the European Spatial Planning Lens.” European Planning Studies 22 (3): 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.744384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotella, G. 2020. “How Europe Hits Home? The Impact of European Union Policies on Territorial Governance and Spatial Planning.” Géocarrefour 94 (3): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.4000/geocarrefour.15648.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, N. M., M. Hess, H. W. C. Yeung, P. Dicken, J. Henderson. 2004. "'Globalizing’ Regional Development: a global Production Networks Perspective." Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 29 (4): 468–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., and S. Martin. 2003. “The Joy of Joining Up: Modes of Integrating the Local Government Modernisation Agenda.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21 (2): 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, S., M. Bogaardt, P. Kersten, F. Kistenkas, N. Neven, and M. van der Zouwen. 2010. Zoektocht naar nationale beleidsruimte in de EU-richtlijnen voor het milieu- en natuurbeleid (No. 174). Wageningen: Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• De Gier, T., F. Groothuijse, M. van Rijswick, and J. Robbe. 2007. “The Influence of Environmental Quality Standards and Safety Standards on Spatial Planning.” Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 1: 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2000/60/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 23 october 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2008/50/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 21 May 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe. 2008. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/pdf/?uri=celex:32008L0050&from=en.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2009/147/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Eggenberger, M., and M. Partidário. 2000. “Development of a Framework to Assist the Integration of Environmental, Social and Economic Issues in Spatial Planning.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 18 (3): 201–207. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154600781767448.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Impact Assessment Guidelines (SEC(2009) 92). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D. 2019. “Downloading EU Policies Into Dutch Spatial Planning.” XXXII Congresso Geografico Italiano, 2519–2531.
   Google Scholar
• Evers, D., and J. Tennekes. 2016. The Europeanisation of Spatial Planning in the Netherlands. The Hague: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., and O. Treib. 2005. Explaining EU Policy Implementation Across Countries: Three Modes of Adaptation. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ferranti, F., R. Beunen, and M. Speranza. 2010. “Natura 2000 Network: A Comparison of the Italian and Dutch Implementation Experiences.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 12 (3): 293–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2010.505417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, T., O. Sykes, T. Gore, N. Marot, M. Golobič, P. Pinho, B. Waterhout, and A. Perdicoulis. 2015. “Territorial Impact Assessment of European Draft Directives—The Emergence of a New Policy Assessment Instrument.” European Planning Studies 23 (3): 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.868292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleurke, F., and A. Trouwborst. 2011. “Kolencentrales, robuuste verbindingen en EU-milieurichtlijnen: Balanceren tussen nationale en Europese doelstellingen.” Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Europees Recht 12 (3): 95–103.
   Google Scholar
• Fleurke, F., and R. Willemse. 2006. “The European Union and the Autonomy of sub-National Authorities: Towards an Analysis of Constraints and Opportunities in Sub-National Decision-Making.” Regional & Federal Studies 16 (1): 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597560500533752.
   Google Scholar
• Fleurke, F., and R. Willemse. 2007. “Effects of the European Union on Sub-National Decision-Making: Enhancement or Constriction?” Journal of European Integration 29 (1): 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330601144466.
   Google Scholar
• German Presidency of the Council of the European Union. 2020. Territorial Agenda 2030. Informal meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development and/or Territorial Cohesion.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakourou, G. 2005. “Transforming Spatial Planning Policy in Mediterranean Countries: Europeanization and Domestic Change.” European Planning Studies 13 (2): 319–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0365431042000321857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri, S., N. N. Arbab, R. G. Lathrop. 2019. “Assessing the Potential Impacts of Climate and Land use Change on Water Fluxes and Sediment Transport in a Loosely Coupled System.” Journal of Hydrology 577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.123955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassman, R. 1973. “Persistence and Loose Coupling in Living Systems.” Behavioral Science 18 (2): 83–98. Periodicals Archive Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830180202.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinska-Jurczak, M., and J. Cent. 2011. “Expansion of Nature Conservation Areas: Problems with Natura 2000 Implementation in Poland?” Environmental Management 47 (1): 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9583-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1996. “Consensus-building Across Difficult Divisions: New Approaches to Collaborative Strategy Making.” Planning Practice & Research 11 (2): 207–216. Business Source Premier. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459650036350.
   Google Scholar
• Jager, N.W., E. Challies, E. Kochskämper, J. Newig, D. Benson, K. Blackstock, K. Collins, A. Ernst, M. Evers, J. Feichtinger, et al. 2016. “Transforming European Water Governance? Participation and River Basin Management under the EU Water Framework Directive in 13 Member States.” Water 8 (4): 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/w8040156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaeding, M. 2008. “Lost in Translation or Full Steam Ahead: The Transposition of EU Transport Directives across Member States.” European Union Politics 9 (1): 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116507085959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaika, M. 2003. “The Water Framework Directive: A New Directive for a Changing Social, Political and Economic European Framework.” European Planning Studies 11 (3): 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310303640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastens, B., and J. Newig. 2007. “The Water Framework Directive and Agricultural Nitrate Pollution: Will Great Expectations in Brussels be Dashed in Lower Saxony?” European Environment 17 (4): 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.446.
   Google Scholar
• Keessen, A., J. van Kempen, M. van Rijswick, J. Robbe, and C. Backes. 2010. “European River Basin Districts: Are They Swimming in the Same Implementation Pool?” Journal of Environmental Law 22 (2): 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqq003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korthals Altes, W. 2014. “The Europeanization of Development Planning in Valencia.” European Planning Studies 22 (2): 418–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.757585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• König, T., and L. Mäder. 2013. “Non-conformable, Partial and Conformable Transposition: A Competing Risk Analysis of the Transposition Process of Directives in the EU15.” European Union Politics 14 (1): 46–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512447703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KplusV. 2012. Evaluatie Impact_Assesment biodiversiteit samenvatting.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe Boyd, W., and R. L. Crowson. 2002. “The Quest for a New Hierarchy in Education: From Loose Coupling Back to Tight?” Journal of Educational Administration 40 (6): 521–533. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230210446018
   Google Scholar
• Maantay, J. A., J. Tu, and A. R. Maroko. 2009. “Loose-Coupling an air Dispersion Model and a Geographic Information System (GIS) for Studying air Pollution and Asthma in the Bronx, New York City.” International Journal of Environmental Health Research 19 (1): 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120802392868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E. 2003. “Surviving the Deadline: The Transposition of EU Directives in the Netherlands.” European Union Politics 4 (4): 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/146511650344001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., 2013. “Strategic Coupling and Regional Development in Resource Economies: The Case of the Pilbara.” Australian Geographer 44 (3): 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2013.817039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry I&M. 2013. Environment and Planning Act Explanatory Memorandum: (Unofficial) Translation. The Hague: Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Münter, A., and M. Reimer. 2019. “Europäische Territoriale Governance: Auswirkungen auf nationale Planungssysteme.” Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 3: 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., and D. Stead. 2013. “Opening up the Compendium: An Evaluation of International Comparative Planning Research Methodologies.” European Planning Studies 21 (10): 1542–1561. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., D. Stead, M. Dąbrowski, and A. Fernandez-Maldonado. 2021. “Integrated, Adaptive and Participatory Spatial Planning: Trends Across Europe.” Regional Studies 55 (5): 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, B., and G. Hoekveld. 2014. “The European Union as an Ethical Community and What This Means for Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 22 (5): 1010–1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.757586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orton, J., and K. Weick. 1990. “Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization.” Academy of Management Review 15 (2): 203–223. https://doi.org/10.2307/258154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrow, C. 2011. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies - Updated Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, J., and A. Wildavsky. 1984. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; Or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Primus, H. 2006. “Fijnstofnormering: Patstelling tussen volksgezondheid en ruimtelijke ontwikkeling?” Nova Terra 6 (1): 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E. 2018. Understanding Europeanisation from Within: The Interpretation and Instrumentalisation of European Spatial Planning in Austria and Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E. 2020. “The Enticement of the ESDP: Motivating (Future) Planners to Engage with EU Policies.” Transactions of the Association of European Schools of Planning 4 (2): 133–145. https://doi.org/10.24306/TrAESOP.2020.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• RWS. 2023. Geluid en een goede ruimtelijke ordening [Webpagina]. Kenniscentrum InfoMil. https://www.infomil.nl/vaste-onderdelen/onderwerpen/geluid/thema/geluid/beleid-wet/geluid-beleid-ro/.
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W., and J. de Vries. 2019. “Contextualisation of Policy and Law in Sustainable Urban Development.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 62 (2): 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1418304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandström, U., and I. Elander. 2019. “Biodiversity, Road Transport and Urban Planning: A Swedish Local Authority Facing the Challenge of Establishing a Logistics hub Adjacent to a Natura 2000 Site.” Progress in Planning 148, 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2019.100463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., and C. Radaelli. 2008. “The Europeanization of Public Policies: Introduction.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 10 (3): 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876980802276847.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, M., and D. Creed. 2021. “Institutional Contradictions, Praxis, and Institutional Change: A Dialectical Perspective.” The Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 222–247. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134353
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L. 2010. “Territorial Cohesion Discourses: Hegemonic Strategic Concepts in European Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 11 (3): 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2010.500135.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders-Storm, E. 2011. “Compenseren! En dan? Borging van mitigerende en compenserende maatregelen in het kader van Natura 2000.” Tijdschrift voor Bouwrecht 163 (10): 4.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D., and E. Meijers. 2009. “Spatial Planning and Policy Integration: Concepts, Facilitators and Inhibitors.” Planning Theory & Practice 10 (3): 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903229752.
   Google Scholar
• Taskforce Trojan. 2008. Stikstof/Ammoniak in Relatie tot Natura 2000, 49. The Hague: Ministerie LNV.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. 2010. “Opposition Through the Back Door in the Transposition of EU Directives.” European Union Politics 11 (4): 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510380283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiefenthaler, V. 2011. “Spatial Planning in Europe— e Impact of European Union Law on National Planning Systems and Territorial Transnational Cooperation.” Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 8 (2): 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1163/187601011X576188
   Google Scholar
• Trein, PH. 2017. “A New Way to Compare Horizontal Connections of Policy Sectors: ‘Coupling' of Actors, Institutions and Policies.” Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 19 (5): 419–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2016.1225342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulumello, S. 2015. “Questioning the Universality of Institutional Transformation Theories in Spatial Planning: Shopping Mall Developments in Palermo.” International Planning Studies 20 (4): 371–389. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2015.1029693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ravesteyn, N., and D. Evers. 2004. Unseen Europe A Survey of EU Politics and Its Impact on Spatial Development in the Netherlands, 86. The Hague: Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research.
   Google Scholar
• van Rijswick, M., and W. Salet. 2012. “Enabling the Contextualization of Legal Rules in Responsive Strategies to Climate Change.” Ecology and Society 17 (2): art18. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04895-170218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Schendelen, M. 2005. Machiavelli in Brussels: The Art of Lobbying the EU. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Veen, M., M. Sanders, and M. Broekmeyer. 2011. Ecologische effectiviteit van natuurwetgeving. The Hague: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving (PBL).
   Google Scholar
• Vink, M., L. Pols, and F. van Dam. 2020. Stikstof: Ruimte voor perspectief, 25. The Hague: Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
   Google Scholar
• Waterhout, B. 2007. “Episodes of Europeanization of Dutch National Spatial Planning.” Planning Practice and Research 22 (3): 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701666696.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. 1976. “Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems.” Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., D. Liefferink, M. Kaufmann, and N. Kustjens. 2018. Final Report The Implementation of the Water Framework Directive a Focused Comparison of Governance Arrangements to Improve Water Quality. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld, W., J. Trip, and B. Waterhout. 2008. The Impact of EU Regulations on Local Planning Pfactice: The Case of the Netherlands. 22.
   Google Scholar